11.02.2024 Views

YSM Issue 96.4

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SPECIAL<br />

Archives vs. Today<br />

From The Archives: Science Fiction<br />

Prediction of Scientific Fact<br />

Editor's Note:<br />

In the spirit of this special issue, we<br />

traveled back in time and dove into<br />

<strong>YSM</strong>’s archives, seeking to track how<br />

our perception of scientific progress<br />

has changed over the last century.<br />

We found one <strong>YSM</strong> article written by<br />

Yale physics major Henry Thwing in<br />

1951 (reproduced here), to which we<br />

asked one of our members to write<br />

a response (pg. 35). In this side-byside<br />

comparison, we examine how<br />

our vision of artificial intelligence<br />

(AI) technology—and how it is<br />

presented in literary science fiction—<br />

has changed between the midtwentieth<br />

century and the present.<br />

To most dyed-in-the-wool science fiction<br />

fans, any suggestion that science fiction<br />

may be utter nonsense is sacrilege. They<br />

will immediately point to Jules Verne, the first<br />

truly great science prophet. His submarine in<br />

“Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea”,<br />

written in 1870, has a design very similar to<br />

present day construction and is run by an<br />

electric motor and screw. The “Gymnote”, built<br />

in 1888 was the first submarine to incorporate<br />

this improvement.<br />

Now, in modern science fiction, the writers<br />

are attempting to predict what the world will<br />

be many years from now. Even among stories<br />

written in recent years, it is not difficult to find<br />

those which have come true. “Deadline” by<br />

Cleve Cartmill was so accurate in its description<br />

of an atomic bomb when it appeared in 1944<br />

that the author was investigated for connections<br />

with the Manhattan Project. It is just as likely<br />

that some of the stories being published today<br />

will become realities in the near future.<br />

Let us look into the various types of science<br />

fiction stories to see just how and what the<br />

author predicts.<br />

***<br />

[One] field in which the author attempts<br />

a sincere prediction is that of robots. There<br />

is a very important question in connection<br />

with thinking machines which most of these<br />

stories consider: “If we build intelligent robots,<br />

will they become our masters?” The resultant<br />

answers vary. Usually there is a condition<br />

to all thinking the robots do which is built<br />

into their machinery—no harm must be<br />

done to any human being. Jack Williamson's<br />

“Humanoids” follow this directive in an odd<br />

way. They restrict the motions of humans so<br />

severely that life becomes a hell of inaction.<br />

Their actions are directed entirely by cold<br />

logic. Isaac Asimov, in his series, has equipped<br />

robots with the human emotion of a love<br />

somewhat like maternal love, overcoming<br />

this difficulty. Other emotions which have<br />

been granted robots by their authors are<br />

pride, respect, and even sexual love. A good<br />

example of the latter appeared in a November<br />

issue of Collier's under the title of “Epicac”, in<br />

which an electronic calculator falls in love<br />

with its female operator. In all these cases,<br />

the author is trying to see what will be the<br />

effect both on men and on the robots if the<br />

machines should have the qualities which<br />

he postulates.<br />

Modern electronic calculators merely carry<br />

out mathematical operations, introducing<br />

no new variables and no original thought.<br />

Even then, however, they exhibit properties<br />

sometimes with a striking similarity to mental<br />

aberration. If a calculator could be made which<br />

by HENRY W. THWING, 1951<br />

would correlate data in ways other than those<br />

fed into it, then it would be a thinking machine<br />

much as those stipulated by science fiction.<br />

Sociological development offers another<br />

field of prediction. Here, the writer observes the<br />

recent development in our customs, especially<br />

our growing dependence on science and<br />

machines and extrapolates into the future. To<br />

some, science will eventually yield a paradise<br />

on Earth; to others, the cold objectivity of<br />

science will fail to realize the importance of<br />

the individual and the result of science in<br />

the government (which both types of story<br />

predict) will be a stricter life even than that<br />

under a military government. Some authors<br />

even predict a world of neuters in which<br />

babies are developed by chemical processes.<br />

Although this seems unlikely, it is nevertheless<br />

an attempt to foretell the path along which our<br />

society will advance.<br />

***<br />

Stories such as these offer food for thought.<br />

Scientists and engineers make up a good share<br />

of those who are avid fans of science fiction.<br />

The stories tell them what might be invented<br />

and then they frequently try to develop it.<br />

When it became necessary to develop a<br />

suitable dress for high-altitude flight, one<br />

of the adopted styles was a copy of science<br />

fiction’s space suit. In particular, the “goldfish<br />

bowl” helmet (which allows the pilot to look<br />

around without turning his whole body) was<br />

used. (Astounding Science Fiction, Vol. L, No.<br />

1, March 1948. “The Space Suit” by L. Sprague<br />

de Camp)<br />

One should not criticize the fantastic nature<br />

of science fiction before carefully considering<br />

the many consequences it has led to in<br />

modern science. The fantasy of other ages<br />

has continued to be the reality of the present.<br />

With an honest look at the history of scientific<br />

discovery, who can claim to deny the heuristic<br />

value of the wild ideas of fiction? Indeed, will<br />

it not continue to be true that the seeds of<br />

science fiction today will yield a harvest of<br />

new scientific discovery tomorrow? ■<br />

34 Yale Scientific Magazine January 1951 (Reprint) www.yalescientific.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!