EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
mechanisms there is little possibility for <strong>in</strong>terpretive read<strong>in</strong>g. In some cases, a slight decrease <strong>in</strong><br />
susceptibility to all qu<strong>in</strong>olones is observed, but <strong>in</strong> others a <strong>gr</strong>eater decrease <strong>in</strong> susceptibility to<br />
fluoroqu<strong>in</strong>olones than that observed with nalidixic acid can be seen [90-92].<br />
Future of expert rules and conclud<strong>in</strong>g remarks<br />
<strong>Expert</strong> rules were designed to assist cl<strong>in</strong>ical microbiologists <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility test<strong>in</strong>g results. The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of these rules has been to modify the cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation after apply<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>t criteria. In most <strong>in</strong>stances, susceptible or<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>terpretations are modified to resistant due to the demonstration of the<br />
presence of a resistance mechanism that has cl<strong>in</strong>ical implications. These modifications are<br />
supported by cl<strong>in</strong>ical evidence and/or microbiological knowledge. Modifications can also imply,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g with the def<strong>in</strong>ition of cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts, that the breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts used are not optimal and<br />
thus require the support of an expert rule.<br />
The current <strong>EUCAST</strong> process allows for revision of cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts. Revised<br />
breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts can be shown to be more precise <strong>in</strong> the correlation of MIC values with expected<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>ical outcomes. Sett<strong>in</strong>g appropriate cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts may make some of previously def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
expert rules unnecessary, as well as result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> modification or reword<strong>in</strong>g of other rules. This has<br />
been the case for the ESBL expert rule which is no longer necessary when us<strong>in</strong>g the revised<br />
cephalospor<strong>in</strong> breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, it is necessary to stress that cl<strong>in</strong>ical breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts, as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>EUCAST</strong>, do not aim<br />
to detect all resistance mechanisms that might be present <strong>in</strong> the bacteria. Rather, they have been<br />
developed to predict the outcome of antimicrobial treatment of <strong>in</strong>fected patients based on<br />
microbiological, Pk/Pd and cl<strong>in</strong>ical criteria. It is also important to note that <strong>EUCAST</strong> expert rules<br />
should be used with <strong>EUCAST</strong> breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts and may not be applicable if other breakpo<strong>in</strong>t systems<br />
are used.