24.01.2013 Views

STScI Annual Report 2002: A Living Mission

STScI Annual Report 2002: A Living Mission

STScI Annual Report 2002: A Living Mission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optimize Hubble science operations<br />

A Hubble servicing mission always adds complexity and challenges for operating the observatory, and<br />

SM3b, carried out in March of <strong>2002</strong>, was no exception. The Institute did much preparatory work. We<br />

took steps to accommodate the large increase in data volume we anticipated when ACS and NICMOS<br />

became active. We defined the operations to commission the new hardware and re-commission the old.<br />

We developed contingency plans for difficulties that might arise during the mission. This advanced<br />

planning paid off, and we quickly returned Hubble to science observations after SM3b.<br />

Institute staff members began supporting SM3b directly in the week prior to the shuttle launch,<br />

while observations were still underway. Because of the potential for launch delays, we generated an<br />

observing schedule that kept Hubble working whether or not the launch was on time. We achieved this by<br />

scheduling Hubble to slew briefly, once a day, to the shuttle rendezvous attitude. If the shuttle launched,<br />

we would stop observations at that point. If not, we would let Hubble slew to the next science target and<br />

resume observations. (High winds at the launch pad did delay the launch one day.)<br />

During the servicing mission, we monitored the instruments, analyzed ACS data to check performance,<br />

and verified that the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) showed no increase in electronic<br />

noise. All went well. The shuttle astronauts released Hubble as planned on March 11, which started the<br />

commissioning period, SMOV (Servicing <strong>Mission</strong> Orbital Verification).<br />

Engineering and calibration measurements dominated the first two weeks of SMOV. The purpose<br />

was to verify the performance of the observatory and the old instruments. We took care to ensure that<br />

any outgassed organic material did not polymerize and contaminate the optics, which would degrade<br />

ultraviolet performance. We resumed General Observer (GO) science observations with Wide Field<br />

Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) and STIS on March 26. Then we began to interleave the commissioning<br />

activities for the ACS and the NICMOS with its new cryocooler.<br />

The cryocooler took weeks longer than expected to reach the planned operating temperature.<br />

We moved up some ACS activities to compensate, initiating ACS science observations on April 8.<br />

After its detectors were cold, we activated and tested the NICMOS itself, which had been dormant<br />

for about 3 years.<br />

After SMOV, we started executing the Cycle 11 program. Because the Telescope Allocation<br />

Committee had selected many large programs (> 100 orbits), including three Hubble Treasury programs,<br />

the pool of observations contained many more long and/or constrained observing programs than in the<br />

past. We developed a year-long plan to accommodate<br />

these observations, which began in earnest in August with<br />

the first epoch of Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey<br />

(GOODS) observations with ACS. At year’s end, large programs<br />

dominated the Hubble schedule.<br />

A particularly challenging aspect of GOODS is the need<br />

for Target of Opportunity (ToO) follow-up observations<br />

when a type Ia supernova is detected in the ACS images.<br />

The GOODS observations are typically made at the end of a<br />

week, and the ToO team provides decisions on the following<br />

Monday or Tuesday, with any follow-up observations<br />

SMOV3b<br />

included in the following week’s schedule.<br />

Maximum possible sustained observing efficiency is 58%<br />

Figure 5 shows the scheduling efficiency in <strong>2002</strong> remained<br />

high, averaging 49.4% after the completion of SMOV.<br />

FIG 5: Weekly Scheduling Efficiency<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Jan 01 Jun 01 Jan 02 Jun 02 Jan 03<br />

scheduling week<br />

Calibrate Hubble data<br />

The Institute holds occasional Calibration Workshops for Hubble users, Institute staff, and instrument<br />

developers to exchange information about instrument characterization, calibration, and performance. In<br />

<strong>2002</strong>, we held the workshop on October 17 and 18 at the Institute. It featured reports on the commissioning<br />

of ACS and the re-commissioning of NICMOS. It included approximately 30 invited talks, 40 posters,<br />

demonstrations, and splinter meetings on various topics. About 120 astronomers attended. The workshop<br />

proceedings will be published in 2003.<br />

<strong>STScI</strong> AR 02 | A <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Mission</strong><br />

achievements<br />

achievements 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!