A review of HSE's risk analysis and protection-based analysis ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

11. that the assumptions relating to the amount of LPG in a vessel when it undergoes a BLEVE are revisited. This is particularly important if the BLEVE event is going to continue to be used for protection-based analysis of bulk LPG storage installations. It is believed that the amounts currently assumed by HSE could represent an underestimate in some cases. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT HSE 0016072 AUGUST 2004 82
Annex A Details of Incidents Reported to MARS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT HSE 0016072 AUGUST 2004 1
Page 1 and 2:
www.erm.com Delivering sustainable
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTROD
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Health and Sa
Page 7 and 8:
• certain assumptions relating to
Page 9 and 10:
REVIEW OF ASSUMPTIONS USED Overall
Page 11 and 12:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The H
Page 13 and 14:
worthwhile (sometimes almost total)
Page 15 and 16:
1.3.1 Study Definition The Study De
Page 17 and 18:
The data are derived from records o
Page 19 and 20:
• severe distress to almost every
Page 21 and 22:
1.3.7 Risk Evaluation Once a numeri
Page 23 and 24:
• selecting the event or events u
Page 25 and 26:
2 REVIEW OF HSE’S RISK ANALYSIS A
Page 27 and 28:
• HSE, UK; • NCSR Demokritos, S
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.1 Comparison of Accident Experi
Page 31 and 32:
support the findings of the work on
Page 33 and 34:
The findings of the ASSURANCE Proje
Page 35 and 36:
2.3.1 Comparison with Historical Ac
Page 37 and 38:
Table 2.3 Estimated Number of Sites
Page 39 and 40:
teams concerning site-specific deta
Page 41 and 42: 2.4.1 Model and Methodology Evaluat
Page 43 and 44: for people indoors would be somewha
Page 45 and 46: occurred, originating from the pipi
Page 47 and 48: the predicted burn area). However,
Page 49 and 50: stadium were declared unusable. A t
Page 51 and 52: For example, assume that the harm c
Page 53 and 54: Table 2.5 Concentrations Required t
Page 55 and 56: Figure 2.6 Concentrations Required
Page 57 and 58: 2.4.5 Choice of Harm Criterion Curr
Page 59 and 60: Figure 2.9 Variation in Risk of Dan
Page 61 and 62: Figure 2.10 Risk Analysis Process -
Page 63 and 64: easonable correspondence between th
Page 65 and 66: • “the possibility that the pro
Page 67 and 68: a risk analysis, and those for MHI
Page 69 and 70: 3.2.5 General Points - Recommendati
Page 71 and 72: According to reviews performed on b
Page 73 and 74: 4 REVIEW OF ASSUMPTIONS USED Table
Page 75 and 76: Table 4.1 Assumptions Used in HSE A
Page 77 and 78: Assumption Explanation Application
Page 79 and 80: Assumption Explanation Application
Page 81 and 82: 4. HSE perform further investigatio
Page 83 and 84: Risk Analysis Element Review Approa
Page 85 and 86: 9. HSE continues to perform researc
Page 87 and 88: Review Area Specific Subjects Revie
Page 89 and 90: Table 5.3 Summary of Review Finding
Page 91: 5.3.2 Recommendation It is recommen
Page 95 and 96: Table A1.1 Accidents Reported to th
Page 97 and 98: Date Description Effect Accident Ty
show all

A review of HSE's risk analysis and protection-based analysis ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?