the extreme of sympathy. Reduced, emasculated. Isn’t this Blade Runner? But <strong>in</strong> a new age. We fear for Deckard’s future, certa<strong>in</strong>ly, and we pity his situation but there’s someth<strong>in</strong>g about the end<strong>in</strong>g that leaves me th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g to myself that... Blade Runner is not pessimistic. It’s a warn<strong>in</strong>g, blatantly, of a future that could be... but it’s a reflection of our own humanity. That, <strong>in</strong> the end, it triumphs. And that is catharsis truly evolved. NOTES 1. Truman by David McCullough. 2. 3.1 - Eye 3. http://media.bladezone.com/contents/ford-BR.mov 4. Director’s Commentary on The F<strong>in</strong>al Cut
(3.4) INNOCENCE There’s a weird moment <strong>in</strong> Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? It’s one that took me back a little, a t<strong>in</strong>y bit of shock. A prod, if you will, and it’s def<strong>in</strong>itely one of the moments (many of them) <strong>in</strong> the book that made me truly ponder someth<strong>in</strong>g. Innocence itself. The moment was <strong>in</strong> one of Deckard’s descriptions of Rachael, and I remember the quote off by heart. “A figure like a child’s.” Deckard eventually falls <strong>in</strong> love with Rachael. The l<strong>in</strong>e hung throughout the book and I came back to it when Deckard f<strong>in</strong>ished up his affair with Rachael. Not to be hysterical or otherwise absolutely wrong but, with Deckard’s description, is he <strong>in</strong>dulg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> paedophilia? He happily calls her a ‘child’, and actually, the Replicants are <strong>in</strong> some sense ‘children’. Short-life spans, four years old as a Nexus Six, implanted memories as ‘emotional cushions’ only go so far. They are children trapped <strong>in</strong> mechanical bodies of adults that are probably the best way to put it. Innocence, then, seems like a precious commodity <strong>in</strong> the Replicant world. Yet, look<strong>in</strong>g at the ‘human’ world we already see the geishas of Blade Runner all hypersexualized young women, the rich folk <strong>in</strong>dulge themselves <strong>in</strong> look<strong>in</strong>g at naked women and there’s a true ‘honesty’ to the place. The grime just froths over <strong>in</strong> the cities, I’m not sure there are any children <strong>in</strong> the film. I’ve looked it over tens of times, and they might be on bikes dur<strong>in</strong>g Roy’s first appearance. This world, regardless, seems devoid of ‘childhood’. It’s the boroughs and urban filth from wall to wall, no place for a child, but who knows. These ‘childhoods’ of the Replicants are fabricated but... does that make them adults? Memories are what matter here; they’re what makes us human. Tyrell goes beyond that, “More human than human”. If our own childhood is fabricated, if we cannot preserve our own past self then what are we? Shells, husks even. The Replicants are only (at most) four years old but still smoke and dr<strong>in</strong>k and kill. They act like angstyteenagers or the middle-aged or, quite frankly, the depressed mill<strong>in</strong>g sheep of Blade Runner’s world. Even Deckard turns himself to alcoholism, an addiction mirrored with Rachael and Pris’ smok<strong>in</strong>g. Indulg<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> adult activity, try<strong>in</strong>g to keep them ‘adult’ and ‘human’, but utterly fall<strong>in</strong>g back on that ‘miss<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g’. In either case, Deckard or Replicant, it’s ‘life’. And it’s that drive for ‘life’, that underly<strong>in</strong>g goal that punctuates Blade Runner’s moral underbelly. Is Deckard’s quest one for <strong>in</strong>nocence? Are the Replicants ask<strong>in</strong>g for life so they can be children aga<strong>in</strong>? Without a childhood, there is usually life-crush<strong>in</strong>g trauma. Orphans are, thanks to this lovely ‘car<strong>in</strong>g’ world, the most at risk of fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to depression <strong>in</strong> Uganda[1] and without generaliz<strong>in</strong>g that’s probably true for the Western world too. That’s what they are then, the Replicants, ‘Orphans’. The only separation between them and Deckard, a Replicant <strong>in</strong> my view but it’s not necessary to view it this way, is a purpose. A drive, a motivation; his job. Even then, he f<strong>in</strong>ds himself corrupted by his kill<strong>in</strong>g. His first on-screen taken life, Zhora, takes him back. It’s like it’s his first time ever, someth<strong>in</strong>g doesn’t feel right. He’s shaken as he steps out of the little snow display. The ‘cold-blooded killer’ becom<strong>in</strong>g physical, tangible, he has lost his <strong>in</strong>nocence
- Page 2 and 3:
Written and Edited By: Nathan Hardi
- Page 4 and 5:
INTRODUCTION Blade Runner is consid
- Page 6 and 7:
SECTION I: IDEAS I don’t think it
- Page 8 and 9:
(1.1) DECKARD Any film, video-game
- Page 10 and 11:
some of his wit. Yet, Blade Runner
- Page 12 and 13:
Perhaps he’s on the edge of his h
- Page 14 and 15:
about immigration, but he is also t
- Page 16 and 17:
he’s using it to go in and kill Z
- Page 18 and 19:
dependent he is upon her love now.
