12.07.2015 Views

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology - Department of Psychological ...

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology - Department of Psychological ...

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology - Department of Psychological ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong><strong>Cognitive</strong><strong>Psychology</strong>Greg FrancisSpring 2013MWF 1:30 - 2:20 pmSmith Hall, Room 108http://www.psych.purdue.edu/~gfrancis/Classes/PSY200/index.html


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis<strong>Introduction</strong>PSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 01Four great mysteriesHumans face four great mysteries about theuniverse1) Why is there something instead <strong>of</strong> nothing? This is the domain <strong>of</strong> physics Most <strong>of</strong> us are not going <strong>to</strong> understand the ideasFour great mysteries.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFour great mysteriesHumans face four great mysteries about theuniverse2) How did life form? This question is addressed at the boundary betweenchemistry and biologyFour great mysteriesHumans face four greatmysteries about theuniverse3) Why is there so muchdiversity <strong>of</strong> life? This is the domain <strong>of</strong>biology Evolution and naturalselection answer thisquestionPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFour great mysteriesHumans face four great mysteries about the universe4) What is the basis <strong>of</strong> human intelligence andconsciousness? <strong>Cognitive</strong> psychology and neuroscience Far from a complete answer Lots <strong>of</strong> issues <strong>to</strong> discussCourse outline Neuroscience -- EXAM (16%) Perception, Attention & Memory -- EXAM (16%) Memory & Mental representation -- Exam (16%) Language -- Exam (16%)Reasoning Cumulative Final (16%)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg FrancisTopicsTopicsDiscuss a sample <strong>of</strong> issues in cognitivepsychology / cognitive neuroscienceFor example Whats the deal with left and right brains? Why does everyone love Prozac?Try <strong>to</strong> relate cognitive psychology <strong>to</strong>s<strong>to</strong>ries you may have heard in the popularpressIdentify how the <strong>to</strong>pics can help you <strong>to</strong> bea better person Why telephone opera<strong>to</strong>rs seem rude. Why there is a gate at the first floor stairwayin the <strong>Psychology</strong> building. What <strong>to</strong> do if you are drunk while studying foran exam. What is the plural <strong>of</strong> walkman?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityTextbookThere is no textbookLecture notes are used insteadIf you want a book, borrow from a pastclassI am adding links <strong>to</strong> optional readings <strong>to</strong>the syllabus Not for every subjectLecture notesDownloadable from theclass web page Adobe Acrobat (pdf)format Reduced form (6 <strong>to</strong> apage)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBoiler castVodcast <strong>of</strong> the lectures will be provided on iTunesDo not believe that these are a substitute for attending lectureLink and instructions are on the class web pageCourse web pageSyllabus on the web http://www.psych.purdue.edu/~gfrancis/Classes/PSY200/index.html! updates <strong>to</strong> the syllabus links <strong>to</strong> labs Study guides for the exams Links <strong>to</strong> optional readings Grades will be posted after the first examThis course does not use BlackboardPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg FrancisExamsMix <strong>of</strong> multiple choice and short answer Students are <strong>of</strong>ten surprised at how muchdetail is expected in the short answerquestionsDetailed study guides will be provided atleast one week in advance <strong>of</strong> an examBeware the scheduling <strong>of</strong> the final exam! The exam is during the final exam week There are few excuses for changing the dateClass participationOccasionally I need assistance during a lectureI will randomly select names from the class listIf you are absent, you lose class participationpoints (few excuses)Sometimes everyone in class is checkedContributes <strong>to</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> class grade.Usually 6-10 checks per semesterPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityHomeworkCogLabJava-based programs that can be run through aweb browser (e.g., Firefox, IE Explorer, Opera,Safari, Chrome).You participate in classic experimentsTotal lab grade contributes <strong>to</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> your classgrade.Grade is based solely on completing theexperiment, not on the quality <strong>of</strong> the dataPurdue UniversityCogLabLabs are listed on the syllabusThey must be completed by 10:00 am at thedate indicated in the syllabus else you get no creditSince I wrote CogLab, you get access <strong>to</strong> theexperiments for free (a $30 value!)See handout for instructions on getting startedRegistration code is on a label on the instructionsFirst lab is due at 10:00 am on Wednesday!Purdue UniversityStraight scale 98% -100% A+ 93% - 97% A 90% - 92% A- 88% - 89% B+ 83% - 87% B 80% - 82% B- 78% - 79% C+ 73% - 77% C 70% - 72% C- 68% - 69% D+ 63% - 67% D 60% - 62% D-0% - 59% FGrading No rounding up: 82.99 is a B-Last semester: Fall 12# %A 13 6B 61 30C 74 35D 40 18F 23 11Purdue UniversityGradingLast semesters gradesE1 E2 E3 E4 Final CogLab% CP%Average 71.3 69.9 73.2 80.7 76.0 83.5 75.3Max 98 99 99 98 98 100 100Min 32 27 36 22 31 17.6 0Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg FrancisImportance <strong>of</strong> attending classCounts for 10% <strong>of</strong> final class gradeCorrelates well with final class grade (r=0.63)Instruc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong>fice hours Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 10:00 - 11:00am Or by appointment Psych 3186 Email: gfrancis@purdue.eduPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityTeaching assistantsGrade examsKeep track <strong>of</strong> gradesMay lecture when I am out <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>wnHave <strong>of</strong>fice hoursProvide out-<strong>of</strong>-class study sessions forexamsTeaching assistant Jihyun Kim Office: PSYCH, Room 3194Office hours: Monday and Wednesday, 2:30 – 4:00 pmEmail: kim510@purdue.edu!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMindi CogdillTeaching assistant Office: PSYCH 3143Office hours: Tuesday and Thursday,12:30 – 1:30 pm, Friday 2:30-3:30 pmEmail: mcogdill@purdue.edu!Purdue UniversityAttitudeDuring lectures: turn <strong>of</strong>f cell phones, dont read newspapers, dontplay gamesQuestions are always welcome. I can adjust my lecturing paceaccordinglyPrint out the lectures and bring them <strong>to</strong> class. Take notes duringclass. Not everything is on the slides.Everything we talk about in class is importantThis class is an introduc<strong>to</strong>ry class, but that does not mean it is easy Its like <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Physics or <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Chemistry Almost every other sub<strong>to</strong>pic in psychology depends on the ideas incognitive psychology Everything is at least 10,000 times more complicated than what wediscussIf you dont find a <strong>to</strong>pic interesting, just wait a weekPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg FrancisNext time<strong>Cognitive</strong> neuroscienceThe brainThe modularity hypothesisCogLab on Brain asymmetry due!Whats the deal with left and right brains?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Brain partsPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 02What’s the deal with left andright brains?Purdue University!! The source <strong>of</strong> cognition(consider transplant!)!! Weighs about 3 pounds!! Damage <strong>to</strong> some parts resultin immediate death ordisability!! Damage <strong>to</strong> other partsseems <strong>to</strong> have no effect!!! What brain parts areimportant <strong>to</strong> cognition?!! How do we discover the role<strong>of</strong> each brain part?The brainPurdue University!! Fore-brain!!cortex!! Hind-brain!!brain stem)The brain!! Hind-brain!!(brainstem)The brainLimbic Lobe(sexual behavior,emotional behavior,memory)Hypothalamus(appetite, thirst,temperature,hormones)Thalamus(sensorygateway,exceptsmell)Purdue UniversityCerebellumPurdue University (muscle control, learning)!! Cortex!! Similar <strong>to</strong> a thick,crumplednewspaper page!! Grooves (fissuresor sulci) separateregionsFore-brain!! Cortex!! Similar <strong>to</strong> a thick,crumplednewspaper page!! Grooves (fissuresor sulci) separateregionsFore-brainPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Fore-brainFore-brain!! Cortex!! Similar <strong>to</strong> a thick,crumpled newspaperpage!! Grooves (fissures orsulci) separate regions!! Cortex!! Similar <strong>to</strong> a thick,crumplednewspaper page!! Grooves (fissuresor sulci) separateregionsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityContralateral processing!! Processing in the brain is done on theopposite side <strong>of</strong> your organs!! Control <strong>of</strong> your right arm is from the leftside <strong>of</strong> your brainContralateral processing!! Neural fibersfrom the eyecross on way<strong>to</strong> cortex!! Information from your left field <strong>of</strong> viewgoes <strong>to</strong> the right side <strong>of</strong> your brainPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityContralateral processingCut corpus callosum!! Brainhemispheresareconnected bya mass <strong>of</strong>neural fiberscalled thecorpuscallosum!! Behaviorchanges verylittle!! Subtle effectsPurdue Universityhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMLzP1VCANoPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12!! If “nut” flashes on leftscreen!! subject cannot name it!! subject can pick up nutwith left hand!! If “nut” flashes on rightside!! subject can name it!! subject cannot pick upnut with left hand untilhe says “nut” out loudBrain sides1981 Nobel Prize for Roger Sperry!Purdue UniversityBrain sides!! Results led <strong>to</strong> further study and common belief that!! Left side: language, analytical, classification, Western rationalization!! Right side: art, music, recognition <strong>of</strong> faces and shapes, Easternmysticism!! Vast oversimplification!! in a normal brain, bothsides are involved inmany tasks!! Results do support the ideathat different parts <strong>of</strong> thebrain are involved indifferent cognitive tasks(modularity hypothesis)Purdue University!! In the CogLabexperiment Brainasymmetry!! You saw a pair <strong>of</strong>chimeric faces andwere asked <strong>to</strong>choose which onelooked youngerCogLabChimeric faces!! The faces were made by taking a normal face and anartificially aged faceTimePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityChimeric faces!! Take opposite halves <strong>of</strong> the facesChimeric faces!! Put them <strong>to</strong>gether, and make the other face by flipping it!! Thus, both faces are mirror images, they contain the sameinformationPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12CogLab!! If you stare at the middle <strong>of</strong> face, theinformation on the left goes <strong>to</strong> theright hemisphere!! which is supposed <strong>to</strong> be better able <strong>to</strong>deal with face information than the lefthemisphere!! So the information on the left side <strong>of</strong> theface should dominate the face decision!! This face should look relatively youngCogLab!! If you stare at the middle <strong>of</strong> face, theinformation on the left goes <strong>to</strong> theright hemisphere!! which is supposed <strong>to</strong> be better able <strong>to</strong>deal with face information than the lefthemisphere!! So the information on the left side <strong>of</strong> theface should dominate the face decision!! This face should look relatively oldPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityCogLab!! So, we would expect people with brain asymmetrieswould usually choose as younger, the face that has theyounger half on the left side!! Left handed people typically do not show as much brainasymmetry effects as right handed people!! Thus, we can look for differences between left and righthanded people!! We expect right handed people <strong>to</strong> select the face with theyounger image on the left more <strong>of</strong>ten than left handed peoplePurdue UniversityCogLab!! Here is the data average for the class!! 191 right handed people!! 15 left handed people!! In the right direction, but a small effectLeft handed Right handedPercentage <strong>of</strong> 50.95 56.13choices withyounger faceon leftPurdue UniversityCogLab!! Here is the data average for the global data set!! 16,056 right handed people!! 1676 left handed people!! Some evidence <strong>of</strong> a very weak effectLeft handed Right handedPercentage <strong>of</strong> 56.4 57.2choices withyounger faceon leftPurdue UniversityAna<strong>to</strong>my!! The cortex contains large fissures thatseparate five major areas!!Limbic (already discussed)!!Occipital!!Parietal!!Temporal!!Frontal!! Each has distinct propertiesPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Occipital lobeParietal lobe!! Receivesinformation fromthe eye!!Most investigatedarea <strong>of</strong> the brain!! Sensations <strong>of</strong>pain,temperature,<strong>to</strong>uch, pressurePrimarysensoryareaPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityParietal lobe!! Primary sensoryarea!!sensitivityinvolvesdisproportionateareas <strong>of</strong> the brain,relative <strong>to</strong> size <strong>of</strong>body part!! Hearing!!speech (left)!!music (right)!! Memory andattention!!visual recognitionTemporal lobePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFrontal lobe!! Divide lobes in<strong>to</strong> areasBroadman areas!! Largest part <strong>of</strong>cortex!!planning!!prediction!!mo<strong>to</strong>r area!!speech area!! e.g. Broadman!! Area 1, Area 12, … Area 200!! Some special names: V1, V2, V3,…Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12!! Can partly identifyfunction by looking atnerves coming in andout <strong>of</strong> area!! Pathways throughareas seem <strong>to</strong> beinvolved in differentkinds <strong>of</strong> cognitive tasksArea functionPurdue UniversityColor!! There is order andfunction even withinan area!! The cortex is asheet <strong>of</strong> neurons!! In its thickness are6 layers <strong>of</strong> neurons!! numbered 1-6!! sometimes includesubdivisions (4a, 4b,4c!, 4c", …)Brain layersPurdue UniversityConclusionsNext time!! Lots <strong>of</strong> research in this area!! New brain regions are being mapped outdaily with ever increasing resolution!! <strong>Cognitive</strong> neuroscience relies strongly onthe “modularity hypothesis”!! Putting everything <strong>to</strong>gether is very difficult!! Brain scans!! EEG recordings!! MRI scans!! PET scans!! Functional MRI!! How <strong>to</strong> study the brain without killing someone.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Brain scansPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 03How <strong>to</strong> study the brain withoutkilling someone.Purdue UniversityScanning!! Technology provides insight in<strong>to</strong> brain processes!! EEG recordings!! MRI!! Functional MRI!! Non-invasive!! Maps <strong>of</strong> brain activity!! The goal is <strong>to</strong> relate brain events <strong>to</strong> cognitiveeventsPurdue UniversityResolution!! For almost every technique we have <strong>to</strong> worry about itsability <strong>to</strong> discriminate differences in!! Space: whichplace is active?!! Time: whendoes somethinghappen?!! Finer resolutionis usually better!! But can bedifficult <strong>to</strong> dealwith so muchdataElectroencephalogram!! EEG!! The brainproduceselectrical activity!! Put electrodeson the headPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEEG!! Watch the electrical current change through time whilereading sentences (averaged across many trials)!! Good temporal resolution!! Kutas & Hillyard (1980)SemanticanomalyBrain maps!! You can analyze the EEG signals in many different ways!! Compare the signal strength for different situations!! Ayahuasca is a Brazilian psychoactive teaPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12!! Poor spatialresolution!! You never reallySpatial resolutionknow which part <strong>of</strong>the brain is makingthe current!! Lots <strong>of</strong> work <strong>to</strong>improveMagnetic Resonance Imaging!! Magnetic fieldforces pro<strong>to</strong>ns inyour body <strong>to</strong> lineup!! pulses <strong>of</strong> radioin<strong>to</strong> fieldbouncespro<strong>to</strong>ns around!! as they return<strong>to</strong> normalposition, theyemit a signalthat can bedecoded in<strong>to</strong> amapPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMagnetic Resonance Imaging!! MRI Scans: Like an x-ray machine, butcan look at s<strong>of</strong>t tissue (like lungs, heart,..)!!Very good spatial resolutionMagnetic Resonance Imaging!! MRI Scans: Like an x-ray machine, but can look at s<strong>of</strong>ttissue (like ankles, my brain,..)!! Very good spatial resolution!! millimetersPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMRI ScansMRI Scans!! MRI providesa “slice” at atime!! Take multipleslices <strong>to</strong> buildup full image!! Can identifyana<strong>to</strong>micaldifferences betweenbrains!! Alcoholic has largerventricles and thinnercorpus callosumNobel prizewinning work!Purdue University!! Note comparingacross brains is a bittricky!!! Everyone’s brain is abit differentPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12!! 3-D maps!! NormalMRI ScansMRI Scans!! Non-invasive, no side effects!! Allows early detection <strong>of</strong> brain disease,tumors,…!! Fantastic spatial resolution!! But…!! Ataxia:!!loss <strong>of</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>rcontrol!!it only shows structure!!no way <strong>to</strong> know what a brain area doesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFunctional MRI!! Just like MRI, but with a new analysis!! MRI differentiates between different types <strong>of</strong> tissue (celltypes)!! Functional MRI differentiates between active andinactive neurons: concentration <strong>of</strong> oxygen!! The measurement is called the “blood oxygen leveldependent” (BOLD)»! It roughly tracks the flow <strong>of</strong> blood in the brain»! More active neurons recruit more bloodPurdue University!! Color maps showstrongest“responses”!! E.g., fMRI scan <strong>of</strong> awoman after a stroke!!Blue/green:normal blood flow!!Red/black:abnormal bloodflowFunctional MRIPurdue UniversityFunctional MRIScanning!! Consider this fMRI scan!! Very good spatialresolution!! millimeters!! Pretty goodtemporal resolution!! Seconds!! (Silva, 2002)!! It shows regional cerebralblood volume (rCBV)!! You cannot tell how/ifdifferent regions are involvedin different activities!! Breathing!! Digestion!! Thinking about exams!! …..Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Differences!! We have <strong>to</strong> look for differences in activity!! Alzheimer’s patients have reduced brain activityA simple experiment!! Suppose you run an fMRI experiment where a person alternatesbetween seeing a blank screen and a face!! You take multiple fMRI scans with half recording brain activity duringthe blank and half recording brain activity during the face!! Add them up pixel by pixel for each conditionViewing blankViewing facePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySubtraction method!! Subtract the fMRI signals produced by one condition from the fMRIsignals produced by another condition!! The difference map indicates those brain regions that are involved inthe different cognitive tasks!! It requires a sophisticated statistical analysis <strong>to</strong> avoid false positives!Viewing blankViewing facePurdue UniversityDifference map!! What is usuallyreported is just thedifference map!! Colors mark placesin the brain that arestatistically differentbetween conditions!! Czisch et al. (2009)for rare <strong>to</strong>nes vs.frequent <strong>to</strong>nes!! The map would bedifferent if itcompared rare <strong>to</strong>nesversus speechReportingPurdue UniversityFunctional MRIFunctional MRI!! Color maps showstrongest“responses”!! e.g., during a taskthat requires covertspatial attentioncompared <strong>to</strong> one thatdoes not requireattention!! When moving apointer <strong>to</strong> a targetbox compared <strong>to</strong> nomovement!!