MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...
MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...
MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE <strong>MISO</strong> PLANNING ENVIRONMENT<br />
• Multi Value Projects (MVP): meeting Attachment FF requirements to provide regional<br />
public policy economic and/or reliability benefits<br />
MTEP projects are prioritized based on their documentation, justification and approval. Each<br />
annual MTEP plan lists projects in appendices according to these priorities. Projects start in<br />
Appendix C when submitted into the MTEP process, transfer to Appendix B when <strong>MISO</strong> has<br />
documented the project need and effectiveness, then move to Appendix A after approval by the<br />
<strong>MISO</strong> board of Directors.<br />
<strong>MISO</strong> planning efforts expanded in 2010 to meet the challenges associated with integrating<br />
renewable energy. The MVP project category represents new transmission that provides regional<br />
public policy economic and/or reliability benefits. The MVP category requires extensive analysis<br />
and modeling to determine which transmission expansions best meet regional public policy goals<br />
under different future economic and regulatory scenarios. The Regional Generation Outlet <strong>Study</strong><br />
(RGOS) and the Regional Economic Criteria and Benefits (RECB) task force were created to<br />
determine the transmission needed to meet <strong>MISO</strong> stakeholder RPS policy goals as well as how to<br />
fairly allocate costs associated with these projects.<br />
The RGOS analysis includes refining future generation and load scenarios, and modeling<br />
transmission values under a full range of future possibilities. The study produced three reliable<br />
transmission portfolios based on different scenarios. Elements common between these three<br />
portfolios, and common with previous reliability, economic and generation interconnection<br />
analyses were identified to produce a 2011 candidate MVP portfolio.<br />
The 2011 MTEP studies 5 evaluate the candidate MVP portfolio to identify near-term, robust<br />
transmission solutions that fulfill multiple transmissions and reliability needs. This represents a<br />
first step towards a truly regional transmission solution to integrate wind resources into the<br />
<strong>MISO</strong> footprint.<br />
The future resource and load planning scenario detail used during the MTEP11 MVP analysis is<br />
presented here to explain the model environment that <strong>MISO</strong> transmission planners currently use<br />
to evaluate wind integration projects. The <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Study</strong> uses similar future scenarios and<br />
assumptions to model the additional impact that using energy storage might have on the <strong>MISO</strong><br />
resource and load plan.<br />
The MTEP11 MVP modeling analysis uses the following alternative future scenarios and<br />
parameters:<br />
• Future Policy Scenarios<br />
o Business as usual with continued low demand and energy growth (assumes that<br />
current energy policies will be continued, with continuing, recession-level low<br />
demand and energy growth projections).<br />
o Business as usual with historic demand and energy growth (assumes that current<br />
energy policies will be continued, with demand and energy returning to prerecession<br />
growth rates).<br />
5 The MTEP2011 Planning Cycle is still in progress<br />
2-5