Prof. Dr Jan Pajak Sightings of UFO vehicles and devices - Totalizm
Prof. Dr Jan Pajak Sightings of UFO vehicles and devices - Totalizm
Prof. Dr Jan Pajak Sightings of UFO vehicles and devices - Totalizm
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
S-54<br />
thin protruding stems with tiny glass droplets on the end. There were also clusters <strong>of</strong> needle<br />
wires pointing outward."<br />
One may wonder at this point if it is possible to receive a more precise description <strong>of</strong> a<br />
twin-chamber capsule from an untrained observer who has never seen it before <strong>and</strong> who does<br />
not know the theory behind it.<br />
S2. Indirect confirmations that <strong>UFO</strong>s use Oscillatory Chambers<br />
The evidence collected in previous subsections probably represents only a small<br />
fraction <strong>of</strong> the vast amount <strong>of</strong> facts spread amongst various publications, which directly<br />
document that <strong>UFO</strong> <strong>vehicles</strong> already utilize Oscillatory Chambers in their propulsors. The<br />
identification <strong>and</strong> revealing <strong>of</strong> this evidence turned out to be a slow process, as it involves a lot<br />
<strong>of</strong> research.<br />
In the process <strong>of</strong> searching for direct evidence, I have encountered some indirect<br />
evidence as well. This indirect evidence also leads to the conclusion that the Oscillatory<br />
Chamber is used in <strong>UFO</strong>s. But this conclusion is not obvious <strong>and</strong> must be reached by logical<br />
deduction. However, because the use <strong>of</strong> such indirect evidence in the pro<strong>of</strong> concerning <strong>UFO</strong>s<br />
could be the subject <strong>of</strong> criticism on the part <strong>of</strong> sceptically inclined investigators, the<br />
presentation <strong>of</strong> facts belonging to this indirect class will be omitted (after all the direct evidence<br />
already presented here well suffices to prove the thesis <strong>of</strong> this chapter). But to give readers<br />
some idea as how consistently these facts support the main thesis <strong>of</strong> this chapter, the main<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> them will be named. These groups are as follows:<br />
(1) Numerous observers noted that a magnetic field <strong>of</strong> <strong>UFO</strong>s does not attract or repel<br />
ferromagnetic objects. As it is explained in subsection C7.3, only the appropriate<br />
arrangements <strong>of</strong> Oscillatory Chambers can produce such a non-interacting (antigravity-type)<br />
magnetic field.<br />
(2) No one observed any products <strong>of</strong> "combustion" which in the case when <strong>UFO</strong>s<br />
produce their energy from some kind <strong>of</strong> a fuel would need to be exhausted. Furthermore, no<br />
device which could serve for the burning <strong>of</strong> fuel <strong>and</strong> producing energy was observed on <strong>UFO</strong>s.<br />
This in turn means that the reserves <strong>of</strong> energy in these <strong>vehicles</strong> must be accumulated in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> the circulating flux in their twin-chamber capsules, not carried by them in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
fuel.<br />
(3) <strong>UFO</strong> crews never mention that a fuel supply is required for their <strong>vehicles</strong>, or that<br />
they produce energy during the flight through burning a fuel. Although the same crews<br />
frequently mention that the cubical <strong>devices</strong> (twin-chamber capsules formed from Oscillatory<br />
Chambers) witnessed in their spacecraft store their reserves <strong>of</strong> energy - see subsection S1.4.<br />
S3. Material (hard) evidence left by <strong>UFO</strong> Oscillatory Chambers<br />
The evidence described in subsection S1 can be called the "court-type" (or "s<strong>of</strong>t"), as<br />
similar type <strong>of</strong> presentations on many occasions are used in our courts to decide about the life<br />
or death <strong>of</strong> an accused. However, in addition to this, there is also a wealth <strong>of</strong> material (or<br />
"hard") evidence available which can be investigated in scientific laboratories. This "hard"<br />
evidence similarly well confirms the use <strong>of</strong> Oscillatory Chambers in <strong>UFO</strong>s. So-far I managed<br />
to identify two different categories <strong>of</strong> this hard evidence. The first <strong>of</strong> these are square marks<br />
scorched on the ground by outlets from the Oscillatory Chambers installed in <strong>UFO</strong>s (these<br />
marks were already discussed in subsection S1.1. <strong>and</strong> illustrated in Figure S3). The second<br />
category includes parts <strong>of</strong> Oscillatory Chambers worn-out during exploitation, <strong>and</strong> thrown out<br />
by <strong>UFO</strong> crews after replacing them with new parts.<br />
An example <strong>of</strong> such worn-out parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>UFO</strong> Oscillatory Chambers are