27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the Matter of<br />

)<br />

)<br />

DANIEL CHAER ONE,<br />

a corporation,<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

JAMES FEIJO,<br />

individually, and as an officer of<br />

Daniel Chapter One.<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION<br />

Docket No. 9329<br />

PUBLIC DOCUMENT<br />

COMPLAI COUNSEL'S POST-TRI BRIEF<br />

The evidence at tral demonstrated that Respondents Danel Chapter One ("DCO") and<br />

James Feijo violated Sections 5(a) and 12 of<br />

the <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> Commssion Act (the "FTC Act")<br />

when marketing their Bio*Shark, 7 Herb Formula, GDU, and BioMixx products (collectively,<br />

the "DCO Products"). Respondents represented in their adverisements and promotional<br />

materals disseminated on the Interet that the DCO Products were effective in preventing,<br />

treating, or curg cancer or tuors. Respondents preyed upon desperate, sick consumers<br />

"suffer(ing) from any tye of cancer." Respondents touted the DCO Products as "Cancer<br />

solutions" that would "stop tuor growth," "fight() tuor formation," and otherise ''battle()<br />

cancer." Indeed, Respondents admt that they made the following health and disease clais<br />

about the DCO Products:<br />

a. Bio*Shark inbits tuor growth;<br />

b. Bio*Shark is effective in the treatment of cancer;<br />

c. 7 Herb Formula is effective in the treatment or cure of cancer;<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!