09.01.2013 Views

BC Hydro > Financial Information Act Return (to March 31, 2007)

BC Hydro > Financial Information Act Return (to March 31, 2007)

BC Hydro > Financial Information Act Return (to March 31, 2007)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

notes <strong>to</strong> consoliDateD <strong>Financial</strong> stateMents<br />

For the years enDeD <strong>March</strong> <strong>31</strong>, <strong>2007</strong> anD 2006<br />

note 2: regulation (continued)<br />

Demand-Side Management Programs<br />

1 0 4<br />

2 0 0 7 B C H Y D R O A N N U A L R E P O R T<br />

F I N A N C I A L R E S U L T S<br />

Established under a regula<strong>to</strong>ry order from the Commission, demand-side management programs are designed <strong>to</strong> reduce the energy requirements on<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong>’s system. Costs of the programs include materials, direct labour and applicable portions of administration charges, equipment costs, and<br />

incentives. Amounts are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the anticipated period of benefit of the program, generally not in excess<br />

of 10 years.<br />

In the absence of rate regulation, GAAP would require period costs <strong>to</strong> be included in operating results in the year in which they are incurred. Costs<br />

relating <strong>to</strong> identifiable tangible assets that meet the capitalization criteria would be recorded as property, plant and equipment. In <strong>2007</strong>, $46 million<br />

of period costs were incurred and amortization of previously capitalized amounts <strong>to</strong>taled $33 million (2006 – $90 million and $28 million,<br />

respectively). Consequently, net income would have been $13 million lower than would have been recorded in the absence of rate regulation<br />

(2006 – $62 million).<br />

First Nation Negotiations, Litigation and Settlement Costs<br />

Established under a regula<strong>to</strong>ry order, provisions for and costs incurred with respect <strong>to</strong> First Nation negotiations, litigation and settlements are<br />

deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 10 years.<br />

In the absence of rate regulation, GAAP would require period costs <strong>to</strong> be included in operating results in the year in which they are incurred. Costs<br />

relating <strong>to</strong> identifiable tangible assets that meet the capitalization criteria would be recorded as property, plant and equipment. In <strong>2007</strong>, $11 million<br />

(2006 – $96 million) of period costs were recorded as regula<strong>to</strong>ry assets, and the amortization of previously capitalized amounts <strong>to</strong>taled $4 million<br />

(2006 – $4 million). Consequently, net income would have been $7 million lower than would have been recorded in the absence of rate regulation<br />

(2006 – $92 million).<br />

Other Regula<strong>to</strong>ry Accounts<br />

Included in other regula<strong>to</strong>ry accounts are the following regula<strong>to</strong>ry assets and liabilities: Foreign Exchange Gains and Losses Arising from the<br />

Translation of Specified Foreign Currency <strong>Financial</strong> Instruments, Large <strong>Hydro</strong> Investigation Costs, Depreciation Study Adjustments; CIA Amortization<br />

Variance, and Major S<strong>to</strong>rm Res<strong>to</strong>ration Costs. All of these accounts have been approved by the Commission through regula<strong>to</strong>ry order, except for the<br />

Major S<strong>to</strong>rm Res<strong>to</strong>ration Costs account which <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> is applying <strong>to</strong> the Commission for approval. Recoverability of the s<strong>to</strong>rm res<strong>to</strong>ration costs is<br />

subject <strong>to</strong> approval of the Commission.<br />

In <strong>2007</strong>, $52 million of costs deferred <strong>to</strong> these accounts would have decreased net income in the absence of rate regulation (2006 – $4 million).<br />

Future Removal and Site Res<strong>to</strong>ration Costs<br />

As part of its Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2004 decision, the Commission ordered the establishment of a regula<strong>to</strong>ry provision for future removal and site res<strong>to</strong>ration<br />

costs. This account was established in 2006 by a one-time transfer of $251 million from retained earnings. The costs of dismantling and disposal of<br />

property, plant and equipment will be applied <strong>to</strong> this regula<strong>to</strong>ry liability if they do not otherwise relate <strong>to</strong> an asset retirement obligation.<br />

This liability has been recognized solely as a result of rate regulation as costs for future removal and site res<strong>to</strong>ration have been established in excess<br />

of amounts required as asset retirement obligations. In the absence of rate regulation, it would be anticipated that a liability would not be<br />

recognized. The amortization of previously capitalized amounts <strong>to</strong>taled $16 million in the current year (2006 - $11 million). Consequently, net<br />

income would be $16 million lower than would have been recorded in the absence of rate regulation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!