Gb08_engl Umschlag:GB 2005 - DVFA
Gb08_engl Umschlag:GB 2005 - DVFA
Gb08_engl Umschlag:GB 2005 - DVFA
- TAGS
- dvfa
- www.dvfa.de
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
activities of the committees<br />
Committee Investment Performance Standards<br />
Asset Management_<br />
In 2008, the Committee Investment Performance Standards (IPS) of the “Germany Asset<br />
Management Standards Committee” continued to focus on the German translation of the<br />
GIPS, and on revision of the standards themselves.<br />
Work on translation of the GIPS into German was successfully completed in 2008. The<br />
Executive Committee of the international GIPS organisation approved the translation<br />
on 08 December 2008.<br />
A complete revision of the Global Investment Performance Standards is set to enter into<br />
force on 01 January 2011, under the name GIPS 2010. In addition to the international<br />
GIPS subcommittees, other bodies such as national performance commissions were<br />
involved in the revision. In a first step, five working groups within the Investment Performance<br />
Standards Committee (IPS) of the German Asset Management Standards<br />
Committee (GAMSC) completed a full review of the GIPS. The resulting amendment proposals<br />
of the working groups were then discussed in several phases, and presented as<br />
a table comparing the existing version and the proposed changes. The amendments<br />
were submitted to the GAMSC for approval, and subsequently forwarded by the GAMSC<br />
to the Executive Committee of the GIPS organisation.<br />
After completion of this work, the IPS created two working groups (“Leverage” and “Assets<br />
under Management”), to address enquiries from the asset management industry. In a<br />
sense, the two topics are closely related to one another, because the basis for performance<br />
measurement is not always clearly defined, especially for leverage products. At<br />
the same time, however, there are significant differences in the areas of focus, since<br />
the definition of “assets under management” is imprecise, both in relation to leverage<br />
products and other constructions.<br />
23