Footprints in the forest - Fern
Footprints in the forest - Fern
Footprints in the forest - Fern
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IV. PEFC Sweden<br />
Author: Elisa Peter<br />
This text was written based on <strong>in</strong>formation provided by WWF Sweden, SSNC and PEFC<br />
Sweden (responses to <strong>the</strong> questionnaire). Literature review and an <strong>in</strong>terview with <strong>the</strong><br />
National Accreditation Body provided additional <strong>in</strong>formation. The numbered criteria refer<br />
to those <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first edition of Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Logo.<br />
Summary of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> PEFC Sweden s<strong>in</strong>ce 2001<br />
When <strong>the</strong> first edition of Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Logo was published <strong>in</strong> 2001, PEFC Sweden had only<br />
developed a <strong>forest</strong> certification standard. There were no Cha<strong>in</strong> of Custody (CoC)<br />
certification procedures and no accredited certifiers to carry out PEFC certification.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year 2001 certification bodies were accredited and umbrella organizations<br />
(Forest Owners Associations and Independent Sawmills Associations) were certified.<br />
Several CoC certificates were delivered.<br />
As of 2002, all <strong>the</strong> Forest Owners Associations and <strong>the</strong> Independent Sawmills<br />
Associations <strong>in</strong> Sweden were PEFC certified 52 .<br />
The Swedish PEFC standard has been slightly modified <strong>in</strong> 2002 as a result of a<br />
comparative study between <strong>the</strong> Swedish PEFC and FSC standards 53 , <strong>in</strong> which WWF<br />
Sweden and <strong>the</strong> Swedish Society for Nature Conservation participated. The study<br />
showed that <strong>the</strong> Swedish PEFC standard had lower demands than <strong>the</strong> FSC standard on 17<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts, while <strong>the</strong> FSC standard had lower demands on 4 po<strong>in</strong>ts 54 .<br />
The subsequent changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> PEFC standard concern <strong>the</strong> logg<strong>in</strong>g moratorium for key<br />
biotopes (<strong>in</strong> which <strong>forest</strong> owners must restra<strong>in</strong> from logg<strong>in</strong>g key biotopes on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
property until 2005, after which <strong>the</strong> key biotope protection will be conditional of State<br />
compensation), environmental evaluation rout<strong>in</strong>es and requirement for set aside areas <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn region (<strong>in</strong>creased from 3% to 5%). The changes were endorsed by <strong>the</strong> PEFC<br />
Council <strong>in</strong> April 2002 55 .<br />
52<br />
PEFC Sweden. http://www.pefc.se June 2003. Orig<strong>in</strong>al with <strong>the</strong> author.<br />
53<br />
Aulén, G. and Bleckert, S. 2002. Skogsduvan – Förslag till överbyggnadsdokument mellan svenska<br />
PEFC och FSC standarder.<br />
54<br />
Lena Dahl, WWF Sweden. Response to PEFC questionnaire. June 18, 2003.<br />
55<br />
Folke Stenström, Executive Director PEFC Sweden. Response to <strong>the</strong> PEFC questionnaire. June 23,<br />
2003<br />
20