CBS COLLECTION 072 UCLA - Film Score Rundowns
CBS COLLECTION 072 UCLA - Film Score Rundowns
CBS COLLECTION 072 UCLA - Film Score Rundowns
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
with the <strong>CBS</strong> material, so no “authorization” was required. Because of the potential<br />
hassles initiated by SPFM, FSM felt disinclined to publish my articles. And the<br />
interesting point is that my first two papers had nothing to do with the issues I had with<br />
the Society regarding the <strong>CBS</strong> Dats—just exclusively focused on Bernard Herrmann<br />
research. One was a fully comprehensive “Cue Inventory” of Herrmann’s music at <strong>CBS</strong>-<br />
Television. Such “politics,” petty power tactics and intimidations are unbecoming of such<br />
people (if only one or two “bad apples”) in an educational charity.<br />
It bears noting that I was informed from various parties involved that there was<br />
perhaps “dirty politics” involved with the ouster of one of the Founders of SPFM years<br />
earlier—a sort of "hostile corporate takeover,” as one central person involved described<br />
it, ousting an original Founder. I would love to read a detailed account of this dismissal<br />
if anyone has the courage to report it honestly. But at this late date, I doubt if that old<br />
dirty laundry will ever see the light (and fresh air) of day. I happened to be professionally<br />
involved with that individual because I was writing a research paper for his journal and,<br />
as given earlier, I was told by a Trustee/Officer of SPFM that such an association was<br />
construed as problematic.<br />
There is an old Soundtrack issue that includes a story titled The Society for the<br />
Preservation of <strong>Film</strong> Music, an interview conversation with that founder of the Society<br />
who was ousted. At least it gives some information and insight into the matter, and I<br />
believe it was the only source of information except perhaps for some old <strong>Film</strong>us-L<br />
archive posts (other posts—such as mine and a SPFM Founder-- were deleted by an<br />
administrator of the site who was also a Board of Director of SPFM). Unfortunately,<br />
however, <strong>Film</strong>us-L ceased to exist a few months ago. The archive is gone too but perhaps<br />
someone will eventually put it back online. At the moment I am writing this, I do not<br />
have the precise Soundtrack issue number, nor can I find a free index to the issues (the<br />
periodical ceased to exist in 2001, I believe). The xerox pages I have did not have the<br />
issue designation on the pages. But the article appears on pages 57 thru 63.<br />
On a side note, I also found it curious, for example, that grant money at the time<br />
was directed to create an “Executive Director” salaried position whose basic function was<br />
to raise money in a public relations fashion (fund-raising dinners, etc.) that smacks more<br />
of profit-making activity instead of being directed to preserve film music materials for<br />
tax-exempt purposes (and, by extension, allowing researchers to study them). The<br />
original articles of the Society had no such paying position titled “Executive Director.”<br />
The only officers were non-paying President, Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer<br />
positions. The new full-time “Executive Director” position in that 1990 and/or 1991<br />
period had a yearly salary, I understand, of about $45,000. That is a tremendous expense<br />
for such a relatively small tax-exempt entity. Currently, according to the 2010 FSM site<br />
listing of the Board of Directors, there is a “Producing Director” position. I assume this is<br />
simply a synonymous term for the previously-named “Executive Director” position (and I<br />
assume still a paid management position).<br />
162