26.09.2022 Views

Credit Management October 2022

THE CICM MAGAZINE FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

THE CICM MAGAZINE FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPINION<br />

the target entity or asset is in one of the 17 sensitive<br />

sectors or a sector closely linked to one of those<br />

sectors.<br />

There are three risk factors that are also relevant<br />

in particular in determining whether a transaction<br />

is likely to be called in.<br />

These are target risk – whether the target entity<br />

or asset is being used, or could be used, in a way<br />

that poses a risk to national security; acquirer<br />

risk – whether the acquirer has characteristics<br />

that suggest there is, or may be, a risk to national<br />

security from the acquirer having control of the<br />

target; and control risk – whether the amount of<br />

control that has been, or will be, acquired poses a<br />

risk to national security (a higher level of control<br />

may increase the level of national security risk).<br />

BEIS believes there will be around 1,000 to<br />

1,830 transactions notified each year with 70 to 95<br />

transactions called in for a full national security<br />

assessment. Others think those numbers will be<br />

exceeded.<br />

But whatever the exact number of national<br />

security reviews under the new regime, it is clear<br />

the number will be significantly higher than under<br />

the previous Enterprise Act regime. National<br />

security reviews under the Enterprise Act were<br />

relatively rare (fewer than 20 reviews since 2003),<br />

even despite a notable increase in such reviews<br />

after the Bill for the new regime was published in<br />

November 2020.<br />

WHEN THE REGIME TOOK EFFECT<br />

While the full regime came into force at the start<br />

of the year, the retrospective call-in power applies<br />

from the day after publication of the Bill. This<br />

means that trigger events that occurred during the<br />

period 12 November 2020 to 3 January <strong>2022</strong> can also<br />

see transactions called in for review.<br />

Parties to transactions where a trigger event<br />

occurred between those earlier dates had an<br />

incentive to make the ISU aware of their transaction<br />

before the Act came into force. Doing so limited<br />

any retrospective call-in to six months from 4<br />

January <strong>2022</strong> instead of up to five years from that<br />

date (although any call-in subject to the five-year<br />

deadline also needs to be within six months of<br />

when the Secretary of State became aware of the<br />

trigger event after the Act came into force).<br />

The mandatory notification requirements have<br />

applied from 4 January <strong>2022</strong> (including in relation<br />

to any deals that were signed previously but where<br />

a relevant trigger event takes place after the Act<br />

came into force). Accordingly, parties to any deals<br />

that might require mandatory notification need<br />

to factor the process into their deal planning, and<br />

likewise for transactions where parties decide to<br />

submit a voluntary notification.<br />

THE PROCESS<br />

The ISU deals with notifications. It will conduct<br />

an initial review within 30 working days of<br />

notification, after which the transaction will either<br />

be cleared or called-in for a full national security<br />

assessment. A full assessment will itself take up to<br />

30 working days, subject to an initial extension of<br />

45 working days, and further potential voluntary<br />

AUTHORS – Ian Giles and Mark Daniels<br />

❝<br />

The mandatory<br />

notification<br />

requirements<br />

have applied<br />

from 4 January<br />

<strong>2022</strong> (including<br />

in relation to<br />

any deals that<br />

were signed<br />

previously but<br />

where a relevant<br />

trigger event<br />

takes place after<br />

the Act came<br />

into force).<br />

❝<br />

extension if agreed with the parties. The clock can<br />

be stopped on the review during a full assessment<br />

if further information is required.<br />

For mandatory notifications, clearance must be<br />

received before the transaction takes place. Where<br />

a mandatory notification has not been made, the<br />

Secretary of State may call-in the deal at any future<br />

point, provided this is within six months of the<br />

Secretary of State becoming aware of the trigger<br />

event.<br />

