22.01.2024 Views

Mid Rivers Newsmagazine 1-24-24

Local news, local politics and community events for St. Charles County Missouri.

Local news, local politics and community events for St. Charles County Missouri.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 I NEWS I<br />

January <strong>24</strong>, 20<strong>24</strong><br />

MID RIVERS NEWSMAGAZINE<br />

@MIDRIVERS_NEWS<br />

MIDRIVERSNEWSMAGAZINE.COM<br />

O’Fallon passes North Cool Springs-Tom Ginnever intersection project<br />

By JOHN TREMMEL<br />

A project that was defeated<br />

in December has been rejuvenated<br />

in January.<br />

At its Dec. 14 meeting, the<br />

O’Fallon City Council voted<br />

6-3 to deny the use of federal<br />

funding for a new roundabout<br />

at Tom Ginnever Avenue and<br />

North Cool Springs Road.<br />

That decision was reversed at<br />

the council’s Jan. 11 meeting,<br />

when reconsideration resulted<br />

in six council members voted to<br />

allow the use of federal funding.<br />

The $986,700 for the project comes in the<br />

form of MoDOT Congestion Mitigation and<br />

Air Quality Funding (CMAQ) funds administered<br />

through the East-West Gateway<br />

Council of Governments and the Missouri<br />

Department of Transportation (MoDOT).<br />

Lisa Thompson (Ward 2) brought about<br />

the change.<br />

Prior to the Jan. 11 meeting, Thompson<br />

requested reconsideration of the bill under<br />

rules defined in the city code that allow a<br />

council member who voted with the majority<br />

to request reconsideration at the same or<br />

next succeeding meeting. Council member<br />

Deana Smith (Ward 1) asked Thompson<br />

why she requested reconsideration.<br />

“The full city council was not present<br />

for the vote on Dec. 14, and this being an<br />

Tom Ginnever Avenue at North Cool Springs Road<br />

important project, I wanted everyone to<br />

vote,” Thompson responded.<br />

Council member Jeff Kuehn (Ward 4)<br />

was the member who had been absent/<br />

excused on Dec. 14.<br />

Thompson also said she had re-watched<br />

the council workshop during which Tony<br />

Friedman, Ph.D., the city’s assistant director<br />

of engineering, had presented the benefits<br />

and safety statistics of a roundabout at the<br />

intersection. Then, she did her own additional<br />

research about the safety of a roundabout<br />

versus a stop sign intersection. She said<br />

her research confirmed that the roundabout<br />

safety rating is an “A” compared to “C” and<br />

“E” for stop sign intersections. An “A” being<br />

the safest and “F” being the most dangerous.<br />

Regarding the proximity to two high<br />

schools, Thompson said, “I<br />

have two young drivers in<br />

my family, and they have no<br />

problem with roundabouts.”<br />

Several other council<br />

members responded with<br />

their views on Jan. 11.<br />

Debbie Cook (Ward 5)<br />

said she did not understand<br />

why the absence of one<br />

council member would be<br />

a reason for reconsideration<br />

and a re-vote.<br />

“We have members<br />

absent at various meetings<br />

throughout the year,” Cook<br />

said. “Should we cancel a meeting if we<br />

have one member absent?”<br />

She said safety is not a concern at this<br />

intersection and the stop sign is only a brief<br />

inconvenience.<br />

“Senior residents in nearby housing are all<br />

against this roundabout,” Cook said. “We<br />

asked them.”<br />

Cook said the city has “even busier intersections<br />

on Crooked Stick and other streets<br />

and no roundabouts are used there.” She<br />

said the three-way intersection at Mexico<br />

Road and Bryan Road has school buses,<br />

young drivers and a high traffic volume.<br />

She then asked if the federal project funds<br />

could be used for other intersections such<br />

as Bryan at Mexico. City Engineer Wade<br />

Montgomery said no, the city would need to<br />

(Google Earth photo)<br />

apply for that specific project funding. City<br />

Administrator Michael Snowden then commented<br />

that if the city did not use the federal<br />

funding available and already granted,<br />

applying again later would not be looked<br />

upon favorably.<br />

“I was absent from the prior meeting. I am<br />

an engineer, a numbers guy,” Kuehn said.<br />

“I agree with council member Thompson’s<br />

comments. I hate roundabouts, but my teenaged<br />

son has no problem with them, and<br />

roundabouts are obviously safer.”<br />

Smith said she talked with Friedman<br />

about safety and learned that accidents at<br />

North Cool Springs-Tom Ginnever intersection<br />

have mostly been sideswipe and rearender<br />

accidents with no fatalities.<br />

“We still will have sideswipes and rearenders<br />

