10.01.2013 Views

HKMagazine_974

HKMagazine_974

HKMagazine_974

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BACKUP<br />

First Person<br />

Stephen Fisher, the former director of the Social Welfare Department, was a civil servant<br />

for three decades until he retired in 2009. Unlike many of his former colleagues, Fisher enjoys<br />

a reputation as an official who truly cares about the community. Last year, he came out of<br />

retirement to take up the position of director general at Oxfam Hong Kong. He discusses social<br />

justice with Grace Tsoi.<br />

46 HK MAGAZINE FRIDAY, JANUARY 11, 2013<br />

My [British] great-grandfather was<br />

a civil servant at the Sanitation Board<br />

[the predecessor of the Food and<br />

Environmental Hygiene Department]<br />

when he came to Hong Kong in the 1890s.<br />

There were only four senior sanitation<br />

inspectors in the city at that time: Hong<br />

Kong East, Hong Kong West, Kowloon East<br />

and Kowloon West. When he arrived, the<br />

New Territories had not been leased to the<br />

Brits yet. He was the inspector of Hong<br />

Kong West.<br />

According to documents that we dug<br />

out, it seems that my great-grandfather<br />

had some flair for languages. He claimed to<br />

speak Cantonese and the Hakka language.<br />

My grandfather was born in Hong Kong and<br />

married a local Chinese woman. My mother<br />

was also a local Chinese.<br />

The public and the government have<br />

different ways of assessing civil servants.<br />

You have a choice to be either the people’s<br />

servant or the officials’ servant.<br />

I did not consider leaving the<br />

government in the last years because<br />

I had to think in terms of my pension<br />

[chuckles]. I survived the system—<br />

I worked in the government for 30 years.<br />

I was not at the very top, but I was<br />

promoted six, seven times. But do the<br />

people at the very top recognize me as<br />

one of them? The answer is no.<br />

Most civil servants do not quite agree<br />

with the things their seniors ask them to do.<br />

It’s a fact of life.<br />

XKCD<br />

RANDALL MUNROE<br />

You have<br />

a choice to be either<br />

the people’s servant<br />

or the officials’<br />

servant.<br />

A lot of people say that we need<br />

professionals in the government. I don’t<br />

think it really works that way.<br />

Most of us are like salesmen—it doesn’t<br />

matter if it’s a policy or a bar of soap. A<br />

technical expert may not have selling skills,<br />

so I think there is no problem with the<br />

rotation system [administrative officers in the<br />

Hong Kong government that are picked to<br />

be promoted to senior positions are rotated<br />

through various government departments,<br />

regardless of their background].<br />

The rules of the government are very<br />

clear. But the problem is whether you want<br />

to play by those rules. If you follow, your<br />

colleagues and seniors will treat you well,<br />

and you will be promoted to a certain post—<br />

say, permanent secretary.<br />

The rules include keeping quiet and<br />

cooperating with other government<br />

departments. If you always challenge the<br />

rules, there will be problems.<br />

After joining Oxfam, I learnt a few<br />

words such as “core values.” When I was<br />

interviewing for the job, the staff there joined<br />

in on two sessions. They had a say in who<br />

was going to be their director general. This<br />

would not happen anywhere else.<br />

I have been appointed to the<br />

Commission on Poverty. It’s rather<br />

interesting, because I was the secretary<br />

to the previous commission and now I am<br />

sitting on the other side. Are they afraid<br />

of me? They [government officials] cannot<br />

assume that their use of technical jargon<br />

will scare non-professional members. I know<br />

exactly where the terms come from and<br />

what they are thinking.<br />

In my opinion, statistical indicators<br />

such as Gini coefficient have to be measured<br />

over time, and Hong Kong’s Gini coefficient<br />

has been on the rise in the past ten years.<br />

In the past decade, the income<br />

for management positions has been<br />

continuously increasing. But for the bottom<br />

ten percent, their income has not risen.<br />

In fact, some even have a smaller<br />

income. The income inequality has been<br />

aggravated, no matter how you measure it.<br />

If you believe in “big market, small<br />

government,” the market will inevitably<br />

take over some of the government’s<br />

functions. If the market has too much<br />

influence, the government cannot allow it<br />

to fail because it is too big. For example<br />

in the United States and the United<br />

Kingdom, the governments cannot allow<br />

the collapse of banks. Therefore, these<br />

institutions have disproportionate influence<br />

on the government.<br />

In Hong Kong, we have a new term<br />

[to describe the situation]: property<br />

hegemony. Even though the government<br />

wants to regulate the property market,<br />

it is too difficult. The developers are not<br />

only powerful in Hong Kong, they are also<br />

powerful in Beijing. Flats are ridiculously<br />

expensive in Hong Kong but there’s nothing<br />

you can do.<br />

The business sector keeps saying that<br />

the government does not need to do<br />

anything, and problems will be resolved by<br />

economic development: a bigger pie will<br />

make a bigger slice for everyone. Let me tell<br />

you that the slicing is not equitable. A bigger<br />

economic pie does not always translate into<br />

bigger slices for everyone.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!