“activity” in areasinvolved in vision,planning, and mo<strong>to</strong>rcontrolPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Limitations!! Brain scans do not really tell us how the brainworks!! the scans just tell us approximately where in the brainsomething occurs!! sometimes it can tell approximately when!! Even trying <strong>to</strong> find the place may be problematic!! Lots <strong>of</strong> cognitive abilities involve many different areas<strong>of</strong> the brain!! Most <strong>of</strong> the time theories <strong>of</strong> cognition are derivedfrom experimental psychology!! Brain studies explore how <strong>to</strong> implement the theoriesPurdue UniversityCommon misconception!! Brain scans demonstrate a physiological basis <strong>to</strong>things that were thought <strong>to</strong> be emotionally orcognitively based!! e.g., MRI scans<strong>of</strong> stutters!! in fact, allbehavioral traitsare physiologicallybasedPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Lots <strong>of</strong> research in this area!! Technology is improving in many ways!! There are many other types <strong>of</strong> scanningtechnologies!! Computerized Axial Tomography (CAT)!! Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)!! Single Pho<strong>to</strong>n Emission Computed Tomography(SPECT)!! Near Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging (NIRSI)!! Magne<strong>to</strong>encephalography (MEG)!! Positron Emission Tomography (PET)Purdue UniversityNext time!! How do we use brain scans <strong>to</strong> studycognition?!! How good are the scans?!! What is really being measured?!! How <strong>to</strong> read someone’s mind.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Brain scansPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 04Scanning!! Brain scanning techniques like fMRIprovide spatial and temporal patterns <strong>of</strong>activity across the brain!! We want <strong>to</strong> analyze those patterns <strong>to</strong>discover how the brain worksHow <strong>to</strong> read someone’s mind.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityfMRI!! Passive listening vs. active listening!!Vannest et al. (2009)!! Twenty children (ages 11-13) complete threetasks!!Passive listening: hear a female speaker tell a 30-second s<strong>to</strong>ry!!Active response: hear the same speaker tell a s<strong>to</strong>ry in5 second segments <strong>of</strong> two sentences. Scanningoccurred after the sentences (silence). Answerquestions!!Random <strong>to</strong>nes: no task, just listenPurdue UniversityfMRI!! The colors show thedifference mapsrelative <strong>to</strong> listening <strong>to</strong>the <strong>to</strong>nes!! Common activity(breathing, digestion,hearing machinenoise,…) issubtracted out!! The colors are notbrain activity!Purdue UniversityPassivelisteningActiveresponsefMRI!! More and differentactivity for activelistening compared <strong>to</strong>passive listeningPassivelisteningfMRI!! Does more activity for theactive response mean activeresponse listening is “better”than passive listening?Passivelistening!! (Could it be!! Tested children onotherwise?)comprehension <strong>of</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ries!! PL: 75.1% correct, SD=12.7Activeresponse!! AR: 79.1% correct, SD=9.1!! No real difference incomprehensionActiveresponsePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Sensory substitution!! Some scientists look for replacements <strong>to</strong> lost perception!! For example, there is a <strong>to</strong>ngue display unit that attempts <strong>to</strong> present spatialinformation for blind peopleSensory substitution!! People can use a TDU <strong>to</strong> discriminate shapes!! Kaczmarek, Bach-y-Rita & Tyler (1998)!! Link <strong>to</strong> video on class web pagePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySensory substitution!! So what happens in the brain?!! Are there responses from areas typically involved in shapeperception? Or in areas related <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>uch on the <strong>to</strong>ngue? (or both orneither?)!! fMRI differencessuggest that using theTDU involves areas <strong>of</strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r cortex!! Not areas that aretraditionally for visualperceptionSensory substitution!! This is the kind <strong>of</strong>question that can bestbe answered with brainscan technologyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityReading minds!! Long-term, the goal <strong>of</strong> fMRI research is <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> analyze a brain scanand identify what a person is thinking!! There are several attempts <strong>to</strong> do this (Haynes et al., 2006)!! Adding or subtracting numbersReading minds!! Based on the choice at the end, we can deduce whether the subject choseaddition or subtraction for that trial!! Make an fMRI scan during the selection process!! Whether <strong>to</strong> add or subtract numbersScan "now"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityOr scan"now"PSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Mind reading!! It is possible <strong>to</strong> build a recognition system that distinguishes (with71% accuracy) the brain patterns for addition and subtraction!! Depends on the place in the brain!! Different places for intention and execution!! You can read the mind <strong>of</strong> these subjects!Thought reconstruction!! Another research group analyzed fMRI responses <strong>to</strong>reproduce a shown imagePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityThought reconstruction!! Performance depends on where the signals come from!! Fewer errors for “lower” brain areas!! Where do you s<strong>to</strong>p?, the retina?, the lens <strong>of</strong> the eye?Purdue UniversityThought reconstruction!! These kinds <strong>of</strong> studies are mostly a demonstration <strong>of</strong>technology!! we already know the brain represents visual information!!! Before the study was run, we knew that there weredifferences in the brain when we see different images!! The percept is based on the brain, so there must bedifferences!!! These kinds <strong>of</strong> studies tell us that theneurophysiological differences between cognitiveevents can be measured by these brain scanningtechnologies!! A bit like statistical powerPurdue UniversityMind reading with EEG!! You can purchase an EEG device <strong>to</strong> read your mindand control a computer!! www.emotiv.comMind reading limits!! fMRI: If subjects decide <strong>to</strong> multiply numbers, a system trained <strong>to</strong>distinguish between subtraction and addition is clueless!! Thought reconstruction: As the number <strong>of</strong> possible images <strong>to</strong> beshown increases, it becomes harder <strong>to</strong> reconstruct the shownimage!! Emotiv: very limited set <strong>of</strong> mind reading possibilities!! This is a very limited form <strong>of</strong> mind reading!! People do better than this every day by watching people behave(posture, eyes, skin <strong>to</strong>ne)!! The military and police are quite interested in these approaches!! Companies are interested in identifying what you think!! Proc<strong>to</strong>r & GamblePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Problems / limitations withscanning!! So much data that is difficult <strong>to</strong> know what <strong>to</strong> do with everything!! Statistical analysis is complicated!! In a small brain scan, you may have 64 x 64 voxels x 10 slices»! =40,960 voxels overall!! Some <strong>of</strong> those voxels will give different responses just by chance!! Difficult <strong>to</strong> compare across subjects!! Slightly different ana<strong>to</strong>my!! Blurring <strong>of</strong> images is difficult <strong>to</strong> deal with!! Sometimes blur <strong>to</strong>gether brain areas, across a fissure, that areactually far apart on surface <strong>of</strong> cortex!! Some cognitive events are faster than the technology can track!! Can only measure the brain, cannot manipulate itPurdue UniversityStatistics!! It is easy <strong>to</strong> do the statistics incorrectly (it has taken a while for thefield <strong>to</strong> sort this out)!! Bennett et al. (2010) ran a study where the subject was shown aseries <strong>of</strong> pho<strong>to</strong>graphs depicting people in social situations with aspecified emotional valence, either socially inclusive or sociallyexclusive. The subject was asked <strong>to</strong> determine which emotion theindividual in the pho<strong>to</strong> must have been experiencing.!! fMRI contrasts were computed between the scans for the twotypes <strong>of</strong> emotional valencePurdue UniversityStatistics!! There is a significant difference in fMRI activity for some regions <strong>of</strong>the brain!! Medial brain cavity and upper spinal columnStatistics!! The “subject” in this study was a mature Atlantic salmon(sex unknown)!! The “active” regions identified by the fMRI are due <strong>to</strong>chance!! Even with purely random noise, there will be somestatistically significant findings!! The brain has lots <strong>of</strong> random noise!! These problems can be reduced but never entirelyeliminated!! They are common <strong>to</strong> many areas <strong>of</strong> psychology, not just brainscansPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNeurons!! The brain cells that are responsible for cognitionare neurons!! Dendrite!! input!! Soma!! integrateA neuron!! Axon!! output!! Myelin sheath!! insulatePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12A neuron!! There are many different types <strong>of</strong> neurons!! We will describe only the most common characteristicsHow many neurons?!! Estimates <strong>of</strong> 10^11 neurons in the human brain!!100,000,000,000; one hundred billion!!estimates <strong>of</strong> 100,000 per cubic millimeter!!(about the resolution <strong>of</strong> functional MRI)!! Millions are active at any given timeNo. 21 mmPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Brain scans usually look at differences in brain“activity”!! Lots <strong>of</strong> technical (and ethical) issues!! The goal is <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> look at a map (or movie)and be able <strong>to</strong> read someone’s mind!! That is many years <strong>of</strong>f!! questionable if it can even be done with these methodsaloneNext time!! What is the neural activity that producesbrain scans?!! How do neurons transmit information <strong>to</strong>other neurons?!! Why does (nearly) everyone like Prozac?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Neurons and neurotransmittersPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 05Neurons!! The brain cells that are responsible for cognitionare neuronsWhy does (nearly) everyonelove Prozac?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityInput / outputInput at dendrites!! Electrical signal!! Established by therelative amount <strong>of</strong>charged ions insideversus outside the cellmembrane!! Inputs change theresting potential <strong>of</strong> thecell!! Output identifies whenthe cell potential hasincreased a lotelectrode-70 millivoltsresting levelPurdue UniversityNA+K+NA+K+!! Changes the cell membranepotential!! which causes furtherchanges in the cell’schemistry!! which causes furtherchanges in the membranepotential!! Strong enough input crossesa threshold and the cell fires!! action potentialhttp://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/neurons_intro/action_potential_1.0.swfPurdue UniversityA neuron!! An action potentialgenerated at thesoma travelsdown the axon <strong>to</strong>the terminalsA neuron!! The action potential then affects the membranes <strong>of</strong>other cells’ dendritesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Output!! Myelin is like insulation for thecell’s axon!! it insures that the signalgenerated by the actionpotential is strong!! Jumps electrically rather thanthe normal chemical exchanges!! In multiple sclerosis the body’simmune system attacks myelin!! physical problems (paralysis)!! cognitive problems (memory,reasoning, judgement)!! cause unknown (300,000people)Output!! The output <strong>of</strong> a neuron is either excita<strong>to</strong>ry or inhibi<strong>to</strong>ry on theother neuron it reaches!! Excita<strong>to</strong>ry: when our neuron sends an output, the receivingneuron is more likely <strong>to</strong> produce an action potential!! Inhibi<strong>to</strong>ry: when our neuron sends an output, the receivingneuron is less likely <strong>to</strong> produce an action potentialPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNetworks!! <strong>Cognitive</strong> behavior is related <strong>to</strong>groups <strong>of</strong> neurons working<strong>to</strong>gether!! Include excitation and inhibition!! more laterEpilepsy!! Disease <strong>of</strong> central nervous system!! causes mostly unknown!! Seizures!! bursts <strong>of</strong> electrical activity travelling through networks inthe brain!! brain activity is out <strong>of</strong> control!! epileptic fits!! Isolated seizures also occur due <strong>to</strong> high fever,lack <strong>of</strong> oxygen, or head injuryPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEpilepsyEpilepsy!! EEG recordingsare <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>to</strong>diagnose epilepsy!! Many differenttypes <strong>of</strong> epilepsy,with different EEGpatterns!! One theory (but not yet proven) is that epilepsypatients’ inhibi<strong>to</strong>ry cells are not working properly!! Excita<strong>to</strong>ry cells activate everything until they “exhaust”themselvesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11!! Treatment generally involves!! drugs, diet, avoiding stress,keeping regular schedule!! In extreme cases surgeryprevents seizures fromspreading throughout thebrainEpilepsyA balanced brain!! The brain is a dynamic system!! at multiple levels!! Neurons!! balance between “forces” inside and outside <strong>of</strong> cell membraneallows for action potentials!! Networks!! balance between excitation and inhibition!! Without these balances you do not thinkPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Axon --> dendritesNeural connectionsMolecular structure!! Molecules have a particular threedimensionalshapewaterbenzenehttp://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/neurons_intro/neurotransmission_classic_3.0.swfPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMolecular structureMolecular structureTNT!! Different molecules have differentshapesaspirin!! Neurotransmitters are just molecules!! At least 50 different neurotransmitters!!dopamine, norepinephrine, sero<strong>to</strong>nin,acetylcholine, glutamate, gammaaminobutyricacid (GABA)!! All with different shapes!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Recep<strong>to</strong>rRecep<strong>to</strong>r!! Very largemolecules calledproteins!! Similar <strong>to</strong> a filter!! accepts someneurotransmitters!! rejects others!! When it accepts a neurotransmitter, itstarts a chain reaction <strong>of</strong> events!!physical, chemical, electrical!!locally changes the cell membrane»!depolarization (excitation)»!hyperpolarization (inhibition)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNeurotransmitters!! Different neurotransmitters are associatedwith different properties!!actually neurotransmitter and recep<strong>to</strong>r pairs!! neural!! cognitive!! behavioralTourette’s syndrome!! Inherited (~200,000 in US)!! Behavior!! Tics»! Simple: eye blinking, facial grimacing, sniffing»! Complex: coordinated patterns, sniffing objects,jumping, twisting!! Too much dopamine!! Treated with Haldol (among others)!! blocks dopaminehttp://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=1033515nPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityParkinson’s!! Lack <strong>of</strong> dopamine!!Many different causes!!In extreme cases, patients are “frozen”!! Give patients large doses <strong>of</strong> L-DOPA!!a precursor <strong>of</strong> dopamine!!sometimes solves the problem!!lots <strong>of</strong> side effects!! Awakenings, by Oliver SacksDrugs!! Interact with neurotransmitters in lots <strong>of</strong> ways, forexample!! Replace: accepted by recep<strong>to</strong>r and with similar effect!! Production: increase or decrease!! Reuptake: knock out enzymes that removeneurotransmitter from recep<strong>to</strong>r, neurotransmitter has abigger effect!! Blocking: enter recep<strong>to</strong>r but does not trigger reaction,partly closes recep<strong>to</strong>r protein so neurotransmittercannot enterhttp://you.video.sina.com.cn/b/10602624-1406529597.htmlPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11!! Some forms <strong>of</strong> depressionseem <strong>to</strong> be related <strong>to</strong> limits inthe use <strong>of</strong> theneurotransmitter sero<strong>to</strong>nin!! Prozac is a selectivesero<strong>to</strong>nin reuptake inhibi<strong>to</strong>r(SSRI)!! it keeps sero<strong>to</strong>nin bound <strong>to</strong> arecep<strong>to</strong>r for longer thanusual, thereby increasing itseffect!! Prozac is one <strong>of</strong> the mostwidely prescribed drugs in theworld!ProzacOther drugs!! Amphetamines: release <strong>of</strong> norepinephrin or dopamine!! LSD: resembles sero<strong>to</strong>nin!! Phenothiazine drugs: block dopamine!! Curare: blocks acetylcholine!! Cocaine: prolongs effects <strong>of</strong> dopamine!! Morphine: resembles small set <strong>of</strong> neurotransmitters called endorphinpeptides (modulate pain perception)!! Tetrahydrocannabinol (active ingredient in marijuana): binds <strong>to</strong>some neurorecep<strong>to</strong>rs, but it’s not clear what it doesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Neural action potentials!! Shape <strong>of</strong> proteins!! Specific use <strong>of</strong> neurotransmitters for certain behaviors!! Current work on identification <strong>of</strong> role <strong>of</strong> neurotransmitters!! Lots <strong>of</strong> money <strong>to</strong> be made!! Lots more complicated than what we’ve seen hereNext time!! Neural sensitivity!! Neural codes!! Receptive fields!! CogLab on Blind spot due!!! How do you recognize your grandmother?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Receptive fieldsAction potentialPSY 200Greg FrancisWith enough excita<strong>to</strong>ry input, a cell produces anaction potential that sends a signal down its axon<strong>to</strong> other cells But a single action potential has little effectLecture 06If the input stays present, the cell producesanother, and another,…How do you recognize yourgrandmother? A rapid series <strong>of</strong> action potentials can influence othercellsThe number <strong>of</strong> action potentials in a certainlength <strong>of</strong> time determines the firing rate <strong>of</strong> thecellPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFiring rateSpecificity8 spikes (action potentials) during 300 ms Firing rate <strong>of</strong> 27 Hz (27 spikes per second)Two key questions in cognitive neuroscience are What stimulus (or stimuli) makes a given cell fire at a strongrate?» something red?» a pen?» your grandmother? What does it mean when a given cell fires strongly?» You are thinking <strong>of</strong> something?» Seeing something?» Remembering something?