18.01.2013 Views

Decision report- Carey's Gully Sludge Dewatering Facility - Greater ...

Decision report- Carey's Gully Sludge Dewatering Facility - Greater ...

Decision report- Carey's Gully Sludge Dewatering Facility - Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The applicant stated that there are no matters raised by the applications in<br />

relation to Section 6, due to the specific locations within which the activities<br />

take place. The landfill is completely isolated from Carey’s <strong>Gully</strong> Stream and<br />

the Owhiro Stream, so rivers and their margins are protected. The hearing<br />

panel agreed with this assessment as well as the conclusions made by the<br />

Council Officers that the proposal was consistent with Section 6(e) which<br />

provides for the relationship of Maori with ancestral lands, water, sites, waahi<br />

tapu and taonga.<br />

The hearing panel noted that the applicant and the Council Officers were<br />

generally in agreement about what the relevant matters of Section 7 were.<br />

These were identified as:<br />

(a) kaitiakitanga:<br />

(aa) the ethic of stewardship:<br />

(b) the efficient use and development of natural and physical resources:<br />

(c) the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values:<br />

(f) maintenance and enhancement of the quality of the environment:<br />

(j) the benefits to be derived from the use and development of renewable<br />

energy.<br />

The hearing panel took into account the evidence given by the applicant and<br />

the assessments of the Council Officers. They also noted that no submissions<br />

specifically addressed the relevance and consistency with the provisions of<br />

Section 7.<br />

As outlined above, the hearing panel did not consider that the application<br />

would have an adverse impact to the principle of kaitiakitanga. The hearing<br />

panel noted that the Council Officers and the applicant both agreed that the<br />

proposal was consistent with (b) and (c). Furthermore the Southern Landfill has<br />

been using the gas released from the facility to generate energy which is an<br />

efficient benefit of the proposal.<br />

The hearing panel considered that the requirement of the consent holder to<br />

comply with the conditions placed on the consent would allow for the<br />

application to be consistent with (c), (f) and (j).<br />

Section 8 of the Act requires the hearing panel to take into account the<br />

principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. All parties considered that the proposal<br />

did not raise any Treaty issues. The hearing panel concurred with this<br />

assessment and for the reasons discussed above and within the assessment of<br />

iwi issues, the proposal was seen to be consistent with Section 8.<br />

In conclusion the hearing panel determined that the proposal was consistent<br />

with Part 2 of the Act.<br />

PAGE 35 OF 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!