- Page 20 and 21:
Deckard is not a powerful character
- Page 22 and 23:
Roy Batty kills the last remaining
- Page 24 and 25:
What about his humanity? Well, as c
- Page 26 and 27:
Deckard appear so inhuman at the st
- Page 28 and 29:
system in any way. Roy, as evil and
- Page 30 and 31:
Whereas Sheep is definitely centred
- Page 32 and 33: SECTION II: BEYOND 1980s. This was
- Page 34 and 35: for Star Wars and Blade Runner. The
- Page 36 and 37: cityscape scene from Episode Two. A
- Page 38 and 39: Superhero movies aren’t exactly s
- Page 40 and 41: eal first ‘ideas’ film that led
- Page 42 and 43: notes. There was a great rusty feel
- Page 44 and 45: with ideas and philosophies and not
- Page 46 and 47: I mentioned the Hamlet comparison e
- Page 48 and 49: The biggest grossing film of 1982 h
- Page 50 and 51: opposite to what E.T said, but the
- Page 52 and 53: games that was an inevitability I c
- Page 54 and 55: (2.5) AFTERMATH Blade Runner was a
- Page 56 and 57: elieves if you go in disappointed a
- Page 58 and 59: those events. Blade Runner is undou
- Page 60 and 61: SECTION III: SYMBOLS Memories. Is t
- Page 62 and 63: Batty takes this upon himself to ri
- Page 64 and 65: Coming away from the more abstract,
- Page 66 and 67: give more evidence and integrity to
- Page 68 and 69: Tyrell is then rewarded by having h
- Page 70 and 71: a family, now he is only Roy Batty.
- Page 72 and 73: through the ceiling, hangs off stee
- Page 74 and 75: Blade Runner does not argue with re
- Page 76 and 77: (3.3) TRAGEDY "When one man dies it
- Page 78 and 79: thought I had won Ridley's agreemen
- Page 80 and 81: Except the original Star Wars trilo
- Page 84 and 85: to the Replicants. He knows what he
- Page 86 and 87: (3.5) GAFF Who or what is Gaff? As
- Page 88 and 89: common culture there is some humani
- Page 90 and 91: (4.1) EAST AND WEST I write this at
- Page 92 and 93: acist or other discriminatory attit
- Page 94 and 95: physically into Deckard, to carry o
- Page 96 and 97: (4.2) THE CAPITALIST MACHINE Blade
- Page 98 and 99: parties but that he can watch them.
- Page 100 and 101: Deckard recognizes this, eventually
- Page 102 and 103: glory days of almost 1920s ‘rugge
- Page 104 and 105: they fundamentally destroy it and l
- Page 106 and 107: (4.4) TODAY Today. As I type this,
- Page 108 and 109: capitalism. The docile populace see
- Page 110 and 111: SECTION V: EVOLUTION Blade Runner e
- Page 112 and 113: females who use their pure sexualit
- Page 114 and 115: I respect Barr’s interpretation,
- Page 116 and 117: and indeed the placement of women a
- Page 118 and 119: (5.2) THE NEXT STEP “THE NEXUS 6
- Page 120 and 121: Deckard spits in his face there’s
- Page 122 and 123: Final Cut whether Blade Runner was
- Page 124 and 125: trace of sarcasm from Holden. He’
- Page 126 and 127: CONCLUSION When I took on this proj
- Page 128 and 129: BIBLIOGRAPHY Kerman, J.B (1997 edit
- Page 130: ABOUT THE AUTHOR Nathan Hardisty is