07.12.2023 Views

Swissmedic Vigilance News

Edition 31 – November 2023

Edition 31 – November 2023

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Regulatory<br />

The masking effect in pharmacovigilance: A signal detection challenge<br />

amidst the COVID-19 vaccine rollout<br />

Irene Scholz, Thomas Stammschulte<br />

Safety of Medicines Division, <strong>Swissmedic</strong>, Bern, Switzerland<br />

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a global health<br />

crisis necessitating rapid development and deployment<br />

of vaccines to curb its spread. The broad use<br />

of COVID-19 vaccines and the considerable attention<br />

to potential safety issues in the media and<br />

among the public led to an unprecedented large<br />

number of reports of suspected adverse events. All<br />

these reports are evaluated and stored in databases<br />

on a national and international level in order to<br />

identify previously unknown adverse effects. In this<br />

context, a known phenomenon called the "masking<br />

effect" has presented a challenge as regards<br />

statistical signal detection in databases of adverse<br />

event reports. This “masking effect” is caused by<br />

the large number of COVID-19 vaccines but applies<br />

to signal detection for other medicines or the vaccines<br />

amongst each other in the database.<br />

In order to detect potential safety issues in databases<br />

containing adverse event reports, a statistical<br />

and a scientific analysis are combined. A statistical<br />

disproportionality analysis enables screening of a<br />

database of reported adverse events for patterns<br />

that may indicate a larger number of certain adverse<br />

events than expected for certain medicinal<br />

products. An identified “disproportionality” will<br />

then be substantiated by a clinical review of cases<br />

and screening of the scientific literature and studies.<br />

There are different statistical methods for the<br />

disproportionality analysis. One of the most common<br />

of these is the reporting odds ratio (ROR),<br />

which is based on a 2x2 contingency table. The ROR<br />

corresponds to the ratio between the odds of an<br />

adverse event of interest with a certain medication<br />

or vaccine to the odds of the same adverse event<br />

with all other medicinal products and vaccines in<br />

the database (Table 1).<br />

Table 1: Calculation of the reporting odds ratio (ROR)<br />

Medication or<br />

vaccine of interest<br />

All other medications<br />

and vaccines<br />

Adverse event<br />

of interest<br />

a<br />

All other<br />

adverse events<br />

When the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval<br />

is greater than 1, the chosen adverse event<br />

of interest could be a signal. A prerequisite for the<br />

ROR to work is that there is a randomly scattered<br />

background rate.<br />

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the large amount<br />

of adverse event reports has impacted databases<br />

worldwide and affected signal detection for other<br />

medicines based on disproportionality analysis<br />

by significantly changing the background rates<br />

of reports in the databases. This phenomenon is<br />

called the “masking effect”: The signal detection<br />

ratio for a specific drug event of interest, identified<br />

through quantitative methods, is reduced or inhibited<br />

due to the presence of another product (e.g.<br />

COVID-19 vaccines) in the database, with overrepresented<br />

reporting of the event in question. Masking<br />

effects may complicate the interpretation of<br />

adverse event data by potentially obscuring safety<br />

issues and thus delay timely intervention.<br />

c<br />

b<br />

d<br />

<strong>Swissmedic</strong> <strong>Vigilance</strong> <strong>News</strong> | Edition 31 – November 2023<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!