26.09.2012 Views

tears-in-rain

tears-in-rain

tears-in-rain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although the idea of ‘love’ between man and Replicant is explored <strong>in</strong> a different<br />

way throughout the film. As I’ve covered countless times before Deckard only ever<br />

directly kills female Replicants <strong>in</strong> the film. It’s an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g little tick towards perhaps<br />

this either ruptur<strong>in</strong>g Deckard’s guilt more than kill<strong>in</strong>g the males, or perhaps a different<br />

tick altogether. A tick <strong>in</strong> the direction of the ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’.<br />

Sean Redmond herself comments that “Deckard kills Zhora as she runs through<br />

a crowded shopp<strong>in</strong>g mall, the <strong>in</strong>ner Cathedral of Capitalism.”[1] And it’s almost perfect<br />

for her to death to take place <strong>in</strong> such a barbaric and perhaps blasphemous place.<br />

Blasphemous to the human condition of course, where materialism takes place over life<br />

itself.<br />

Life as an object is explored further throughout the dialogue exchange between<br />

Deckard and Rachael <strong>in</strong> their first meet<strong>in</strong>g. Deckard comments on the owl, with gl<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eyes, that it “Must be expensive.” with Rachael reply<strong>in</strong>g “Very.” Perhaps as an<br />

establishment of power? Money here seems to be worth a lot more than just the paper<br />

it’s pr<strong>in</strong>ted on but an establishment of power and who exactly holds it over whom.<br />

Further still is life exacerbated as an object of worth, with the conversation about<br />

Rachael’s fate follow<strong>in</strong>g Leon’s death. Deckard merely says “It’s part of the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.”<br />

and she replies “I am the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.” bus<strong>in</strong>ess. It rem<strong>in</strong>ds me of the ‘bus<strong>in</strong>esslike’<br />

depiction of John Proctor’s death <strong>in</strong> The Crucible. Life and death are handled like<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess exchanges, like facts fed <strong>in</strong>to a ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’. Money is the price of life,<br />

and the Replicants seem disposable like a fridge or someth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Tyrell himself says “Commerce is our goal here at Tyrell.” Not the actual<br />

technology. He isn’t build<strong>in</strong>g towards a brighter future for the populace but rather an iron<br />

grip through economic imperialism. A truly ‘fat cat’ motivate as it were. Nowhere is this<br />

more relevant than <strong>in</strong> today’s political sphere. A world where the ‘Wall Street<br />

Government’ has become a newly political term, alongside that of ‘Underclass’. The<br />

‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’ of today seems not that different from the mach<strong>in</strong>e of tomorrow, of<br />

2019.<br />

Beyond the monetary value of human life is the issue of weigh<strong>in</strong>g up both<br />

genders. While I commented earlier about Deckard kill<strong>in</strong>g only female Replicants, it’s<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to notice just how sexism is portrayed <strong>in</strong> the feature. Deckard uses the<br />

disguise of a weirdly flamboyant <strong>in</strong>spector try<strong>in</strong>g to see if Zhrora is be<strong>in</strong>g “Exploited” and<br />

Bryant himself comments on her as a “Pleasure model.” I’m not one to argue that this is<br />

probably a touch on the wider ‘fem<strong>in</strong>ist’ themes of the picture but it seems rather<br />

dehumaniz<strong>in</strong>g for both parties, doesn’t it? That the men who ‘use’ Zhora aren’t really<br />

act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> love but just <strong>in</strong> primitive love, it’s rather regressive <strong>in</strong> that way. Zhora herself<br />

carries a price-tag too, one absolutely advertised by Taffey Lewis’ bar. The snake<br />

around her neck be<strong>in</strong>g the “Serpent that once corrupted man.” Perhaps the snake has<br />

taken on a new form <strong>in</strong> the ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!