Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a. The Adverisements in Question Make Disease Claims, Not<br />
Strctue-Function Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />
b. Respondents' Misrepresentations Are Not Cured By<br />
Disclaimers ................................... 19<br />
B. Respondents' Representations That The DCO Products Prevent, Treat, or Cure<br />
Cancer Are Misleading ............................................ 21<br />
1. Unsubstantiated Claims Are Misleading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21<br />
2. Respondents Did Not Possess a Reasonable Basis for Their Adverising<br />
Representations that the DCO Products Prevent, Treat and/or Cure<br />
Cancer ................................................... 23<br />
a. Respondents Never Conducted Any Tests or Studies on the DCO<br />
Products ............................................ 24<br />
b. Dr. Miler, an Exper Oncologist, Confied that No Competent<br />
and Reliable Scientific Evidence Exists with Regard to the DCO<br />
Products ............................................ 24<br />
1. Respondents' Claims that Bio*Shark Inbits Tumor<br />
Growt and Effectively Treats Cancer Are<br />
Unsubstantiated ................................25<br />
11. Respondents' Clais that 7 Herb Formula Inbits Tumor<br />
Formation and Effectively Treats or Cures Cancer Are<br />
Unsubstantiated ................................ 26<br />
11. Respondents' Claims that GDU Elimates Tumors and<br />
Effectively Treats Cancer Are Unsubstantiated . . . . . . . . 27<br />
iv. Respondents' Clais that BioMixx Effectively Treats<br />
Cancer and Heals the Destrctive Effects of Radiation and<br />
Chemotherapy Are Unsubstantiated ................ 27<br />
c. Respondents' Purorted Expers Did Not Possess Any Information<br />
Substantiating Respondents' Claims and Reinforced Dr. Miler's<br />
Conclusion that No Competent and Reliable Scientific Evidence<br />
Exists to Support Respondents' Clais . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<br />
C. Respondents' Adverising Representations That the DCO Products Prevent,<br />
Treat, or Cure Cancer Are Materal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31<br />
IV. THE FTC is NOT VIOLATING THE RESPONDENTS' FIRST AMENDMENT<br />
RIGHTS ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32<br />
A. The Filng of the Instant Suit Does Not Infrge Respondents' First Amendment<br />
Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32<br />
B. The First Amendment Does Not Protect Deceptive Commercial Speech . . . . . . 33<br />
C. The FTC's Action Does Not Constitute a Prior Restraint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35