EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 11. Interpretive rules for macrolides, l<strong>in</strong>cosamides and strepto<strong>gr</strong>am<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Rule<br />
no.<br />
Organisms Agents tested Agents affected Rule<br />
11.1 All Erythromyc<strong>in</strong> Azithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />
clarithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />
roxithromyc<strong>in</strong><br />
11.2 Staphylococcus<br />
spp.<br />
Erythromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong><br />
IF susceptible, <strong>in</strong>termediate or<br />
resistant to erythromyc<strong>in</strong>, THEN<br />
report the same category of<br />
susceptibility for azithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />
clarithromyc<strong>in</strong>, roxithromyc<strong>in</strong> .<br />
Exceptions, scientific basis and<br />
comments<br />
Erythromyc<strong>in</strong> is the class representative<br />
for 14- and 15-membered r<strong>in</strong>g<br />
macrolides. Resistance to erythromyc<strong>in</strong> is<br />
generally due to the production of a<br />
ribosomal methylase encoded by erm<br />
genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g the macrolidel<strong>in</strong>cosamide-strepto<strong>gr</strong>am<strong>in</strong><br />
B (MLSB)<br />
phenotype or by production of an efflux<br />
pump. In both cases, there is crossresistance<br />
between erythromyc<strong>in</strong> and the<br />
other 14- and 15-membered r<strong>in</strong>g<br />
macrolides.<br />
Cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> IF resistant to erythromyc<strong>in</strong> but Staphylococci resistant to macrolides but<br />
susceptible to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>, THEN susceptible to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> produce Erm<br />
test for <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB resistance. IF ribosomal methylases conferr<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
negative, THEN report susceptible to <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB phenotype or express<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>. IF positive, THEN efflux pumps. In case of <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB report as resistant to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> or resistance, constitutively resistant<br />
report as susceptible with a warn<strong>in</strong>g mutants can be selected by cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>.<br />
that cl<strong>in</strong>ical failure dur<strong>in</strong>g treatment In the case of resistance by efflux, the<br />
with cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> may occur by risk for selection of mutants resistant to<br />
selection of constitutively resistant cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> is not <strong>gr</strong>eater than that for<br />
mutants and the use of cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> erythromyc<strong>in</strong> susceptible isolates. Both<br />
is probably best avoided <strong>in</strong> severe cl<strong>in</strong>ical failures and successes with<br />
<strong>in</strong>fections.<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> have been reported for<br />
Evidence<br />
<strong>gr</strong>ade<br />
C [59]<br />
References<br />
B [59,60]