12.01.2013 Views

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

The Sonate auf Concertenart: A Postmodern Invention? David ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sonate</strong> <strong>auf</strong> <strong>Concertenart</strong>, p. 21<br />

Movement 2 of TWV 43:d2 opens with a substantial passage for the full ensemble, in<br />

which all parts participate in the motivic work. After a cadence in the tonic, there follows an<br />

episode in which the two violins exchange new, somewhat more lively, leaping and running<br />

figuration, leading to a partial restatement of the opening section in the relative major. <strong>The</strong><br />

process repeats itself two or three more times. One of the work's two manuscript sources<br />

designates it a concerto, leaving no question that it was regarded as such by at least one reliable<br />

eighteenth-century witness: none less than the composer Christoph Graupner. 62<br />

<strong>The</strong> same might be said for each of the concertos in Telemann's Six concerts et six suites<br />

(Hamburg, 1734), which are playable both as trios with continuo and as duos for flute and<br />

obbligato keyboard. Concert no. 5 in B minor, TWV 42:h1, has become something of an<br />

archetype for the <strong>Sonate</strong> <strong>auf</strong> <strong>Concertenart</strong>, having served as an example in analyses by Swack,<br />

63<br />

Zohn, and Dreyfus (ex. 3). <strong>The</strong> latter finds that here "the identities of Telemann's ritornellos and<br />

episodes are . . . too close for comfort"; that is, they are insufficiently distinct in style. But this<br />

could not be said of many other examples by the composer, including the fourth movement of<br />

Concert no. 6 from the same set (TWV 42:a2), which ingeniously combines elements of fugue,<br />

ritornello design, and Sonata mit zwei <strong>The</strong>mata (see below). In most cases, however, any apparent<br />

distinction between "tutti" and "solo" roles for two upper parts dissolves in the course of a given<br />

movement. What, then, justified the generic identification as a concert?<br />

64 65<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence of one quasi-ritornello form within each of these works--or within the earlier<br />

concerto TWV 43:d2--seems a relatively weak distinguishing feature when the complete<br />

four-movement design of each is taken into consideration. <strong>The</strong> overall design and style are not<br />

otherwise very different from those of some of Telemann's other concertos and sonatas. For<br />

example, in the early quartet TWV 43:G5 the second movement is not a ritornello form but a<br />

so-called concertante fugue with soloistic episodes. Its last movement employs some of the<br />

phraseology of a ritornello form, including an opening tutti followed by exchanges of material<br />

between the two violins, as occurs in some concerto movements--but it is a sonata form (i.e., a<br />

62<br />

Zohn "<strong>The</strong> Ensemble Sonatas," speaks of this movement as a sort of double concerto<br />

(with two solo violin parts).<br />

63<br />

Swack, "On the Origins," 387-9; Zohn, "<strong>The</strong> Ensemble Sonatas," 474-5; and Dreyfus,<br />

Bach and the Patterns, 112-6.<br />

64<br />

As Swack argues in the case of the first movement of Telemann's B-minor Concert ("On<br />

the Origins," 387-9). Zohn and Dreyfus both analyze the latter, revealing substantially different<br />

views of what constitutes a "ritornello formation" (Dreyfus's term, Bach and the Patterns, table<br />

4.2 [p. 115]; cf. Zohn, "<strong>The</strong> Ensemble Sonatas," pp. 474-5).<br />

65 <strong>The</strong>re seems no reason to suppose that the French word concert carried implications<br />

other than the Italian concerto.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!