22.01.2013 Views

A Critique of Pure (Genetic) Information

A Critique of Pure (Genetic) Information

A Critique of Pure (Genetic) Information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Chapter 3<br />

is still a central challenge. It is well established that the compartmentalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cell in general and <strong>of</strong> its messenger RNA—the legacy <strong>of</strong><br />

the maternal egg cell—is extremely influential in setting early development<br />

along a certain course. That this organization is not merely the<br />

product <strong>of</strong> nuclear inheritance but also significantly <strong>of</strong> structural inheritance<br />

is directly addressed by Grimes and Aufderheide (1991) in their<br />

extensive review <strong>of</strong> the subject:<br />

The highly organized cytoplasm <strong>of</strong> a metazoan egg, therefore, cannot be solely<br />

the consequence <strong>of</strong> direct nuclear gene activity. Given the background <strong>of</strong> information<br />

from the Cliophora, one would predict that structurally heritable information<br />

systems must be present in addition to direct nuclear (genic) control<br />

systems in the metazoa. The ciliated protozoa are a group <strong>of</strong> organisms that have<br />

made exceptional use <strong>of</strong> the posttranslational, ‘epigenetic’ systems that contribute<br />

to the localization <strong>of</strong> gene products ...Processes homologous, or at least<br />

analogous, to the directed assembly and directed patterning seen in ciliates are<br />

also functional in metazoa, and are <strong>of</strong> fundamental developmental significance<br />

(p. 67).<br />

Order from the Inheritance <strong>of</strong> Self-Sustaining Dynamics and/or the<br />

Emergence <strong>of</strong> Self-Sustaining Order for “Free”<br />

The Global View<br />

In his contribution to a fiftieth anniversary retrospective <strong>of</strong> Schrödinger’s<br />

What is Life?, Stuart Kauffman (1995) points out that the force <strong>of</strong><br />

Schrödinger’s argument was based on the assumptions <strong>of</strong> equilibrium<br />

thermodynamics held by “most physicists <strong>of</strong> his day.” Macroscopic<br />

order, in this view, is attributable to “ averages over enormous ensembles<br />

<strong>of</strong> atoms or molecules . . . not to the behavior <strong>of</strong> individual molecules.”<br />

At equilibrium the predictability <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

components in a system in relation to one another is very weak except<br />

for the case <strong>of</strong> those atoms that are held together in a crystalline array.<br />

If given the presuppositions <strong>of</strong> equilibrium statistical physics and asked<br />

to account for the stability <strong>of</strong> complex life-forms through and across generations,<br />

then it would follow that some form <strong>of</strong> solid-state structure,<br />

i.e., a crystal, and an aperiodic one to make it more interesting, must be<br />

involved. But life is not an equilibrium phenomenon, and so-called<br />

dissipative far-from-equilibrium systems are not only capable <strong>of</strong> sus-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!