geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...
geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...
geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8<br />
CHAPTER 2<br />
INNOVATIVE CONTRACTING AND PERFORMANCE-BASED<br />
SPECIFICATIONS<br />
History and Development<br />
The MTO is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its organizational structure. For a 3-year period,<br />
<strong>the</strong> MTO is under an edict to reduce staff by approximately two-thirds. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
significant reduction <strong>in</strong> force, <strong>the</strong> MTO has had to def<strong>in</strong>e and implement <strong>in</strong>novative<br />
contract<strong>in</strong>g procedures to accomplish <strong>the</strong> same amount <strong>of</strong> work that it performed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past.<br />
To date, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative contract<strong>in</strong>g procedures have been implemented with <strong>the</strong><br />
recognition that lessons will be learned and modifications to <strong>the</strong> processes will be made upon<br />
project evaluation.<br />
In project development, <strong>the</strong> MTO has <strong>in</strong>stituted a Total Project Management (TPM)<br />
approach that requires <strong>the</strong> consultant to perform all scop<strong>in</strong>g services, <strong>in</strong> addition to project<br />
design. Such services <strong>in</strong>clude subsurface <strong>in</strong>vestigations, <strong>the</strong> establishment and purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
land acquisition, and utility relocation needs. Under this approach, <strong>the</strong> standard contract<strong>in</strong>g<br />
selection process for consultants is based on <strong>the</strong> best bid <strong>of</strong> registered consultants—that is,<br />
cost, qualifications, and additional evaluation criteria are used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> selection process. The<br />
first step is to prequalify consultants. A performance <strong>in</strong>dex assigned for each contract is<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> attributes <strong>of</strong> quality (60 percent), safety (15 percent), timel<strong>in</strong>ess (15 percent),<br />
and contract execution (10 percent), as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Contractor Rat<strong>in</strong>g, 1997 (MTO, 1997).<br />
Value <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> proposals are <strong>the</strong>n reviewed, and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al selection is based on cost and<br />
quality.<br />
The MTO qualifies <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> consultants and subconsultants and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a registry.<br />
Under <strong>the</strong> TPM process, po<strong>in</strong>ts are assessed to consultants based on technical competence<br />
and cost. There are no qualification requirements, similar to <strong>the</strong> Brooks Act, for selection <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> services.<br />
For design-build projects, an adjusted best-bid award process is commonly used, and eight<br />
design-build projects have been awarded by <strong>the</strong> MTO. Bidders are prequalified, and,<br />
typically, three to five are selected to submit proposals. Unlike <strong>the</strong> prime contractor,<br />
subcontractors are not prequalified, but <strong>the</strong>y are typically registered with <strong>the</strong> MTO and must<br />
be selected by <strong>the</strong> prime contractor prior to award. The MTO must approve changes if <strong>the</strong><br />
prime elects to change subcontractors after award. This restricted bid practice was<br />
established as a result <strong>of</strong> a process evaluation <strong>of</strong> past performance <strong>of</strong> design-build projects.<br />
Awards are based primarily on low bid; however, <strong>in</strong> several cases, f<strong>in</strong>al selections have<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded quality criteria. In Ontario, no current legislation limits or directs <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>novative contract<strong>in</strong>g. On one design-build project, Highway 407, a Toronto bypass, a “buy<br />
Ontario” provision was required for 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work.<br />
Partner<strong>in</strong>g and team concepts, like those used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, have not been<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract<strong>in</strong>g process. For design-build projects, only prelim<strong>in</strong>ary design<br />
(approximately 20 percent), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>geotechnical</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation, utilities, and land<br />
acquisition <strong>in</strong>formation, is completed by <strong>the</strong> owner; but this <strong>in</strong>formation is provided to <strong>the</strong><br />
contractor “for <strong>in</strong>formation only.” The basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>geotechnical</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is developed by a<br />
consultant reta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> MTO, and contractors are required to submit <strong>the</strong> design codes