Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review
Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review
Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MAXIMS OR MYTHS OF BEAUTY 421<br />
Appendix G (continued)<br />
Study Sample size Gender Rater type Attractiveness measure d<br />
Kalick, Zebrowitz, Langlois, & Johnson (1998) 127 F I<br />
Kleck & Rubenstein (1975) 48 M I<br />
Kowner (1996) 122 B N<br />
Kowner & Ogawa (1995) 49 M I<br />
Kowner & Ogawa (1995) 44 F I<br />
Kuhlenschmidt & Conger (1988) 35 F I<br />
Larrance & Zuckerman (1981) 60 B I<br />
Longo (1990) 243 B I<br />
M<strong>and</strong>el & Shrauger (1980) 37 M N<br />
Martindale, Ross, Hines, & Abrams (1978) 19 B I<br />
Martindale, Ross, Hines, & Abrams (1978) 19 B I<br />
Mathes & Kahn (1975) 110 M I<br />
Mathes & Kahn (1975) 101 F I<br />
McGovem, Neale, & Kendler (1996) 1,100 F I<br />
L. C. Miller & Cox (1982) 42 F I<br />
Mohr (1932) 25 M I<br />
Mohr (1932) 25 F I<br />
Molar &Lund (1933) 50 M I<br />
Mohr &Lund (1933) 50 F I<br />
Moisan-Thomas, Conger, Zellinger, & Firth (1985) 60 M I<br />
Murphy, Nelson, & Cheap (1981) 41 B I<br />
Napoleon, Chassin, & Young (1980) 28 B I<br />
Noles, Cash, & Winstead (1985) 77 B I<br />
O'Grady (1989) 64 M I<br />
O'Grady (1989) 63 F i<br />
Pellegrini, Hicks, Meyers-Winton, & Antal (1978) 96 B N<br />
Pilkonis (1977) 46 B I<br />
Raskin & Terry (1988), Study 2 57 B N<br />
Raza & Carpenter (1987) 171 B N<br />
Reis, Nezlek, & Wheeler (1980) 35 M I<br />
Reis, Nezlek, & Wheeler (1980) 36 F I<br />
Reis et al. (1982) 43 M I<br />
Reis et al. (1982)/Reis, Wheeler, Nezlek, Kernis, & Spiegel (1985) 51 F I<br />
Romer & Berkson (1980) 176 B N<br />
Roszell, Kennedy, & Grabb (1990) 1,141 B N<br />
Rowe, Clapp, & Wallis (1987) 28 M I<br />
Rowe, Clapp, & Wallis (1987) 22 F I<br />
Sarason, Sarason, Hacker, & Basham (1985) 168 B I<br />
Shackelf<strong>or</strong>d & Larsen (1999) 34 M I<br />
Shackelf<strong>or</strong>d & Larsen (1999) 66 F I<br />
Shapiro, Struening, Shapiro, & Barten (1976) 97 B N<br />
Shapiro, Struening, Shapiro, & Barten (1976) 97 B N<br />
Singer (1964) 10 F I<br />
Singer (1964) 14 F I<br />
Singer (1964) 192 F I<br />
Snyder, Berscheid, & Glick (1985) 39 M I<br />
Sparacino (1980) 549 M I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 1 55 M I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 1 65 F I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 2 50 M I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 2 87 F I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 3 84 M I<br />
Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 3 83 F I<br />
Steffen & Redden (1977) 40 M N<br />
Stelzer, Desmond, & Price (1987) 41 F I<br />
Stewart (1980) 67 B I<br />
Stewart (1984) 60 B I<br />
Snssman et al. (1987) 50 B I<br />
Sussman & Mueser (1983) 43 F I<br />
Turner, Gillil<strong>and</strong>, & Klein (1981) 99 B I<br />
Turner, Gillil<strong>and</strong>, & Klein (1981) 103 B N<br />
Walster, Aronson, Abrahams, & Rottmann (1966) 376 M I<br />
Walster, Aronson, Abrahams, & Rottmann (1966) 376 F I<br />
Wessberg, Marriotto, Conger, Farrell, & Conger (1979) 45 M I<br />
Zakahi & Duran (1988) 20 M I<br />
Zakahi & Duran (1988) 27 F I<br />
Zebrowitz, Collins, & Dutta (1998) 80 F I<br />
Note. M = male; F = female; B = both; I = independent; N = nonindependent; F = facial measure; G = global measure.<br />
F 0.20<br />
F 0.94<br />
G 0.72<br />
F 0.43<br />
F -0.314<br />
G -0.06<br />
F 0.97<br />
G -0.04<br />
G 0.34<br />
F 0.02<br />
F 0.31<br />
G -0.08<br />
G 0.49<br />
F -0.02<br />
F 0.57<br />
G 0.59<br />
G 0.61<br />
G 0.10<br />
G 0.51<br />
G 0.38<br />
F 0.26<br />
F 0.20<br />
G -0.16<br />
F -0.56<br />
F 0.58<br />
G -0.69<br />
G 0.62<br />
F -0.20<br />
G 0.79<br />
G 0.24<br />
G 0.20<br />
G 0.20<br />
G -0.10<br />
G 0.18<br />
F 0.16<br />
F 0.38<br />
F 0.50<br />
F 0.14<br />
F 0.28<br />
F 0.22<br />
G 1.41<br />
G 1.18<br />
F 0.20<br />
F 0.63<br />
F 0.38<br />
G 0.07<br />
F -0.20<br />
F 0.26<br />
F 0.18<br />
F -0.64<br />
F -0.04<br />
F 0.02<br />
F -0.45<br />
G 0.83<br />
G 0.55<br />
G 0.67<br />
G 0.53<br />
G 0.94<br />
G 0.26<br />
G 0.47<br />
G 0.47<br />
G 1.77<br />
G 0.98<br />
G 0.60<br />
F 1.23<br />
F 0.27<br />
G 0.38<br />
(Appendixes continue)