15.01.2013 Views

Urquhart et al. 2010. - Australia Telescope Compact Array - Australia ...

Urquhart et al. 2010. - Australia Telescope Compact Array - Australia ...

Urquhart et al. 2010. - Australia Telescope Compact Array - Australia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characterisation of the Mopra Radio <strong>Telescope</strong> at 16–50 GHz 327<br />

Figure 5 Maps of the telescope beam produced from observations<br />

of Jupiter using the 7-mm receiver. Each map covers a 2 GHz frequency<br />

window and are separated by a 2 GHz interv<strong>al</strong> through the<br />

30–50 GHz frequency range of the 7-mm receiver. Contours have<br />

been added to illustrate the shape of the beam at the various frequencies;<br />

these start at 10% of the peak emission and increase in<br />

steps of 20%.<br />

For compact sources with a uniform brightness temperature<br />

the equation above simplifies to:<br />

T ∗ �<br />

plan<strong>et</strong><br />

A = ηmb<br />

Pn(θ, φ) d�<br />

�<br />

mb Pn(θ,<br />

�plan<strong>et</strong><br />

TB = ηmb TB,<br />

φ) d�<br />

�mb<br />

(3)<br />

where �plan<strong>et</strong> is the solid angle of the plan<strong>et</strong> at the time<br />

of the observations, and �mb is the telescope main beam<br />

solid angle. ηmb is referred to as the main beam efficiency<br />

and is defined as the ratio of the tot<strong>al</strong> measured power<br />

within the telescope’s main beam, and tot<strong>al</strong> measured<br />

power integrated over the full sphere of 4π, i.e.:<br />

�<br />

mb<br />

ηmb =<br />

Pn(θ, φ) d�<br />

�<br />

4π Pn(θ,<br />

. (4)<br />

φ) d�<br />

The ratio of plan<strong>et</strong>ary and main beam solid angles<br />

shown in the right hand side of Equation 3 consists of<br />

two important correction factors: beam dilution, f , which<br />

reduces the expected antenna temperature and can be<br />

large if the angular size of the main beam is much larger<br />

than angular size of the plan<strong>et</strong>; and the coupling coefficient,<br />

K, which corrects for the antenna’s response for<br />

the non-pointlike plan<strong>et</strong>ary disk. Beam dilution is simply<br />

the ratio of the area of the plan<strong>et</strong>ary disk, π/4 × D2 plan<strong>et</strong> ,<br />

where Dplan<strong>et</strong> is the angular diam<strong>et</strong>er of the plan<strong>et</strong>, and<br />

the telescope’s main beam, 1.133 × θ2 mb , such that:<br />

f −1 = D2 plan<strong>et</strong><br />

θ2 ln 2, (5)<br />

mb<br />

and K can be c<strong>al</strong>culated following Baars (1973) equation<br />

12:<br />

K =<br />

x 2<br />

1 − exp(−x 2 )<br />

Dplan<strong>et</strong> √<br />

where x = ln 2. (6)<br />

θmb<br />

Both correction factors K and f have been derived<br />

using the angular diam<strong>et</strong>er of the plan<strong>et</strong> at the time of<br />

the observation, and the FWHM of the telescopes main<br />

beam has been derived from a Gaussian fit to the azimuth<strong>al</strong><br />

radi<strong>al</strong> profiles of the Jupiter maps (i.e., using Equation 1).<br />

The derived v<strong>al</strong>ues of K and f and the angular size of the<br />

plan<strong>et</strong> at the time of the various observations are presented<br />

in columns 3, 4 and 5 of Table 3, respectively.<br />

The frequency-dependent brightness temperature of<br />

Jupiter is derived from the model of de Pater & Massie<br />

(1985), which gives the physic<strong>al</strong> temperature, Tphys. The<br />

plan<strong>et</strong>’s brightness temperature is obtained by applying<br />

the Rayleigh-Jeans correction, TB = Tphys − hν<br />

2k . The<br />

plan<strong>et</strong>s physic<strong>al</strong> temperature and Rayleigh-Jeans correction<br />

are given in this form in column 6 in Table 3.<br />

The correction is ∼0.5 and 1 K for the 12- and 7mm<br />

receiver ranges respectively. This model has been<br />

adopted because it yields brightness temperatures at <strong>al</strong>l<br />

frequencies and is <strong>al</strong>so used for c<strong>al</strong>ibration at the ATCA.<br />

The model is quite consistent with recent broadband<br />

measurements of the brightness temperature of Jupiter:<br />

152 ± 5 K at 32 GHz (6 GHz bandwidth, Mason <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!