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityReceptive fieldThe set <strong>of</strong> stimuli that reliably changes acells firing rate.A stimulus could excite the cell above normal firing rateOr inhibit the cell below normal firing rateReceptive fieldReceptive fields are very useful for studies <strong>of</strong> spatial perceptionTouch involves sensitivity <strong>to</strong> pressure on skinThe loops indicate theregions where a singleneuron responds <strong>to</strong>pressurePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Receptive fieldRecep<strong>to</strong>rsReceptive fields are very useful for studies <strong>of</strong> visual perceptionVision involves spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> lightThe back <strong>of</strong> the eyecontains tightlyLightpacked sensorscalled rods andcones that detectlight at a particularlocationPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityRecep<strong>to</strong>rsRecep<strong>to</strong>rsLight sensors (rods and cones) respond <strong>to</strong> lightat a particular location in the back <strong>of</strong> the eye produces a neural responseA recep<strong>to</strong>r has a simple receptive field it responds <strong>to</strong> light <strong>of</strong> the right wavelength (color) and the rightpositionLightPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWhere nerves leavethe back <strong>of</strong> the eye,there are no lightrecep<strong>to</strong>rs light that hits this spot isnot visibleBlind spotBlind spotIn CogLab you mapped your blind spotmydatalookslikethisPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Blind spotHeres the average data for the whole class141 participantsNetworkLight recep<strong>to</strong>rs do not just pass information<strong>to</strong> the brainNeurons are hooked <strong>to</strong>gether in an inhibi<strong>to</strong>rywayLightPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEvidence <strong>of</strong> inhibitionEvidence <strong>of</strong> inhibitionStimulation <strong>of</strong> a center region alonegives a strong responseAdding light <strong>to</strong> a surrounding regioncan reduce the responseLight4035Light4035Firing rate3025201510Firing rate3025201510550Time0TimePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityReceptive fieldThe receptive field <strong>of</strong> this cellincludes any place on the retinawhere light excites the cell and anyplace where light inhibits the cellOn-center, <strong>of</strong>f-surround-+Purdue UniversitySpatial responsesThe spatialpattern <strong>of</strong>excitation(center) andinhibition(surround)means the cellis sensitive <strong>to</strong>the location <strong>of</strong>a small spot <strong>of</strong>lightPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Spatial responsesSimple cellsYou have manydifferent suchcells withreceptive fieldsOn-center, <strong>of</strong>f-surround cells send action potentials <strong>to</strong>simple cells in parts <strong>of</strong> visual cortex, which have orientedreceptive fieldsthat arecentered atdifferentlocationsThey responddifferently <strong>to</strong> anedgePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySimple cellsSimple cellsOn-center, <strong>of</strong>f-surround cells send action potentials <strong>to</strong>simple cells in parts <strong>of</strong> visual cortex, which have orientedreceptive fieldsSimple cells come in a variety <strong>of</strong> types,but all are sensitive <strong>to</strong> bars or edges <strong>of</strong> apreferred orientation at a particularlocationPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityInformation processingFor simple cells, an image like thisInformation processingFor simple cells, an image like this is coded something like thisStrongresponsesat edges!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Complex cellsComplex cellsMany simple cells feedin<strong>to</strong> a complex cell,which is insensitive <strong>to</strong>direction <strong>of</strong> contrast andresponds <strong>to</strong> an orientedMany simple cells feed in<strong>to</strong> acomplex cell, which isinsensitive <strong>to</strong> direction <strong>of</strong>contrast and responds <strong>to</strong> anoriented bar in many differentplacesbar in many differentplaces Often these cells are alsosensitive <strong>to</strong> directions <strong>of</strong>motionPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityReceptive field hierarchyHigher order cellsReceptive fields inherit some properties fromComplex cells feed in<strong>to</strong> hypercomplex cells, whichlower-level cellsare sensitive <strong>to</strong> some types <strong>of</strong> curves and visualBut they also gain new selectivity by interactingformswith each other (and across levels)Receptive fields seem <strong>to</strong> get ever more complexWhat does this mean?Is there a grandmother cell?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityReceptive fieldGrandmother cellsIn the inferior temporal cortex <strong>of</strong> monkeysIt could be that a single cell has a receptive fieldsome cellsappear <strong>to</strong> havereceptive fieldsselectively tuned <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> the image <strong>of</strong> yourgrandmother but it is unlikelythat respond <strong>to</strong>monkey faces, inpr<strong>of</strong>ile not enough cells cell deathReceptive fields become less useful as we searchfor neural representations <strong>of</strong> non-sensory concepts What is the receptive field <strong>of</strong> a neuron that codes loveor trust?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12ConclusionsReceptive fields any stimulus that affects a cells firing rate excita<strong>to</strong>ry inhibi<strong>to</strong>ryVery useful for studies <strong>of</strong> the visualnervous systemLots <strong>of</strong> issues left unresolvedNext timeNetworks <strong>of</strong> neuronsConnections between cellsFeedback -- resonanceCogLab on Receptive fields due!Seeing things that are not there.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11Neural networksPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 07Seeing something that is notthere.Purdue UniversityReceptive field!! As we saw last time, acell’s receptive fielddepends <strong>to</strong> a large exten<strong>to</strong>n the receptive fields <strong>of</strong>other cells!! (e.g., complex cells dependon simple cells)!! Today we look at someissues involved innetworks <strong>of</strong> neuronsPurdue UniversityFeedbackResonance hypothesis!! Initially cell firing rates may vary a lot!! Cell 1 can affect cell 2, whichcan affect cell 3, which canaffect cell 1 again, which…!! What happens <strong>to</strong> cell firingrates?!! high firing rate==> active321!! In some networks cell firing rates s<strong>to</strong>pchanging much (unless outside input changes)!! The remaining active cells are those thatsupport each others’ activities throughexcitation: resonance!! Inactive cells are inhibited by the active cells!! low firing rate ==> inactive!! Mental awareness ==> resonancePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityA “simple” model!! A cell’s activation is on or <strong>of</strong>f (one or zero)!! Cell connections (synapses or weights) arereciprocal!! Cells update activations one at a time!! Cell activations are calculated with the ruleai&" $ 1 if wijaj> 0= #%$ 0 if & wijaj! 0Purdue UniversityA simple model!! Neural connections(synapses) are described asweights on the links betweencells2 w 21!! Input <strong>to</strong> a cell is the summed 31multiplication <strong>of</strong> sendingw 41activation and weight w 34w 15!! Reciprocal weights have 45w ij = w ijPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11Demonstration!! Cell activities do settle down eventually!! Final pattern <strong>of</strong> activities satisfiesconstraints <strong>of</strong> the network connections!! Error correction capabilities!! Can <strong>to</strong>lerate the loss <strong>of</strong> some cells!! Emergent properties <strong>of</strong> the network!!no single cell has these propertiesFeedback!! Feedback in networks can act <strong>to</strong> “clean up”noisy sensory information <strong>to</strong> make itconsistent with what our systems expect!! In a very real way, what we see, hear, taste,smell, <strong>to</strong>uch, and think, is biased by ournetwork’s expectation!! A network’s expectation is established by itsconnection weights!! excitation -- inhibitionPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySeeing things that are notthere!! Do you see a square in front <strong>of</strong> thepac men?Seeing things that are notthere!! Neurons in area V2 <strong>of</strong> your brain“create” the illusory con<strong>to</strong>ursPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFeedback!! Similar situation with the illusorycircle seen hereConclusions!! Networks <strong>of</strong> neurons have propertiesdifferent from single cells!!emergent properties!!stable activities!!multiple constraints!!<strong>to</strong>lerance <strong>to</strong> errors and cell loss!! Structure <strong>of</strong> connections (synapses)determines the final pattern <strong>of</strong> responsesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11Next time!! How networks learn!! Changing connections!! Learning rules!! Self-organization!! A problem with virtual reality.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11ProblemProblem!! The network coordinatingeye-hand systems, adjustsitself!! Extended use <strong>of</strong> thecomputer cameras makesthe user adapt so his eyesare where the cameras are!!! After taking the cameras <strong>of</strong>f,it takes some time <strong>to</strong> adaptback!! Eye-hand coordination is <strong>of</strong>f!! Could be a problem forsurgeons and pilots!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityOther adaptations!! Inverted prisms!! Fortunately, the adaptations return <strong>to</strong>normal pretty quickly!! Kind <strong>of</strong> like the feeling you get afterroller-skatingConclusions!! Learning in neural networks!!changing connections!!relatively simple rules!! Much <strong>of</strong> our perceptual and mo<strong>to</strong>rbehavior is based upon this type <strong>of</strong>continuous learning!! It’s not clear if more cognitive learning issimilarPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext time!! Neural networks for visual perception!!brightness!!color!!form!! Why we see color afterimages.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11Brightness contrast!! Two receptive fields inside the middle squarereceive the same excita<strong>to</strong>ry and inhibi<strong>to</strong>ry signals!! Little responseBrightness contrast!! Receptive fields on the corner!!Receive the same excitation at the center!!differ in the amount <strong>of</strong> inhibition in the surroundlessinhibitionmoreinhibitionPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBrightness contrastBrightness contrast!! Thus, the visual system computes brightness assomething like local contrast!! It’s a property <strong>of</strong> the center-surround cells!! Our percept <strong>of</strong> brightness is determined by the responses<strong>of</strong> cells at contrast edges!! As a result, things that have equal physical intensities canlook dramatically different (next slide)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBrightness contrastBrightness contrastPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/5/11Brightness contrastHermann gridPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Seems related <strong>to</strong> on-center,<strong>of</strong>f-surround cells!! Cells at intersections receivemore inhibition than cells atsingle roadsHermann gridFilling-in!! We see color and brightness inside objects!! so edge information must fill-in <strong>to</strong> the interior!! It sometimes gets things messed up!! Water color effect!! How do we explain the otherversion?Purdue UniversityPurdue University!! Brightnessinformationspreads acrosssurfaces!!Craik-O’Brien-CornsweeteffectFilling-in!! Carefully fixatethe pink center!! If you keep youreyes very still, itwill disappear!! The yellow fills-in!Filling-inPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Visual dynamicsPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 10Why (CRT) computer moni<strong>to</strong>rswork.Purdue UniversityFlicker!! A flashing light looks constant if it ispresented rapidly enough!! The frequency <strong>of</strong> flashing at whichsubjects do not detect flicker is called theCritical Flicker Frequency (CFF)!!about 50 Hertz (50 on-<strong>of</strong>f cycles in a second)!!20 millisecond durationsPurdue UniversityCFF!! Establishes minimum characteristics <strong>of</strong>electronic devices!! Lights flicker at 120 Hz!! we spend a lot <strong>of</strong> time in darkness!! Computer (Cathode Ray Tube, CRT)moni<strong>to</strong>rs and TV’s flicker at around 60 Hz!! better moni<strong>to</strong>rs go faster!! Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) moni<strong>to</strong>rs workdifferently»! Although some still flickerPhosphor!! The phosphor on a computer screentypically glows less than 10milliseconds!! ten thousandths <strong>of</strong> a second!! The gun reactivates the phosphorevery 17 milliseconds!! Thus, at any given time 1/3 <strong>of</strong> thescreen is dark!! the percept persists in your head!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPersistenceExperiment!! What is the source <strong>of</strong> the persisting percept?!!Recep<strong>to</strong>rs in the eye?!!Receptive fields?!!Network interactions?!! Bowen, Pola & Matin (1973)!!subjects adjust duration <strong>of</strong> a blankstimulus so onset <strong>of</strong> probe matchedperceived <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> the target!!<strong>Cognitive</strong> (memory)?!! Studies support network interactions+Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Strange property!! As the target’sduration orluminanceincreases!!its persistencedecreasesNetworks!! Feedback isimportant!! Produces a persistingresponse!! DemonstrationInput from eyesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityExplanation!! Francis, Grossberg & Mingolla (1994)!! Something has <strong>to</strong> reset the network!!else it would keep “persisting” forever!! Two mechanisms!!(1) new inputs inhibit old responses!!(2) afterimages act as new inputs!! Note: afterimages get stronger as durationand luminance increase!Purdue University!! Offset <strong>of</strong> input fromExplanationthe eyes produces anafter response!!e.g., due <strong>to</strong>competition fromorthogonally tunedcells!! Offset responseinhibits persistingresponseInput from eyesPurdue University!! As the target’sduration orluminanceincreases!! the afterimageproduced at targe<strong>to</strong>ffset increases instrength!! so there is strongerinhibition <strong>to</strong> breakthe feedback!! so the persistence<strong>of</strong> the originalpercept decreasesExplanationPurdue UniversityWait a minute!! If visual percepts persist for over 100milliseconds, why doesn’t the world seemblurry?!!There should be smears <strong>of</strong> objects as theymove or as we move!! There must be something else preventingsuch blurring!!maskingPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12No maskNo mask!! Write down all the letters you see!! Write down all the letters you seePurdue UniversitySR KMW DPurdue UniversityNo maskMasking demonstration!! Write down all the letters you see!! Write down all the letters you seePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMasking demonstrationMasking demonstration!! Write down all the letters you see!! Write down all the letters you seeDQ FJR PPurdue UniversityX X X XX X X XX X X XPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Significance!! The mask appeared after the target turned <strong>of</strong>f!! The target was presented all by itself for a briefperiod <strong>of</strong> time!! However, our visual system is unable <strong>to</strong>develop a complete percept <strong>of</strong> a scene in asuch a period <strong>of</strong> time!! Thus, the XXX mask interferes with processing <strong>of</strong>the letters by shortening their persisting responses!! And prevents perceived blurring <strong>of</strong> changing scenes!! Masking is <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>to</strong> investigate otheraspects <strong>of</strong> cognition (we’ll see examples later)Purdue UniversityMotion!! In simple animals (like flies and frogs), we know howmotion is detected!! Demo on web page!! Reichardt detec<strong>to</strong>rhttp://neurovision.berkeley.edu/Demonstrations/matthew/reichardt.htmlPurdue UniversityDetecting Motion!! Humans have something like Reichardt motion detec<strong>to</strong>rs!! at lots <strong>of</strong> different positions in the visual field!! sensitive <strong>to</strong> lots <strong>of</strong> different motion directions!! sensitive <strong>to</strong> lots <strong>of</strong> different motion speeds!! Think <strong>of</strong> them as receptive fields that vary in both space and time!! Many aspects <strong>of</strong> how we perceive motion follow from the properties<strong>of</strong> Reichardt motion detec<strong>to</strong>rsApparent Motion!! When objects move, there is a continuous path <strong>of</strong>motion!! Reichardt motion detec<strong>to</strong>rs do not requirecontinuous motion!! and, continuous paths are not necessary for motion <strong>to</strong> beseenTime1Time2Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityApparent Motion!! For just two stimuli, it does not depend on!! color!! shape!! attention!! cognitive primingApparent Motion!! The percept <strong>of</strong> motion does depends on!! stimulus duration!! interstimulus interval (50-200 msec)!! distancePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12!! For a Reichardt detec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong>indicate motion, the signal fromthe second area must follow thesignal from the first by just theright length <strong>of</strong> time!! Vary the Interstimulus Interval(ISI) between the stimuli!! The time between <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> thefirst stimulus and onset <strong>of</strong> thesecond stimulusTimingISI <strong>to</strong>o short"ISI about right"Korte’s laws!! Apparent motion was highly studied at the turn <strong>of</strong> the 20th century!! Korte (1915) noted that <strong>to</strong> get good motion, you needed <strong>to</strong> increasethe ISI between the stimuli as the distance between them increased!! CogLab data!! (169 participants- from class, 12,824 from global)ISI <strong>to</strong>o long"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMotion representation!! One conclusion <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>of</strong> apparent motionis that motion is a fundamental percept!! It has an explicit representation in the visual system!! You could imagine otherwise, we can be aware <strong>of</strong>something moving withoutactually seeing the movement!! Apparent motion is the source<strong>of</strong> motion for all movies andanimationPurdue University!! Just like for color andorientation, we mightexpect an aftereffect <strong>of</strong>motion!! competition betweenopposite directions <strong>of</strong>motion!! Left-right!! Up-down!! habituating gate!! <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> one direction leads <strong>to</strong>rebound in otherMotion aftereffectPurdue UniversityAfter effect!! Motion can be adopted by non-moving stimuli!! http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/mot_adapt/index.html!! Dynamic vision!! flicker!! persistence!! network dynamics!! Masking!! Reichardt detec<strong>to</strong>rs!! Apparent motion!! Motion aftereffectConclusions!! Also used <strong>to</strong> investigate other areas <strong>of</strong> cognitionand types <strong>of</strong> mental problemsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/12Next time!! Face perception!! Visual agnosia!! Emotions!! Aftereffects!! Why do women wear cosmetics?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Face perceptionPSY 200Dr. FrancisLecture 11FacesPeople are very sensitive <strong>to</strong> faces Identity Health Interpretation <strong>of</strong> environmentWhy do women wearcosmetics?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMotherTheresa?"FacesPeople see faces where they do not existFacial FeaturesPeople focus on some key features <strong>of</strong> faces Eyes, mouth And can fail <strong>to</strong> notice when things are askewThese images do not look so very different from each other Margaret Thatcher IllusionMartians?"Face-<strong>of</strong>godinWTC on9-11?"