Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In the Matter of<br />
)<br />
)<br />
DANIEL CHAER ONE,<br />
a corporation,<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
JAMES FEIJO,<br />
individually, and as an officer of<br />
Daniel Chapter One.<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />
FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION<br />
Docket No. 9329<br />
PUBLIC DOCUMENT<br />
COMPLAI COUNSEL'S POST-TRI BRIEF<br />
The evidence at tral demonstrated that Respondents Danel Chapter One ("DCO") and<br />
James Feijo violated Sections 5(a) and 12 of<br />
the <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> Commssion Act (the "FTC Act")<br />
when marketing their Bio*Shark, 7 Herb Formula, GDU, and BioMixx products (collectively,<br />
the "DCO Products"). Respondents represented in their adverisements and promotional<br />
materals disseminated on the Interet that the DCO Products were effective in preventing,<br />
treating, or curg cancer or tuors. Respondents preyed upon desperate, sick consumers<br />
"suffer(ing) from any tye of cancer." Respondents touted the DCO Products as "Cancer<br />
solutions" that would "stop tuor growth," "fight() tuor formation," and otherise ''battle()<br />
cancer." Indeed, Respondents admt that they made the following health and disease clais<br />
about the DCO Products:<br />
a. Bio*Shark inbits tuor growth;<br />
b. Bio*Shark is effective in the treatment of cancer;<br />
c. 7 Herb Formula is effective in the treatment or cure of cancer;<br />
1