09.01.2013 Views

Full Conference Details Inside

Full Conference Details Inside

Full Conference Details Inside

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friday, October 12, 2012<br />

7:00 Networking Coffee<br />

7:30 Technology Workshop with Light Continental Breakfast Sponsored by:<br />

New Tools for High Throughput Analysis in Biopharmaceutical Development<br />

This talk presents applications of the AssayMAP high throughput microchromatography platform for automated sample preparation prior to various protein/peptide analytical methods.<br />

The system can purify protein products from complex samples for quantitation and downstream analysis. A major application is automated sample preparation for N-glycan profiling,<br />

including enzymatic digestion, fluorescent labeling and cleanup. Peptide mapping will also be shown.<br />

Scott P. Fulton, MSc., Head, AssayMAP Operations & Workflow Development, Agilent Technologies, Inc.<br />

8:00<br />

8:15<br />

8:45<br />

9:15<br />

Cell Culture Process Development for Novel Molecules<br />

and Next Generation Protein Therapeutics<br />

Chairperson’s Opening Remarks<br />

Kathie Fritchman, Manager, BioProcess Application - Advanced Bioprocessing, BD Biosciences<br />

Expression, Purification and Characterization of an IL-1<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

Therapeutic Inhibitor<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

DATA<br />

Gregory Zarbis-Papastoitsis, Ph.D., Senior Director, Protein Production and Analytical<br />

Development, Eleven Biotherapeutics<br />

Kathryn Golden, M.S., Scientist III, Protein Production and Analytical Development, Eleven Biotherapeutics<br />

Process and Technology Development for the Production of<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

Non-Antibody Therapeutic Proteins in a Continuous Manner<br />

DATA<br />

The integration of bioprocessing steps into continuous operations is paving the future for streamlined<br />

and flexible biopharmaceutical production. Despite such simplifications, the process, hardware, and<br />

associated control strategies must be carefully optimized to achive overall robustness and product<br />

quality goals. This presentation will cover these topics as applied to the development of a continuous<br />

non-antibody protein producing process.<br />

Timothy Johnson, Ph.D., Senior Manager, Process Development, Genzyme, a Sanofi company<br />

Keynote Address<br />

The Evolution of QbD Implementation in Cell Culture at<br />

Genentech and Lessons Learned<br />

Cell Culture Recovery & Purification<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

DATA<br />

The expectations for cell culture process characterization have evolved over the<br />

last decade, and integration of Quality by Design (QbD) principles is the latest example. Several<br />

Genentech projects have applied various aspects of QbD in the last several years, and with each new<br />

project, we’ve built upon lessons learned. The broadest QbD strategy consists of a Quality Target<br />

Product Profile, risk assessments to determine Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), risk assessments to<br />

determine what process parameters to study, Design of Experiment studies to investigate parameter<br />

effects on CQAs, a Critical Process Parameter identification tool, risk assessments related to Control<br />

System definition, and lifecycle management. Development and use of the risk assessments and other<br />

tools has been the most challenging aspect of applying QbD to cell culture process characterization.<br />

At first glance, all the moving pieces that are part of QbD can appear quite complex, both to<br />

people within the company and to Health Authorities. While it is complex, one main benefit is that<br />

it has provided a structured approach to document rationale for how we execute and interpret our<br />

characterization studies. As we’ve become more experienced with QbD, our study designs and tools<br />

have evolved. This talk will review the evolution of tools and studies, and discuss lessons learned in<br />

applying QbD.<br />

Steven Meier, Ph.D., Principal Engineer, Senior Group Leader, Genentech, Inc.<br />

9:45 Networking Refreshment Break<br />

10:15 Thought Leadership Forum Co-Sponsored by:<br />

Understanding Sources of Process Variability<br />

Chairperson’s Opening Remarks<br />

Günter Jagschies, Ph.D., Senior Director, Strategic Customer Relations, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Sweden<br />

Optimization of Process Steps during Scale Up to Reduce<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

Unanticipated Sources of Process Variability<br />

DATA<br />

We had developed a three step Phase 1 mAb process using typical anion and cation<br />

exchangers (Sepharose Fast Flow). Anticipated commercial demand stimulated the development<br />

of a modified upstream process yielding a doubling in harvest titer. Fixed tankage limitations in the<br />

intended commercial facility stimulated the use of high capacity ion exchangers and a modification<br />

in the flow of the process streams which resulted in a doubling of the process throughput. The new<br />

resins were used in both the normal titer and doubled titer processes during scale-up and yielded<br />

equivalent product quality and process performance in both process versions.<br />

Joseph P. Martin Jr., Ph.D., Research Fellow,<br />

Senior Scientist, Downstream Operations, Pfizer Inc.<br />

Identification of Chromatogram Variances and<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

Their Relation to Product Quality and Process Performance<br />

DATA<br />

Chromatogram monitoring and trending has become a routine and powerful<br />

tool to ensure consistent performance of liquid chromatography columns and quality of the final<br />

product. Trending of chromatograms against a Gold Standard was implemented for both clinical<br />

and commercial manufacturing processes at HGS to ensure downstream purification processes<br />

are performing as expected. Several case studies will be presented to demonstrate chromatogram<br />

variances and their potential impacts on product quality and process performance. Process<br />

monitoring and its follow up investigations proved to be extremely valuable for better process<br />

understanding and continuous improvement of the downstream purification processes. Several<br />

lessons learnt, in the execution of these studies, will be presented.<br />

Yaling Wu, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Human Genome Sciences, Inc.<br />

Mitigation of Chromatography Adsorbent Lot Variability<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

UNPUBLISHED<br />

Through Design Space and Process Control<br />

DATA<br />

Lot to lot variability in chromatography adsorbent properties can result in<br />

unacceptable performance, in both product quality and process consistency. The column operating<br />

conditions may need to be designed to be adsorbent lot specific to achieve acceptable and consistent<br />

performance. In this presentation, we discuss how a design space strategy can be used to mitigate<br />

such risks for an anion exchange chromatography step, by providing additional flexibility in applying<br />

the appropriate column operating conditions for different chromatography adsorbent lots.<br />

Ionela Iliescu, M.S., Scientist I, Technical Development, Biogen Idec<br />

Structuring Process Knowledge to Achieve Robust Processes, Simplified Technology Transfer and Regulatory Compliance (See more details on p.21)<br />

19 To Register, Call: (800) 390-4078 • Fax: (941) 365-0104 • E-mail: reg@ibcusa.com • www.IBCLifeSciences.com/BPI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!