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFacial FeaturesAnother way <strong>to</strong> describe what happens is that people are unable<strong>to</strong> piece <strong>to</strong>gether the features and so do not detect the true facialexpressionThese images do not look so very different from each otherFacial AdaptationFurther evidence for representations <strong>of</strong> facial featurescome from face adaptation studiesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Facial beautyFacial beautyAverage faces are almost always beautifulAverage faces are almost always beautifulPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFacial beautyFacial beautyAverage faces are almost always beautifulAverage faces are almost always beautifulhttp://www.faceresearch.org/demos/averagePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFacial beautyAveraging is not the only thing that mattersThe average <strong>of</strong> attractive faces is more attractive than the average <strong>of</strong> unattractivefacesMore sophisticated averaging (morphing) <strong>to</strong> avoid blurringAverage <strong>of</strong> fourfaces rated as veryattractive"Average <strong>of</strong> four facesrated as veryunattractive"CosmeticsWhy do people (especially women) wear cosmetics? Averageness: smooths the face, which is a characteristic <strong>of</strong> average faces Symmetry: blemishes on one side are hidden from other Youth: coloring and blush Femininity: female attractiveness is related <strong>to</strong> femininity, which is related <strong>to</strong> some simplevariables (Russell, 2009)These two faces are identical except that the facial skin on the left isdarker than for the face on the right (eyes and mouth are identical)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13CosmeticsIt makes sense for people <strong>to</strong> interpret faces this way, because it reflects truedifferences between male and female facesMore so than men, the eyes and mouth <strong>of</strong> women tend <strong>to</strong> be darker than their skinCosmeticsContrast alone is enough <strong>to</strong> modify femininity (most neurons in the visual systemare sensitive <strong>to</strong> contrast)The two images have the same skin luminance, but the one on the right has darkermouth and eye regionsWomen wearing cosmetics have greater contrast than women not wearingcosmetics (Russell, 2009)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFacial agnosiaSome people (maybe 3% <strong>of</strong> the population) cannot recognize faces or reademotions from facesFamous faces test:Prosopagnosiahttp://www.faceblind.org/facetests/index.phpMany people have it all their lives but do not realize it Recognize people by characteristics other than facesCannot recognize themselves in a pho<strong>to</strong>graph by face aloneThey know there are different faces, but they all look the sameWith fMRI, we can identify placesin the brain that responddifferently <strong>to</strong> faces compared <strong>to</strong>other stimuliThis image looks like a youngman with a cap in pr<strong>of</strong>ile There is a set <strong>of</strong> images like this(called Mooney images)FMRI <strong>of</strong> facesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityInverting the image changesthe percept dramaticallyWhat happens in the brain?fMRI scan while viewing eachtypeSubtract responses <strong>to</strong> find thedifference map There should be activity thatis present when seeing a facebut not present when notseeing a face Activity at other visual areasshould be similarFMRI controlfMRIStronger responses <strong>to</strong> facesFusiform Face Area (FFA) Region in the fusiform gyrus Region <strong>of</strong> the temporal lobe Especially in right hemispherePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Face area?However, these results do not necessarily mean the FFA is responsible fordetecting facesHumans are very practiced at detecting faces, maybe the FFA is involved inpractice and expertise Gauthier et al. (2000) Participants see a sequence <strong>of</strong> objects (cars, faces, birds, other), judge similarity acrosstrials Participants include car and bird experts (everyone is a face expert)Face area?Bird and car experts show extra activity in right hemisphere FFA whenjudging faces or judging items in their area <strong>of</strong> expertise Note: the left side <strong>of</strong> the scan image is the right hemisphereSo faces may be special only because we practice a lotPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityGrandmother cells?We earlier dismissed the idea that responses from a single cell mightcorrespond <strong>to</strong> seeing your grandmotherHowever, this does not mean that some cells may not be quite specific intheir responsesSome epileptic patients have electrodes implanted in their brains <strong>to</strong> helpcontrol their seizures These electrodes can also be used <strong>to</strong> record responses <strong>to</strong> different stimuli Quiroga et al. (2005) made such recordings in the left posterior hippocampusfrom eight patientsJennifer Anis<strong>to</strong>n NeuronSome cells respond <strong>to</strong> very specific sets <strong>of</strong> stimuliPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPitt-Anis<strong>to</strong>n NeuronSome cells respond <strong>to</strong> very specific sets <strong>of</strong> stimuliHalle Berry NeuronSome cells respond <strong>to</strong> very specific sets <strong>of</strong> stimuliPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Sydney Opera House NeuronSome cells respond <strong>to</strong> very specific sets <strong>of</strong> stimuliSydney Opera House & Pitt-Anis<strong>to</strong>n NeuronBut lots <strong>of</strong> cells respond more generallyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityGrandmother cellsThese results indicate that a neuron may have great selectivity in itsresponsesHowever, the researchers could not test all possible images. Maybe theJennifer Anis<strong>to</strong>n cell would also respond <strong>to</strong> other images that were nottestedThus, it may be a mistake <strong>to</strong> suppose that there is a single cell whosefiring corresponds <strong>to</strong> thinking about Jennifer Anis<strong>to</strong>nPurdue UniversityConclusionsFace detectionFeatures and illusionsEmotionsBeautyAgnosiaExpertiseGrandmother cellsPurdue UniversityNext timeAttentionWhat is attention?What does it do?How could you not see it?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11AttentionPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 12How could you not see it?Attention!! The world contains more information thanwe can fully interpret or process all at once!! The ability <strong>to</strong> deal with some stimuli andnot others is attention!!not clear if there is an attentive system!!or if attention derives from other systemsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityInformation processing!! Modern theories see cognition as information processing!! much like a computer!! Different systems have different capabilities, capacities, and speeds!! Necessarily, some information is ignored because it is notprocessedAttention!! Part <strong>of</strong> attention seems <strong>to</strong> be due <strong>to</strong> mental effort onyour part!! attending a lecture!! ignoring whispering around you!! Part <strong>of</strong> attention seems a natural side effect <strong>of</strong> mentaleffort!! ignoring the “uhs” and “ums” from a speaker!! ignoring the feel <strong>of</strong> clothes on your body!! Part <strong>of</strong> attention seems effortless!! a loud noisePurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Pick any card!! Memorize itMagic trick!! really study the card carefully <strong>to</strong> be certain you have itmemorizedMagic trick!! Now the computer will shuffle the cards and presentthem againPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Magic trick!! Hey, the card you selected is missing!! How did I know which card you would select?Attention as processing!! Mental effort either is or requires attention!! Consider the following video (Simons & Chabris, 1999)!! Try it on the web at http://members.tripod.com/~andybauch/magic.htmlPurdue University!! you will see twogroups <strong>of</strong> peoplewearing either blackor white shirts!! each group is<strong>to</strong>ssing around aball!! count how manypasses are madeby the white groupPurdue UniversityAttention as processing!! Did you notice an unusual event in the video?!! Let’s look at it again!! Attention is a powerful force!! when you are busy doing something else, you can fail<strong>to</strong> observe even very significant things!! that’s why it is not a good idea <strong>to</strong> talk on a cell phonewhile driving a carDrawing attention!! Attention is focused by meaningful stimuli!! Also focused by certain stimulus characteristics,especially changes!! Flashes <strong>of</strong> light!! Movement!! Color!! Think <strong>of</strong> advertising signs!! ExamplePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityDrawing attention!! Suppose these cues were masked by otherchanging stimuli!! You might not notice the change at all!! DemonstrationAttention!! Another way <strong>to</strong> interpret these results is thatattention is necessary <strong>to</strong> detect stimuluschanges!! Explains how people can “look” but not “see”!!walking in<strong>to</strong> doors!!driving in<strong>to</strong> trains!!detecting changes on a radar screen!!why magicians use flashes <strong>of</strong> light!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Attention effects!! An illusion because people do not see stimuli orsomething else?!! E.g., do not remember, do not recognize!! In general, attention seems <strong>to</strong> strengthenstimulus representations if they are weak!! Perceptual processing is better with attentionalfocus!! Detection!! Masking!! Discrimination!! Some neurons respond stronger <strong>to</strong> stimuli thatare attendedAttentional paradox!! If attention strengthens perceptual representations, we shouldlose perceptual veridicality!! We might expect what is schematized below!! But we normally do not experience this!! Attention generally seems <strong>to</strong> strengthen information about astimulus that is not perceptual!! Maybe edges rather than surfaces?StimulusAttend redAttend greenReynolds et al., 2000"Purdue UniversityPurdue University!! Sometimes attentioncan change perceptualproperties!! But then we have anincorrect perception <strong>of</strong>the properties <strong>of</strong> thevisual scene!! So it is difficult <strong>to</strong>understand howattention is helpinghereAttentional paradoxMore demos!! If time permits, here’s some more demos!! http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.html!! Field!! Living room!! Phone call!! Lunch conversation (9 changes)!! Paris sceneTse, 2005"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusionsNext time!! Attention can have very powerful effects!!help processing <strong>of</strong> focused on things!!can cause unawareness <strong>of</strong> unattended things!! Not precisely defined!!characteristic <strong>of</strong> processing?!!An “extra” system?!! Methods <strong>of</strong> studying attention!! What things influence attention!!Timing, features!! CogLabs on Attentional blink and Visualsearch due!!! Should you pay $59.95 for Mega-speedreading?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13AttentionPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 13Should you pay $59.95 forMega-speed reading?Purdue UniversityAttentionWe saw last time that attention can havevery powerful effects when it is focused on one thing, you ignoreother thingsToday we want <strong>to</strong> consider some morespecific properties <strong>of</strong> attention and look at experimental methods that areused <strong>to</strong> study attentionPurdue UniversityCharacteristics <strong>of</strong> attentionBy identifying the properties andcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> attention we can deduceproperties <strong>of</strong> the underlying systems thatare involved in cognition whether attention is thought <strong>of</strong> as a system or as a by-product <strong>of</strong> other systemsLook at temporal featuralPurdue UniversityAttentional blink Suppose you have <strong>to</strong> identify rapidly presented (100ms) letters e.g., detect J and/or K in a stream <strong>of</strong> lettersMPKRWSPurdue UniversityAttentional blinkTurns out that detection <strong>of</strong> first letter tends <strong>to</strong> makedetection <strong>of</strong> the second letter very difficult if it immediately follows the first Attentional blinkMPKRJSAttentional blinkMeasure frequency <strong>of</strong> detection class data (183 observers)Implies thatdetecting thefirst lettercausesyou <strong>to</strong> miss thesecond letter!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Attentional blinkSuggests that processing the first targetletter, J uses up resources that would otherwise be used<strong>to</strong> process second target letter, KSpeed readingEver seen the ads for speed reading?One is for a program called Mega Speed Reading claims <strong>to</strong> teach you <strong>to</strong> read 25,000 words per minuteJ attentional focus and refocus takes time and forthis task takes approximately 400 msSLNBJRKH...Once processing is done (afew hundred milliseconds),there is no difficultydetecting second letter.Purdue University ==> 2.4 milliseconds for each word impossible, if only by attentional blink!The seller is skimming at best,and lying at worstPurdue UniversityVisual searchVisual searchPro<strong>of</strong>readingMuch <strong>of</strong> our time is spent looking for various thingsTime and type <strong>of</strong> processing can also be measured byhaving observers respond as quickly as possible whenthey detect a target Staplers, Road signs hypothesize that tasks that involve attention will beslower than perceptually based tasks expect attention <strong>to</strong> depend on the number <strong>of</strong> things thatmust be searchedTypically, we distinguish between a target anddistracters by one or more features we vary the number <strong>of</strong> distracters and measure reaction timePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySet SizeSet SizeIn some situations, more distracters make search takelongerIn some situations, more distracters make search takelonger fast slowPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Feature SearchFeature SearchBut if the target differs from the distracters in the right way,search can be fast even with lots <strong>of</strong> distractersBut if the target differs from the distracters in the right way,search can be fast even with lots <strong>of</strong> distracters pop out pop outThis <strong>of</strong>ten happens when the target has a unique featureThis <strong>of</strong>ten happens when the target has a unique featurerelative <strong>to</strong> the distractersrelative <strong>to</strong> the distracters shape colorPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConjunctive SearchVisual search experimentBut if the target has shared features with differentdistracters, search is difficult No pop outThis <strong>of</strong>ten happens when the target is defined by aconjunction <strong>of</strong> features relative <strong>to</strong> the distracters Orange rectangle: color and shapeFour types <strong>of</strong> responses 1) Feature - present (can respond as soon as see target) 2) Feature - absent (must examine all stimuli before suretarget is not present) 3) Conjunctive - present (can respond as soon as seetarget) 4) Conjunctive - absent (must examine all stimuli beforesure target is not present)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityCogLab feature searchCogLab feature searchFew distracters -easyMany distracters - still easyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Conjunctive searchConjunctive searchFew distracters - fairly easyMany distracters - difficultPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityVisual searchCogLab data (182 observers)InterpretationFeature maps: color, shapeFeature search can identify target within either feature mapColorShapebluecornersgreenarcsNo searchingrequired!"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFeature maps: color, shapeInterpretationFeature maps: color, shapeInterpretationFeature search can identify target within either feature mapConjunctive search cannot identify target within either feature map aloneColorShapeColorShapebluecornersbluecornersgreenarcsNo searchingrequired!"greenarcsRequires searchby comparisonacross featuremaps.Serial processthat takes timePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13bluegreenFeature maps: color, shapeInterpretationConjunctive search cannot identify target within either feature mapColorShapecornersarcsPurdue UniversityRequires searchby comparisonacross featuremaps.Serial processthat takes timeConjunctive search fortarget absent has aslope twice as steep asfor target present Because when thetarget is present youfind it, on average,after searching half theitems and then cans<strong>to</strong>p the search For target absentsearches, you mustsearch all items <strong>to</strong>verify each is not thetargetVisual searchPurdue UniversityAu<strong>to</strong>maticityWhen a task is unfamiliar itseems <strong>to</strong> require a lot <strong>of</strong>attention <strong>to</strong> performLater it requires less attention riding a bike driving a car typing tying shoelaces» http://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/knots.htmPurdue UniversityAu<strong>to</strong>maticityThe process whereby a task goes fromrequiring a lot <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>to</strong> requiring little iscalled au<strong>to</strong>matizationMany tasks are au<strong>to</strong>matizable color naming word namingCan measure effects by pitting anau<strong>to</strong>matized task against a non-au<strong>to</strong>matizedtaskPurdue UniversityStroop task Stroop (1935)Identify the color <strong>of</strong> ink for wordsStroop effectIt takes longer when the words are colornamesDemonstration measure reaction timePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Stroop effectStroop effectWord name interferes with ink colornaming ink color does not generally interfere withword naming lots <strong>of</strong> studies on Stroop effectMany effects that are similar <strong>to</strong> it Simon effect for pointingYou can try them both on CogLab Not required, no creditPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityExplanationWord reading is well practiced especially among college undergraduatesConclusionsMethods <strong>of</strong> studying attention attentional blink so it occurs quickly and is au<strong>to</strong>maticColor naming is unpracticed, so it occursslowly and requires attention visual search Stroop taskCharacteristics <strong>of</strong> attention timingWith two tasks, both trying <strong>to</strong> report on a color the au<strong>to</strong>matic one tends <strong>to</strong> mess up theunpracticed one, it takes more mental effort (andtime) <strong>to</strong> do the unpracticed task role <strong>of</strong> perceptual featuresAu<strong>to</strong>maticityPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext timeIntersection <strong>of</strong> attention, perception, and memory Iconic memory echoic memorySerial position curvesCogLab on Partial report due!Why telephone opera<strong>to</strong>rs seem rude.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Sensory memoryPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 14Why telephone opera<strong>to</strong>rsseem rude.Purdue UniversityMemory!! Humans demonstrate memory when theybehave in a way that could only be basedupon previous experience!!does not necessarily imply that there arememory systems!! Memory could be a by-product <strong>of</strong> othersystems (vision, audition, language,…)Purdue UniversityPerception <strong>to</strong> memory!! Suppose you want <strong>to</strong> know how muchinformation is available in a single visualglanceWhole Report!! Write down as many letters as you see!! How would you measure it?!! It turns out it’s a complicated taskbecause it involves perception, attention,and memoryPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWhole ReportWhole Report!! Write down as many letters as you see!! Write down as many letters as you seeE G M BT W V XP F A SPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Whole report results!! Subjects report 4.5 letters onaverage (Sperling, 1960)!! Subjects claim they saw moreletters, but lost the percept whilethey reported!!they cannot report fast enough!! How can we tell if percept is lost?Purdue UniversityPartial report!! Same type <strong>of</strong> letter matrix!! Indicate which row <strong>to</strong> report after the matrixdisappears!! choice <strong>of</strong> row is random!! Suppose the subject reports 3 <strong>of</strong> 4 letters fromany row!! =>3/4ths <strong>of</strong> each row was available!! ==> entire field was available!! This is essentially how college tests aredesigned!Purdue UniversityPartial reportPartial report!! Write down letters from the indicated row!! Write down letters from the indicated rowPurdue UniversityZ K O LU Y V NC S D PPurdue UniversityPartial reportSensory memory!! Write down letters from the indicated row!! Temporal characteristics!! delayPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Sensory memorySensory memory!! Temporal characteristics!! delayC R H JO K Q EN S D MPurdue University!! Temporal characteristics!! delayPurdue University!! Temporal characteristics!! delaySensory memoryResults!! Vary delay <strong>to</strong> watch decay from memory!! compare <strong>to</strong> CogLab dataNumber <strong>of</strong> letters correct432100 0.2 0.4 0.6 1Delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne (seconds)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityResults!! CogLab data (187 participants)Results!! We can test on any row and get essentially the sameresult!! so, the number <strong>of</strong> letters that actually persist and is available isfound by multiplying by the number <strong>of</strong> rowsPurdue UniversityNumber <strong>of</strong> letters available10864200 0.2 0.4 0.6 1Delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne (seconds)Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11!! Performance is betterthan the whole-reportIconic/sensory memoryprocedure because youcan focus attention onjust one row before thepercepts fade away!! Fading percepts are due<strong>to</strong> visual persistence,which we talked aboutearlier!! We call the use <strong>of</strong> thisinformation iconicmemory!! Large capacityNumber <strong>of</strong> letters available10864200 0.2 0.4 0.6 1Delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne (seconds)!! The partial-reportexperiment can bemodified in severalInfant iconic memory!! Short duration Purdue UniversityPurdue Universityways!! Blaser and Kaldy(2010) modified it <strong>to</strong>test iconic memory<strong>of</strong> infants!! 