Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As we saw previously, the optimal control-showing<br />
scale for 21-22 RCP is: one step, 6 or fewer controls;<br />
two steps, 7 controls; three steps, 8 controls; etc. Let<br />
us consider possible sequences with these seven<br />
responding hands:<br />
♠ K 10 x x A x Q J x x ♣ x x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
3NT 1 Pass 2<br />
1. 6 or fewer controls.<br />
2. We lack 10 combined controls.<br />
♠ K 10 x x A x K 10 x x ♣ x x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
3NT 1 4 2<br />
4NT 3 Pass 4<br />
1. 6 or fewer controls.<br />
2. If you have 6 controls we have at least 10. I have<br />
biddable diamonds but not biddable clubs.<br />
3. I don't have 6 controls (or, less likely, I have no<br />
suit to show).<br />
4. Sorry<br />
♠ K 10 x x x K x x x K Q ♣ x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
4♣ 1 4 2<br />
5♣ 3 5♠ 4<br />
Whatever 5<br />
1. 7 controls.<br />
2. I have biddable hearts but not biddable diamonds,<br />
and we have at least 10 controls.<br />
3. I have biddable clubs but not biddable spades.<br />
4. Since I know you don't have four spades, I'm<br />
showing five (I have, therefore, 5-4-2-2).<br />
5. This looks to me like the best contract.<br />
♠ K 10 x x K x x x K Q x ♣ x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
4♣ 1 4 2<br />
5 3 or<br />
6 4<br />
1. 7 controls.<br />
2. We're OK for controls; I have biddable hearts but<br />
not biddable diamonds.<br />
3. I have four hearts, but only one top honor.<br />
4. I have four hearts with two top honors.<br />
♠ K 10 x K x x x x K J 10 ♣ x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
4♣ 1 4 2<br />
5♣ 3 5 4<br />
5NT 5<br />
1. 7 controls.<br />
2. Controls OK; my hearts are biddable, but not my<br />
diamonds.<br />
3. How about clubs?<br />
4. No club fit, but I do have five hearts.<br />
5. That's not enough.<br />
♠ Q 10 x x x K x K Q 10 x ♣ J x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
4♣ 1 4NT 2<br />
Pass 3<br />
1. 7 controls.<br />
2. That's not enough – I hoped you could show 8 or 9.<br />
3. You're the boss.<br />
♠ Q x x K J 9 x 10 x ♣ J x x<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
2NT 3♠<br />
4♣ 1 4 2<br />
4♠ or 4NT 3 5NT 4<br />
1. 7 controls.<br />
2. What about hearts?<br />
3. No heart fit; either we may have a spade fit, or<br />
I've discovered that we can't have a 4-4 suit fit.<br />
4. Even though we have no suit fit, bid six notrump<br />
if you have a maximum.<br />
SUPERCONFI<br />
By Dr. George Rosenkranz, Mexico City<br />
I<br />
n the previous article I described the CONFI (for<br />
controls, fit) convention for scientific bidding of<br />
pseudo-balanced hands (4-3-3-3, 4-4-3-2, 5-3-3-2 or<br />
5-4-2-2 suit distribution) in the small-slam or possible<br />
small-slam range opposite a limited balanced hand.<br />
Although they arise much less frequently, pseudobalanced<br />
hands in the grand slam or possible grand<br />
slam range should be considered also. Most bridge<br />
texts give either no method of bidding these hands, or<br />
a method so ambiguous as to be valueless. Through<br />
IBPA <strong>Handbook</strong> 2010 103