18.01.2013 Views

Footprints in the forest - Fern

Footprints in the forest - Fern

Footprints in the forest - Fern

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

owners association) after a third-party audit was conducted by a certification<br />

body. A prerequisite for submitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> application for <strong>the</strong> regional certification is<br />

that <strong>the</strong> applicant represents <strong>forest</strong> owners which posses at least 50% of <strong>the</strong> area<br />

of all <strong>forest</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region The audit is based on a report written by <strong>the</strong> applicant<br />

itself on <strong>the</strong> “condition of <strong>forest</strong> management” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region, which is evaluated<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> CFCS standard by <strong>the</strong> certification body. The CFCS is a system-based<br />

standard 31 . The regional certificate is issued for a period of maximum 5 years.<br />

2- Step 2: Once <strong>the</strong> regional certificate has been issued to <strong>the</strong> regional applicant,<br />

those <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>forest</strong> owners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region who want to be part of <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

certification scheme must apply to <strong>the</strong> applicant. The applicant <strong>the</strong>n decides<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r or not to accept <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional certification scheme<br />

based on an analysis of <strong>in</strong>formation provided by <strong>forest</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions (State Forests<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Czech Inspection of <strong>the</strong> Environment, etc) on <strong>the</strong> conditions of<br />

<strong>forest</strong> management as well as an optional field <strong>in</strong>spection. The option of a field<br />

visit is left to <strong>the</strong> discretion of <strong>the</strong> regional applicant based on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it is<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancially feasible. The guidel<strong>in</strong>es encourage <strong>the</strong> applicant to skip <strong>the</strong> field visit<br />

when <strong>the</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation “guarantees sufficient measure of credibility and<br />

reliability” 32 . If <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner is considered to fulfil <strong>the</strong> certification criteria by<br />

<strong>the</strong> regional applicant, a “confirmation of participation” is issued to <strong>the</strong> owner<br />

(but <strong>the</strong> certificate rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> property of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> applicant).<br />

Only <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed area of those <strong>forest</strong> owners who have been accepted <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

certification scheme is considered and counted as certified area.<br />

Refusal to a <strong>forest</strong> owner to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional certification is considered as a possible<br />

outcome of step 2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> above process. However, it was not possible to determ<strong>in</strong>e if this<br />

has occurred or not. It is unclear how easy <strong>in</strong> practice it is for <strong>forest</strong> owners to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

regional certification. Forest owners can also be expelled from a regional certification if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are found not to comply with <strong>the</strong> certification criteria dur<strong>in</strong>g sample monitor<strong>in</strong>g field<br />

visits. “Conformity with criteria on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual level is assessed periodically and can<br />

result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exclusion of <strong>the</strong> owner from <strong>the</strong> regional certification” unless <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner<br />

him/herself provides “credible evidence” of remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> elements of non-conformity 33 .<br />

No field visits will take place to check <strong>the</strong> validity of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation provided by <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>forest</strong> owner on how she/he will remove <strong>the</strong> elements of non-conformity 34 .<br />

The fact that <strong>forest</strong> owners must actively submit an application to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

certification scheme implies that all owners with<strong>in</strong> a certified region know whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are certified. The CFCS documents also stress <strong>the</strong> importance for <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

applicant to thoroughly <strong>in</strong>form all <strong>forest</strong> owners about <strong>the</strong> regional certification and<br />

participation conditions.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r:<br />

31<br />

CFCS 1002:2001 Criteria and Indicators for Susta<strong>in</strong>able Forest Management<br />

32<br />

CFCS 1006:2000 Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Participation of Individual Forest Owners <strong>in</strong> Regional<br />

Certification p6<br />

33<br />

CFCS 1001:2001<br />

34<br />

CFCS 1006:2000 p 7<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!