31.01.2013 Views

04.29 Ledger 01 - The Cherokee Ledger-News

04.29 Ledger 01 - The Cherokee Ledger-News

04.29 Ledger 01 - The Cherokee Ledger-News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Publisher<br />

DAVE CAUGHMAN<br />

T H E C H E R O K E E<br />

LEDGER-NEWS<br />

Editor<br />

GERRY YANDEL<br />

Assistant Managing Editor<br />

ERIKA NELDNER<br />

©2009 Lakeside Publishing Inc.<br />

All Rights Reserved.<br />

Articles and advertisements may not be reprinted in whole or in part<br />

without the expressed written consent of Lakeside Publishing Inc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cherokee</strong> <strong>Ledger</strong>-<strong>News</strong>, published weekly on Wednesday by Lakeside Publishing, Inc., 103 E. Main St., Woodstock,<br />

GA 3<strong>01</strong>88-4908. Periodicals postage paid at Monroe, GA and additional post offices. USPS 021-137. Postmaster: Please send<br />

address changes to <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cherokee</strong> <strong>Ledger</strong>-<strong>News</strong> 103 E. Main St., Woodstock, GA 3<strong>01</strong>88-4908.<br />

Phone (770) 928-0706 • Fax (770) 928-3152<br />

Send e-mail to: editor@ledgernews.com<br />

Write us at P.O. Box 2369, Woodstock, GA 3<strong>01</strong>88-1379<br />

Disclaimer: <strong>The</strong> views expressed on the Opinion page are not necessarily the views<br />

of the publisher or the staff of the <strong>Cherokee</strong> <strong>Ledger</strong>-<strong>News</strong><br />

