02.02.2013 Views

Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review

Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review

Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MAXIMS OR MYTHS OF BEAUTY 421<br />

Appendix G (continued)<br />

Study Sample size Gender Rater type Attractiveness measure d<br />

Kalick, Zebrowitz, Langlois, & Johnson (1998) 127 F I<br />

Kleck & Rubenstein (1975) 48 M I<br />

Kowner (1996) 122 B N<br />

Kowner & Ogawa (1995) 49 M I<br />

Kowner & Ogawa (1995) 44 F I<br />

Kuhlenschmidt & Conger (1988) 35 F I<br />

Larrance & Zuckerman (1981) 60 B I<br />

Longo (1990) 243 B I<br />

M<strong>and</strong>el & Shrauger (1980) 37 M N<br />

Martindale, Ross, Hines, & Abrams (1978) 19 B I<br />

Martindale, Ross, Hines, & Abrams (1978) 19 B I<br />

Mathes & Kahn (1975) 110 M I<br />

Mathes & Kahn (1975) 101 F I<br />

McGovem, Neale, & Kendler (1996) 1,100 F I<br />

L. C. Miller & Cox (1982) 42 F I<br />

Mohr (1932) 25 M I<br />

Mohr (1932) 25 F I<br />

Molar &Lund (1933) 50 M I<br />

Mohr &Lund (1933) 50 F I<br />

Moisan-Thomas, Conger, Zellinger, & Firth (1985) 60 M I<br />

Murphy, Nelson, & Cheap (1981) 41 B I<br />

Napoleon, Chassin, & Young (1980) 28 B I<br />

Noles, Cash, & Winstead (1985) 77 B I<br />

O'Grady (1989) 64 M I<br />

O'Grady (1989) 63 F i<br />

Pellegrini, Hicks, Meyers-Winton, & Antal (1978) 96 B N<br />

Pilkonis (1977) 46 B I<br />

Raskin & Terry (1988), Study 2 57 B N<br />

Raza & Carpenter (1987) 171 B N<br />

Reis, Nezlek, & Wheeler (1980) 35 M I<br />

Reis, Nezlek, & Wheeler (1980) 36 F I<br />

Reis et al. (1982) 43 M I<br />

Reis et al. (1982)/Reis, Wheeler, Nezlek, Kernis, & Spiegel (1985) 51 F I<br />

Romer & Berkson (1980) 176 B N<br />

Roszell, Kennedy, & Grabb (1990) 1,141 B N<br />

Rowe, Clapp, & Wallis (1987) 28 M I<br />

Rowe, Clapp, & Wallis (1987) 22 F I<br />

Sarason, Sarason, Hacker, & Basham (1985) 168 B I<br />

Shackelf<strong>or</strong>d & Larsen (1999) 34 M I<br />

Shackelf<strong>or</strong>d & Larsen (1999) 66 F I<br />

Shapiro, Struening, Shapiro, & Barten (1976) 97 B N<br />

Shapiro, Struening, Shapiro, & Barten (1976) 97 B N<br />

Singer (1964) 10 F I<br />

Singer (1964) 14 F I<br />

Singer (1964) 192 F I<br />

Snyder, Berscheid, & Glick (1985) 39 M I<br />

Sparacino (1980) 549 M I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 1 55 M I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 1 65 F I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 2 50 M I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 2 87 F I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 3 84 M I<br />

Sparacino & Hansell (1979), Study 3 83 F I<br />

Steffen & Redden (1977) 40 M N<br />

Stelzer, Desmond, & Price (1987) 41 F I<br />

Stewart (1980) 67 B I<br />

Stewart (1984) 60 B I<br />

Snssman et al. (1987) 50 B I<br />

Sussman & Mueser (1983) 43 F I<br />

Turner, Gillil<strong>and</strong>, & Klein (1981) 99 B I<br />

Turner, Gillil<strong>and</strong>, & Klein (1981) 103 B N<br />

Walster, Aronson, Abrahams, & Rottmann (1966) 376 M I<br />

Walster, Aronson, Abrahams, & Rottmann (1966) 376 F I<br />

Wessberg, Marriotto, Conger, Farrell, & Conger (1979) 45 M I<br />

Zakahi & Duran (1988) 20 M I<br />

Zakahi & Duran (1988) 27 F I<br />

Zebrowitz, Collins, & Dutta (1998) 80 F I<br />

Note. M = male; F = female; B = both; I = independent; N = nonindependent; F = facial measure; G = global measure.<br />

F 0.20<br />

F 0.94<br />

G 0.72<br />

F 0.43<br />

F -0.314<br />

G -0.06<br />

F 0.97<br />

G -0.04<br />

G 0.34<br />

F 0.02<br />

F 0.31<br />

G -0.08<br />

G 0.49<br />

F -0.02<br />

F 0.57<br />

G 0.59<br />

G 0.61<br />

G 0.10<br />

G 0.51<br />

G 0.38<br />

F 0.26<br />

F 0.20<br />

G -0.16<br />

F -0.56<br />

F 0.58<br />

G -0.69<br />

G 0.62<br />

F -0.20<br />

G 0.79<br />

G 0.24<br />

G 0.20<br />

G 0.20<br />

G -0.10<br />

G 0.18<br />

F 0.16<br />

F 0.38<br />

F 0.50<br />

F 0.14<br />

F 0.28<br />

F 0.22<br />

G 1.41<br />

G 1.18<br />

F 0.20<br />

F 0.63<br />

F 0.38<br />

G 0.07<br />

F -0.20<br />

F 0.26<br />

F 0.18<br />

F -0.64<br />

F -0.04<br />

F 0.02<br />

F -0.45<br />

G 0.83<br />

G 0.55<br />

G 0.67<br />

G 0.53<br />

G 0.94<br />

G 0.26<br />

G 0.47<br />

G 0.47<br />

G 1.77<br />

G 0.98<br />

G 0.60<br />

F 1.23<br />

F 0.27<br />

G 0.38<br />

(Appendixes continue)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!