09.05.2022 Views

Canadian Costumer's Digital Research Initiative Results

This research is targeted to Canadian Costumers, and more specifically to those working in the production of theatrical costumes.

This research is targeted to Canadian Costumers, and more specifically to those working in the production of theatrical costumes.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

–<br />

Cathleen Sbrizzi (CS): In the ideal situation, where<br />

you have all the resources you needed to use<br />

digital pattering (skilled digital cutter, printing<br />

access etc) how often would you utilize digital<br />

tools on a build?<br />

Kate Klingvall (KK): I would try to use it wherever<br />

my cutter would feel comfortable with it. If they<br />

felt confident they could draft a whole show on<br />

it, great, let’s go for it. If they still wanted to do a<br />

couple “old school”, whatever works. Part of my<br />

job is to trust and support the team however<br />

they need.<br />

CS: What was your experience like working on<br />

Steel Magnolia’s with KaeLeah using CLO?<br />

Katie Klingvall (KK): It was interesting, and I can<br />

see how this can greatly change the way we<br />

pattern draft in the future. There is still some<br />

kinks to work out like the cutter learning the<br />

program and getting better at using the<br />

program. But can see how this could help in so<br />

many ways.<br />

CS: How essential is the backing of your<br />

producers to successfully executing costumes<br />

using digital patterning?<br />

Katie Klingvall (KK): It will be very essential,<br />

especially in the first few years of using the<br />

program. As it will take time to adjust our way of<br />

thinking of how we pattern draft, having the<br />

support will makes things easier. The first few<br />

years it will take a bit more time which means a<br />

bit more in the labor budget and money to<br />

refigure a shop like how we print the patterns<br />

either in a plotter or using a projector. Expenses<br />

that upfront are more but long term can save<br />

time and material waste.<br />

CS: How can Heads of Wardrobe’s help facilitate the<br />

use of digital cutting? What challenges do you<br />

foresee?<br />

Katie Klingvall (KK): I think by supporting whatever<br />

the cutter needs. If that is more prep time in<br />

learning the programs. Or letting them have the<br />

time to work with the program without feeling<br />

stress. I foresee challenges of people wanting to<br />

stick to the “old school” ways, which I understand<br />

but I can see this interesting more younger<br />

generations who already have more computer skills<br />

than any other generation.<br />

CS: How would you choose organize show patterns?<br />

And how do you currently organize your size sheets?<br />

Katie Klingvall (KK): We currently just have them filed<br />

as hard copies, which I have always wanted to do a<br />

digital database, and this sounds like we would have<br />

it that way! And as performers bodies change, it<br />

sounds easier to update their avatar to reflect these<br />

changes.<br />

As for organizing show patterns, I’m not sure if filing<br />

by show or by period would be better for ease of<br />

future use. Either way it would have to be a<br />

discussion with the cutter<br />

CS: When you’re looking at the scope of what you<br />

need to accomplish to execute a design does it make<br />

you nervous to look at incorporating new<br />

technology?<br />

(KK): I think until our cutters get more comfortable<br />

and confident with the software I would start with<br />

smaller shows. Ones that maybe don’t have a big<br />

build but some smaller builds on a show. I don’t<br />

think it matters if it’s period or modern, but more<br />

how much we build on the whole show.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!