May 2024
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ask A Proctor<br />
LOW LAMDA INSULANTS: FAQS<br />
This month the team at A. Proctor Group compare low lamda insulants, focusing on aerogel<br />
and rigid foam solutions...<br />
In terms of thermal efficiency, aerogel<br />
insulation and low lambda foam insulation<br />
boards (like PIR and phenolic) perform very<br />
similarly. But comparing them on thermal<br />
performance alone, without taking into<br />
consideration their other properties, is like saying<br />
apples and oranges are similar because they are<br />
both round fruits.<br />
Aerogel and low lambda rigid foams are both<br />
excellent insulators, but also very different in<br />
other ways. In this month’s FAQs, the A.Proctor<br />
Group looks at the performance characteristics<br />
that set these low-lambda insulation solutions<br />
apart.<br />
What is the thermal conductivity of<br />
aerogel and low lambda foam insulants?<br />
Typical thermal conductivities range from 0.020<br />
W/mK for aerogel and phenolic insulation, to<br />
0.022 W/mK for a typical PIR foam board.<br />
This range is lower – and therefore more<br />
thermally efficient – than most other commonlyused<br />
insulation types. The similarity in<br />
performance means all of the products offer a<br />
similar thermal benefit for similar thicknesses.<br />
Precise lambda values can vary by manufacturer.<br />
For example, A.Proctor Group’s aerogel blanket<br />
product, Spacetherm A1, has a thermal<br />
conductivity of 0.0195 W/mK.<br />
What are the advantages of this thermal<br />
efficiency?<br />
The low lambda of rigid insulation products like<br />
PIR and phenolic allows better U-values to be<br />
achieved in constructions for which the products<br />
are typically offered, including floors, walls and<br />
roofs.<br />
However, in solid wall applications, an air gap is<br />
Installing Spacetherm from A Proctor Group.<br />
often required due to the fact that the thermal<br />
performance is detrimentally affected by being<br />
installed to a potentially more moisture sensitive<br />
substrate. In addition, the lowest U-values<br />
offered by rigid boards often depend on the<br />
insulation’s foil facing delivering a low emissivity<br />
benefit in an adjacent air space.<br />
Aerogel insulation is inherently hydrophobic,<br />
meaning it is completely inert to the effects of<br />
moisture. This means it can be fixed directly to<br />
solid, and cavity, walls without compromising<br />
thermal performance or damaging the insulation.<br />
And because aerogel has no foil facing to provide<br />
an enhanced low emissivity cavity, no air space is<br />
required for the insulation to face into.<br />
The unique composition of aerogel means it can<br />
help to deliver thermal efficiency in spacecritical<br />
areas where ‘conventional’ insulation<br />
products are simply too thick.<br />
The material is generally manufactured in 5-<br />
10mm thicknesses, which can be layered to suit<br />
the required thermal performance. These thin<br />
layers make insulation possible in applications<br />
where foam boards cannot be supplied at the<br />
thickness required.<br />
Using aerogel, the thermal performance of<br />
ventilated facades can be enhanced generally, as<br />
can areas of thermal bridge detailing such as<br />
window reveals and steel beams.<br />
Are aerogel’s moisture characteristics<br />
important for solid wall constructions?<br />
Moisture management in buildings is critical to<br />
longevity of the building fabric and achieving the<br />
intended performance from building elements.<br />
Insulation materials therefore have to be selected<br />
not just for their thermal performance, but also to<br />
support good moisture management.<br />
In new build, timber, steel and concrete framed<br />
buildings, as well as more traditional cavity wall<br />
constructions, the constructions are less moisture<br />
sensitive. This allows greater flexibility in the type<br />
and physical properties of the insulation. Foam<br />
insulants are more than suitable for use as the<br />
constructions benefit from a low permeability<br />
insulation to reduce the amount of vapour that<br />
can pass through the construction.<br />
This is not the case with historic, solid brick and<br />
stone buildings, however. In historic solid<br />
masonry walls, we can have a lot of influence on<br />
the way moisture moves due to both external and<br />
internal conditions.<br />
Solid walls are heavily influenced by driving rain<br />
on the outside, often allowing quite a bit of<br />
natural moisture penetration. The effect of this is<br />
heavily tempered by the internal heat driving or<br />
drying the moisture out of the wall. This allows<br />
these walls to reach a seasonal equilibrium that<br />
has allowed them to stand, in some cases, for<br />
several hundred years.<br />
Installing insulation and other energy efficiency<br />
measures affects the building physics of the wall.<br />
For example, adding insulation can keep the<br />
interior warmer and cut fuel costs, but it can also<br />
mean the walls are now significantly colder than<br />
they have ever been due to not getting any heat to<br />
them to help drive out the moisture. This can<br />
result in interstitial condensation or moisture<br />
46 TC MAY <strong>2024</strong>