16.01.2013 Views

The Ninth and Tenth Pugwash Quinquennia 1997–2007

The Ninth and Tenth Pugwash Quinquennia 1997–2007

The Ninth and Tenth Pugwash Quinquennia 1997–2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GOALS OF PUGWASH IN ITS TENTH QUINQUENNIUM, 2002-2007<br />

At the beginning of each quinquennium, the <strong>Pugwash</strong><br />

Council issues a statement relating the enduring mission<br />

<strong>and</strong> objectives of <strong>Pugwash</strong> to its evolving agenda in the<br />

context of recent international developments. <strong>The</strong><br />

following contains the goals of <strong>Pugwash</strong> for its <strong>Tenth</strong><br />

Quinquennium, from 2002 to 2007, adopted at a plenary<br />

session of the 52nd <strong>Pugwash</strong> Conference at the University<br />

of California, San Diego, in August 2002.<br />

************************<br />

<strong>The</strong> overriding peril which preoccupied the founders<br />

of <strong>Pugwash</strong> in 1955-1957, <strong>and</strong> which has claimed<br />

much of the attention of <strong>Pugwash</strong> participants in<br />

the intervening 45 years, is the danger posed to humanity<br />

by the vast destructive power of nuclear weapons, the<br />

accumulation of these weapons in huge numbers in the<br />

arsenals of the United States <strong>and</strong> Russia, <strong>and</strong> their spread<br />

into the possession of the United Kingdom, France, China,<br />

India, Pakistan <strong>and</strong> Israel. To these ongoing challenges<br />

must now be added the increased threats posed by the<br />

possible acquisition <strong>and</strong> use of weapons of mass destruction<br />

by other states <strong>and</strong> by non-state groups.<br />

<strong>Pugwash</strong> is strongly committed to the goal of abolishing<br />

all nuclear weapons. It is imperative that <strong>Pugwash</strong><br />

constantly remind the international community of the<br />

immorality, illegality, <strong>and</strong> peril inherent in nuclear<br />

weapons, <strong>and</strong> to propose concrete steps towards their<br />

elimination.<br />

Despite promising steps in the early 1990s to reduce<br />

the numbers of nuclear weapons, more recent developments<br />

give rise to serious concern about a reversal in this<br />

process of controlling, reducing <strong>and</strong> abolishing nuclear<br />

weapons. <strong>The</strong> nuclear peril, while somewhat abated,<br />

nonetheless persists:<br />

• in the tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s of weapons still deployed (many<br />

in rapid response alert),<br />

• in doctrines calling for the first use of nuclear weapons,<br />

<strong>and</strong> also for the possible use of nuclear weapons against<br />

non-nuclear countries,<br />

• in the presence of nuclear weapons in regions having a<br />

significant risk of conflict<br />

4 <strong>Pugwash</strong> Newsletter SPECIAL EDITION, October 2007<br />

• in the risk of the further spread of nuclear weapons,<br />

• in the risk of theft of nuclear weapons or nuclearweapons<br />

material from widely dispersed <strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />

inadequately guarded stockpiles,<br />

• in the risk of the use of nuclear weapons by international<br />

terrorist groups,<br />

• in the development of new types of nuclear weapons,<br />

that may call for the resumption of nuclear tests,<br />

• in the challenge to arms control <strong>and</strong> strategic stability<br />

posed by the development of missile defenses <strong>and</strong> the<br />

deployment of new types of weapons.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole system of nuclear arms control is, moreover,<br />

under strain, with treaties that are renounced by one<br />

party (the ABM Treaty), treaties that are not ratified<br />

(Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty), proposed treaties where<br />

no apparent progress is made (Fissile Material Cutoff<br />

Treaty), <strong>and</strong> commitments for nuclear arms control <strong>and</strong><br />

disarmament, such as the 13 steps of the 2000 NPT<br />

Review Conference, that are assumed but largely disregarded<br />

in practice. Most importantly, the implementation<br />

of Article VI of the NPT that m<strong>and</strong>ates nuclear disarmament<br />

is far from being the basis of the policy of the nuclear<br />

powers.<br />

Thus the <strong>Pugwash</strong> goal of reducing <strong>and</strong> eliminating the<br />

nuclear peril will be more important than ever in the <strong>Tenth</strong><br />

Quinquennium. Specific points on the <strong>Pugwash</strong> agenda<br />

will include prescriptions for much deeper cuts in nuclear<br />

arsenals, for the effective dismantlement of retired<br />

warheads, for much greater transparency <strong>and</strong> control of<br />

all the deployed forces <strong>and</strong> warheads in storage, for<br />

stronger non-proliferation measures <strong>and</strong> verification, especially<br />

regarding the safety of nuclear materials, for fast<br />

disposal of fissile material, for the entry into force of the<br />

nuclear test ban, for a stop to the production of new<br />

weapons <strong>and</strong> new weapon-grade material, <strong>and</strong> for the<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>onment of nuclear policies that allow an early use or<br />

a first use of nuclear weapons. <strong>Pugwash</strong> will also consider<br />

as an essential element of the non-proliferation agenda the<br />

prevention of the proliferation of expertise, where nuclear<br />

weapons experts may be induced to work for countries or<br />

subnational groups wishing to acquire nuclear weapons

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!