01.06.2023 Views

June 2023 - Bay of Plenty Business News

From mid-2016 Bay of Plenty businesses have a new voice, Bay of Plenty Business News. This new publication reflects the region’s growth and importance as part of the wider central North Island economy.

From mid-2016 Bay of Plenty businesses have a new voice, Bay of Plenty Business News. This new publication reflects the region’s growth and importance as part of the wider central North Island economy.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 BAY OF PLENTY BUSINESS NEWS <strong>June</strong> <strong>2023</strong><br />

THE PORTER REPORT<br />

A monthly update on the business<br />

world from leading writer David Porter<br />

www.bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

CONTACT INFORMATION<br />

PUBLISHER<br />

Alan Neben, Ph: 021 733 536<br />

Email: alan@bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

Alan Neben, Ph: 021 733 536<br />

Email: editor@bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

PRODUCTION – Copy/Pro<strong>of</strong>s/Graphic Design<br />

Times Media – Clare McGillivray<br />

Email: clare@times.co.nz<br />

ADVERTISING<br />

Pete Wales, Mob: 022 495 9248<br />

Email: pete@bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

ELECTRONIC FORWARDING<br />

EDITORIAL: <strong>News</strong> releases/Photos/Letters:<br />

editor@bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

GENERAL INQUIRIES: info@bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>News</strong> has a circulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> 8000, distributed throughout <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong><br />

between Waihi and Opotiki including Rotorua and<br />

Taupo, and to a subscription base.<br />

www.bopbusinessnews.co.nz<br />

<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong> <strong>Business</strong> Publications<br />

309/424 Maunganui Rd, Mt Maunganui, 3116<br />

<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong> <strong>Business</strong> Publications specialises in<br />

business publishing, advertising, design, print and<br />

electronic media services.<br />

In case you missed<br />

last month’s edition<br />

Scan to<br />

subscribe<br />

Appalling or enthralling?<br />

I<br />

observed a large portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the British royal mania that<br />

preoccupied most media earlier<br />

this year. I have seldom<br />

been exposed to quite as much<br />

vapid repetition over so many<br />

days.<br />

I expected that the British<br />

Broadcasting Corporation<br />

(BBC) – whose work I generally<br />

respect – would be obliged<br />

to devote a large amount <strong>of</strong><br />

coverage first to Queen Elizabeth’s<br />

funeral, and then King<br />

Charles’ <strong>of</strong>ficial assumption <strong>of</strong><br />

the head job.<br />

Charles, <strong>of</strong> course, automatically<br />

became King on the<br />

Queen’s death, so the procession<br />

<strong>of</strong> his golden coach and<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the Anglican pieties<br />

surrounding his coronation,<br />

were rather redundant to the<br />

global audience other than for<br />

tourist/informational purposes.<br />

Apparently, the funeral cost the<br />

country around £162 million<br />

and the coronation between<br />

£50-100 million. By way <strong>of</strong><br />

a return, tourism monarchy<br />

returns are estimated by Brand<br />

Finance, in a “normal” year at<br />

around £2.5 billion. So we can<br />

assume returns were higher<br />

during these special events.<br />

What I wasn’t quite prepared<br />

for was the remarkable amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> air and print time devoted by<br />

other media around the world to<br />

these events, especially in the<br />

US. The funeral perhaps – but<br />

Charles’ coronation? It would<br />

seem that, despite parting from<br />

the United kingdom long ago,<br />

the US still can’t resist a bit <strong>of</strong><br />

pomp and ceremony.<br />

To be clear, I have nothing<br />

against Charles. Indeed as a<br />

young reporter, I even spent a<br />

fortnight trailing around New<br />

Zealand reporting on him and<br />

the late Diana after they visited<br />

Australia. He was an interesting<br />

speaker and personally affable,<br />

and his then wife was publicly<br />

charming, and was just finding<br />

and relishing her media role on<br />

her first overseas tour.<br />

The royal press rat pack that<br />

travelled with him from the<br />

UK was a revelation to a junior<br />

journalist, extremely experienced<br />

and very funny.<br />

Sadly, since assuming the<br />

throne, Charles appears likely<br />

to be obliged to talk far less<br />

about those issues around climate<br />

change he presciently<br />

made his own. More to the<br />

point perhaps, latest polling<br />

suggests he is not exactly the<br />

most popular person to assume<br />

the throne, especially amongst<br />

the younger generations.<br />

However, there remain one<br />

or two issues that just won’t<br />

go away. Yes, the monarchy is<br />

a great tourist attraction for the<br />

UK, as well as the late Queen<br />

having provided a figure <strong>of</strong> stability<br />

and British reassurance<br />

for many decades.<br />

According to Brand<br />

Finance, while the average<br />

annual cost for UK taxpayers in<br />

royal upkeep comes to around<br />

David Porter<br />

£500 million a year, the monarchy’s<br />

brand contributes £2.5<br />

billion to British economy in<br />

the same timeframe.<br />

More distastefully – but<br />

increasingly coming into prominence<br />

– is the Royal Family’s<br />

wealth, and more significantly,<br />

its source, a good portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> which was reaped from<br />

