17.01.2013 Views

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As we saw previously, the optimal control-showing<br />

scale for 21-22 RCP is: one step, 6 or fewer controls;<br />

two steps, 7 controls; three steps, 8 controls; etc. Let<br />

us consider possible sequences with these seven<br />

responding hands:<br />

♠ K 10 x x A x Q J x x ♣ x x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

3NT 1 Pass 2<br />

1. 6 or fewer controls.<br />

2. We lack 10 combined controls.<br />

♠ K 10 x x A x K 10 x x ♣ x x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

3NT 1 4 2<br />

4NT 3 Pass 4<br />

1. 6 or fewer controls.<br />

2. If you have 6 controls we have at least 10. I have<br />

biddable diamonds but not biddable clubs.<br />

3. I don't have 6 controls (or, less likely, I have no<br />

suit to show).<br />

4. Sorry<br />

♠ K 10 x x x K x x x K Q ♣ x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

4♣ 1 4 2<br />

5♣ 3 5♠ 4<br />

Whatever 5<br />

1. 7 controls.<br />

2. I have biddable hearts but not biddable diamonds,<br />

and we have at least 10 controls.<br />

3. I have biddable clubs but not biddable spades.<br />

4. Since I know you don't have four spades, I'm<br />

showing five (I have, therefore, 5-4-2-2).<br />

5. This looks to me like the best contract.<br />

♠ K 10 x x K x x x K Q x ♣ x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

4♣ 1 4 2<br />

5 3 or<br />

6 4<br />

1. 7 controls.<br />

2. We're OK for controls; I have biddable hearts but<br />

not biddable diamonds.<br />

3. I have four hearts, but only one top honor.<br />

4. I have four hearts with two top honors.<br />

♠ K 10 x K x x x x K J 10 ♣ x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

4♣ 1 4 2<br />

5♣ 3 5 4<br />

5NT 5<br />

1. 7 controls.<br />

2. Controls OK; my hearts are biddable, but not my<br />

diamonds.<br />

3. How about clubs?<br />

4. No club fit, but I do have five hearts.<br />

5. That's not enough.<br />

♠ Q 10 x x x K x K Q 10 x ♣ J x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

4♣ 1 4NT 2<br />

Pass 3<br />

1. 7 controls.<br />

2. That's not enough – I hoped you could show 8 or 9.<br />

3. You're the boss.<br />

♠ Q x x K J 9 x 10 x ♣ J x x<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

2NT 3♠<br />

4♣ 1 4 2<br />

4♠ or 4NT 3 5NT 4<br />

1. 7 controls.<br />

2. What about hearts?<br />

3. No heart fit; either we may have a spade fit, or<br />

I've discovered that we can't have a 4-4 suit fit.<br />

4. Even though we have no suit fit, bid six notrump<br />

if you have a maximum.<br />

SUPERCONFI<br />

By Dr. George Rosenkranz, Mexico City<br />

I<br />

n the previous article I described the CONFI (for<br />

controls, fit) convention for scientific bidding of<br />

pseudo-balanced hands (4-3-3-3, 4-4-3-2, 5-3-3-2 or<br />

5-4-2-2 suit distribution) in the small-slam or possible<br />

small-slam range opposite a limited balanced hand.<br />

Although they arise much less frequently, pseudobalanced<br />

hands in the grand slam or possible grand<br />

slam range should be considered also. Most bridge<br />

texts give either no method of bidding these hands, or<br />

a method so ambiguous as to be valueless. Through<br />

IBPA <strong>Handbook</strong> 2010 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!