with the roundabout,” she said. “This<br />

project is not fiscally responsible compared<br />

to other projects. We are creating a solution<br />

for a problem we do not have.”<br />

Smith said she also was worried about<br />

pedestrians using a roundabout.<br />

However, Montgomery said the current<br />

three-way stop intersection requires pedestrians<br />

to cross five traffic lanes. The roundabout<br />

has safety islands where pedestrians<br />

can wait, all traffic goes in the same direction,<br />

and pedestrians must cross only two<br />

lanes, making the roundabout much safer.<br />

Council member Dr. Jim Ottomeyer<br />

See O’FALLON, page 11<br />

St. Peters approves four road projects for 20<strong>24</strong><br />

By JESSICA MARIE BAUMGARTNER<br />

Multiple road improvement projects were<br />

passed at the Jan. 11 St. Peters Board of<br />

Aldermen meeting. From the Spencer Road<br />

reconstruction to the Harvester Road at<br />

Queensbrooke Boulevard signal replacement<br />

and more, residents can expect to see various<br />

projects move ahead this year.<br />

The Spencer Road Reconstruction Project<br />

was passed in order to improve transportation<br />

systems and facilities to promote the<br />

general health, safety and welfare of the<br />

community. M&H Concrete Contractors, Inc.<br />

will be executing the updates, which amount<br />

to $3,025,983 in construction work.<br />

In addition, a Mexico Road Stabilization<br />

project was approved with the provision that<br />

it is to be funded utilizing the St. Charles<br />

County Capital Improvements Sales Tax. It<br />

will construct a 6-foot wall off of the back<br />

of the curb along the south side of Mexico<br />

Road from Kindred Hill Road, extending<br />

approximately 600 feet to the east. A 6-footwide<br />

sidewalk will also be created at the back<br />

of the curb along the south side of Mexico<br />

Road from First Executive Avenue to Jungermann<br />

Road, where no sidewalk currently<br />

exists, and a fence will be placed on top of<br />

the wall at the back of the sidewalk.<br />

The wall will help ease erosion and ensure<br />

the safety of residents. It is slated for completion<br />

by June 30, 2025. The cost of the project<br />

is estimated at $150,000, which includes<br />

design preparation. The city has also agreed<br />

to apply for federal funding in the form<br />

of grants administered by the East-West<br />

Gateway Council of Governments and/or<br />

MoDOT Cost Share funds.<br />

A Willot Road Replacement Project<br />

received approval as well. This will replace a<br />

pair of failing reinforced concrete pipes that<br />

are under Willott Road between Carrington<br />

Drive and Jody Drive and experiencing<br />

erosion and settlement issues on both ends,<br />

along with joint separation under the roadway.<br />

The pipes will be replaced with a pair of<br />

8-by-6-foot concrete box culverts. This will<br />

cost an estimated $938,986. The city noted<br />

that it is currently working with a consultant<br />

Northwest corner of Harvester Road and Queensbrooke<br />

Boulevard intersection looking south.<br />

to complete the design.<br />

The signal located<br />

at Harvester Road and<br />

Queensbrook Boulevard<br />

is also due for replacement.<br />

The current signal<br />

was a temporary installment<br />

that the city had<br />

planned to replace eventually.<br />

Now, the spanwire<br />

system is weathered and<br />

the signal has provided an unreliable for the<br />

St. Peters and GGL traffic network, making<br />

it difficult for the city to properly respond to<br />

outages.<br />

According to the city, the aging spanwire<br />

system will be replaced with a permanent<br />

steel signal system.<br />

“The project will also construct a sidewalk<br />

along the east side of Harvester Road from<br />

Queensbrooke Boulevard to Sugarwood<br />

Drive and provide a signalized pedestrian<br />

crossing at the Queensbrooke Boulevard signalized<br />

intersection. The project will install<br />

a fiber optic cable interconnect for the Harvester<br />

Road and Queensbrooke Boulevard<br />

signal,” according to city documents.<br />

Before voting on the signal replacement<br />

project, alderman Patrick Barclay (Ward 4)<br />

commended residents for reaching out to<br />

help the city decide to replace the light. He<br />

noted that various improvement projects are<br />

always being discussed and proposed, so<br />

hearing from concerned residents aids the<br />

board in choosing what issues need to be<br />

addressed in a more timely manner.<br />

Each of these projects focuses on different<br />

areas and was approved based on separate<br />

timelines. All four passed unanimously.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!