24.12.2012 Views

geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...

geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...

geotechnical engineering practices in canada - the Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

INNOVATIVE CONTRACTING AND PERFORMANCE-BASED<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

History and Development<br />

The MTO is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its organizational structure. For a 3-year period,<br />

<strong>the</strong> MTO is under an edict to reduce staff by approximately two-thirds. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

significant reduction <strong>in</strong> force, <strong>the</strong> MTO has had to def<strong>in</strong>e and implement <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

contract<strong>in</strong>g procedures to accomplish <strong>the</strong> same amount <strong>of</strong> work that it performed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past.<br />

To date, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative contract<strong>in</strong>g procedures have been implemented with <strong>the</strong><br />

recognition that lessons will be learned and modifications to <strong>the</strong> processes will be made upon<br />

project evaluation.<br />

In project development, <strong>the</strong> MTO has <strong>in</strong>stituted a Total Project Management (TPM)<br />

approach that requires <strong>the</strong> consultant to perform all scop<strong>in</strong>g services, <strong>in</strong> addition to project<br />

design. Such services <strong>in</strong>clude subsurface <strong>in</strong>vestigations, <strong>the</strong> establishment and purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

land acquisition, and utility relocation needs. Under this approach, <strong>the</strong> standard contract<strong>in</strong>g<br />

selection process for consultants is based on <strong>the</strong> best bid <strong>of</strong> registered consultants—that is,<br />

cost, qualifications, and additional evaluation criteria are used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> selection process. The<br />

first step is to prequalify consultants. A performance <strong>in</strong>dex assigned for each contract is<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> attributes <strong>of</strong> quality (60 percent), safety (15 percent), timel<strong>in</strong>ess (15 percent),<br />

and contract execution (10 percent), as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Contractor Rat<strong>in</strong>g, 1997 (MTO, 1997).<br />

Value <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> proposals are <strong>the</strong>n reviewed, and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al selection is based on cost and<br />

quality.<br />

The MTO qualifies <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> consultants and subconsultants and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a registry.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> TPM process, po<strong>in</strong>ts are assessed to consultants based on technical competence<br />

and cost. There are no qualification requirements, similar to <strong>the</strong> Brooks Act, for selection <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> services.<br />

For design-build projects, an adjusted best-bid award process is commonly used, and eight<br />

design-build projects have been awarded by <strong>the</strong> MTO. Bidders are prequalified, and,<br />

typically, three to five are selected to submit proposals. Unlike <strong>the</strong> prime contractor,<br />

subcontractors are not prequalified, but <strong>the</strong>y are typically registered with <strong>the</strong> MTO and must<br />

be selected by <strong>the</strong> prime contractor prior to award. The MTO must approve changes if <strong>the</strong><br />

prime elects to change subcontractors after award. This restricted bid practice was<br />

established as a result <strong>of</strong> a process evaluation <strong>of</strong> past performance <strong>of</strong> design-build projects.<br />

Awards are based primarily on low bid; however, <strong>in</strong> several cases, f<strong>in</strong>al selections have<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded quality criteria. In Ontario, no current legislation limits or directs <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>novative contract<strong>in</strong>g. On one design-build project, Highway 407, a Toronto bypass, a “buy<br />

Ontario” provision was required for 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work.<br />

Partner<strong>in</strong>g and team concepts, like those used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, have not been<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract<strong>in</strong>g process. For design-build projects, only prelim<strong>in</strong>ary design<br />

(approximately 20 percent), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>geotechnical</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation, utilities, and land<br />

acquisition <strong>in</strong>formation, is completed by <strong>the</strong> owner; but this <strong>in</strong>formation is provided to <strong>the</strong><br />

contractor “for <strong>in</strong>formation only.” The basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>geotechnical</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is developed by a<br />

consultant reta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> MTO, and contractors are required to submit <strong>the</strong> design codes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!