07.08.2023 Views

TIAPS ALB_Module 2B. Managing People

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2B</strong>.3.2 McGregor’s Theory X, Theory Y<br />

McGregor distinguished between two broadly different approaches by managers to attempt<br />

to motivate employees.<br />

• Theory X managers assume people are basically lazy and do not like working or<br />

taking on additional responsibilities unless there is something to gain personally and<br />

so they need to be closely supervised and coerced into completing tasks. This<br />

requires an autocratic or transactional style of leadership.<br />

• Theory Y managers assume people are inherently conscientious and hard-working. If<br />

left alone they will self-direct, being motivated to fulfil their responsibilities. Individuals<br />

will naturally seek responsibility and rise to the occasion. This requires a more<br />

inclusive or laissez-faire style of leadership with appropriate delegation.<br />

In practice, managers may need to adopt some of the assumptions of both Theory X and<br />

Theory Y to suit the situation – a “carrot-and-stick approach.” However, Theory Y<br />

assumptions support a more enlightened, caring perspective of individuals and an<br />

appropriate focus on their well-being and development.<br />

<strong>2B</strong>.3.3 Vroom’s Expectancy Theory<br />

Vroom’s model asserts that individuals focus on the outcome and plan their actions based on<br />

their desire for the most favorable personal results. Vroom translated this idea into an<br />

equation:<br />

Motivation = valence x expectancy x instrumentality<br />

• Valence is the level of appeal of the outcome (the reward) to an individual. The<br />

higher the appeal, the greater the motivation. Valence is subjective and varies among<br />

individuals. It is based on perceived value.<br />

• Expectancy is the perceived likelihood that completing the task is achievable. If it<br />

seems impossible or too hard given the effort needed, then motivation will be low.<br />

• Instrumentality relates to the expected reward from completing the task.<br />

The higher the values for each of these variables, the higher the level of motivation.<br />

Managers must try to maximize these variables, recognizing the importance of perception<br />

and the variability of desired rewards. The relative perceived value of praise, financial bonus,<br />

promotion, a pay rise, increased status, additional vacation, and other tangible and<br />

intangible benefits must be understood.<br />

<strong>2B</strong>.3.4 Hertzberg’s Two-Factor Model<br />

Hertzberg identified two groups of conditions associated with motivation.<br />

• Hygiene factors are those conditions that need to be present. Their absence will<br />

demotivate workers, but when they are present, increasing them does not increase<br />

motivation. This includes a safe and pleasant working environment, the necessary<br />

tools to complete the assigned tasks, policies and procedures, job security, adequate<br />

supervision, and convivial relationships. These are similar to the lower order needs in<br />

Maslow’s pyramid and Theory X assumptions.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!