10.01.2013 Views

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

EUCAST Expert Rules in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - eibne.gr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 11. Interpretive rules for macrolides, l<strong>in</strong>cosamides and strepto<strong>gr</strong>am<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Rule<br />

no.<br />

Organisms Agents tested Agents affected Rule<br />

11.1 All Erythromyc<strong>in</strong> Azithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

clarithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

roxithromyc<strong>in</strong><br />

11.2 Staphylococcus<br />

spp.<br />

Erythromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong><br />

IF susceptible, <strong>in</strong>termediate or<br />

resistant to erythromyc<strong>in</strong>, THEN<br />

report the same category of<br />

susceptibility for azithromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

clarithromyc<strong>in</strong>, roxithromyc<strong>in</strong> .<br />

Exceptions, scientific basis and<br />

comments<br />

Erythromyc<strong>in</strong> is the class representative<br />

for 14- and 15-membered r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

macrolides. Resistance to erythromyc<strong>in</strong> is<br />

generally due to the production of a<br />

ribosomal methylase encoded by erm<br />

genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g the macrolidel<strong>in</strong>cosamide-strepto<strong>gr</strong>am<strong>in</strong><br />

B (MLSB)<br />

phenotype or by production of an efflux<br />

pump. In both cases, there is crossresistance<br />

between erythromyc<strong>in</strong> and the<br />

other 14- and 15-membered r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

macrolides.<br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> IF resistant to erythromyc<strong>in</strong> but Staphylococci resistant to macrolides but<br />

susceptible to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>, THEN susceptible to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> produce Erm<br />

test for <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB resistance. IF ribosomal methylases conferr<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

negative, THEN report susceptible to <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB phenotype or express<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>. IF positive, THEN efflux pumps. In case of <strong>in</strong>ducible MLSB report as resistant to cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> or resistance, constitutively resistant<br />

report as susceptible with a warn<strong>in</strong>g mutants can be selected by cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong>.<br />

that cl<strong>in</strong>ical failure dur<strong>in</strong>g treatment In the case of resistance by efflux, the<br />

with cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> may occur by risk for selection of mutants resistant to<br />

selection of constitutively resistant cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> is not <strong>gr</strong>eater than that for<br />

mutants and the use of cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> erythromyc<strong>in</strong> susceptible isolates. Both<br />

is probably best avoided <strong>in</strong> severe cl<strong>in</strong>ical failures and successes with<br />

<strong>in</strong>fections.<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>damyc<strong>in</strong> have been reported for<br />

Evidence<br />

<strong>gr</strong>ade<br />

C [59]<br />

References<br />

B [59,60]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!