06.01.2013 Views

MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...

MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...

MISO Energy Storage Study Phase 1 Report - Utility Wind ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE <strong>MISO</strong> PLANNING ENVIRONMENT<br />

• Multi Value Projects (MVP): meeting Attachment FF requirements to provide regional<br />

public policy economic and/or reliability benefits<br />

MTEP projects are prioritized based on their documentation, justification and approval. Each<br />

annual MTEP plan lists projects in appendices according to these priorities. Projects start in<br />

Appendix C when submitted into the MTEP process, transfer to Appendix B when <strong>MISO</strong> has<br />

documented the project need and effectiveness, then move to Appendix A after approval by the<br />

<strong>MISO</strong> board of Directors.<br />

<strong>MISO</strong> planning efforts expanded in 2010 to meet the challenges associated with integrating<br />

renewable energy. The MVP project category represents new transmission that provides regional<br />

public policy economic and/or reliability benefits. The MVP category requires extensive analysis<br />

and modeling to determine which transmission expansions best meet regional public policy goals<br />

under different future economic and regulatory scenarios. The Regional Generation Outlet <strong>Study</strong><br />

(RGOS) and the Regional Economic Criteria and Benefits (RECB) task force were created to<br />

determine the transmission needed to meet <strong>MISO</strong> stakeholder RPS policy goals as well as how to<br />

fairly allocate costs associated with these projects.<br />

The RGOS analysis includes refining future generation and load scenarios, and modeling<br />

transmission values under a full range of future possibilities. The study produced three reliable<br />

transmission portfolios based on different scenarios. Elements common between these three<br />

portfolios, and common with previous reliability, economic and generation interconnection<br />

analyses were identified to produce a 2011 candidate MVP portfolio.<br />

The 2011 MTEP studies 5 evaluate the candidate MVP portfolio to identify near-term, robust<br />

transmission solutions that fulfill multiple transmissions and reliability needs. This represents a<br />

first step towards a truly regional transmission solution to integrate wind resources into the<br />

<strong>MISO</strong> footprint.<br />

The future resource and load planning scenario detail used during the MTEP11 MVP analysis is<br />

presented here to explain the model environment that <strong>MISO</strong> transmission planners currently use<br />

to evaluate wind integration projects. The <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Study</strong> uses similar future scenarios and<br />

assumptions to model the additional impact that using energy storage might have on the <strong>MISO</strong><br />

resource and load plan.<br />

The MTEP11 MVP modeling analysis uses the following alternative future scenarios and<br />

parameters:<br />

• Future Policy Scenarios<br />

o Business as usual with continued low demand and energy growth (assumes that<br />

current energy policies will be continued, with continuing, recession-level low<br />

demand and energy growth projections).<br />

o Business as usual with historic demand and energy growth (assumes that current<br />

energy policies will be continued, with demand and energy returning to prerecession<br />

growth rates).<br />

5 The MTEP2011 Planning Cycle is still in progress<br />

2-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!