exploiting its empire. Charles<br />

denounced the “atrocity <strong>of</strong> slavery”<br />

during a recent speech in<br />

Barbados when the island held<br />

a ceremony to swear in their<br />

first president after removing<br />

the Queen as head <strong>of</strong> state.<br />

The Queen was head <strong>of</strong> state<br />

for as many as 32 countries<br />

during her reign; by the time <strong>of</strong><br />

her death just 14, other than the<br />

UK, remained. Charles’ accession<br />

provides an opportunity<br />

for many <strong>of</strong> his Commonwealth<br />

subjects to wonder if the time<br />

is right to install a less-remote<br />

head <strong>of</strong> state.<br />

Taking into account that the<br />

exact sources <strong>of</strong> royal wealth<br />

tend to be kept quiet and the<br />

figures are not easy to track,<br />

according to an Investopedia<br />

estimate:<br />

• Queen Elizabeth II had a<br />

separate personal fortune<br />

<strong>of</strong> £380.7 million, inherited<br />

by Charles. According<br />

to Forbes this inheritance<br />

has made his net worth over<br />

£1.8 billion.<br />

• Additionally, The Crown<br />

Estate, which manages the<br />

monarchy’s property holdings,<br />

is valued at about<br />

£15.6 billion and generated<br />

an estimated £312.7<br />

million in net revenue at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the 2022 fiscal<br />

year. It is understood many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the receipts for this go<br />

to the government and are<br />

returned in the form <strong>of</strong> royal<br />

salaries.<br />

• The royal family’s overall<br />

wealth is estimated at £21.3<br />

billion, according to Forbes.<br />

That is separate from Queen<br />

Elizabeth’s personal fortune<br />

and assets. (Let’s not forget<br />

those jewels, the royal collection,<br />

etc).<br />

Again, to stress, I’ve got<br />

nothing against Charles or his<br />

current wife. I lived in London<br />

for several years and greatly<br />

enjoyed it. I admire Charles’<br />

efforts to slim down the royal<br />

presence on the balcony, and to<br />

despatch brother Andrew to the<br />

sidelines. But doesn’t it all feel<br />

a bit redundant now for the UK<br />

and its former colonies?<br />

OPTIMUM FLEXIBILITY, WITH THE MINIMUMS GUARANTEED<br />

C H O O S E A U N I Q U E F I N A N C E O F F E R , C U R A T E D E S P E C I A L L Y F O R Y O U<br />

LEXUS RZ450e Dynamic<br />

$1,586.33*<br />

PER MONTH FOR 3 YEARS<br />

7.6% FINANCE<br />

$90,960.00**<br />

Guaranteed Trade GMTIV<br />

Choices gives you just that, choice! Especially when it comes to your options as your plan ends.<br />

Choose to take a Guaranteed Minimum Trade-In Value (GMTIV) Certificate* and you’ll know<br />

exactly what your vehicle will be worth when the plan ends.<br />

07 577 0880<br />

lexus<strong>of</strong>tauranga.co.nz<br />

Lexus <strong>of</strong> Tauranga, 158 Elizabeth Street<br />

*Terms & Conditions: The 7.6% p.a. finance rate is only available on the new RZ (XEBC), purchased via an Authorised Lexus Dealer between 1 Jun-31 Aug <strong>2023</strong>, while stocks last. Not available with any other <strong>of</strong>fer(s) and excludes direct fleet purchasers. The<br />

finance rate is fixed for the loan term and is only available with a $30,000 deposit on a Choices Finance Loan through Lexus Financial Services for terms up to 36 months. Normal lending criteria apply. See lexus.co.nz for full terms and conditions.<br />

**Guaranteed Minimum Trade-In Value Certificate: • Total repayable $148067.88 • PPSR fee $9.20 • Keep the vehicle regularly serviced in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. • Stay within the kilometer allowance <strong>of</strong> 45,000kms. If you<br />

choose to trade in your vehicle your Certificate amount will be reduced on a per-kilometer basis, should you exceed the allowance. • Make sure the vehicle is returned in good condition (allowance for fair wear and tear). • Application Fees apply ($400) •<br />

Talk to our dealership for full terms and conditions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!