29.12.2012 Views

Chapter 34 Austin Plant - Plant Family History Group

Chapter 34 Austin Plant - Plant Family History Group

Chapter 34 Austin Plant - Plant Family History Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On a possible connection to <strong>Plant</strong>agenet<br />

by Dr John S <strong>Plant</strong> (Member No 52) March 2007<br />

There has been much debate about a possible connection between the <strong>Plant</strong> and <strong>Plant</strong>agenet<br />

surnames. For example, an 1860 Surname Dictionary refers to an edition of the Leicester Mercury<br />

and states that <strong>Plant</strong> is a corruption of <strong>Plant</strong>agenet. In 1897, some further discussion appeared in<br />

Notes and Queries (Oxford University Press) [8th S., XII, Aug 28, ’97, p. 167]:<br />

PLANTAGENET. – Some time ago I read an account of a boy named <strong>Plant</strong> (residing<br />

in Warwickshire, I believe), whose grandfather had borne the royal name <strong>Plant</strong>agenet,<br />

but had changed it to <strong>Plant</strong>, thinking that the full name too grand for a poor man. The<br />

note proceeded to state that this boy, if Salic Law had been in force, would have been<br />

king of England. Can anyone tell me more of this, or inform me as to where I should<br />

obtain the note in question? ... PELOPS.<br />

There were replies [op. cit., Sept. 25, ’97, p. 258]:<br />

PLANTAGENET (8th S, xii. 167). – Some such note as this, of the name <strong>Plant</strong>agenet<br />

shortened to <strong>Plant</strong>, may be found in Burke’s ‘Vicissitudes of Families.’ But there<br />

is no kind of verification, and the statement that the holder of the name would be king<br />

by Salic law must be taken with very great caution. ... C.F.S. Warren, M.A., Longford,<br />

Coventry.<br />

The Rev Anthony Bathe wrote from Paull, Yorks, the account of the boy <strong>Plant</strong> that<br />

PELOPS enquires about. It appeared in one of the daily papers - the Standard, I think<br />

- and Mr Bathe mentioned that the boy at that time was living at Paull. – R.H., Ely.<br />

Subsequent Surname Dictionaries have offered different opinions for the meaning of <strong>Plant</strong>; and,<br />

my own opinion, having studied the matter for many years, is that any connection between the<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> and <strong>Plant</strong>agenet surnames is cultural rather than genetic. That is not to say that the embellished<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>agenet claim does not provide a tidy explanation of some details of the more recently<br />

established evidence:<br />

• there is an indication of illegitimacy in the <strong>Plant</strong> blazon;<br />

• the <strong>Plant</strong>-like name, <strong>Plant</strong>yn or <strong>Plant</strong>eng’, belonged to a servant of the noble <strong>Plant</strong>agenet<br />

descent which, like the place name, la <strong>Plant</strong>eland, can be related to de Warenne descendants<br />

of Geoffrey <strong>Plant</strong>egenest (ca.1250) to whom the name <strong>Plant</strong>e or Plont or <strong>Plant</strong> was nearby;<br />

and,<br />

• the spelling <strong>Plant</strong>t (a possible abbreviation) is found after the times of the royal House of York<br />

(for whom there is definite evidence that they used <strong>Plant</strong>agenet as a surname, ca.1450-1500),<br />

to which we can add that DNA evidence indicates that <strong>Plant</strong>t belongs to the same male-line<br />

family as <strong>Plant</strong>.<br />

However, on the other hand, it should be added that:<br />

• we can not simply presume that the name <strong>Plant</strong> referred to the generated (illegitimate) children<br />

of a generator of the realm; <strong>Plant</strong>egenest (or <strong>Plant</strong>agenet) can mean ‘a generator of the<br />

realm’, since Geoffrey <strong>Plant</strong>e Genest founded the Angevin Empire, and there is evidence in<br />

early English books to support such a meaning;<br />

• there were many others who could have been the forefather of the <strong>Plant</strong> offspring;<br />

• apart from a few references, such as ones to <strong>Plant</strong>egenest, <strong>Plant</strong>eng’ etc., it is not clear how<br />

much the <strong>Plant</strong>agenet name was in use when the <strong>Plant</strong> surname was first forming (ca.1250-<br />

1400); and,<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!