28.01.2013 Views

Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE). ICES CM 2004/C:05 ...

Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE). ICES CM 2004/C:05 ...

Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE). ICES CM 2004/C:05 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.7. Approximate numbers (individuals x 1000) and biomass (t<strong>on</strong>nes) of birds that breed outside NAFO subareas but enter<br />

NAFO 5 and 6 (from <strong>ICES</strong>. 2003, Table 3.4).<br />

Species Number Biomass<br />

Greater shearwater 1900 2100<br />

Sooty shearwater 410 320<br />

Wils<strong>on</strong>’s storm-petrel 600 20<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-tailed duck 230 190<br />

Black scoter 60 60<br />

Surf scoter 120 150<br />

Velvet scoter 100 130<br />

Red-breasted merganser 60 40<br />

Red-necked phalarope 250 10<br />

Grey phalarope 240 10<br />

B<strong>on</strong>aparte’s gull 60 10<br />

Ring-billed gull 1500 600<br />

Total 5530 3640<br />

5.2.3 C<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> estimates<br />

<strong>Seabird</strong>s occupying the NAFO and <strong>ICES</strong> areas of the North Atlantic c<strong>on</strong>sume an estimated 11.5 milli<strong>on</strong> t<strong>on</strong>nes of food<br />

per year with 45% being taken in the western sector and 55% in the east. This total is ca. 10–20% of the total<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> by the world’s seabirds (max. CI range = 56–133 milli<strong>on</strong> t<strong>on</strong>nes) estimated by Brooke (2003). Although<br />

this percentage seems relatively high, it may reflect both the elevated c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> by seabirds at high latitudes and the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>servative approach of Brooke’s estimate.<br />

The near equality of the overall c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> both sides of the Atlantic is despite the fact that nearly twice the<br />

number of seabirds occupies the NAFO areas and is a reflecti<strong>on</strong> of the huge numbers of small species in the west.<br />

The total food c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> estimates for both the <strong>ICES</strong> subareas and for the NAFO subareas peak in the summer<br />

seas<strong>on</strong> at levels 44% and 54% higher than the respective winter c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> estimates. The elevated energy demand in<br />

summer is primarily caused by increased reproducti<strong>on</strong> activity, but also the larger numbers of birds (and hence higher<br />

biomass) in summer <strong>on</strong> both sides of the Atlantic. In the <strong>ICES</strong> area there are 37% more birds (and an 11% higher<br />

biomass) and in the NAFO area 12% more birds (and 16% higher biomass) in summer than in winter. In the NAFO area<br />

the extra food c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> caused by reproducti<strong>on</strong> and the summer visitors from the southern hemisphere outweigh by<br />

far the extra c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> by wintering visitors entering the NAFO area from the <strong>ICES</strong> area and the eastern Canadian<br />

Arctic (guillemots and seaducks) and leaving the NAFO area for the summer.<br />

Note that while numbers and biomass of seabirds in a given area in a given seas<strong>on</strong> are based <strong>on</strong> maximum numbers in<br />

that seas<strong>on</strong>, the food c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> of seabirds occupying the <strong>ICES</strong> subareas (Table 5.8) and the NAFO subareas (Table<br />

5.9) are calculated based <strong>on</strong> the number of days each species stays in a given subarea and thus do not directly<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>d to the biomass in Tables 5.5 and 5.6.<br />

24<br />

<strong>ICES</strong> <strong>WGSE</strong> Report <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!