60, 6 month oldinfants!! Infants show apreference <strong>to</strong> look atthe changed object forsmall enough set sizes!! Infant iconic memory isInfant iconic memoryactually quite similar <strong>to</strong> adults!! Ask adults <strong>to</strong> report thelocation <strong>of</strong> the changed coloritem!! They do better thaninfants (who did notunderstand the ‘task’)!! Look for sharp drop inperformance as set sizeincreases!! Estimate items in memoryMasking!! Masking effects can influence iconic memory!!persistence-based memory is very brief, and iseasily destroyed by a mask!! Iconic memory is!!brief!!easily disturbed!! Adults = 5.75!! Infants = 5.0Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPartial report with maskingPartial report with masking!! Write down letters from the indicated row!! Write down letters from the indicated rowPurdue UniversityI J T RH V P LC G K MPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Partial report with masking!! Write down letters from the indicated rowX X X XX X X XX X X XPurdue UniversityMasking!! With the mask you do not have enough time <strong>to</strong> focusattention on the indicated row!! Iconic memory is so brief (less than a second) that itprobably has little <strong>to</strong> do with “normal” memory!! Too brief <strong>to</strong> be useful for many situations (except maybeknowing how <strong>to</strong> reach for something just after lights go out)!! Other similar systems are more notablePurdue UniversityEchoic memoryEchoic memory!! Other senses have a similar type <strong>of</strong>persistence or sensory memoryASWFHVDEX!! Properties!!Longer duration(seconds)!!Smallercapacity!! Significant forsome memorytasksNumber <strong>of</strong> lettersavailable5432100 1 2 3 4Delay (seconds)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityImmediate serial recall!! After given a list <strong>of</strong> items!!e.g., digits, letters, words,…!!subject must report them back!!1) no delay (immediate)!!2) in the correct order (serial)!!3) no cues (recall, not recognition)!! Plot percentage correctly recalled againstposition <strong>of</strong> item in listPurdue UniversitySerial position curve!! Often, subjects recall first and last itemsbestProbability <strong>of</strong> recall10.80.6 PrimacyRecency0.40.201 2 3 4 5 6 7Position in listPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Modality effect!! Recency depends on the modality <strong>of</strong>presentationProbability <strong>of</strong> recall10.80.6Audi<strong>to</strong>ry0.4Visual0.201 2 3 4 5 6 7Position in listPurdue University!! Explanation:Modality effect!! In this task, recency depends on sensory memory!! It takes time <strong>to</strong> report all the items in the list, in order!! in the visual presentation, iconic memory <strong>of</strong> the last itemis gone before subject tries <strong>to</strong> report it (poor recall)!! in the audi<strong>to</strong>ry presentation, echoic memory <strong>of</strong> last itemis still present when subject tries <strong>to</strong> report it (good recall)!! Thus, audi<strong>to</strong>ry presentation shows recency, butvisual does not!! We will explain the primacy effect laterPurdue UniversitySuffix effectSuffix effect!! Audi<strong>to</strong>ry presentation only!! Cue <strong>to</strong> report is either a word or a <strong>to</strong>ne24168792, 4, 1, 6, 8, 7, 9Purdue University!! Recency when cue <strong>to</strong> report is a <strong>to</strong>ne!! Loss <strong>of</strong> recency when cue <strong>to</strong> report is a wordDemonstrationProbability <strong>of</strong> recall10.80.60.40.201 2 3 4 5 6 7Position in listPurdue UniversityToneWord!! Not affected by!!practice!!meaning <strong>of</strong> cue word!!common vs. rare wordSuffix effect!! Words are physically different from <strong>to</strong>nes!!suffix word acts like a mask <strong>to</strong> wipe out last word inlist from echoic memory!!the situation is similar <strong>to</strong> being unable <strong>to</strong> report theletters in the partial report task with the X-masksPurdue UniversityPhone opera<strong>to</strong>rs!! Call information for a number!! Opera<strong>to</strong>rs are very short!!give the number!!do not say “goodbye” or “have a nice day”!! Avoiding the suffix effect!!!you would forget the last part <strong>of</strong> the phonenumber if they finished with pleasantriesPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/12/11Conclusions!! Partial report experiment!! Sensory memory!! iconic memory (visual)!! echoic memory (audi<strong>to</strong>ry)!! Relation <strong>to</strong> immediate serial recall (recency)!! modality effect!! suffix effect!! significance for phone opera<strong>to</strong>rsNext time!! Memory!! Modal model!! short term memory!! long term memory!! Experiments!! CogLabs on Brown-Peterson and Serial position due!!! Why it is difficult <strong>to</strong> win a pizza at Little Caesars.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 7


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Two s<strong>to</strong>re modelPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 15!! Simple viewMemory!!memory is a container <strong>of</strong> past impressions andknowledge!!memories can leak-out, decay away!! Not very realistic!!need <strong>to</strong> explain why memories disappearWhy it is difficult <strong>to</strong> win a pizza at LittleCaesar’s.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySimple view!! The container theory <strong>of</strong> memory does not explain, forexample,!! why some memories are very long lasting (my childhood cartrips <strong>to</strong> Utah)!! why some memories are very brief (my wife asks me <strong>to</strong> takeout the trash)!! We are not going <strong>to</strong> get a full theory <strong>of</strong> memory, butwe can start <strong>to</strong> get an outline!! and identify some misconceptions about memoryEbbinghaus’ experiments!! First memory experiment (1885)!! Measure how long it takes <strong>to</strong> learn a list <strong>of</strong> nonsensesyllables perfectly!! NOF, QAP, HOS, LEQ, FIK, MEC, KIJ, HOM, NEM, MOJ!! How long does the memory last?!! In what form does the memory last?!! How does it affect future behavior?!! Does it help relearn the list at a later time?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEbbinghaus!! Relearn the list at later points in time!!a different list each time!! Measure how long it takes <strong>to</strong> relearn the list!! Calculate savingsSavings = TimeoriginalTime! TimeoriginalPurdue UniversityrelearnForgetting curve!! Savings =1!! subjects do not need <strong>to</strong> relearn, perfect memory!! Savings=0!! subjects show no evidence <strong>of</strong> earlier learningSavings1.210.80.60.4Still not 0!0.200 5 10 15 20 25 30Time (days)Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Significance!! Ebbinghaus’ results suggest that memories canlast a very long time, in some form!! Memories were believed <strong>to</strong> be “s<strong>to</strong>red” in a memorysystem and did not just fade away (otherwise, thecurve should not asymp<strong>to</strong>te above zero)!! Memory loss was believed <strong>to</strong> be due <strong>to</strong> interference <strong>of</strong>other memories!! Other experiments challenge this viewMemory task!! See (or hear) a trigram <strong>of</strong> consonants!! Report it back in order!! Ebbinghaus’ results suggest goodmemory until other letters are alsomemorizedWRMPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityRetention!! Peterson & Peterson (1959)!!Brown (1958)!! Give subjects trigram!!ask them <strong>to</strong> count backwards by 3’s andthen recall trigram779, 776, 773,...WRM 782Purdue UniversityRetention!! Vary duration <strong>of</strong> counting backward!! Numbers are different from letters, youmight not expect any interference!!but they can have very strong interferenceSuggestssome memorieslast only afew seconds!Proportion correct10.80.60.40.200 3 6 9 12 15 18Retention interval (seconds)Purdue UniversityRetention!! The results <strong>of</strong> the Brown-Peterson studysuggest that some aspects <strong>of</strong> forgettingare process driven!!keeping a memory “active” requires effort!!if you are distracted by another task, youcannot apply the effort <strong>to</strong> keep the memory!!similar <strong>to</strong> our observations about attentionand processingRetention!! The results <strong>of</strong> the Brown-Peterson study alsosuggest that some aspects <strong>of</strong> forgetting arepassive!! even if you are distracted, you can recall the trigram ifonly a short time has passed!! if many seconds have passed, while you aredistracted, you cannot recall the trigram!! memory has “decayed”, or something like decay, whileyou were doing the distracting taskPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11!! CogLab dataRetentionAnother experiment!! 179 subjects!! Not everyone shows interference on this taskPurdue University!! Memory span!!how many items canyou correctly recallimmediately afterexposure?!! “The magic number7+/-2:…”!!Miller (1956)95 78 6 34 9 2 75 9 0 1 36 8 2 9 3 47 2 5 1 6 9 39 1 0 3 5 7 3 23 9 0 5 7 4 2 1 6Purdue UniversityInterpretation!! There exist two types <strong>of</strong> memory systems!! Long Term Memory (LTM)!! high capacity (no limit)!! long duration (forever)!! Ebbinghaus’ experiment!! Short Term Memory (STM)!! small capacity (~7 items)!! short duration (seconds)!! Memory span, Brown-PetersonPurdue UniversityPizza!! There used <strong>to</strong> be a LittleCaesar’s in W. Lafayette with agame where you could win apizza!! must repeat a sequence <strong>of</strong> flashinglights!! The sequence gets longer until youmake a mistake!! need a sequence length >7 <strong>to</strong> winmuch»! nearly impossible with STMproperties!! http://www.freegames.ws/games/kidsgames/simon/simon.htmPurdue UniversityModal Model <strong>of</strong> Memory!! Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968)!! Multiple stages <strong>of</strong> memory!! STM plays a dominant role in active memory!! Requires transfer between STM (STS) and LTM (LTS)Modal Model <strong>of</strong> Memory!! When something is memorized!! Items are first held in STM (temporary s<strong>to</strong>re)!! Items may transfer <strong>to</strong> LTM (permanent s<strong>to</strong>re)!! Takes time <strong>to</strong> transferPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Free Recall Serial Position Curve!! Given almost any list <strong>of</strong> items!! Subjects remember the first and last few itemsbest (free recall, not immediate serial recall)1Probability <strong>of</strong> recall0.8RECENCYPRIMACY0.60.40.201 2 3 4 5 6 7Position in listPurdue UniversitySerial position curve!! The effect <strong>of</strong> position is robust across many types <strong>of</strong> lists!! words!! letters!! numbers!! pictures…!! Here’s theCogLab data!! Demo!! (171 subjects)Percent correct"Position in list"Purdue UniversitySerial position curve!! In some situations the serial position curve canbe explained by different properties <strong>of</strong> STM andLTMProbability <strong>of</strong> recall10.80.60.40.20PRIMACY:Use LTMRECENCY:Use STMNEITHER LTM NOR STM1 2 3 4 5 6 7Position in listPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Short Term Memory (STM)!! Long Term Memory (LTM)!! STM / LTM distinction is one <strong>of</strong> thestrongest conclusions <strong>of</strong> cognitivepsychology!! Accounts for quite a bit <strong>of</strong> data!! Many details are unresolvedPurdue UniversityNext time!! Expansion <strong>of</strong> STM in<strong>to</strong>!! Working memory!! central executive!! phonological s<strong>to</strong>re!! visuo -spatial sketchpad!! CogLab on Sternberg search due!!! Why there is a gate at the first floor stairway inthe Psych building.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Working memoryPSY 200Greg FrancisModal Model <strong>of</strong> Memory!! Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968)!! Today we focus on the Short-term s<strong>to</strong>re (Short termmemory)Lecture 16Why there is a gate at the first floorstairway in the Psych building.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySearch <strong>of</strong> memory!! How is memory searched?!! Sternberg hypothesized three types <strong>of</strong> searches!! Explore by varying the number <strong>of</strong> items in memory set5 3 2 9(similar <strong>to</strong> visual search experiments)!! measure reaction time!!Sternberg (1969)5 3 2 95 3 2 9Purdue University8NOTypes <strong>of</strong> searches!! (1) parallel: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> all the items inmemory at the same timeNO!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after all items have beenchecked8 8 8 8885 3 2 98 8 8 88Purdue UniversityTypes <strong>of</strong> searches!! (1) parallel: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> all the items inmemory at the same timeYES!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after all items have beenchecked3 3 3 3335 3 2 93 3 3 33Purdue UniversityReaction time isthe same for ayes response!! If parallel searchMemory search!! number <strong>of</strong> items doesnot matter!! Yes and No responsesare both flatReaction timeSet sizePurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Types <strong>of</strong> searches!! (2) serial terminating: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> eachitem one after the other!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after the target is found orall items are searchedTypes <strong>of</strong> searches!! (2) serial terminating: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> eachitem one after the other!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after the target is found orall items are searchedNO5 3 2 9YES5 3 2 9Reaction time isfaster for a yesresponse8888 8 8883333 33Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityIf self-terminating searchTypes <strong>of</strong> searches!! (3) serial exhaustive: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> each!! Go through itemsone-by-one until findtarget!! RT increases with setsize!! YES RT’s shorter thanNO RT’s!! Lines have differentslopesReaction time70060050040030020010001 2 3 4 5 6Set sizeYESNOitem one after the otherNO!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after all items are searched(regardless <strong>of</strong> whether target is found or not)8885 3 2 98 8 888Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityTypes <strong>of</strong> searchesIf exhaustive search!! (3) serial exhaustive: target item is compared <strong>to</strong> eachitem one after the otherYES!! the answer (yes or no) is returned after all items are searched(regardless <strong>of</strong> whether target is found or not)3335 3 2 93 33 33Reaction time isthe same for ayes response asfor a noresponse!! Go through everyitem and then reportanswer!! RT’s increases withset size!! YES RT increases thesame as NO RT’s!! Lines are parallelReaction time70060050040030020010001 2 3 4 5 6Set sizeYESNOPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Hypothetical searches!! So, we have three hypothetical ways <strong>of</strong> searchingSTM!! They predict very different patterns <strong>of</strong> reaction time as afunction <strong>of</strong> memory set size!! Sternberg runs the experiment <strong>to</strong> see how the datacomes out!! You ran a version <strong>of</strong> the experiment in CogLabSearch <strong>of</strong> memory!! Sternberg’s data support exhaustivesearch!! Sternberg’sdata supportexhaustivesearch!! Here’s theCogLab data(182participants)=“Yes”=“No”Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySearch <strong>of</strong> memory!! Implications: Search <strong>of</strong> STM!! 1) is serial, one item at a time»! and checking each item takes approximatelythe same length <strong>of</strong> time»! Approximately 40 milliseconds (CogLab data isa bit slower, 50 milliseconds)!! 2) is exhaustive»! search always goes through all itemsSearch <strong>of</strong> memory!! These results were a bombshell in 1969!! finer analysis <strong>of</strong> cognition than anyone expectedwas possible!! used a thought experiment about different types <strong>of</strong>searches <strong>to</strong> generate precise testable predictionsabout cognition»! subsequent research found that there were othertypes <strong>of</strong> searches that complicate the conclusions!! counter-intuitive finding»! why should search be exhaustive?»! seems inefficient!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityInterpretation!! Exhaustive search makes sense if search <strong>of</strong> STMis done by some process that is!! very efficient (can search very quickly)!! dumb (doesn’t bother <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p itself)!! initiated by some other system (a controller)STMControllerSearchmemoryprocessPurdue UniversityController!! Controlling attentional system!! supervises!! coordinates!! starts and s<strong>to</strong>ps relatively independent processes!! e.g.!! Search short term memory!! Search long term memory!! walking down stairs!! gate in psychological sciences building!! DoorsPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Other aspects <strong>of</strong> STM!! At about the same time, another studyindicated important characteristics <strong>of</strong>phonological and visuo-spatial systems!! Brooks (1968)!! two types <strong>of</strong> tasks (visuo-spatial and phonological)!! two types <strong>of</strong> responses (visuo-spatial andphonological)!! Identifies two types <strong>of</strong> systems that arerelatively separate!! A complicated experiment!! Part 1: spatial mental task(diagrams)!! visual imagerySeparate systems!! classify corners (<strong>to</strong>p or bot<strong>to</strong>mcorner?)!! “yes” if <strong>to</strong>p or bot<strong>to</strong>m!! “no” if not <strong>to</strong>p or bot<strong>to</strong>mFPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Part 2: verbal mentaltask!!read sentenceSeparate systems!!categorize words (nounor not?Purdue UniversityA bird inthe hand isnot in thebush.!! Either!!verbally!!spatiallyTwo response typesYES NOYES NONO YESYES NONO YESPurdue Universityno, yes, no,no, yes, no,...Results!! Measure time <strong>to</strong> finish mental task for eachresponse type!! diagrams -- pointing!! sentence -- pointing!! diagrams -- verbal!! sentence -- verbal!! ResultsResults!! when you have <strong>to</strong> respond by pointing, it is easier <strong>to</strong>work with sentence information than diagram information!! when you have <strong>to</strong> respond verbally, it is easier <strong>to</strong> workwith diagram information than sentence informationResponse taskPointing"Verbal"Mental taskDiagrams"28.2s"11.3s"Sentences"9.8s"13.8s"Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Significance!! The results suggest that there are tworelatively separate systems!!one deals with visuo-spatial information andmust do the pointing response and mentaldiagram task!!one deals with verbal information and must dothe spoken response and the sentence taskInterference!! These system have only limited resources and capabilities!! Asking a system <strong>to</strong> do two things at once (e.g., pointing andmental diagram) slows down the system!! Splitting responsibilities across the systems (e.g., spokenresponse and mental diagram) can be done quicklyDiagramsPointingVisuo-spatialinformationVerbalinformationSentencesVerbalDiagramsPointingVisuo-spatialinformationVerbalinformationSentencesVerbalPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityAll <strong>to</strong>gether now!! Sternberg’s study suggests the existence <strong>of</strong> a “controller”that tells other systems what <strong>to</strong> do!! Brook’s study suggests separate systems that dealspecifically with viso-spatial and verbal information,respectively!! Baddley (1986) put these ideas <strong>to</strong>gether in<strong>to</strong> a model <strong>of</strong>working memoryCentralexecutiveWorking memory!! Current thought, awarenessWorking memory"!! extension <strong>of</strong> short-term memory!! small capacity!! rapid forgetting!! Processor <strong>of</strong> information!! not a s<strong>to</strong>rage device!! hypothesizes mechanisms that lead <strong>to</strong> memory propertiesVisuospatialsketchpadPhonologicalloopPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Sternberg’s study!!controller system!! Brook’s study!!separate visual and verbal systems!! Baddley’s working memory model!!Central executive!!Visuo-spatial sketchpad!!Phonological loopPurdue UniversityNext time!! Properties <strong>of</strong> phonological loop!! Data!! phonological similarity effect!! articula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression!! word length effect!! irrelevant speech effect!! CogLab on Memory span due!!! A problem with IQ tests.