LEDGER-NEWS<br />

OPINION<br />

6 THE CHEROKEE LEDGER-NEWS MANAGING EDITOR: GERRY YANDEL APRIL 29, 2009<br />

CHEROKEE VOICE<br />

■<br />

ISSUE: April 29 marks 100 days in office for Barack Obama.<br />

QUESTION: How has President Obama done in his first 100 days?<br />

“I'm not impressed.”<br />

David Garner<br />

Canton<br />

“He sounds good on TV, but, in reality,<br />

it's not really working.”<br />

“I'd say middle of the road.”<br />

Kim Stone<br />

Hickory Flat<br />

Michelle McKinney<br />

Holly Springs<br />

“I don't have a clue yet.”<br />

Rodney Holbrook<br />

Canton<br />

“I guess he's doing fair, considering the<br />

shape it was in when he got there.”<br />

Ray Vickery<br />

Holly Springs<br />

“I'm in favor of a few of the things he's<br />

done, but the majority, no.”<br />

Tammy Sloan<br />

Canton<br />

O ne<br />

Etowah Valley’s road to nowhere<br />

of the responsibilities and<br />

obligations of publishing a<br />

weekly opinion column, at<br />

least the way I see it, is that one<br />

should be open to dissenting viewpoints<br />

and be willing to change<br />

one’s mind – and say so – when the<br />

situation calls for it.<br />

This, I think, is one of those situations.<br />

I had previously written a column<br />

supporting the approval of<br />

the Etowah Valley project, formerly<br />

know as Canton West, based on<br />

the fact that a lot of people in our<br />

county could use the work right<br />

now.<br />

While I still feel that the project<br />

could provide a lot of jobs for a lot<br />

of people in <strong>Cherokee</strong> who are in<br />

the building industry, I’m having<br />

second thoughts about the project.<br />

Perhaps I got a little bit rusty<br />

from having the residential<br />

growth in the county all but dry up<br />

when the mortgage meltdown occurred.<br />

Luckily, our <strong>Cherokee</strong> County-<br />

Municipal Planning Commissioners<br />

didn’t get rusty when the<br />

Etowah Valley case came before<br />

them earlier this month for a public<br />

hearing and subsequent discussion<br />

that lasted about two hours at<br />

the new county administration<br />

building.<br />

<strong>The</strong> commission at that time voted<br />

to table the application for a second<br />

public hearing, which is currently<br />

scheduled for May 5 at 7 p.m.<br />

Opponents of the project who<br />

spoke at the first public hearing<br />

raised a number of points, some of<br />

which were further expounded upon<br />

during the planning commissioners’<br />

discussion afterward, that<br />

caused me to re-assess my feelings<br />

about the project.<br />

At issue was whether the project<br />

should have to be re-reviewed<br />

through the DRI (development of<br />

regional impact) process, what<br />

would happen if PEC had to bail<br />

out of the project for economic reasons,<br />

why 428 units of residential<br />

senior living weren’t included in<br />

the unit count of about 2,800 for the<br />

2,300-acre proposal, the potentially<br />

hazardous flexibility of RD-3 and,<br />

most importantly, the true status of<br />

the proposed four-lane parkway.<br />

Unfortunately, the RD-3 zoning<br />

classification is what it is. RD-3<br />

zoning is subject to a wide range of<br />

densities – from three units an acre<br />

to six units an acre – and we have<br />

seen developers in the past come<br />

back before commissioners to increase<br />

their RD-3 density for economic<br />

reasons. If the RD-3 classification<br />

is too open-ended, it should<br />

be revisited and fixed, but to penalize<br />

a developer on the front end for<br />

wanting to use a valid classification<br />

would be like charging someone<br />

for DUI when they drove up<br />

sober to a liquor store to buy booze.<br />

Likewise, I don’t see the seniorliving<br />

units, which would be rezoned<br />

under the Office and Institutional<br />

classification, as being a<br />

deal-breaker, either. Although<br />

there will be some separate homes<br />

as part of the senior complex, the<br />

idea is that seniors would eventually<br />

move from those to assisted<br />

living and full-time care units.<br />

That kind of component would<br />

have no impact on the schools, and<br />

almost none on traffic and services,<br />

such as police and fire.<br />

But, the question about a new<br />

DRI review, particularly in light of<br />

the current<br />

parkway status,<br />

is another<br />

matter entirely.<br />

DRI reviews<br />

are done by the<br />

Atlanta RegionalCommission<br />

(ARC)<br />

and, when appropriate,<br />

as in<br />

the case of<br />

large residentialdevelopments,<br />

by the<br />

Georgia RegionalTransportationAuthority<br />

(GR-<br />

TA). <strong>The</strong> ARC<br />

weighs a devel-<br />

DIALOGUE<br />

Gerry<br />

Yandel<br />

opment’s regional impact on infrastructure,<br />

the environment, how it<br />

fits into the area’s land use plan for<br />

long-term growth and other factors.<br />

GRTA evaluates the proposal’s<br />

impact on traffic and whether<br />

current road systems need improvement<br />

to support the anticipated<br />

influx of new residents.<br />

Although the ARC’s decisions<br />

are not binding, most communities<br />

weigh them heavily when deciding<br />

on rezoning issues for a proposal.<br />

GRTA, on the other hand,<br />

can withhold state and federal<br />

transportation funds if a developer<br />

and a community decide to ignore<br />

its decisions and conditions,<br />

which typically entail road improvements<br />

to handle additional<br />

traffic and vehicle trips brought on<br />

by large developments.<br />

In a letter sent April 7 to <strong>Cherokee</strong><br />

Planning Director Jeff<br />

Watkins, the ARC said a re-review<br />

was not necessary, because the<br />

scaled-down version of Canton<br />

West did not meet the requirements,<br />

based on land use and the<br />

size and scope of the proposal, to<br />

warrant a new DRI review under<br />

the ARC’s rules.<br />

■ ■ ■<br />

However, the letter also stated:<br />

“ARC strongly recommends that<br />

<strong>Cherokee</strong> County and the developer<br />

identify new funding sources<br />

for this transportation project and<br />

work with the city of Canton to request<br />

an administrative modification<br />

to the RTP (Regional Transportation<br />

Plan) in regards to this<br />

project.”<br />

GRTA’s response was even less<br />

equivocal. “If there are substantial<br />

changes to a plan, we expect<br />

the developer to discuss them with<br />

us – especially if they affect one of<br />

the conditions,” a GRTA<br />

spokesman told me. “If the<br />

changes are significant we would<br />

want to re-evaluate the DRI. Our<br />

DRI staff is going to follow up with<br />

the city.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> city has already spoken; last<br />

week Canton, which appears to<br />

want nothing to do with Etowah<br />

Valley whatsoever in light of the<br />

city having about 3,000 empty<br />

homesteads already looking for<br />

owners, formally removed the<br />

Etowah Valley parkway from its<br />

RTP.<br />

Furthermore, it is highly doubtful<br />

the city will allow any type of<br />

road connected to the project to be<br />

constructed within its city limits ...<br />

which pretty much foils about 75<br />

percent of the conditions and requirements<br />

for road improvements<br />

GRTA has said are necessary<br />

for the project to proceed.<br />

GRTA’s assessment was based<br />

on a four-lane road being put between<br />

Ga. 5 and Ga. 108 to handle<br />

the majority of the project’s expected<br />

traffic, but PEC has said it<br />

only plans to build a two-lane road,<br />

as per its original deal with Canton<br />

under Mayor Cecil Pruett. While<br />

there are no state or federal funds<br />

attached to the parkway project –<br />

which would need an additional<br />

$25 million or more to be widened<br />

to four lanes – GRTA’s findings<br />

should not be discounted, particularly<br />

by anyone who lives in the<br />

area and intends on being able to<br />

drive anywhere around there in<br />

the future.<br />

Everyone else in <strong>Cherokee</strong><br />

should let their commissioners<br />

know how they feel about the county<br />

possibly approving the proposal<br />

and being on the hook to pony up<br />

$25 million of taxpayer money to<br />

put the appropriate four-lane road<br />

out there.<br />

Perhaps the planning commission<br />

did PEC a favor by tabling the<br />

application for a second hearing –<br />

as opposed to recommending denial<br />

outright – but I’ll reserve judgment<br />

on that until after GRTA<br />

takes another look at it … even<br />

though no one asked them to do so.<br />

LETTERS<br />

■<br />

Turn off the TV and be productive<br />

Dear Editor,<br />

Media in America has begun to<br />

ensnare most of the kids who live<br />

there. It has produced so many<br />

new means of entertainment that<br />

many kids and young adults spend<br />

an average of 45 hours a week using<br />

some sort of electronic entertainment<br />

or communication device.<br />

It has gone too far, and some type<br />

of reform is needed, but focusing<br />

on what parents and their children<br />

can do to limit how much time they<br />

spend using media devices by find-<br />

ing other, more fulfilling, things to<br />

occupy their time is where it<br />

should start.<br />

I think the most effective way<br />

would be to simply not have a television<br />

in the house other than in<br />

the sitting room, den, living room<br />

or anywhere that the entire family<br />

will know that someone is watching<br />

the TV at any one time.<br />

Perhaps a more subtle approach,<br />

which might prevent any confrontations,<br />

would be to remove<br />

the cable box but not the entire TV<br />

from the room. A house could have<br />

just broadcast TV; it has very few<br />

channels, so there is less chance to<br />

have immoral programming on.<br />

I also believe that the use of the<br />

Internet on a cell phone is a waste<br />

of time and can lead to disaster<br />

when a person can watch any TV<br />

show they want whenever they<br />

want to watch it.<br />

At the least, these simple guidelines<br />

can help me, and they can<br />

surely help others.<br />

Daniel Bailey, 15<br />

Woodstock

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!