01.05.2024 Views

May 2024

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ask A Proctor<br />

LOW LAMDA INSULANTS: FAQS<br />

This month the team at A. Proctor Group compare low lamda insulants, focusing on aerogel<br />

and rigid foam solutions...<br />

In terms of thermal efficiency, aerogel<br />

insulation and low lambda foam insulation<br />

boards (like PIR and phenolic) perform very<br />

similarly. But comparing them on thermal<br />

performance alone, without taking into<br />

consideration their other properties, is like saying<br />

apples and oranges are similar because they are<br />

both round fruits.<br />

Aerogel and low lambda rigid foams are both<br />

excellent insulators, but also very different in<br />

other ways. In this month’s FAQs, the A.Proctor<br />

Group looks at the performance characteristics<br />

that set these low-lambda insulation solutions<br />

apart.<br />

What is the thermal conductivity of<br />

aerogel and low lambda foam insulants?<br />

Typical thermal conductivities range from 0.020<br />

W/mK for aerogel and phenolic insulation, to<br />

0.022 W/mK for a typical PIR foam board.<br />

This range is lower – and therefore more<br />

thermally efficient – than most other commonlyused<br />

insulation types. The similarity in<br />

performance means all of the products offer a<br />

similar thermal benefit for similar thicknesses.<br />

Precise lambda values can vary by manufacturer.<br />

For example, A.Proctor Group’s aerogel blanket<br />

product, Spacetherm A1, has a thermal<br />

conductivity of 0.0195 W/mK.<br />

What are the advantages of this thermal<br />

efficiency?<br />

The low lambda of rigid insulation products like<br />

PIR and phenolic allows better U-values to be<br />

achieved in constructions for which the products<br />

are typically offered, including floors, walls and<br />

roofs.<br />

However, in solid wall applications, an air gap is<br />

Installing Spacetherm from A Proctor Group.<br />

often required due to the fact that the thermal<br />

performance is detrimentally affected by being<br />

installed to a potentially more moisture sensitive<br />

substrate. In addition, the lowest U-values<br />

offered by rigid boards often depend on the<br />

insulation’s foil facing delivering a low emissivity<br />

benefit in an adjacent air space.<br />

Aerogel insulation is inherently hydrophobic,<br />

meaning it is completely inert to the effects of<br />

moisture. This means it can be fixed directly to<br />

solid, and cavity, walls without compromising<br />

thermal performance or damaging the insulation.<br />

And because aerogel has no foil facing to provide<br />

an enhanced low emissivity cavity, no air space is<br />

required for the insulation to face into.<br />

The unique composition of aerogel means it can<br />

help to deliver thermal efficiency in spacecritical<br />

areas where ‘conventional’ insulation<br />

products are simply too thick.<br />

The material is generally manufactured in 5-<br />

10mm thicknesses, which can be layered to suit<br />

the required thermal performance. These thin<br />

layers make insulation possible in applications<br />

where foam boards cannot be supplied at the<br />

thickness required.<br />

Using aerogel, the thermal performance of<br />

ventilated facades can be enhanced generally, as<br />

can areas of thermal bridge detailing such as<br />

window reveals and steel beams.<br />

Are aerogel’s moisture characteristics<br />

important for solid wall constructions?<br />

Moisture management in buildings is critical to<br />

longevity of the building fabric and achieving the<br />

intended performance from building elements.<br />

Insulation materials therefore have to be selected<br />

not just for their thermal performance, but also to<br />

support good moisture management.<br />

In new build, timber, steel and concrete framed<br />

buildings, as well as more traditional cavity wall<br />

constructions, the constructions are less moisture<br />

sensitive. This allows greater flexibility in the type<br />

and physical properties of the insulation. Foam<br />

insulants are more than suitable for use as the<br />

constructions benefit from a low permeability<br />

insulation to reduce the amount of vapour that<br />

can pass through the construction.<br />

This is not the case with historic, solid brick and<br />

stone buildings, however. In historic solid<br />

masonry walls, we can have a lot of influence on<br />

the way moisture moves due to both external and<br />

internal conditions.<br />

Solid walls are heavily influenced by driving rain<br />

on the outside, often allowing quite a bit of<br />

natural moisture penetration. The effect of this is<br />

heavily tempered by the internal heat driving or<br />

drying the moisture out of the wall. This allows<br />

these walls to reach a seasonal equilibrium that<br />

has allowed them to stand, in some cases, for<br />

several hundred years.<br />

Installing insulation and other energy efficiency<br />

measures affects the building physics of the wall.<br />

For example, adding insulation can keep the<br />

interior warmer and cut fuel costs, but it can also<br />

mean the walls are now significantly colder than<br />

they have ever been due to not getting any heat to<br />

them to help drive out the moisture. This can<br />

result in interstitial condensation or moisture<br />

46 TC MAY <strong>2024</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!