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Working memoryWorking memoryPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 17A problem with IQ tests.Purdue University!! Current thought, awareness!!extension <strong>of</strong> short-term memory!!small capacity!!rapid forgetting!! Processor <strong>of</strong> information!!not a s<strong>to</strong>rage deviceVisuospatialsketchpad!!hypothesizes mechanisms that lead <strong>to</strong> memorypropertiesPurdue UniversityCentralexecutivePhonologicalloopPhonological loopLoop capacity!! Two components!! Articula<strong>to</strong>ry control process(ACP)»! converts non-speechinformation in<strong>to</strong> speechcode»! rehearsal / refresh!! Phonological s<strong>to</strong>re (PS)»! similar <strong>to</strong> how we firstdescribed STM (itemsdecay from memory)»! Refresh restarts the decayprocessPhonological loopACPPS!! How many items can bekept in the phonologicalloop?!! Depends on two fac<strong>to</strong>rs!!Duration before decay fromPS!!Speed <strong>of</strong> rehearsal!! Spinning coins!Phonological loopACPPSPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMagic number?!! We earlier noted that memory span was about 7 items (+/- 2)!! The phonological loop suggests that it is not the number <strong>of</strong>items but their rehearsal duration!! To recall a list <strong>of</strong> items you must rehearse them all before any<strong>of</strong> them fade!! The duration <strong>of</strong> decay in the PS!! Memory span should follow the equation!! Span = (Rehearsal Rate) X (PS decay time)!! Measure memory span (s): around 7 items!! Measure verbal rehearsal rate (r): around 4 items per secondfor English speakers!! Estimate duration <strong>of</strong> decay in PS (d)!! d=1.75 secondsPurdue University!! Capacity <strong>of</strong> theEffect <strong>of</strong> rehearsal ratephonological loop dependson the rate <strong>of</strong> rehearsal (r)!! A set <strong>of</strong> items that takeslonger <strong>to</strong> rehearse shouldbe harder <strong>to</strong> remember!! more likely that some itemswill drop out before you getback <strong>to</strong> the first itemPhonological loopACPPSPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Effect <strong>of</strong> rehearsal rate!! Explains differences across groups <strong>of</strong> people!! Age effects in children!! Hitch, Halliday & Littler (1989)!! This implies that it is not theloop size that changes withage, but the rate <strong>of</strong>rehearsalSpan=1.68(Oral Reading Rate)+0.71Word length effect!! Memory span isrelated <strong>to</strong> the length<strong>of</strong> words!! Number <strong>of</strong> syllables!! Nicely matched bychanges in readingspeed!! Rate <strong>of</strong> rehearsalPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Somelanguages arespoken morequickly thanothers!! Should allowlarger memoryspan!! it doesLanguage effects!! Ellis & Henley (1980)Relation <strong>to</strong> IQ!! investigated complaints about WISCintelligence scores!! Welsch children tended <strong>to</strong> score lowerthan English children!! Part <strong>of</strong> the exam checks memory span!! and the slower rate <strong>of</strong> speech in Welsch partlyexplains the difference!! bilingual Welsch students tested in English got betterscores than when tested in WelschPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityArticula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression!! Subjects sees (hears) a list <strong>of</strong> phonemes!! Also repeats a phrase over and over!! e.g., “tippy-<strong>to</strong>e, tippy-<strong>to</strong>e, tippy-<strong>to</strong>e,...!! Recall is worse!! True for both audi<strong>to</strong>ry and visual presentation!! (Recall for visual may be better than audi<strong>to</strong>ry because there issome information in the visuospatial sketchpad as well)Proportion recalled10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10VisualAudi<strong>to</strong>ryPurdue UniversitySilentSuppressionArticula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression!! Repeating phrase ties up the ACP!!Without rehearsal more forgetting occursVisualPhonological loopAudi<strong>to</strong>ryACPtippy-<strong>to</strong>ePSPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Phonological similarity!! Memory <strong>of</strong> a list <strong>of</strong> items is worsewhen the items sound the samePhonological similarity!! All items are s<strong>to</strong>red in phonological loop!! similar sounding items interfere with each other in thephonological loop!! two possibilities:»! 1) harder <strong>to</strong> rehearse (effect in the ACP)»! 2) fade more quickly (effect in the PS)B F H NBG P TBetterrecallWorserecallPhonological loopACPNFPSH BPhonological loopACPG PBPSTPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPhonological similarity!! All items are s<strong>to</strong>red in phonological loop!! similar sounding items interfere with each other in thephonological loop!! two possibilities:»! 1) harder <strong>to</strong> rehearse (effect in the ACP)»! 2) fade more quickly (effect in the PS)Phonological loopPhonological loopLocus <strong>of</strong> similarity effect!! Studies find a phonological similarity effect for audi<strong>to</strong>ry stimuliunder articula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression!! We suggested two possibilities:»! 1) harder <strong>to</strong> rehearse (effect in the ACP)»! 2) fade more quickly (effect in the PS)!! Since the phonological similarity effect is there even when theACP is not involved, it must be possibility 2 (in the PS)ACPFPSH B NACPPS B GP TProportion recalledPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityCogLab data!! The CogLab experiment on memory span shows datain agreement with our expectations (189 subjects)!! Item type Final list length!! Numbers ! ! !6.47!!! Letters that sound different !5.66!!! Letters that sound similar !5.01!!! Short words ! ! !5.20!!! Long words ! ! !4.17About 7Phonologicalsimilarity effectWord lengtheffectIrrelevant speech effect!! Does irrelevant “background” sound affectmemory?!!E.g., studying with the TV on!! Three groups <strong>of</strong> subjects recall consonants!!1) no backgroundbest!!2) background = nonsense words!!3) background = noise burstsworstPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11Irrelevant speech effect!! The presence <strong>of</strong> phonemes in thebackground is critical <strong>to</strong> the effect!!strong effect when background is spoken inGerman, even for English speakers!! Suggests that background phonemesinterfere in the PS!! Study with classical music if you needsomething!Visuospatial sketchpad!! Briefly holds visual and spatialinformation!! Important for tasks that requireinteraction with theenvironment or searching!! Properties seem <strong>to</strong> vary acrossindividuals!! VSS <strong>of</strong> video gamers differs fromnon-video gamersVisuospatialsketchpadCentralexecutivePhonologicalloopPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityVisuospatial sketchpad!! West et al. (2009)!! Participants identify whether or notthe 2 second display contains a nonmoving“swimmer”!! Video Game Players!! Minimum 3-4 days a week!! Action video game!! Minimum 2 hours each day!! Non video game players!! Little <strong>to</strong> no video game usage in thepast 6 monthsPurdue UniversityVisuospatial sketchpad!! Video game players do better on the detection task!! Both do similar on noting the absence <strong>of</strong> the targetPercent1009080706050403020100HitsCorrectrejectionsPurdue UniversityVGPsNVGPsConclusions!! Data accounted for by phonological loop!! word length effect!! phonological similarity!! articula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression!! irrelevant speech effect!! Don’t listen <strong>to</strong> lyrical music while studying!! Classical music is fine!! Go ahead and play videogames!! There are limits, <strong>of</strong> courseNext time!! Review for Exam 2!! After exam 2!! Encoding specificity!! What <strong>to</strong> do if you are drunk while studying for anexam.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/17/11Encoding specificityPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 18What <strong>to</strong> do if you are drunk whilestudying for an exam.Purdue UniversityContext!! The context within which you learn and recallcan have a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on your memory!! e.g., part-set cueing!! given part <strong>of</strong> a set that has been learned, subjects recallfewer <strong>of</strong> the remaining items than with normal free recall!! Interference <strong>of</strong> recall»! Have <strong>to</strong> keep checking if an item you recall isalready on the list!! DemonstrationPurdue UniversityContext!! The effect <strong>of</strong> part-set cueing suggests that <strong>to</strong> measure memoryyou must consider the conditions at test!! Memory is more <strong>of</strong>ten about discrimination <strong>of</strong> memory traces andnot about the strength <strong>of</strong> memory traces!! Similar <strong>to</strong> visual search experimentsPurdue UniversityFeaturesearchConjunctivesearchContext!! But memory is not exactly the same as visual search!! Information must be encoded in memory as well asrecalled!! Such encoding can alter what features are s<strong>to</strong>red as part <strong>of</strong> the memory!! Which changes the discrimination <strong>of</strong> subsequent recall!! It turns out, that <strong>to</strong> maximize recallability!! the effort and conditions at the time <strong>of</strong> learning must beconsistent with the properties and conditions <strong>of</strong> the test!! Encoding specificity principlePurdue UniversityRepresentative study!! Subjects in two groups!! see the same words, but have different tasks!! This changes the encoding <strong>of</strong> information in memorySemantic judgementCHEESEThe manthrew the ball<strong>to</strong> the______.Rhyme judgementPurdue UniversityCHEESESNEEZETest!! Each group is then split in<strong>to</strong> two subgroups that vary in the recall <strong>of</strong>information!! 1) Normal recognition task!! 2) Shown a word and asked if any <strong>of</strong> the target words rhymed with thisword987Study65Semantic4Rhyme3210Number <strong>of</strong> wordsrecognizedStandardRhymeRecognition testPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/17/11Significance!! It is not that one learning strategy is better thanthe other!! or that one testing strategy is better than the otherEncoding specificity!! Memory is better when the cues available duringrecall match the cues available during encoding!! Tulving & Osler (1968)!! Encoding (learning) <strong>of</strong> information and recall <strong>of</strong>information need <strong>to</strong> matchCueNo cue!! This means it is very difficult <strong>to</strong> test forabsolute memory!! subject’s performance depends on many fac<strong>to</strong>rssoar-EAGLEHEALTH-nurseWHEEL-au<strong>to</strong>paper-BOOK...EAGLEHEALTHWHEELBOOK...Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEncoding specificity!! Each group split in<strong>to</strong> two groups for testingCuerecall!! cue is always related <strong>to</strong> target wordsoarnurseau<strong>to</strong>paper...No cuePurdue University!! ResultsWords recalledEncoding specificity!!cue does not always help1614121086420No cueCueTest displayPurdue UniversityStudy no cueStudy cueSurrounding context!! Deep-sea divers learn words (Godden& Baddeley, 1975), either!!on land (dry)!!under water (wet)Surrounding context!! Test for recall on land (dry) or under water (wet)StudyEAGLEHEALTHWHEELBOOK...Purdue UniversityEAGLEHEALTHWHEELBOOK...Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/17/11Significance!! Decompression tables for divers!! want <strong>to</strong> remember when under water!! generally study while on land!! Researchers working under water have difficultyrecalling their details on land!! E.g., counts <strong>of</strong> species!! How do you know if something is forgotten?!! changing context may allow subject <strong>to</strong> recall seeminglyforgotten information!! forgetting = retrieval problem?Purdue UniversityForgetting!! Forgetting is not always a characteristic <strong>of</strong> amemory system, or your brain!!although it could be in some cases, it is notalways!! Forgetting must be defined operationally!!specify the task and context <strong>of</strong> retrieval!!You can never be certain that if you are placedin a different context you will still show forgettingPurdue University!! Goodwin et al. (1969)Internal context!! Subjects drink 10 oz. 80 pro<strong>of</strong> vodka, mixed insugar-free lemon-lime drink!! or a similar tasting drink (bit <strong>of</strong> vodka on <strong>to</strong>p <strong>of</strong> drink)!! Test memory 24 hours laterInternal context!! Best recall if study and test states are the same!! Similar effects for marijuana cigarettes (Eich et al., 1975)Study state!! Subjects are either:!! Sober at study, sober at test!! Drunk at study, sober at test!! Sober at study, drunk at test!! Drunk at study, drunk at testPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityTesting!! So, if you are in<strong>to</strong>xicated while studying for anexam!!and you didn’t study before!! You should be in<strong>to</strong>xicated while taking theexamMood!! Mood has a similar effect (Eich et al, 1994)!! Mood induced by music and directed thoughtsStudy moodBut do notexpect <strong>to</strong> dovery wellGET HELP!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/17/11Classrooms!! Is memory better when you are tested in the same room aslectured?!! significant for final exams!!! Smith et al. (1978)!! Subject studied words in one <strong>of</strong> two contexts (on separate days)!! Varied classroom and dress <strong>of</strong> experimenterClassrooms!! Subjects recall all words either in the context <strong>of</strong> Day 1 or Day 2(different contexts for different subjects)!! Recall was best for words that were studied in the test contextStudy contextPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Context!! Encoding specificity!!memory best if study and test are similar!! Cues!! Environment!! StateNext time!! Discrimination in memory!! Proactive interference (PI)!! Release from PI!! CogLab on False memory due!!! How <strong>to</strong> take a test.!! Mood!! ClassroomsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Memory discriminationPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 19DiscriminationMany cognitive tasks require you <strong>to</strong>discriminate between events/stimuli Is this a real smile? Is this fruit ripe? Is the stapler on the desk?The same kind <strong>of</strong> discrimination is required for memoryHow <strong>to</strong> take a test.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityDiscriminationFalse memoryDiscrimination is difficult because memoriescan come from lots <strong>of</strong> different sourcesConsider so-called False memory studies as in CogLab subject views a list <strong>of</strong> words the list <strong>of</strong> words have something in common» they are all related <strong>to</strong> a target wordAn example list is smooth, bumpy, road, <strong>to</strong>ugh, sandpaper, jagged, ready,coarse, uneven, riders, rugged, sand, boards, ground,gravel the special target is rough, which is not shown <strong>to</strong> thesubjectAfter viewing the list, the subject must go through aset <strong>of</strong> words and identify which ones were in thejust seen list some words were in the list some words were not seen» including the special targetPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFalse memoryFalse memoryThe main finding is that the special target is <strong>of</strong>tenidentified as part <strong>of</strong> the just seen list even though it was notSometimes people will even report that theyrecall seeing the special target but this is impossible because it was never shownCogLab data (193 participants) Type <strong>of</strong> selected items ! !Percentage <strong>of</strong> recalls! In original list ! ! !75.5! Normal distrac<strong>to</strong>r (not in list) ! 7.4! Special distrac<strong>to</strong>r (not in list) !70.3!Purdue UniversityThese types <strong>of</strong> findings suggest that ourmemories are not necessarily accurate, we can remember things thatnever occurred able <strong>to</strong> be manipulated, <strong>to</strong> a certain extent, I can makeyou have certain memoriesWhy does the false memory effecthappen?