SeeNews TOP 100 SEE 2012 - SEE Top 100 - SeeNews
SeeNews TOP 100 SEE 2012 - SEE Top 100 - SeeNews
SeeNews TOP 100 SEE 2012 - SEE Top 100 - SeeNews
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>TOP</strong> <strong>100</strong><br />
companies<br />
New sectors steal ground from<br />
telcos in 2011 <strong>SEE</strong> ranking of<br />
most profi table companies<br />
by Emilia Atanassova<br />
Telecommunications emerged as<br />
the clear-cut leader among sectors<br />
when <strong>SeeNews</strong> compiled its 2011<br />
ranking of the 20 most profi table<br />
companies in Southeast Europe.<br />
One year down the line and the picture<br />
looked quite diff erent. All top three companies<br />
in 2010 were telcos and the sector had<br />
nine representatives in the league table. In<br />
2011, only one remained among the biggest<br />
three - former leader Hrvatski Telekom – and<br />
the sector was down to fi ve names.<br />
Transportation, on the other hand, had no<br />
representatives in the 2010 rankings and<br />
not only did it place two in the 2011 edition<br />
but saw them snatch the top two positions.<br />
The most profi table <strong>SEE</strong> company last year<br />
was Croatian shipbuilder Brodosplit – Brodogradiliste,<br />
which achieved a veritable feat<br />
by reversing a 28.04% negative return on<br />
revenue in 2010 to 44.57%. The company’s<br />
revenues in 2011 surged by 130.90% to 466.5<br />
million euro, while gross losses of 57.8 million<br />
euro made way for gross profi t of 207.9 million<br />
euro. Serbian railway company Zeleznice<br />
Srbije AD (formerly JP Zeleznice Srbije) had a<br />
similarly auspicious year, delivering return on<br />
revenue of 23.78% compared to a negative<br />
64.18% a year earlier. Its total revenue jumped<br />
by 96.19% to 511.1 million euro and the company<br />
exited 2011 with a net profi t of 121.5 million<br />
euro against a net loss of 165.3 million euro in<br />
the preceding year.<br />
The 2010 leader managed a very modest<br />
improvement in return on revenue, which<br />
stood at 23.13% versus 22.39% in 2010. Hrvatski<br />
Telekom wrapped up 2011 with total revenues<br />
of 1.04 billion euro, or 5.85% lower, and<br />
its net profi t slipped from 252.4 million euro<br />
to 240.8 million euro. Telekom Srbija AD, Orange<br />
Romania SA, Vodafone Romania SA and<br />
Bulgaria’s Mobiltel EAD were the remaining<br />
Most profi table companies<br />
No<br />
<strong>SEE</strong> <strong>TOP</strong><br />
<strong>100</strong> No<br />
representatives of the telecommunications<br />
sector, ranking respectively 4th, 7th, 11th and<br />
20th.<br />
The petroleum and natural gas sector held<br />
steady with three representatives, which<br />
were the same as in the 2010 rankings. Among<br />
them is the biggest <strong>SEE</strong> enterprise by revenue<br />
- OMV Petrom SA. The Romanian company<br />
fi nished at number six in terms of profi tability,<br />
one place below another Romanian<br />
sector player - Romgaz SA. Naftna Industrija<br />
Srbije AD rounded off the trio of petroleum<br />
and natural gas companies on the list.<br />
Other sectors that retained their level of representation<br />
were electricity (with Bulgaria’s<br />
AETs Kozloduy EAD, Croatia’s HEP-Operator<br />
Distribucijskog Sustava and Serbia’s Termoelektrane<br />
Nikola Tesla DOO ranked 10th,<br />
16th and 19th respectively), pharmaceuticals<br />
(Slovenia’s Krka and Lek at numbers nine and<br />
12 respectively), rubber/rubber products (Romanian<br />
Continental Automotive Products<br />
SRL in the 15th position) and wholesale/retail<br />
(Dedeman SRL of Romania at number 13).<br />
Three new sector secured representation in<br />
16<br />
Company name Country Industry<br />
Return on<br />
revenue 2011<br />
Return on<br />
revenue 2010<br />
1 92 Brodosplit - Brodogradiliste d.o.o. Croatia Transportation 44.57% -28.04%<br />
2 82 Zeleznice Srbije AD Serbia Transportation 23.78% -64.18%<br />
3 26 Hrvatski Telekom d.d. Croatia Telecommunications 23.13% 22.39%<br />
4 34 Telekom Srbija AD Serbia Telecommunications 22.66% 16.39%<br />
5 25 Romgaz SA Romania Petroleum/Natural Gas 22.11% 15.37%<br />
6 1 OMV Petrom SA Romania Petroleum/Natural Gas 20.80% 11.58%<br />
7 37 Orange Romania SA Romania Telecommunications 19.95% 22.16%<br />
8 9 Naftna Industrija Srbije AD Serbia Petroleum/Natural Gas 19.63% 9.10%<br />
9 31 Krka d.d. Slovenia Pharmaceuticals 15.40% 17.48%<br />
10 97 AETs Kozloduy EAD Bulgaria Electricity 12.81% 7.42%<br />
11 43 Vodafone Romania SA Romania Telecommunications 12.00% 13.35%<br />
12 63 Lek d.d. Slovenia Pharmaceuticals 11.55% 8.24%<br />
13 88 Dedeman SRL Romania Wholesale/Retail 9.96% 9.61%<br />
14 69<br />
Compania Nationala de Autostrazi si<br />
Drumuri Nationale din Romania SA<br />
Romania Construction 9.67% 3.49%<br />
15 80<br />
Continental Automotive Products<br />
SRL<br />
Romania<br />
Rubber and Rubber<br />
Products<br />
8.93% 10.79%<br />
16 77<br />
HEP-Operator Distribucijskog<br />
Sustava d.o.o.<br />
Croatia Electricity 8.68% 2.85%<br />
17 66 Alro SA Romania Metals 8.51% 7.30%<br />
18 95 Autoliv Romania SRL Romania Automobiles 8.16% 8.87%<br />
19 44 Termoelektrane Nikola Tesla DOO Serbia Electricity 7.68% 0.66%<br />
20 78 Mobiltel EAD Bulgaria Telecommunications 7.38% 19.69%<br />
the 2011 league table and they all had Romanian<br />
companies to thank for that. Construction<br />
entered the chart courtesy of Compania<br />
Nationala de Autostrazi si Drumuri Nationale<br />
din Romania SA, which landed at number 14.<br />
Metals joined the club through Alro SA (17th)<br />
and automobiles staged an appearance due<br />
to Autoliv Romania SRL (18th).<br />
Methodology<br />
Most Profi table is a ranking of the<br />
top 20 companies with the highest<br />
return on revenue in <strong>TOP</strong> <strong>100</strong><br />
companies. Return on revenue is<br />
calculated as net profi t divided<br />
by total revenue, both in euro<br />
terms. To allow comparison,<br />
all local currencies have been<br />
converted into euro, using the<br />
central banks’ offi cial exchange<br />
rates on the last working day of<br />
2011 and 2010, respectively.