tears-in-rain
tears-in-rain
tears-in-rain
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Although the idea of ‘love’ between man and Replicant is explored <strong>in</strong> a different<br />
way throughout the film. As I’ve covered countless times before Deckard only ever<br />
directly kills female Replicants <strong>in</strong> the film. It’s an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g little tick towards perhaps<br />
this either ruptur<strong>in</strong>g Deckard’s guilt more than kill<strong>in</strong>g the males, or perhaps a different<br />
tick altogether. A tick <strong>in</strong> the direction of the ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’.<br />
Sean Redmond herself comments that “Deckard kills Zhora as she runs through<br />
a crowded shopp<strong>in</strong>g mall, the <strong>in</strong>ner Cathedral of Capitalism.”[1] And it’s almost perfect<br />
for her to death to take place <strong>in</strong> such a barbaric and perhaps blasphemous place.<br />
Blasphemous to the human condition of course, where materialism takes place over life<br />
itself.<br />
Life as an object is explored further throughout the dialogue exchange between<br />
Deckard and Rachael <strong>in</strong> their first meet<strong>in</strong>g. Deckard comments on the owl, with gl<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
eyes, that it “Must be expensive.” with Rachael reply<strong>in</strong>g “Very.” Perhaps as an<br />
establishment of power? Money here seems to be worth a lot more than just the paper<br />
it’s pr<strong>in</strong>ted on but an establishment of power and who exactly holds it over whom.<br />
Further still is life exacerbated as an object of worth, with the conversation about<br />
Rachael’s fate follow<strong>in</strong>g Leon’s death. Deckard merely says “It’s part of the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.”<br />
and she replies “I am the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.” bus<strong>in</strong>ess. It rem<strong>in</strong>ds me of the ‘bus<strong>in</strong>esslike’<br />
depiction of John Proctor’s death <strong>in</strong> The Crucible. Life and death are handled like<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess exchanges, like facts fed <strong>in</strong>to a ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’. Money is the price of life,<br />
and the Replicants seem disposable like a fridge or someth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Tyrell himself says “Commerce is our goal here at Tyrell.” Not the actual<br />
technology. He isn’t build<strong>in</strong>g towards a brighter future for the populace but rather an iron<br />
grip through economic imperialism. A truly ‘fat cat’ motivate as it were. Nowhere is this<br />
more relevant than <strong>in</strong> today’s political sphere. A world where the ‘Wall Street<br />
Government’ has become a newly political term, alongside that of ‘Underclass’. The<br />
‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’ of today seems not that different from the mach<strong>in</strong>e of tomorrow, of<br />
2019.<br />
Beyond the monetary value of human life is the issue of weigh<strong>in</strong>g up both<br />
genders. While I commented earlier about Deckard kill<strong>in</strong>g only female Replicants, it’s<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to notice just how sexism is portrayed <strong>in</strong> the feature. Deckard uses the<br />
disguise of a weirdly flamboyant <strong>in</strong>spector try<strong>in</strong>g to see if Zhrora is be<strong>in</strong>g “Exploited” and<br />
Bryant himself comments on her as a “Pleasure model.” I’m not one to argue that this is<br />
probably a touch on the wider ‘fem<strong>in</strong>ist’ themes of the picture but it seems rather<br />
dehumaniz<strong>in</strong>g for both parties, doesn’t it? That the men who ‘use’ Zhora aren’t really<br />
act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> love but just <strong>in</strong> primitive love, it’s rather regressive <strong>in</strong> that way. Zhora herself<br />
carries a price-tag too, one absolutely advertised by Taffey Lewis’ bar. The snake<br />
around her neck be<strong>in</strong>g the “Serpent that once corrupted man.” Perhaps the snake has<br />
taken on a new form <strong>in</strong> the ‘capitalist mach<strong>in</strong>e’?