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13False memoryWith every <strong>to</strong>-be-remembered item you s<strong>to</strong>re someinformation, but not only information about the item Other information is au<strong>to</strong>matically generated as well smooth, bumpy, road, <strong>to</strong>ugh, sandpaper, jagged, ready,coarse, uneven, riders, rugged, sand, boards, ground, gravelMemory: Item 1 Memory: Item 2 Memory: Item 3smoothroughbabybumpysmoothroughbabyroadPurdue Universitybumpysmoothrough<strong>to</strong>ughbaby nailsroadFalse memoryAt the end <strong>of</strong> the trial, you have a lot <strong>of</strong> items in memory thatare related <strong>to</strong> the list Some <strong>of</strong> them are items that were actually on the list and some <strong>of</strong> them are items thatwere generated but not actually on the list Reporting all items from memory is not going <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> good performance Both types <strong>of</strong> memory items are real, but only one type matches the physical stimuliGood performance on this task requires discrimination betweenmemories generated by physical stimuli and memories generated byinternal processes Source moni<strong>to</strong>ringjagged s<strong>to</strong>nesbumpysmooth peaks Memory<strong>to</strong>ughroughsandpaperbaby nailsgravel roadunevenPurdue UniversityDiscriminationInterferenceGood memory recall usually requires not onlyrecall <strong>of</strong> an item from memoryYou also must identify the correct item relative<strong>to</strong> the appropriate context or time frame The current trial The context <strong>of</strong> the experiment Relative <strong>to</strong> an earlier eventRetroactive interference (RI) new information prevents recall <strong>of</strong>previous information e.g., Overwriting a computer file.Proactive interference (PI) prior learning prohibits new learning e.g., Learning new cultural cus<strong>to</strong>ms. At a particular moment in timePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityProactive interferenceMay be due <strong>to</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> effects One is that memory involves discriminating new from oldVisual memory See a set <strong>of</strong> pho<strong>to</strong>s Then see a test pho<strong>to</strong> and decide if new or oldMemory: Trial 1 Memory: Trial 2 Memory: Trial 3Proactive interferenceSuppose you see this building as the test on the third trial You have a match in memory, but is from trial 1, not trial 3 You may report it having been shown in trial 3In general, previous trials make memory discriminationmore challengingMemory: Trial 1 Memory: Trial 2 Memory: Trial 3Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Proactive interferenceOne finds proactive interference for lots <strong>of</strong> memory tasksCogLab serial position experiment I looked at recall <strong>of</strong> the first letter in each list, averaged acrossall studentsProportion <strong>of</strong> times firstletter is recalled10.950.90.850.80.750.70.650.61 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15TrialPurdue UniversityRelease from PIProactive interference weakens for differentstimulus typesRun two Brown-Peterson type experimentsControlExperimentalXJFTrial 1 XJFWRMTrial 2 WRMDBLTrial 3 DBLNRXTrial 4 942Purdue UniversityRelease from PIRelease from PITrials 1-3 show build up <strong>of</strong> PIExperimental group shows release <strong>of</strong> PI onTrial 4Percentage correct1008060Control40Experiment2001 2 3 4Trial Purdue UniversityWorks for many kinds <strong>of</strong> memory tasksMany kinds <strong>of</strong> stimuli5, 7, 9, 1vs5, 7, 9, HANDNews s<strong>to</strong>riesD, D, D, DvsD, D, D, FNICE, SUNNY, ENJOY, PUPPYvsNICE, SUNNY, ENJOY, KILLPurdue UniversityMemory systemWorking memoryEvery memory system must have at least twocomponents/processes S<strong>to</strong>rage retrievalWe have described proactive interference as beingdue <strong>to</strong> difficulty discriminating new items fromprevious itemsBut there is an alternative explanation Proactive interference might prevent items from beings<strong>to</strong>red and thereby make them unrecallableFor example, working memory has a s<strong>to</strong>rageinterference hypothesis for the phonological loopWorking memory suggests that interference canoccur by blocking ACP rehearsal (articula<strong>to</strong>ry suppression,Brown-Peterson task, word length effect) within the PS when items sound similar both <strong>of</strong> these block the s<strong>to</strong>rage <strong>of</strong> items (items fall out <strong>of</strong> theloop)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Testing modelsTest location <strong>of</strong> PI by changinginstructions after the list is presentedExperiment stimuli are names <strong>of</strong> indoor and outdoorgames subjects usually do not notice that wordon the fourth trial is an indoor game andothers are outdoor gamesTake two groups <strong>of</strong> subjects one has traditional PI type experiment one is <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>of</strong> difference on fourth trial, atthe time <strong>of</strong> testTrial 1Trial 2Trial 3Trial 4Purdue UniversityFOOTBALLSOCCERBASEBALLWALLYBALLInterference at recallIf PI prevented the last item from being s<strong>to</strong>red your telling asubject that the fourth item was an indoor sport, shouldmake no difference (other than guessing) but it makes a big difference, they show release from PIPercentage correct1008060Not <strong>to</strong>ld40Told2001 2 3 4TrialPurdue UniversityACTHow <strong>to</strong> take a testAvoid PIAnswering successive questions on thesame <strong>to</strong>pic hurts recall after answering unrelated questions go back <strong>to</strong> questions you cannot answer less proactive interference should recall moreT1, T1, T1, T1vsT1, T1, T1, T2Purdue UniversityLong-long term memory Bahrick et al (1975)392 subjects brought in their high schoolyearbook asked <strong>to</strong> matchnames with faces or recall names forfacesPurdue UniversityLong-long term memoryWhy is memory generally poorer with time?DiscriminationOne can suggest at least two explanations for poorermemory as time elapses1) Retroactive interference from subsequent faces/names2) The mental representation <strong>of</strong> temporal positionbecomes blurred as a function <strong>of</strong> time Recent events are easy <strong>to</strong> discriminate in time~25 years~50 years Long ago events are difficult <strong>to</strong> discriminate in timePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13ConclusionsDiscriminationRetroactive interferenceProactive interferenceRelease from PIStrong effectsKnowing about can help in everyday tasksNext timeConstructive memoryFlashbulb memoriesMemory misattributionMisleading questionsHow good is eye-witness testimony?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Constructive memoryPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 20Memory testLast lecture you watched me for 50 minutesWhat was I wearing?How good is eye-witness testimony?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityDiscriminationThe task is difficult because you have <strong>to</strong> doseveral things Recall information that might be related <strong>to</strong> the task from memory Determine if the memory is actually for the correct event Determine if the memory is actually for the correct moment in time Gauge your confidence in the memorys validityAll <strong>of</strong> this suggests that performance on a memory taskinvolves discriminating informationTo address the discrimination problem, people engagein a constructive process <strong>to</strong> report memoriesNo forgetting? Brain surgeon (Penfield, 1959) Epilepsy patients stimulate brain regions before operating want <strong>to</strong> know what is being removedConscious patients report vivid memories unable <strong>to</strong> recall normally» "she saw herself as she had been while giving birth <strong>to</strong> herbaby." stimulation <strong>of</strong> temporal lobesIn the image, numbers indicateplaces where stimulationevoked different reportedexperiencesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNo forgetting?Suggests that memories are s<strong>to</strong>red but normallyunreachable (context things again)Basis for ideas <strong>of</strong> memory repression (and a few self-help books) The results are usually misunders<strong>to</strong>od Actually only occurred for 5% <strong>of</strong> patientsEven worse…Penfield (1959) the memories are nearly impossible <strong>to</strong> verify the few attempts find that the memories are not true» people describe places they have never visited, impossibleevents, fantasy,… The patients have epilepsy» Stimulation may have triggered something like an epilepticseizure (which can have hallucinations)It is more likely that stimulation feels like a memory, even thoughit is not your awareness <strong>of</strong> remembrance is a product <strong>of</strong> your brain it can be stimulated, even without a real memoryWhat do we mean by a valid memory?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Flashbulb memoriesHighly emotional events tend <strong>to</strong> produce strongmemoriese.g. JFK assassination Challenger explosion Oklahoma City bombing Earthquakes September 11, 2001 ...Flashbulb memoriesPeople vividly recall detailssurrounding event where they were when theyheard what people said clothing worn time <strong>of</strong> day,..People are confident abouttheir reports however...Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityFlashbulb memories Talarico & Rubin (2003) On September 12, 2001Asked volunteers <strong>to</strong> answer questionsabout their memory <strong>of</strong> The WTC attack An ordinary event (volunteers choice)Three groups for follow up 7 days later 42 days later 224 days laterRecalling <strong>of</strong> details was the same forWTC attack and ordinary eventPurdue UniversityFlashbulb memoriesThe memories <strong>of</strong> the WTCattack were more vividSubjects believed thosememories were more likely <strong>to</strong> bereliableOrdinary memories Faded in vividness Belief decreased over timePurdue UniversityFlashbulb memoriesSubjects confidence in their memory can bemisleading retelling <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>ry (I remember vividly when Kennedywas shot. I was…) probably reinforced the s<strong>to</strong>ry Maybe not the true memoryFlashbulb memories are a real phenomenonabout the experience <strong>of</strong> memory, but probably not super-memoryMemory misattributionDonald Thomson was accused <strong>of</strong> rape and picked out <strong>of</strong>a lineup by the victim (Schacter, 1996)He was on live TV at the time <strong>of</strong> the rape Ironically, he was discussing memory <strong>of</strong> faces for eyewitnesstestimonyThe victim had the TV on at the time <strong>of</strong> rape misattributed the face on TV for the face <strong>of</strong> her attacker very accurate report <strong>of</strong> the crime, otherwisePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Eyewitness testimonyI will show you a series <strong>of</strong> slides and then ask yousome questionsPurdue UniversityDr. Kim VuPSY 332: Cognition Purdue University 14Purdue UniversityDr. Kim VuPSY 332: Cognition Purdue University 16Purdue UniversityDr. Kim VuPSY 332: Cognition Purdue University 18PSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityQuestionsEyewitness testimonyDid the bus, which came by, come from the left or theright?Later, show slides and ask subjects if they were part <strong>of</strong> theoriginal setDid another car pass the Red Datsun while it was at real slide contains YIELD signthe intersection with the s<strong>to</strong>p sign? fake slide contains STOP signDid you see a bicycle?Did you see the taxi cab?Did you see if the policeman wrote anything down?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/2/13Eyewitness testimonyEyewitness testimonyMisinformation effect L<strong>of</strong>tus & Palmer (1974)Compare accuracy according <strong>to</strong> pre-test questions Subjects without a misleading question--90% accurate Subjects with a misleading question -- 20% accurate In a follow-up, the experimenters asked those with misleadingquestions if they thought they were misled» 90% say noPaying money for correctness also had no effectL<strong>of</strong>tus, Miller &Burns (1978)Themisinformationeffect getsstronger with aweek delaybefore thememory testPercentage correct80706050403020100Consistent None MisleadingTypes <strong>of</strong> questions"DelayedImmediatePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMemory implantsL<strong>of</strong>tus has a procedure that implants amemory <strong>of</strong> being lost in a mall Basically just have subject read a plausible s<strong>to</strong>ry (withsome details that could be true) Get family members <strong>to</strong> pretend the s<strong>to</strong>ry is true Later the subject remembers the s<strong>to</strong>ry as somethingthat happened <strong>to</strong> him/herIt is very easy for a therapist <strong>to</strong> implant falsememories in<strong>to</strong> patientsConclusionsMany techniques believed <strong>to</strong> provide accuratememories, do not flashbulb memories brain stimulationMemory is constructiveMemories can be easily influenced by questions,interpretation, and contextPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext timeAmnesiaAnterograde amnesiaRetrograde amnesiaUnusual characteristicsRepressionWhats wrong with my wife?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11AmnesiaPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 21What is wrong with my wife?Purdue UniversityFundamental fact!! There is no method other than objectphysical evidence <strong>to</strong> verify the accuracy <strong>of</strong> amemory!! Memory is a cognitive experience!!Confidence in the memory is another cognitiveexperience!!You can be very confident and still be wrong!! Of course, we must be correct fairly <strong>of</strong>ten, orour lives would be a <strong>to</strong>tal mess!Purdue UniversityAmnesiaAmnesia!! Loss <strong>of</strong> memory or memory abilities!! retrograde: forgetting events prior <strong>to</strong> the injury!! anterograde: forgetting events after the injury!! In most cases amnesia is limited in scope andduration!! like when my brother Joe slipped while playing frisbeePurdue University!! Scope and duration!! Retrograde amnesia for one patient5 months 8 months16 monthscomacomacoma1 year2 weeks2 years4 years<strong>to</strong> infancy <strong>to</strong> infancy<strong>to</strong> infancyPurdue UniversityTime<strong>of</strong>accidentWhat’s wrong with my wife?!! Nothing!!! But she cannot remember anything beforeher senior year in high school!! mo<strong>to</strong>r cycle accident!! complete retrograde amnesiaPurdue UniversityAn unusual case!! Side issues!! Sense <strong>of</strong> smell!! Mild anomia!! Odd aphasia (language deficit)!! She is able <strong>to</strong> learn and remember new information!! Remarkably unaffected by the loss <strong>of</strong> memories!! Personality!! Parents!! college!! makes study <strong>of</strong> retrograde amnesia difficultPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11What is lost?!! How can someone who loses theirchildhood memories go <strong>to</strong> college the nextyear?!!memories cannot be “wiped clean”!!perhaps they are just not directly accessible!!forgetting = recall problem?!! More generally,What is lost?!!while patients with retrograde amnesia forget theirnames, parents, addresses,…!!they do not generally forget how <strong>to</strong> walk, talk,solve problems»!Although they may have problems…!!Different types <strong>of</strong> memory systems»!controversial!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMemory systems!! There are many different types <strong>of</strong> memory!! Amnesia seems <strong>to</strong> affect declarative more than nondeclarative memoryAnterograde amnesia!! Some patients have amnesia that preserves pastmemories but prevents formation <strong>of</strong> new memories!! many are long-time alcoholics who did not eat properly»! which leads <strong>to</strong> a thiamine deficiency»! which leads <strong>to</strong> Korsak<strong>of</strong>f’s syndrome!! Leonard in Memen<strong>to</strong>Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPatient HM!! Surgery on hippocampus (<strong>to</strong> control epilepsy)!! anterograde amnesia!! unable <strong>to</strong> learn anything new!! Thought it was 1953!! shocked by age <strong>of</strong> face in his mirror!! Could not stand <strong>to</strong> read newspapers!! reintroduced himself <strong>to</strong> doc<strong>to</strong>rs, nurses,…!! Could carry on a conversation!Purdue UniversityAnterograde amnesics!! Fairly normal STM digit span (~7 items)!! But very difficult <strong>to</strong> extend digit span!! how many trials <strong>to</strong> repeat back list correctly?Mean trials <strong>to</strong> criterion3025201510500 5 10 15 20 25Number <strong>of</strong> digits <strong>to</strong> rememberPurdue UniversityControlsPatientsPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11!! Normal recency!! Abnormal primacySerial position curve!! Consistent with STM-LTM dicho<strong>to</strong>myPercent correct10090807060504030201000 5 10 15Item number Purdue UniversityControlsAmnesics!! Could learnsome things!!! E.g.,location <strong>of</strong>hospitalcafeteria!! E.g. mirrordrawingtaskPatient HMPurdue UniversityPatient HM!! Mirror drawing task (Milner, 1968)!! HM had no knowledge <strong>of</strong> doing the task before!Purdue UniversityAmnesia-like memory!! Some aspects <strong>of</strong> memory seem very much likeamnesia!!infantile “amnesia”!!repressed memories!! Careful studies are difficult <strong>to</strong> come by becausethe memories (and absence there<strong>of</strong>) must beverified!!remember the “fundamental fact” at the start <strong>of</strong><strong>to</strong>day’s lecturePurdue UniversityInfantile amnesia!! Most people report that they cannot rememberanything that happened <strong>to</strong> them before age 4yearsNumber <strong>of</strong> memoriesreported201510500 2 4 6 8Age at time <strong>of</strong> eventPurdue UniversityInfantile amnesia!! Reason is unknown, but the best theory goeslike this…!!children younger than 4-years-old view the worlddifferently from adults!!by encoding specificity, one needs <strong>to</strong> be in asimilar state as study <strong>to</strong> best recall something!!adults are very different from children, and thisprevents recall <strong>of</strong> early memoriesPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/16/11RepressionRepression!! Psychotherapists (e.g. Freud) suggested thatinfantile amnesia occurred because much <strong>of</strong>childhood is filled with painful events and memory<strong>of</strong> the pain is prevented by psychological defensemechanisms (repression)!! This is very unlikely!! In a labora<strong>to</strong>ry, showing evidence <strong>of</strong> repressionrequires!!being unable <strong>to</strong> remember something!!being able <strong>to</strong> recover the memory through therapy!!proving that the recovered memory is accurate!! people do remember painful events well!! labora<strong>to</strong>ry studies find no evidence <strong>of</strong> repressed memoriesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityRepressionConclusions!! In therapy, clinicians <strong>of</strong>ten claim evidence <strong>of</strong> repressionwith!! dream interpretation!! patterns in symp<strong>to</strong>ms!! recovering a memory through hypnosis!! None <strong>of</strong> these techniques demonstrate a verifiedmemory!! Retrograde amnesia!! Anterograde amnesia!! Learning in anterograde amnesics!! Infantile amnesia!! Repression!! Among carefully controlled memory research, there isno evidence <strong>of</strong> repression!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext time!! Study schedules!! Levels <strong>of</strong> processing!! Mnemonics!! Sleep!! How <strong>to</strong> improve your memory without spending$20.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Improving memoryPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 22How <strong>to</strong> improve your memory withoutspending $20.MemoryWe seem <strong>to</strong> be unable <strong>to</strong> control ourmemories learn things we dont want <strong>to</strong> remember unable <strong>to</strong> learn things we want <strong>to</strong> rememberIs there any reliable cue that something will beremembered? no but there are several tricks you can use<strong>to</strong> improve memory in certain situationsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEncoding specificityWe know that memory is best when study and test contexts aresimilarEncoding specificityTest subjects in a neutral context(after another 3 hour interval) For example, testing in the study classroomBut variability in study promotes more general recall Smith et al. (1978) Subjects studied words twice: either in same context or different contexts (3 hourinterval between contexts)Look at proportion correct recall Highest with variable study contextsAdvice: if you want <strong>to</strong> remembersomething in lots <strong>of</strong> contexts, study inlots <strong>of</strong> contextsSession 1 Learning contextSession 2ContextClassroom 1 Classroom 2Classroom 1 0.41 0.69Classroom 2 0.53 0.39Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityLevel <strong>of</strong> processingMemory can be influenced by depth <strong>of</strong> processing at the time<strong>of</strong> study Craik & Tulving (1975)Subjects observe words with associated tasksquestion YES NOIn capitalletters?Rhyme withthing?Synonymfor heavy?BOOKspringbulkybooksprintbrownPurdue UniversityNumber <strong>of</strong> words recalledLevel <strong>of</strong> processingRecall is better as depth <strong>of</strong> processing increases More distinctive memories are created, which helps subsequent recall By varying depth <strong>of</strong> processing, you can construct memories that aremore likely <strong>to</strong> be recalled2520151050Capital Rhyme SynonymStudy taskPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Levels <strong>of</strong> ProcessingLevel <strong>of</strong> processing is more important than intent <strong>to</strong>learn (Hyde & Jenkins, 1973)11 groups <strong>of</strong> subjects 1 control group: <strong>to</strong>ld they will be tested <strong>to</strong> recall the words» not given any study task 10 experimental groups split <strong>to</strong> perform a study task» Pleasant-unpleasant rating» Estimate frequency <strong>of</strong> word usage» E-G checking: does word contain an E or a G?» Identify part <strong>of</strong> speech: noun, verb,…» Sentence framing: which sentence does word best fit in? For all experimental groups, either» (a) Intentional learning : <strong>to</strong>ld they will be tested <strong>to</strong> recall thewords» (b) Incidental learning: not <strong>to</strong>ld they will be testedPurdue UniversityIntentionRecall (out <strong>of</strong> 24 words) varies a lot with taskNot much variation with intention <strong>to</strong> learnPurdue UniversityImplicationsJudgments <strong>of</strong> LearningPeople do not know the best way <strong>to</strong> remember! There was nothing s<strong>to</strong>pping controls from making pleasantunpleasantratings they apparently did not, or they would