Footprints in the forest - Fern
Footprints in the forest - Fern
Footprints in the forest - Fern
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
owners association) after a third-party audit was conducted by a certification<br />
body. A prerequisite for submitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> application for <strong>the</strong> regional certification is<br />
that <strong>the</strong> applicant represents <strong>forest</strong> owners which posses at least 50% of <strong>the</strong> area<br />
of all <strong>forest</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region The audit is based on a report written by <strong>the</strong> applicant<br />
itself on <strong>the</strong> “condition of <strong>forest</strong> management” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region, which is evaluated<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> CFCS standard by <strong>the</strong> certification body. The CFCS is a system-based<br />
standard 31 . The regional certificate is issued for a period of maximum 5 years.<br />
2- Step 2: Once <strong>the</strong> regional certificate has been issued to <strong>the</strong> regional applicant,<br />
those <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>forest</strong> owners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region who want to be part of <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
certification scheme must apply to <strong>the</strong> applicant. The applicant <strong>the</strong>n decides<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r or not to accept <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional certification scheme<br />
based on an analysis of <strong>in</strong>formation provided by <strong>forest</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions (State Forests<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Czech Inspection of <strong>the</strong> Environment, etc) on <strong>the</strong> conditions of<br />
<strong>forest</strong> management as well as an optional field <strong>in</strong>spection. The option of a field<br />
visit is left to <strong>the</strong> discretion of <strong>the</strong> regional applicant based on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it is<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancially feasible. The guidel<strong>in</strong>es encourage <strong>the</strong> applicant to skip <strong>the</strong> field visit<br />
when <strong>the</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation “guarantees sufficient measure of credibility and<br />
reliability” 32 . If <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner is considered to fulfil <strong>the</strong> certification criteria by<br />
<strong>the</strong> regional applicant, a “confirmation of participation” is issued to <strong>the</strong> owner<br />
(but <strong>the</strong> certificate rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> property of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> applicant).<br />
Only <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed area of those <strong>forest</strong> owners who have been accepted <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
certification scheme is considered and counted as certified area.<br />
Refusal to a <strong>forest</strong> owner to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional certification is considered as a possible<br />
outcome of step 2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> above process. However, it was not possible to determ<strong>in</strong>e if this<br />
has occurred or not. It is unclear how easy <strong>in</strong> practice it is for <strong>forest</strong> owners to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
regional certification. Forest owners can also be expelled from a regional certification if<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are found not to comply with <strong>the</strong> certification criteria dur<strong>in</strong>g sample monitor<strong>in</strong>g field<br />
visits. “Conformity with criteria on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual level is assessed periodically and can<br />
result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exclusion of <strong>the</strong> owner from <strong>the</strong> regional certification” unless <strong>the</strong> <strong>forest</strong> owner<br />
him/herself provides “credible evidence” of remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> elements of non-conformity 33 .<br />
No field visits will take place to check <strong>the</strong> validity of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation provided by <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>forest</strong> owner on how she/he will remove <strong>the</strong> elements of non-conformity 34 .<br />
The fact that <strong>forest</strong> owners must actively submit an application to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
certification scheme implies that all owners with<strong>in</strong> a certified region know whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are certified. The CFCS documents also stress <strong>the</strong> importance for <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
applicant to thoroughly <strong>in</strong>form all <strong>forest</strong> owners about <strong>the</strong> regional certification and<br />
participation conditions.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r:<br />
31<br />
CFCS 1002:2001 Criteria and Indicators for Susta<strong>in</strong>able Forest Management<br />
32<br />
CFCS 1006:2000 Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Participation of Individual Forest Owners <strong>in</strong> Regional<br />
Certification p6<br />
33<br />
CFCS 1001:2001<br />
34<br />
CFCS 1006:2000 p 7<br />
14