Fconomlc Growth TbdolEd

conard.nc. in ksel stslcn, l) legn! enfo@ment ol conlts|s aid 6) Conh'r e'forceabilitt
indcx ol BERI- Tnen wishts e 2l vq l8./., l6vq 2lvq l9% dnd 5% respeliv€rv'
72t.!.12t^+te[!4!!e4
cFdilo6' .ighls pnt€€don, int
'ldrul
d4rdThts i Lr o@ tndrcdo6 ol
pruIEnv dghs pdlstioq inwnc' n$s indcx md
index of pDpeny righls wilh weighls ol2%, 34vq 30% dd l4vq resD'cnvelv'
7.2.1.1 1.21 1&r !Lp!98!E rjs!!..this elb itd€x or ifll€r of inv6hfl1 md findcial
dsl s prcrelion imlud6 indic.rqs lion dilf@t suEc" nm'1, .ltr)l@ic n6don of
Wdld (t!w), World rsnodic Fmn (WtjF) tnd He'ibge Food'lio (Hl)' Bc'rdso
tE6fomation index (BTl) with weighls of 259q 109'q ?6"4 | 99" rcspdiivelv
7.2.L!.122. ito&' ol imt@ .iatts: This tb indd ov6 indi@toB p'nlindg ro
pst*lion ofminority shehd&6' inledsrs gcmdl inv.sor For@tid, 6 *'u a invcstd
rilhrs ind€x orzlt dd Knluk(ZK)(2001)whhweidtsof3Svq2{%,and33%resl'eotivelv
ti.r.u hda d!& "dn |tul:
Ahir ompreh.sive ind.x ofjucic. $dcm nes6 judici.l pro'siontris, i(lcp'n&icc
efici.ncy ond inpaniality snt rfordabililt speificallv, n is 3lb_divided into !) lnd'x ol
Judicial DDfe$idclis b) Index ofjudicid iidcp€nddce c) ind.x ofcfficie'ct ofjudiciary
md d) l.srl stcd imp.nidlary ed lfordrDiliiv wirh wcisbre of l6V\ 32vq 2t tr%'
Esp.rtilely. Thes indic.s e tudier exDlaied b.lo*:
7 2 t t.2 t. Llde of Julicid Drctesio4litd: This mlets l) a numh.r of pMtdud aclio's
Equnld unljl dE 6fo|eqt oaj'rdgnd.nd 2) indq ofjudge.nd hw'crs' with cqul
7 2.11 2.2. Ihlle, of,h.ticlol ituLbeh&Ne: '|nh .g8Fgdtes diffeEnt judicial independene
ndu6 fim dilLEnt 5u'u lrmelt wFE, wEf ,nd b Pon ct !l (LLPS) (2{XX), {ih
*cilhk of4396, 4396, .tn l4% e+edi*ly.