16.01.2013 Views

Download Full Paper - EGOS

Download Full Paper - EGOS

Download Full Paper - EGOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

While looking at the standard mediators of the case organization and their institutionalization<br />

in roles and organizational sub-units, researchers of technology-use can also draw conclusions<br />

from the alignment research stream where “the question of stability and change in role<br />

relationships” is investigated and therefore “the use of a technology might alter or confirm an<br />

existing social order” (Leonardi & Barley 2010, p.25). The alignment to the new standards in<br />

our case company led to the creation of new roles and a whole new department. As we found<br />

out, standard-mediators stand for the transition from enactment to alignment. In the beginning<br />

they were simple but already experienced users and therefore enacted an implicit structuring<br />

process. The transition from implicit to explicit structuring was accomplished when these<br />

users were selected to exercise the new role as standard-mediators. This argumentation is<br />

supported by the findings of Yates et al. (1999) on implicit and explicit structuring of<br />

mediators of an electronic communication media.<br />

Another correlation can be found while observing the different development steps from<br />

implicit structuring, to first a small project and finally a process group while dealing first only<br />

with CMMI in a single organizational unit and then expanding the responsibilities over to<br />

other standards and other organizational units and in the end the whole organization.<br />

Orlikowski (1996) and Leonardi (2007) described these steps as “a phased sequence of<br />

emergent and cumulative changes” (Leonardi & Barley 2010, p.28) and by that emphasized<br />

the relationship between enactment and alignment. We fully support this description and<br />

showed evidence for the 'world of standards' with our findings.<br />

However, whether a standard is experienced as coercive or enabling depends on various<br />

contextual factors like, for instance, support-giving or support-providing norms, the self-<br />

conception of mediators, the concrete interpretation of a standard or, as shown in another<br />

study, the appropriation of standards (Gey 2011). The same line of thought can be applied to<br />

the experience of the whole standard landscape within an organization or experiences with the<br />

standard script as the organization-wide process reference and outcome of the standard-<br />

mediation. At A-Suppliers the support from the higher management as well as from the board<br />

<strong>Full</strong> paper GEY & FRIED <strong>EGOS</strong> conference 2012, Sub-theme 15 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!