17.01.2013 Views

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

Handbook - International Bridge Press Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If the opening leader has, say, Q-9-x-x in both red<br />

suits he has to guess, since the bidding would be<br />

identical if opener's red-suit holdings were reversed. In<br />

standard methods, there would be no guess.<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

♠ A x x x ♠ K x x x<br />

Q J x K 10 x<br />

K J x Q x x x<br />

♣ A J 10 ♣ Q x<br />

Opener Responder<br />

1NT 2♣<br />

2 2<br />

2♠ 3NT<br />

Pass<br />

Responder can suggest notrump after showing his<br />

four-card spade suit, and opener can make the final<br />

decision. In standard methods, responder would have<br />

to make the decision by himself.<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

♠ Q 10 x ♠ K J x x<br />

J x x x x K Q x<br />

A Q x x<br />

♣ A K ♣ J x x x<br />

Opener Responder<br />

1NT 2♣<br />

2 4<br />

Pass<br />

Most players would probably open one notrump, after<br />

which the superior four-heart contract would not be<br />

reached in standard methods.<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

♠ x x ♠ K x x<br />

Q J x K x x x<br />

A Q 10 x x K x x<br />

♣ K Q J ♣ 10 x x<br />

Opener Responder<br />

1NT 2♣<br />

2 2♠<br />

3 Pass<br />

A deal like this came up in the LM Men's Pairs on the<br />

very first board we played this method. I held the<br />

opening hand and was concerned about the spade<br />

weakness since Steve didn't have four spades, so I<br />

tried three diamonds. Steve wisely passed, and + 110<br />

was worth 23 out of 25 match points.<br />

OPENER RESPONDER<br />

♠ A x ♠ x x<br />

A K J Q 10 x x<br />

K J x Q 10 x x x<br />

♣ 10 x x x x ♣ A x<br />

Opener Responder<br />

1NT 2♣<br />

2 2♠<br />

2NT 3<br />

4 Pass<br />

After responder's three-diamond rebid (natural, nonforcing),<br />

opener has a good picture of the hand and<br />

can gamble out a four-heart call or take a more conservative<br />

course. At any rate, a bad notrump contract<br />

is avoided.<br />

THE 1978 PRECISION AWARD<br />

Jeff Rubens (USA)<br />

THE PRECISION AWARD is for the best article or<br />

series on a system or convention. C.C. Wei, inventor<br />

of the Precision System, endows it. This years judges<br />

were Terence Reese, P.S. Gupta and Alec Traub.<br />

THE WINNER for the second time is Jeff Rubens of<br />

New York. His winning article, ‘The Two-Step’ was<br />

published in. 'The <strong>Bridge</strong> World', September 1978.<br />

Rubens previously won the Precision Award for an<br />

article, 'Three-Level Transfer Responses', published in<br />

'The <strong>Bridge</strong> World' in December 1976.<br />

The Two-Step<br />

By Jeff Rubens<br />

W<br />

ith neither side vulnerable there are two passes<br />

to you and you hold:<br />

♠ K Q x x x A J x x x x x ♣ x.<br />

As almost anyone would, you open one spade: partner<br />

responds two notrump. According to most textbooks,<br />

you should now be well placed. Partner has<br />

made a limit bid, which reputedly cures many bidding<br />

deceases single-handedly. In fact, partner has specified<br />

both his point count (11 to a bad 12) and his<br />

distribution (balanced or nearly balanced) within a very<br />

narrow range.<br />

In terms of knowledge, you are indeed very well<br />

placed. You can give good odds that the best contract<br />

is a part-score in hearts. Unfortunately, in terms of<br />

getting to the best contract, or even to a reasonable<br />

contract, you are in terrible shape. If you bid three<br />

hearts, that is forcing – so much for a heart part-score.<br />

You can choose between passing two notrump (possible<br />

survival, but an outrage against common sense)<br />

IBPA <strong>Handbook</strong> 2010 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!