download deliverable - AIDE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AIDE D4.1.6 Final Activity Report PU Contract N. IST-1-507674-IP WP 2.2 Off-line workload assessment WP 2.1 Final AIDE evaluation methodology WP 2.3 Risk (reduction) estimate WP 2.4 Evaluation of SP3 prototypes Figure 10 – Graphical illustration of the relation between the different work packages of SP2 8.2.2 Report per work package 8.2.2.1 WP2.0 Sub-project 2 Technical Coordination Work package no. WP2.0 Work package name Sub-project 2 Technical Coordination Objectives (from Description of Work) Work package leader TNO Other contractors involved Technical coordination for the sub-project. BMW 8.2.2.1.1 Work performed and key results obtained This involved the everyday leadership and coordination of the SP activities. Furthermore in this WP we liaise and interface the sub-project to the other sub-projects, other IP’s, NoE Humanist, and the IP management. 8.2.2.1.2 Discussion and self assessment: results versus objectives and state-of-the-art Quite some effort was directed to interaction on final evaluation (interaction) and involvement in dissemination support (SP4). In general given the prevailing level of professionalism among the partners participating in the SP these activities went mostly smoothly. 08/10/2008 40 VTEC
AIDE D4.1.6 Final Activity Report PU Contract N. IST-1-507674-IP 8.2.2.2 WP2.1 Generic Evaluation Methodology Work package no. Work package name Objectives (from Description of Work) Work package leader Other contractors involved Deliverables generated WP2.1 Generic Evaluation Methodology The general objective of this WP is to develop a generic and cost efficient methodology for industrial human factors safety evaluation of integrated IVIS and ADAS. A particular goal is to link this methodology to the design goals formulated in the European Statement of Principles (ESoP). CRF BASt, BMW, Bosch, Cidaut, USTUTT, ICCS, INRETS, CERTH/HIT, REGIENOV, VTEC No. Title Dissemination level D2.1.1 Review of existing Tools and Methods D2.1.2 Review and Taxonomy of IVIS/ADAS applications D2.1.3 Considerations on Test Scenarios D2.1.4 Specification of AIDE methodology 8.2.2.2.1 Work performed and key results obtained Lead contractor PU CRF 6 PP CRF 6 PU CRF 21 PP BMW 50 Delivery month This WP set out to specify the generic evaluation methodology proper. For a part, this relied on results from two WPs (2.2, 2.3) that dealt with two separate, major chunks that should form part of any methodology. Within the WP itself, activities first focused on the definition of IVIS/ADAS taxonomy and the resulting definition of the scenarios to be applied in evaluation studies. This was then bundled with the WP 2.2 and 2.3 results, delivering a set of reasonable candidate methodologies. A coordinated set of empirical studies comparing candidate evaluation methodologies was then performed so as to study the sensitivity and validity of these for AIDE conditions. On the basis of the conclusions from these studies the final methodology was then specified and reported in D 2.1.4. The methodology comprises the following steps: 1. Define aims 2. Describe system 3. Define scenario 4. Define sample 5. Define parameters and instruments 6. Define study design 08/10/2008 41 VTEC
Page 1 and 2: AIDE D4.1.6 Final Activity Report P
Page 39: AIDE D4.1.6 Final Activity Report P
Page 91 and 92:
AIDE D4.1.6 Final Activity Report P
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95:
show all

download deliverable - AIDE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?