Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Handbook - International Bridge Press Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If the opening leader has, say, Q-9-x-x in both red<br />
suits he has to guess, since the bidding would be<br />
identical if opener's red-suit holdings were reversed. In<br />
standard methods, there would be no guess.<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
♠ A x x x ♠ K x x x<br />
Q J x K 10 x<br />
K J x Q x x x<br />
♣ A J 10 ♣ Q x<br />
Opener Responder<br />
1NT 2♣<br />
2 2<br />
2♠ 3NT<br />
Pass<br />
Responder can suggest notrump after showing his<br />
four-card spade suit, and opener can make the final<br />
decision. In standard methods, responder would have<br />
to make the decision by himself.<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
♠ Q 10 x ♠ K J x x<br />
J x x x x K Q x<br />
A Q x x<br />
♣ A K ♣ J x x x<br />
Opener Responder<br />
1NT 2♣<br />
2 4<br />
Pass<br />
Most players would probably open one notrump, after<br />
which the superior four-heart contract would not be<br />
reached in standard methods.<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
♠ x x ♠ K x x<br />
Q J x K x x x<br />
A Q 10 x x K x x<br />
♣ K Q J ♣ 10 x x<br />
Opener Responder<br />
1NT 2♣<br />
2 2♠<br />
3 Pass<br />
A deal like this came up in the LM Men's Pairs on the<br />
very first board we played this method. I held the<br />
opening hand and was concerned about the spade<br />
weakness since Steve didn't have four spades, so I<br />
tried three diamonds. Steve wisely passed, and + 110<br />
was worth 23 out of 25 match points.<br />
OPENER RESPONDER<br />
♠ A x ♠ x x<br />
A K J Q 10 x x<br />
K J x Q 10 x x x<br />
♣ 10 x x x x ♣ A x<br />
Opener Responder<br />
1NT 2♣<br />
2 2♠<br />
2NT 3<br />
4 Pass<br />
After responder's three-diamond rebid (natural, nonforcing),<br />
opener has a good picture of the hand and<br />
can gamble out a four-heart call or take a more conservative<br />
course. At any rate, a bad notrump contract<br />
is avoided.<br />
THE 1978 PRECISION AWARD<br />
Jeff Rubens (USA)<br />
THE PRECISION AWARD is for the best article or<br />
series on a system or convention. C.C. Wei, inventor<br />
of the Precision System, endows it. This years judges<br />
were Terence Reese, P.S. Gupta and Alec Traub.<br />
THE WINNER for the second time is Jeff Rubens of<br />
New York. His winning article, ‘The Two-Step’ was<br />
published in. 'The <strong>Bridge</strong> World', September 1978.<br />
Rubens previously won the Precision Award for an<br />
article, 'Three-Level Transfer Responses', published in<br />
'The <strong>Bridge</strong> World' in December 1976.<br />
The Two-Step<br />
By Jeff Rubens<br />
W<br />
ith neither side vulnerable there are two passes<br />
to you and you hold:<br />
♠ K Q x x x A J x x x x x ♣ x.<br />
As almost anyone would, you open one spade: partner<br />
responds two notrump. According to most textbooks,<br />
you should now be well placed. Partner has<br />
made a limit bid, which reputedly cures many bidding<br />
deceases single-handedly. In fact, partner has specified<br />
both his point count (11 to a bad 12) and his<br />
distribution (balanced or nearly balanced) within a very<br />
narrow range.<br />
In terms of knowledge, you are indeed very well<br />
placed. You can give good odds that the best contract<br />
is a part-score in hearts. Unfortunately, in terms of<br />
getting to the best contract, or even to a reasonable<br />
contract, you are in terrible shape. If you bid three<br />
hearts, that is forcing – so much for a heart part-score.<br />
You can choose between passing two notrump (possible<br />
survival, but an outrage against common sense)<br />
IBPA <strong>Handbook</strong> 2010 111