29.01.2013 Views

COAL. - Clpdigital.org

COAL. - Clpdigital.org

COAL. - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 53<br />

BRITISH EXPLOSIONS IN MINES COMMITTEE ISSUES ITS REPORT<br />

ON <strong>COAL</strong> DUST.<br />

While many of the mining engineers of the world<br />

have for a number of years recognized the danger<br />

of coal dust in mines, the increasing number of<br />

fatalities from this cause impelled the British<br />

government in 1906 to plan a series of large-scale<br />

experiments, "if only for the purpose of concentrating<br />

the attention of the mining world upon<br />

the danger that coal dust constitutes."<br />

The British Explosions in Mines committee,<br />

which has charge of these experiments, has just<br />

issued its first report to the Secretary of State for<br />

the Home Department, which report will be of<br />

interest to American operators ancl engineers in<br />

view of similar experiments being conducted by<br />

the United States Bureau of Mines.<br />

The committee in its report states: "The effect<br />

of these experiments was, in the first place, to<br />

demonstrate conclusively the fact that coal dust,<br />

in the complete absence of firedamp or other inflammable<br />

gas, is explosive when raised as a cloud<br />

in air and ignited under conditions which may<br />

exist in a coal mine, and moreover is capable of<br />

producing such destruction as is observed after a<br />

colliery disaster. In the second place, the experiments<br />

indicated that the admixture of increasingproportions<br />

of an incombustible dust with the coal<br />

dust rendered the initiation of an explosion increasingly<br />

difficult to accomplish; and that, therefore,<br />

a means of preventing coal dust explosions<br />

in mines might possibly exist in the<br />

TREATMENT OF THE ROADS<br />

with incombustible dust such as stone dust. In<br />

the third place, the experiments on the mode of<br />

propagation of coal dust explosions gave an indication<br />

of the manner of their development during<br />

the initial stages, and suggested a way for a more<br />

complete study of the problem. * * * It wdll be<br />

seen that provision has been made for complete<br />

investigations into the initiation and spread of<br />

coal dust explosions, whereby we hope to ascertain<br />

the means of preventing or limiting them. It may<br />

therefore be some time before we are able from<br />

our own experiments to recommend definite precautions.<br />

There is, however, one point to which<br />

it is desirable to draw attention—the proposal<br />

to use an inert dust as a preventative. It is difficult<br />

to state the exact date- of the idea of using<br />

stone dust as a protection against coal dust explosions,<br />

and we do not pretend to give complete history<br />

of the progress of thought upon the question.<br />

We may, however, mention a few instances in<br />

which it was brought prominently into notice.<br />

That an inert dust might prevent the ignition of<br />

coal dust seems to have been suggested by the<br />

tacts observed in several mine explosions such as<br />

that at Seaham in 1880. The possibility that fine<br />

sand strewn over coal dust might prevent the eoal<br />

dust being raised in an inflammable cloud is re<br />

ferred to in the Prussian Commission's Report,<br />

1884. It is also alluded to in the Report of the<br />

Royal Coal Mines Commission in 1886. *****<br />

As soon as the Altofts gallery had been constructed,<br />

experiments on the large scale<br />

WITH STONE DUST<br />

were commenced on July IS, 1908, under the supervision<br />

of Mr. Garforth, and continued in 1909 and<br />

in subsequent years.<br />

In the record of the Mining Association, pp. 105<br />

to 10S, details are given of experiments upon the<br />

effect of mixing stone dust with coal dust. They<br />

show that the liability of dry coal dust to ignite<br />

is largely reduced by an admixture of fine stone<br />

dust.<br />

In our opinion further experiments upon the<br />

action of stone dust are essential before any final<br />

recommendation can be made. For instance, it<br />

has not yet been proved that a name of coal dust<br />

that has attained full explosive violence in a mine<br />

wdll be extinguished on reaching a region where<br />

stone dust had been strewn over the coal dust, nor<br />

that an explosion of fire-damp would not be "extended"<br />

by a thin layer of coal dust deposited on<br />

stone dust. Further experiments also are needed<br />

to test the correctness of Sir F. Abel's conclusion<br />

that the presence of an incombustible dust niay<br />

increase the danger of a gas explosion. The latter<br />

experiments we have already started.<br />

We think, however, that we ought to call attention<br />

to the steps that have been taken not only at<br />

Altofts in Yorkshire, but also at the Charlaw.<br />

Sacriston and Kimblesworth collieries in Durham,<br />

at the New Moss colliery near Manchester and elsewhere,<br />

to put this theory into actual practice.<br />

At the present time inert dust is not put on In<br />

zones, but is<br />

SCATTERED BY HAND<br />

over the whole surface of such haulage roads as<br />

require it.<br />

This application of rnert dust needs no considerable<br />

expenditure of capital, nor laying down<br />

of plant, ancl is not a costly operation, and we are<br />

of opinion that even in the present incomplete<br />

state of our knowdedge as to the exact action of<br />

inert dust, those who are working and carrying<br />

coal along dry and dusty roads would be well advised<br />

to take into consideration this means or<br />

obviating danger.<br />

We do not, of course, question the utility of wat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!