tradition that referenced <strong>the</strong> sacred text (sūtra) known as <strong>the</strong> “Discourse on Characteristics,” or <strong>the</strong> Lakkhana Sutta in Pāli. This text enumerates <strong>the</strong> thirty-two characteristics <strong>of</strong> great men like <strong>the</strong> <strong>Buddha</strong>, including legs like an antelope’s, a penis that is covered by a sheath, a frame that is divinely straight, and shoulders with no furrow between <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong> sculptors heightened <strong>the</strong>se attributes by carving a transparent drapery comprised <strong>of</strong> ringed folds in relief that systematically cascade down and across <strong>the</strong> body. Most artists created works anonymously yet each showed great originality and craftsmanship. <strong>The</strong>y culled ideas from outsiders — itinerant artists as well as travelling Buddhist clerics and lay practitioners who brought <strong>the</strong>ir own statues, sūtras, and o<strong>the</strong>r religious objects with <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong>se items influenced <strong>the</strong> practices, iconography, and styles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local workshop. As depictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Buddha</strong>s and bodhisattvas moved from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India to o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> Asia, styles were adapted to suit <strong>the</strong> tastes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local cultures. For instance, <strong>the</strong> artist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chinese Standing <strong>Buddha</strong> Śākyamuni (no. 9) did not directly incorporate <strong>the</strong> Indian Gupta style sometime around 600, but what is apparent is his more mediated acceptance <strong>of</strong> it. This is seen in <strong>the</strong> rounded shoulders, <strong>the</strong> hint <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leg underneath <strong>the</strong> robe’s cascading pleats, and <strong>the</strong> nudity <strong>of</strong> his chest. An intermingling <strong>of</strong> styles may also be seen between Bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara in <strong>the</strong> Form <strong>of</strong> Khasarpana Lokeśvara (no. 17), from ei<strong>the</strong>r Bihar or Bengal during <strong>the</strong> Pāla period (750 – 1150) in India, and Bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara (no. 14), from Nepal during <strong>the</strong> Transitional period (c. 879 – 1200). Both works depict bodhisattvas as Brahman princes with smooth and rounded bodies, which are decorated elaborately with necklaces, armbands, diadems, earrings, and sacred threads that wrap around <strong>the</strong> figures’ left shoulders, <strong>the</strong>n down and around <strong>the</strong>ir right thighs. Both have stacked braided hair and sheer dhotis that cling to <strong>the</strong>ir bodies. <strong>The</strong> thin-waist torsos have similar belly clefts that protrude just over <strong>the</strong>ir belts, <strong>the</strong>ir hips move to one side, and <strong>the</strong>ir fleshy palms and animated fingers hold (or once held, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nepalese work) lotus stems. <strong>The</strong> resemblances between <strong>the</strong> works attest to <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> artists, mystics, monks, and lay practitioners who travelled back and <strong>for</strong>th between eastern India and <strong>the</strong> Nepal’s Kathmandu Valley <strong>for</strong> centuries. 5 O<strong>the</strong>r instances <strong>of</strong> cultural exchange in <strong>the</strong> exhibition may be seen between <strong>the</strong> Nepalese Bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara (no. 14) and <strong>the</strong> Mongolian Standing Bodhisattva Maitreya (no. 16). During <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century, <strong>the</strong> renowned Mongolian monk Zanabazar (1635 – 1723), <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> a prominent family <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Khalkha Mongols, learned to make works <strong>of</strong> art inspired by Nepalese sculptures while training to be a Buddhist monk in Tibet. He returned to Mongolia with a convoy <strong>of</strong> clerics and artisans and built monasteries and workshops where sculptures like Standing Bodhisattva Maitreya were cast <strong>for</strong> monastic altars. In this way, early Nepalese 9 traditions <strong>of</strong> making and rendering Buddhist figures made <strong>the</strong>ir way into Mongolia. 