30.01.2013 Views

Givaudan-Roure Lecture - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Givaudan-Roure Lecture - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Givaudan-Roure Lecture - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

367 Slide [ ] Taste Genetics and Physiology<br />

GENETICS OF PTC TASTE SENSITIVITY IN HUMANS<br />

Drayna D. 1, Kim U. 2, Wooding S. 3, Jorde L. 4, Floriano W. 5, Goddard<br />

W.A. 5 1National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication<br />

Disor, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; 2NIDCD, National<br />

Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; 3Genetics, University of Utah, Salt<br />

Lake City, UT; 4Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,<br />

UT; 5Chemistry, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA<br />

The inability of some individuals to taste phenylthiocarbamide (PTC)<br />

was discovered more than 70 years ago and since that time it has been<br />

the subject of detailed studies in genetics, anthropology, and sensory<br />

physiology. We have identified the major gene underlying this trait as<br />

TAS2R38, a G protein coupled bitter taste receptor located on<br />

chromosome 7q. The taster and non-taster <strong>for</strong>ms of this protein differ at<br />

3 amino acid positions, and we have identified other alleles of this gene<br />

that encode various combinations of these 3 variant amino acids, at<br />

least some of which produce intermediate PTC sensitivity. We have<br />

used population genetic methods to study the paradoxical high<br />

frequency of the non-taster <strong>for</strong>m of this gene. Our analyses indicate that<br />

both the major taster and major non-taster alleles have been maintained<br />

by balancing natural selection. Since bitter taste is thought to protect<br />

individuals from ingestion of toxic substances in our diet, this raises the<br />

question of what selective benefit is provided by the non-taster allele.<br />

We hypothesize that the non-taster <strong>for</strong>m of the protein serves as a<br />

functional receptor <strong>for</strong> a different toxic bitter substance not yet<br />

identified. We have also employed molecular structure prediction<br />

techniques to determine the 3D structure of the taster and non-taster<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of this receptor, along with PTC ligand binding sites. Our results<br />

indicate that PTC binds to both <strong>for</strong>ms of the receptor with equal<br />

affinity, and that the non-taster <strong>for</strong>m of the protein does not signal due<br />

to a failure of G protein activation.<br />

Supported by NIDCD/NIH Z01-000046 (to D.D.), by NIH grants<br />

ES12125 (to S.W.), GM59290 (to L.J.), and NSF grant BCS0218370<br />

(to L.J.)<br />

97<br />

368 Slide [ ] Taste Genetics and Physiology<br />

GENETIC CONTROL OF LICK RATE IN MICE<br />

Boughter J. 1, St. John S. 2, Williams R.W. 3, Lu L. 1 1Anatomy &<br />

Neurobiology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN; 2Psychology,<br />

Reed College, Portland, OR; 3Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of<br />

Tennessee, Memphis, Memphis, TN<br />

Licking is a highly stereotyped behavior that is thought to be<br />

determined in part by a central pattern generator (CPG). Lick rate has<br />

been shown to differ among inbred strains of mice, and may play a role<br />

in apparent differences in gustatory sensitivity. We used a 20 minuteaccess<br />

procedure to quantify lick rate in several strains of waterdeprived<br />

mice. Inbred strains could be classified as fast, intermediate,<br />

or slow lickers based on the median value of the inter-lick interval (ILI)<br />

distribution. With virtually no overlap among individual distributions,<br />

C57BL/6J (B6; n = 36) mice were classified as slow lickers (average<br />

median ILI = 122.8 ms) whereas DBA/2J (D2; n = 27) mice were fast<br />

lickers (average median ILI = 101.1). Mice from an F1 generation (n =<br />

14) possessed an intermediate phenotype (112.8 ms). Fast / slow lick<br />

rate phenotypes were static over an extended time period, and were also<br />

evident in non-deprived tests with sucrose. Further testing of an F2<br />

generation (n = 62) resulted in an estimate of broad-sense heritability =<br />

0.54, with no fewer than 2 polymorphic genes influencing the ILI<br />

phenotype. Initial QTL mapping analysis using a panel of BXD RI<br />

strains indicates that at least two and possibly as many as 4 QTL with<br />

comparatively large effects on the ILI are segregating in this cross.<br />

These data will soon be complemented with a genome scan of a panel<br />

of ~ 150 F2 mice that are now being typed using a panel of ~70<br />

microsatellite markers. Additionally, we show how differences in lick<br />

rate between B6 and D2 strains may exert a non-gustatory influence in<br />

lick ratio measurements of sucrose sensitivity. Supported by<br />

DC004935(JDB).<br />

369 Slide [ ] Taste Genetics and Physiology<br />

INTAKE OF SWEET AND BITTER SOLUTIONS: VARIATION<br />

IN INBRED STRAINS OF GOLDEN HAMSTERS<br />

Frank M.E. 1, Wada Y. 2, Makino J. 2, Mizutani M. 2, Umezawa H. 3,<br />

Katsuie Y. 3, Hettinger T.P. 1, Blizard D.A. 4 1Oral Diagnosis,<br />

Neurosciences, UCONN Health Center, Farmington, CT; 2Institute of<br />

Psychology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan;<br />

3Laboratory Animal Research Station, Nippon Institute <strong>for</strong> Biological<br />

Science, Kobuchizawa, Yamanashi, Japan; 4Pennsylvania State<br />

University, University Park, PA<br />

Intake of sweet and bitter solutions by 7 inbred strains of golden<br />

hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), a principal species <strong>for</strong> studies of<br />

mammalian gustatory systems, was measured. Two concentrations of<br />

sucrose, maltose, D-Phe and Na saccharin, which are sweet; and<br />

quinine·HCl, L-Phe, caffeine and sucrose octaacetate (SOA), which are<br />

bitter to humans, were tested. Difference scores, solution intake minus<br />

mean baseline water intake in mL (DIF), were evaluated by analysis of<br />

variance (α = .05). Compared to ACN, CN, APA, APG and CBN (5<br />

strains with similar DIF <strong>for</strong> all tested solutions), the strains ACNT and<br />

GN (an ACNT ancestral strain) preferred sucrose, caffeine and SOA<br />

more strongly; ACNT also preferred saccharin and maltose more<br />

strongly and rejected quinine more strongly. There were no strain<br />

differences in DIF <strong>for</strong> D-Phe or L-Phe. Narrow sense heritabilities <strong>for</strong><br />

the 6 compounds <strong>for</strong> which strain differences were revealed ranged<br />

from 0.31 to 0.57. Genetic correlations indicated the strain variations in<br />

intake of sucrose, saccharin, SOA and caffeine were coupled,<br />

suggesting an association with several possible interpretations. The<br />

genetic differences that influence taste behaviors in existing strains of<br />

hamsters may help identify relevant genes. [Supported by NIH grant<br />

R01 DC04099 (MEF) and a Japan Society Senior Fellowship (DAB)]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!