12.01.2013 Views

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sonate</strong> <strong>auf</strong> <strong>Concertenart</strong>, p. 17<br />

of each of the Venetian concertos that Bach transcribed for keyboard, but these show<br />

considerable variety in modulating schemes and other details, as well as in the degree to which the<br />

ritornello actually returns as a unit. 49<br />

Unfortunately, not a single composing score survives for any of the works most frequently<br />

cited as <strong>Sonate</strong>n <strong>auf</strong> <strong>Concertenart</strong>: the sonatas in B minor and A major for flute and cembalo,<br />

BWV 1030 and 1032; the G-minor sonata for viola da gamba and keyboard, BWV 1029; and the<br />

organ sonata in G, BWV 530. <strong>The</strong>se survive only in fair-copy autographs (Reinschriften) or late<br />

copies. Equally relevant here are the concertos themselves, which survive only in Reinschriften or<br />

revision copies, sets of parts, and copies. As a result, we do not know the original titles, dates of<br />

composition, or instrumental settings for any of these works. It seems certain, however, that Bach<br />

had written a substantial portion of his surviving output of concertos by the early 1720s--in other<br />

words, before the hardening of genre definitions alluded to above. In addition to the Brandenburg<br />

Concertos, whose fair-copy dedication score dates from 1721, it is likely that by that date Bach<br />

had also written other concertos. Direct evidence for this is scant, but the view is supported by<br />

50<br />

arguments from style and internal evidence; the concerto-like opening movements of a number<br />

of cantatas date from as early as 1713.<br />

For example, Klaus Hofmann has argued convincingly that the Second Brandenburg<br />

Concerto is a quintet--that is, a work for four melody instruments and continuo--expanded by the<br />

51<br />

addition of ripieno string parts. If so, the work was originally similar in instrumentation to<br />

compositions by Vivaldi, Telemann, and others that are found under both titles sonata and<br />

reference to such a form in instrumental music appears to be that of Scheibe, more detailed<br />

accounts being given by Johann Joachim Quantz, Versuch einer Anweisung das Flöte traversiere<br />

zu spielen (Berlin, 1752), and Joseph Riepel, Anfangsgründe zur musikalischen Setzkunst.<br />

49<br />

For example, in Vivaldi's op. 3, no. 9 (model for BWV 972), neither quick movement<br />

ever restates its opening ritornello.<br />

50<br />

That at least one of Bach's violin concertos had been composed and was in circulation<br />

by 1726 is evident from a list of pieces acquired by the Ulm Collegium Musicum during the 1725-<br />

6 season; see Adelheid Krause-Pichler, Jakob Friedrich Kleinknecht 1722-1794: Ein Komponist<br />

zwischen Barock und Klassik (Weißenhorn: Konrad, 1991), 223-4. That the "Bach" who wrote<br />

o<br />

the "Conc. a viol: Pr: 3. V.V.A. viol . obl. et B" was Johann Sebastian is implied by the presence<br />

of a "Concerto Großo" by "Bach" of "Lipsia" in the next season's list.<br />

51<br />

Klaus Hofmann, "Zur Fassungsgeschichte des 2. Brandenburgische Konzerts," in Bachs<br />

Orchesterwerke: Bericht über das 1. Dortmunder Bach-Symposion 1996, ed. Martin Geck and<br />

Werner Breig (Witten: Klangfarben, 1997), 185-92. Hofmann has edited this version as Johann<br />

Sebastian Bach: Concerto da camera F-dur: Rekonstruktion nach dem Zweiten<br />

Brandenburgischen Konzert BWV 1047 (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!