For voluntary notifications, the parties have the<br />

option to notify, but the Secretary of State is able to<br />

call-in a deal for up to six months after they become<br />

aware of it, any time up to five years after the deal<br />

takes place. A transaction under the voluntary<br />

regime but not voluntarily notified will proceed<br />

straight to a full assessment if called-in for review.<br />

There are specific requirements for the content<br />

of mandatory and voluntary notifications, which<br />

are set out in the National Security and Investment<br />

Act 2021 (Prescribed Form and Content of Notices<br />

and Validation Applications) Regulations 2021.<br />

Additional requirements in terms of the procedure<br />

for submitting notifications and other documents<br />

to BEIS, including use of the NSI electronic portal,<br />

are in the National Security and Investment Act<br />

2021 (Procedure for Service) Regulations 2021.<br />

SANCTIONS FOR FAILING TO NOTIFY<br />

If a deal requiring mandatory notification is not<br />

approved the transaction will be legally void. In<br />

addition, there are civil and criminal penalties,<br />

including potential daily penalties for ongoing<br />

breaches. Completing a transaction that is subject<br />

to mandatory notification without approval will<br />

risk a penalty of up to five percent of group worldwide<br />

turnover or £10m (whichever is higher), and<br />

imprisonment for individuals for up to five years.<br />

Notably, the Secretary of State may retrospectively<br />

validate a transaction that failed to gain approval.<br />

The Secretary of State also has the power to<br />

impose remedies to address any national security<br />

concerns. These may include, for example,<br />

conditions restricting access to sensitive sites,<br />

access to confidential information and intellectual<br />

property transfers.<br />

IN SUMMARY<br />

Ultimately the Secretary of State has the power to<br />

block deals, or to require acquisitions that have<br />

taken place to be divested or unwound.<br />

However, the vast majority of transactions<br />

reviewed under the new regime are expected to<br />

be cleared without needing remedies. Despite<br />

this, the new regime is far-reaching with serious<br />

consequences for non-compliance and requires<br />

parties to transactions in a much wider range<br />

of situations to engage with a potential national<br />

security review than under the previous Enterprise<br />

Act regime.<br />

Ian Giles is a partner and head of Norton Rose<br />

Fulbright LLP’s antitrust and competition team in<br />

Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Mark Daniels is<br />

a senior knowledge lawyer at the firm.<br />

RECRUITING<br />

FROM YOUR<br />

OFFICE...<br />

...OR<br />

REMOTELY<br />

Contact one of our specialist recruitment consultants to fill your vacancy or find your next career move!<br />

LONDON 020 7650 3199<br />

1 FINSBURY SQUARE, 3 RD FLOOR, LONDON EC2A 1AE<br />

MANCHESTER 0161 523 5585<br />

THE PENINSULA, VICTORIA PLACE, MANCHESTER M4 4FB<br />

theportfoliogroup<br />

portfoliocredit<br />

Scan with your phone to fill your vacancy or find your<br />

next career move at www.portfoliocreditcontrol.com<br />

www.portfoliocreditcontrol.com<br />

recruitment@portfoliocreditcontrol.com<br />

Fill your vacancy or find your next career<br />

move at www.portfoliocreditcontrol.com<br />

WE NEED YOU!<br />

Contribute to our Portfolio <strong>Credit</strong> Control<br />

Salary Survey <strong>2022</strong>/23 today.<br />

Portfolio <strong>Credit</strong> Control specialise<br />

in solely recruiting for permanent,<br />

temporary & contract <strong>Credit</strong><br />

professionals at all levels of the market.<br />

Our expert market knowledge & industry<br />

experience is trusted by businesses<br />

across the UK for all their <strong>Credit</strong> Control<br />

hiring needs including <strong>Credit</strong> Managers,<br />

<strong>Credit</strong> Controllers, Sales Ledger &<br />

Accounts Receivable professionals;<br />

just to name a few…<br />

Contact us to hire the<br />

best <strong>Credit</strong> Control talent<br />

Rated as Excellent<br />

Brave | Curious | Resilient / www.cicm.com / <strong>October</strong> <strong>2022</strong> / PAGE 36<br />

portfolio-credit-control<br />

Brave | Curious | Resilient / www.cicm.com / <strong>October</strong> <strong>2022</strong> / PAGE 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!