06.01.2013 Views

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 2. Vary<strong>in</strong>g response to stoke volume with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g preload as per the Frank-Starl<strong>in</strong>g mechanism.<br />

In a fluid challenge with the patient with a suboptimal preload stroke volume should <strong>in</strong>crease by<br />

> 10 % (a-b). Once preload is optimized, stroke volume will no longer significantly <strong>in</strong>crease (c-d) <strong>and</strong><br />

if the heart is fail<strong>in</strong>g, theoretically you could see a decrease <strong>in</strong> stoke volume with further fluid <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased preload (e-f) although this has never been demonstrated <strong>in</strong> vivo.<br />

tricular preload <strong>and</strong> then the test is to see how the heart reacts to this challenge.<br />

It should, therefore, be evident that it is vitally important for the test to ‘challenge’<br />

the right ventricle. Insufficient fluid will lead to a negative response, not necessarily<br />

because the heart is not preload responsive but because the right ventricular<br />

preload was not <strong>in</strong>creased (<strong>and</strong> then by Starl<strong>in</strong>g’s law it should be obvious that<br />

contraction will not change).<br />

Application of the Fluid Challenge<br />

The Fluid Challenge 335<br />

Before start<strong>in</strong>g a fluid challenge, the first decision is what form of fluid resuscitation<br />

to use. The choices are colloid or crystalloid. Both have advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages,<br />

with a hyperosmotic colloid <strong>in</strong>fusion likely to have a bigger hemodynamic<br />

impact than the same volume of isotonic crystalloid, but with colloids hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

small risks of <strong>in</strong>teractions with clott<strong>in</strong>g function <strong>and</strong> anaphylaxis. In a recent<br />

analysis of 406 fluid challenges <strong>in</strong> ICUs, 62 % of the challenges used colloid, 38 %<br />

crystalloid [2]. Recent evidence from the Sal<strong>in</strong>e versus Album<strong>in</strong> Fluid Evaluation<br />

(SAFE) trial seems to suggest that either is as a safe as the other, so probably it<br />

makes little difference which fluid is used [6]. The next choice is how much volume<br />

to <strong>in</strong>fuse. Some studies <strong>in</strong>to fluid challenges do not <strong>in</strong>fuse a pre-determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

amount but <strong>in</strong>stead give volume until a hemodynamic threshold is reached (e.g.,<br />

until PAOP <strong>in</strong>creases by 3 mmHg) [7]. However, the vast majority of fluid challenges<br />

give a set volume. The Surviv<strong>in</strong>g Sepsis resuscitation bundle recommends<br />

VIII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!