10.01.2013 Views

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mechanisms there is little possibility for <strong>in</strong>terpretive read<strong>in</strong>g. In some cases, a slight decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

susceptibility to all qu<strong>in</strong>olones is observed, but <strong>in</strong> others a <strong>gr</strong>eater decrease <strong>in</strong> susceptibility to<br />

fluoroqu<strong>in</strong>olones than that observed with nalidixic acid can be seen [90-92].<br />

Future of expert rules and conclud<strong>in</strong>g remarks<br />

<strong>Expert</strong> rules were designed to assist cl<strong>in</strong>ical microbiologists <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of antimicrobial<br />

susceptibility test<strong>in</strong>g results. The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of these rules has been to modify the cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation after apply<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>t criteria. In most <strong>in</strong>stances, susceptible or<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>terpretations are modified to resistant due to the demonstration of the<br />

presence of a resistance mechanism that has cl<strong>in</strong>ical implications. These modifications are<br />

supported by cl<strong>in</strong>ical evidence and/or microbiological knowledge. Modifications can also imply,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g with the def<strong>in</strong>ition of cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts, that the breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts used are not optimal and<br />

thus require the support of an expert rule.<br />

The current <strong>EUCAST</strong> process allows for revision of cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts. Revised<br />

breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts can be shown to be more precise <strong>in</strong> the correlation of MIC values with expected<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical outcomes. Sett<strong>in</strong>g appropriate cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts may make some of previously def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

expert rules unnecessary, as well as result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> modification or reword<strong>in</strong>g of other rules. This has<br />

been the case for the ESBL expert rule which is no longer necessary when us<strong>in</strong>g the revised<br />

cephalospor<strong>in</strong> breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, it is necessary to stress that cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts, as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>EUCAST</strong>, do not aim<br />

to detect all resistance mechanisms that might be present <strong>in</strong> the bacteria. Rather, they have been<br />

developed to predict the outcome of antimicrobial treatment of <strong>in</strong>fected patients based on<br />

microbiological, Pk/Pd and cl<strong>in</strong>ical criteria. It is also important to note that <strong>EUCAST</strong> expert rules<br />

should be used with <strong>EUCAST</strong> breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts and may not be applicable if other breakpo<strong>in</strong>t systems<br />

are used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!