6 Incised inscriptions and symbols on Buddhist sculptures provide hints to understanding why and when sculptures were made. Yet trying to fully grasp <strong>the</strong> institutional and ritual contexts <strong>of</strong> a Buddhist image that is now part <strong>of</strong> a museum collection may be problematic given <strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> determining a function on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> appearance alone, and given <strong>the</strong> high probability that a single object had multiple purposes. Indeed, inscriptions carved on <strong>the</strong> bases <strong>of</strong> Buddhist sculptures convey that patrons sought a wide range <strong>of</strong> benefits through such commissions, both worldly and o<strong>the</strong>rworldly. Among worldly benefits were good health and wealth, success in a military campaign, longevity, and <strong>the</strong> happiness and welfare <strong>of</strong> all people. O<strong>the</strong>rworldly benefits included <strong>the</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> karmic merit <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> donors and <strong>the</strong>ir families, guilds, or o<strong>the</strong>r community groups. Karma is <strong>the</strong> universal law <strong>of</strong> cause and effect: Actions in this life will determine <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m in which an individual will be reborn in <strong>the</strong> next life. Such commissions thus would advance patrons on <strong>the</strong> path toward Nirvāna. A desire to accrue karmic merit was likely one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> factors behind <strong>the</strong> making <strong>of</strong> Seated Bodhisattva Tārā in her “Green Manifestation” (no. 15). Tārā, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most beloved deities <strong>of</strong> Vajrayāna Buddhists, has <strong>the</strong> ability to save beings from <strong>the</strong> eight dangers (pride, delusions, hatred, envy, fanatical views, avarice, lust, and doubts). 7 Of Tārā’s twenty-one <strong>for</strong>ms, her green manifestation is considered her most active. Inscribed on <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> this sculpture, near Tārā’s right foot, is <strong>the</strong> following inscription: 大明永樂年施 (Da Ming Yonglenian shi), which may be translated: “Donated [during <strong>the</strong>] Yongle reign [<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>] Great Ming [dynasty].” 8 This indicates that <strong>the</strong> sculpture was likely produced in an imperial workshop <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chinese Yongle Emperor, a Vajrayāna practitioner who reigned from 1402 to 1424. <strong>The</strong> term shi 施 (“donated”) suggests that it was produced specifically as a gift, possibly <strong>for</strong> a Buddhist temple as far away as Tibet. 9 On <strong>the</strong> underside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sculpture Seated Bodhisattva Tārā is a removable plate incised with an image <strong>of</strong> crossed vajras — ritual implements with curved prongs at each end symbolizing <strong>the</strong> thunderbolt/diamond path <strong>of</strong> Vajrayāna Buddhists (fig. 1, page 10). <strong>The</strong> vajra denotes <strong>the</strong> indestructible, immutable, and brilliant nature <strong>of</strong> Buddhist reality. Normally, <strong>the</strong> crossed-vajra symbol protects <strong>the</strong> sacred objects inside. <strong>The</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> inserting objects is <strong>of</strong>ten associated with <strong>the</strong> consecration <strong>of</strong> a Buddhist object as an icon: Inserted objects were thought in some cases to enhance <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> “<strong>the</strong> unseen Sacred and to increase its degree <strong>of</strong> presence in <strong>the</strong> image.” 10 Some included objects have also been associated with talismans, which possess <strong>the</strong> magic to protect, heal, and bring good <strong>for</strong>tune. Since Seated Bodhisattva Tārā is too small to serve as an icon, today it may be categorized as a Vajrayāna talismanic sculpture made in China to be donated <strong>for</strong> karmic merit sometime between 1402 and 1424.
figure 1 Detail <strong>of</strong> Seated Bodhisattva Tārā in her “Green Manifestation” (Duoluo pusa), 1403 – 1424, China figure 2 Prince Shōtoku at Age Two: <strong>The</strong> sculpture and a selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dedicatory objects discovered within 10