11.02.2024 Views

YSM Issue 96.4

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOCUS<br />

Cosmology<br />

REDISCOVERING<br />

COSMIC ORIGINS<br />

THE BIRTH OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM<br />

BY DAVID GAETANO | ART BY ANNLI ZHU<br />

It is easy to take for granted the vast scope<br />

of scientific understanding that humans<br />

have acquired over hundreds of thousands<br />

of years on Earth. Today, for example, the<br />

origin of the solar system is relatively well<br />

understood. But not too long ago, we were<br />

searching for an answer among a sea of<br />

endless theories.<br />

An article from the 1941 edition of the<br />

Yale Scientific Magazine (Vol. 15 No. 4), titled<br />

“The Origin of the Solar System,” is a time<br />

capsule that provides a firsthand account of<br />

the scientific community’s understanding<br />

of the solar system’s origins at the time. The<br />

writer, Lyman Spitzer Jr., was a well-respected<br />

Yale faculty member who earned his PhD<br />

in physics from Princeton University in<br />

1939. In his piece, Spitzer sought to analyze<br />

contemporary understanding of the origin<br />

of the solar system and place doubt on the<br />

existing theories of the time.<br />

Eighty years later, this article revisits<br />

Spitzer’s analysis. By reflecting on evolving<br />

scientific understanding, we can help<br />

provide motivation for further scientific<br />

advancement, as the cosmos still leaves much<br />

to be discovered.<br />

Early Theories<br />

“The rise and subsequent decline of the<br />

most important theories of the origin of the<br />

solar system are an instructive chapter in<br />

the history of science and cast light on the<br />

problems which an ultimately successful<br />

theory must face,” Spitzer wrote. At the time<br />

of his article, there were many different<br />

hypotheses surrounding the formation of<br />

the solar system, yet none could truly be<br />

rigorously proven. In fact, Spitzer criticized<br />

two of the leading hypotheses for their lack of<br />

concrete evidence.<br />

The first theory he analyzed was the<br />

nebular hypothesis, which argued that the<br />

sun was first created out of a huge, rotating<br />

cloud of gas and dust in space, which was<br />

then flattened into a disk. This disk would<br />

have subsequently condensed to form the sun<br />

and various planets seen in the solar system<br />

today. He argued that this hypothesis was<br />

impossible due to the conservation of angular<br />

momentum, which means that the sun would<br />

12 Yale Scientific Magazine December 2023 www.yalescientific.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!