have done better!Advice: study interactively read notes rewrite notes rephrase notes teach someone elseMore generally, people are not usually good atestimating whether something will be rememberedPurdue University Nelson & Dunlosky (1991)Subjects study a pair <strong>of</strong> words (e.g., OCEAN – TREE)Estimate how likely they are <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> rememberone word if shown the other (JOL). Given OCEAN, how likely <strong>to</strong> remember the associated itemlater? This is the subjects estimate <strong>of</strong> their ability <strong>to</strong> use LTMMake judgment either Immediately after studying the pair Delayed <strong>to</strong> later in the experimental trialsNote: students studying for an exam <strong>of</strong>ten use theimmediate approach for a JOL <strong>to</strong> decide if they need<strong>to</strong> continue studyingPurdue UniversityJudgments <strong>of</strong> LearningImmediate JOLs donot match memoryperformance (at theend <strong>of</strong> the experiment) Especially for highJOLsDelaying the JOLleads <strong>to</strong> fairly accurateJOLsAdvice: study, wait,estimate learningMethod <strong>of</strong> lociUsed by ancient Greeks <strong>to</strong> remember complicated speechesTo remember a list <strong>of</strong> words or key ideas visualize walking around an area with distinctive landmarks link the items <strong>to</strong> be remembered with landmarks by using bizarremental imagery <strong>to</strong> recall items in order, mentally walk through area (any ordered sequence will work -- e.g., a childrens rhyme)Memory piggybacks on the easy recallability <strong>of</strong> the bizarreimageryPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Method <strong>of</strong> locie.g., grocery listITEMS LOCI Add vivid,bizarre imageryhot dogscat food<strong>to</strong>ma<strong>to</strong>esdrivewaygarage interiorfront doorDigit spanSF learned <strong>to</strong> increase hisdigit span <strong>to</strong> 81 digits (anyrandom sequence) 200 hours <strong>of</strong> practice Ericsson, Chase & Faloon (1980)Created a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> memorytricksTechnique did not transfer <strong>to</strong> othermemory tasks (e.g., letters)Essentially learned <strong>to</strong> use long-termmemory for the digit span taskPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySleepMany types <strong>of</strong> memory improve with sleepSome type <strong>of</strong> consolidation <strong>of</strong> memoriesThe effect is not just time Although time also has an effectWell look at one representative study Ellenbogen et al. (2007)Subjects learn <strong>to</strong> identifyorder relationshipsbetween random shapesOnly shown one pair at atimeSubjects have <strong>to</strong> learn/memorize the appropriateanswer <strong>to</strong> each pairSleepPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySleepThere is a ordered arrangement <strong>to</strong> the stimuliIf you know this arrangement, deciding for any pair is easy But subjects are never explicitly <strong>to</strong>ld about this arrangementSubjects are split in <strong>to</strong> threegroups, according <strong>to</strong> whenthey are tested 20 minutes later 12 hours later 24 hours laterNo differences when testedon the originally studieditemsSleepPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12SleepSleepSubjects are split in <strong>to</strong> threegroups, according <strong>to</strong> whenthey are tested 20 minutes later 12 hours later 24 hours laterBig differences when testedon new pairs that fit theordered structure E.g., A>C, C>E, B>DHalf <strong>of</strong> the 12 hour grouphad sleep and half did notIt makes a difference forpairs <strong>of</strong> items that are farapart in the orderedstructure1-degree: A>C, B>D,…2-degree: A>D, B>E,…Advice: study early! Get some sleep!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityA common approach <strong>to</strong> studying is<strong>to</strong> use flash cards (or somethingsimilar)Two steps <strong>to</strong> studying 1) Read material on both sides(study) 2) Practice test the material (givenone side, try <strong>to</strong> recall the informationon the other side)What should you do when yousuccessfully recall the informationduring the practice test? Continue <strong>to</strong> study? Continue <strong>to</strong> test? Set aside and focus on other cards?Practicing recall Karpicke & Roediger (2008)Practicing recallSubjects study 40 Swahili - English word pairs mashua – boat kaka -- brother Test for English given Swahili:» mashua --???Four groups <strong>of</strong> subjects, that differ after an item is correctly recalled ST (study-test): subject studies and continually tested over every pair SnT (study on non-recalled - test on all): when a subject recalls a pair, it is nolonger studied, but it continues <strong>to</strong> be tested STn (study all, test only on non-recalled): when a subject recalls a pair, itcontinues <strong>to</strong> be studied, but it is not tested SnTn (study on non-recalled, test on non-recalled): when a subject recalls apair, it is not studied or tested againA week later, everyone is testedPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPracticing recallLearning stylesStandard advice is that once you learn something, study something elseThis is not good advicePerformance is best whenevery pair is tested, even ifyou have alreadydemonstrated it ismemorizedThe amount <strong>of</strong> time spentstudying the words doesnot matter so muchSuggests that you learn how<strong>to</strong> recall the informationAdvice: Test yourself!Keep practicetestingDont practicetestA common approach in education is <strong>to</strong> identify a students learning styleand then teach for that styleLots <strong>of</strong> tests <strong>to</strong> identify a students learning styleThere do seem <strong>to</strong> be real differences in what style people indicate theypreferPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 8/14/12Learning stylesUnfortunately, there is absolutely no evidence that reported learning stylepreference has anything <strong>to</strong> do with learningPashler et al. (2009) observed that <strong>to</strong> demonstrate evidence that learningstyle influenced learning, you have <strong>to</strong> show a particular kind <strong>of</strong> interaction<strong>of</strong> effectLearning stylesPashler et al. (2009) then reviewed hundreds <strong>of</strong> studies purporting <strong>to</strong> showevidence for learning styles, but only ever found effects like theseBut these only indicate an advantage for a type <strong>of</strong> learning or a methodPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWhy is the idea popular?Learning stylesIt fits with the American ideal <strong>of</strong> everyone beingcapable <strong>of</strong> learning if given the chance (no childleft behind)It allows parents (and students) <strong>to</strong> blame theeducational system for failure rather than lack <strong>of</strong>motivation or abilityIt lends itself well <strong>to</strong> statistical quirks <strong>of</strong> findingjust the right method for a given studentIts a generalization <strong>of</strong> the experience that agiven student benefits from a new explanation <strong>of</strong>materialPurdue UniversityConclusionsLots <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>to</strong> improve memory Encoding specificity level <strong>of</strong> processing Judgments <strong>of</strong> Learning method <strong>of</strong> loci Sleep Practice testing Learning stylesPurdue UniversityNext timeMental representationPro<strong>to</strong>typesExemplarsPropositionsCogLab on Pro<strong>to</strong>types due!What is a shoe?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Representation <strong>of</strong> knowledgePSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 23What is a shoe?Concepts!! What is the information in Long Term Memory?!! May be several different types!! We have knowledge about the world!! Due <strong>to</strong> personal experience!! Or due <strong>to</strong> language!! Such information must be in some kind <strong>of</strong> format,which we call concepts!! But what are the concepts?!! what is the concept <strong>of</strong> “dog,” “walking,” or “free-marketcapitalism”?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConcepts!! We will look at three <strong>to</strong>pics in concepts!!Definitions (don’t really work)!!Pro<strong>to</strong>types (closer <strong>to</strong> how humans think)!!Exemplars (more likely than pro<strong>to</strong>types)!! And then combinations <strong>of</strong> concepts!!propositionsDefinitions!! Pla<strong>to</strong> (and Socrates) spent a lot <strong>of</strong> efforttrying <strong>to</strong> define terms like virtue andknowledge!!they were largely unsuccessful!! the 20th century philosopher Wittgensteinwondered if definitions <strong>of</strong> even simpleconcepts were possiblePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityDefinitions!! Consider the concept shoe, you might define it asWebster’s does!! A covering for the human foot, usually made <strong>of</strong> leather,having a thick and somewhat stiff sole and a lighter <strong>to</strong>p.!! Anything resembling a shoe in form, position, or use.!! Lots <strong>of</strong> shoes fit this definitionDefinitions!! Consider the concept shoe, you might define it as Webster’sdoes!! A covering for the human foot, usually made <strong>of</strong> leather, having athick and somewhat stiff sole and a lighter <strong>to</strong>p.!! Anything resembling a shoe in form, position, or use.!! But now consider some situations and decide if they are reallyshoes!! A shoe that is intended for display onlyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Definitions!! Consider the concept shoe, you might define it as Webster’sdoes!! A covering for the human foot, usually made <strong>of</strong> leather, having athick and somewhat stiff sole and a lighter <strong>to</strong>p.!! Anything resembling a shoe in form, position, or use.!! But now consider some situations and decide if they are reallyshoes!! a shoe filled with cement, which cannot be worn!! a covering worn on the hands<strong>of</strong> a person without legs whowalks on his hands!! And this? "Definitions!! The difficulty is the same one that Pla<strong>to</strong> and Socrateshad trying <strong>to</strong> define virtue!! for any definition you come up with, I can find examples that donot seem <strong>to</strong> fit the definition!! But we all know what a shoe is!! so our knowledge <strong>of</strong> this concept must not be based on someprecise definition!! Note, scientists can (sometimes) create precisedefinitions (e.g., a dog is defined by a DNA pattern orby mating abilities)!! but the definition is somewhat arbitraryPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPro<strong>to</strong>types!! Perhaps what defines a concept is similarityamong its members!!there may be no absolutely necessary characteristics!!there may be no absolutely sufficient characteristics!! Pro<strong>to</strong>type theory supposes that similarity isjudged relative <strong>to</strong> a pro<strong>to</strong>type example <strong>of</strong> theconcept!!e.g., an ideal, average, or most frequent version <strong>of</strong> theconceptPro<strong>to</strong>types!! In pro<strong>to</strong>type theory it is possible for an object <strong>to</strong>be “more” or “less” a certain concept!! Consider the concept “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup”Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPro<strong>to</strong>types!! In pro<strong>to</strong>type theory it is possible for an object <strong>to</strong>be “more” or “less” a certain concept!! Consider the concept “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup”!!and variations (some are “cup-ier” than others)Pro<strong>to</strong>types!! In pro<strong>to</strong>type theory it is possible for an object <strong>to</strong>be “more” or “less” a certain concept!! Consider the concept “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup”!!and variations (some are “cup-ier” than others)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Pro<strong>to</strong>types!! In pro<strong>to</strong>type theory it is possible for an object <strong>to</strong>be “more” or “less” a certain concept!! Consider the concept “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup”!!and variations (some are “cup-ier” than others)Pro<strong>to</strong>types!! In pro<strong>to</strong>type theory it is possible for an object <strong>to</strong>be “more” or “less” a certain concept!! Consider the concept “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup”!!and variations (some are “cup-ier” than others)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPro<strong>to</strong>types!! Lots <strong>of</strong> experiments suggest the role <strong>of</strong>pro<strong>to</strong>types!!Posner & Keele (1968): learning category names forrandom dot patterns!!Discriminate two sets <strong>of</strong> random dot patterns!!Each pattern is a variation <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> two pro<strong>to</strong>typepatterns!! Pro<strong>to</strong>typesAPro<strong>to</strong>typesBPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPro<strong>to</strong>types!! variations are made by moving some <strong>of</strong> the dotsvariant <strong>of</strong> Avariant <strong>of</strong> BPro<strong>to</strong>types!! The key test is done after subjects learn <strong>to</strong> classify thevariants!! reaction time for judgment is recorded for stimuli they have neverseen before»! new variants»! the pro<strong>to</strong>types!! reaction time is faster for the pro<strong>to</strong>types!! which suggests that the mental representation <strong>of</strong> the categories(concepts) are built <strong>to</strong> favor the pro<strong>to</strong>type <strong>of</strong> the category!! Look at CogLab data!! subjects learn <strong>to</strong> classify many different variants!!they never see the pro<strong>to</strong>types themselvesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Pro<strong>to</strong>types!! Results are based on data from 169 participants.!! Pattern type Reaction time (ms)!! Pro<strong>to</strong>types ! !686!!! Variants ! !719!!! Unanswered by this (and many other) experiments is what a pro<strong>to</strong>type is:!! a “thing” that resides in memory and contains information about the categoryfeatures!! the result <strong>of</strong> processing information!! A bit <strong>of</strong> thought suggests it is the result <strong>of</strong> processing informationPro<strong>to</strong>types!! Consider the types <strong>of</strong> concepts you can have!! and how specific they can be!! things: bird, dog, chair, shoe,…!! actions: walking, running, sleeping,…!! goal-derived: “things <strong>to</strong> eat on a diet”, “things <strong>to</strong> carry out <strong>of</strong> a housein case <strong>of</strong> a fire”,...!! ad hoc: “things that could fall on your head”, “things you might seewhile in Paris”, “gifts <strong>to</strong> give one’s former high school friend who hasjust had her second baby”,...!! When studied, these concepts all seem <strong>to</strong> have pro<strong>to</strong>typecharacteristicsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPro<strong>to</strong>types!! We can generate new concepts from oldconcepts!!it’s inconceivable that every possible pro<strong>to</strong>type existsready <strong>to</strong> be used!!some must just be built as they are needed!!perhaps even the pro<strong>to</strong>types for simple concepts like“bird” or “shoe” are also just built when they areneeded!! A theory that can account for this processingapproach is exemplar theoryPurdue UniversityExemplars!! A concept consists <strong>of</strong> lots <strong>of</strong> examples <strong>of</strong> theconcept!!e.g., a “c<strong>of</strong>fee cup” concept might contain lots <strong>of</strong>examples <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee cupsPurdue UniversityExemplars!! Comparing an object <strong>to</strong> see if it is a c<strong>of</strong>fee cupinvolves comparing it <strong>to</strong> each example in memoryand seeing if it matches anything well enoughExemplars!! Even if it is a new object, it may match severalexemplars well enough <strong>to</strong> generate an overallresponse <strong>to</strong> indicate it is a c<strong>of</strong>fee cupPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Exemplars!! Some c<strong>of</strong>fee cups seem pro<strong>to</strong>typical becausethey match lots <strong>of</strong> exemplars!!that’s what defines a pro<strong>to</strong>typeExemplars!! Unlike pro<strong>to</strong>type theory, exemplar theory also containsinformation about the variability <strong>of</strong> examples within aconcept!! Thus, we know that pizzas have an average size <strong>of</strong> 16inches but can come in lots <strong>of</strong> different sizes!! And we know that foot-long rulers have an average size<strong>of</strong> 12 inches, but essentially no variability in sizePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityComplex associations!! How do we represent a concept thatinvolves combinations <strong>of</strong> concepts?!!e.g., “Dogs chase cats.”!!e.g., “Last Spring, Jacob fed the pigeons inTrafalgar Square.”!! Need <strong>to</strong> identify the role <strong>of</strong> each conceptPropositions!! Higher order ideas!! things doing something!! Statement that is either true or false!! things cannot be judged true or false!! e.g., Book, Albert, Threw, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Test, Gave!!consists <strong>of</strong> an ordered list <strong>of</strong> concepts»!e.g., (relation:X, Agent:Y, Object:Z)Albert threw the book.(relation:Threw, Agent:Albert, Object:Book)Purdue University(Threw, Albert, Book)Purdue UniversityProposition!! Network Representation!!The proposition connects the appropriate conceptnodesagentAlbertProposition!! Network Representation!! The proposition connects the appropriate concept nodesPr<strong>of</strong>essoragentthrewrelationAlbert threw the bookgaverelationThe pr<strong>of</strong>essor gave a tes<strong>to</strong>bjec<strong>to</strong>bjectbookPurdue UniversitytestPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11!! Network RepresentationProposition!! The proposition connects the appropriate concept nodesProposition!! Network Representationlast SpringDogtimechaserelationagentDogs chase catsJacobagentLast Spring, Jacob fed pigeonsobjectpigeonspigeons inTrafalgar SquareinrelationobjectcatPurdue UniversityrelationfeedslocationTrafalgar SquarePurdue UniversityProposition!! One way <strong>of</strong> combining concepts!!there are also other theories <strong>of</strong> how <strong>to</strong> do this!! Used a lot in Artificial Intelligence!! Do humans represent interactions <strong>of</strong>concepts with propositions?!! Some experimental evidence!! Ratcliff & McKoon (1978)Proposition!! study phase»! subjects are asked <strong>to</strong> memorize a set <strong>of</strong> 504 sentences»! 18 - 1 hour sessions!!! test phase»! show words and have subjects decide if they were in thestudy sentences or not»! measure reaction time for words from the sentencesThe bandit who s<strong>to</strong>le the passport faked the signaturePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityProposition!! Network RepresentationProposition!! In the test phase, a word is given and thesubject responds as quickly as possibleobjectpasspor<strong>to</strong>bjectpassportpassportbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportagentbanditagentfakedrelationbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportagentbanditfakedrelationbandit faked signaturebandit faked signaturerelationobjectrelationobjects<strong>to</strong>lePurdue Universitysignatures<strong>to</strong>lePurdue UniversitysignaturePSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Proposition!! In the test phase, a word is given and thesubject responds as quickly as possibleProposition!! The expectation is that activation will flow through theentire proposition that includes this wordobjectpassportpasspor<strong>to</strong>bjectpassportpassportagentbanditfakedagentbanditfakedbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit faked signaturebandit faked signaturerelationobjectrelationobjects<strong>to</strong>lePurdue Universitysignatures<strong>to</strong>lePurdue UniversitysignatureProposition!! So, if the next word is part <strong>of</strong> the same proposition, asubject will respond even fasterProposition!! If words are from different propositions, noprimingobjectpassportbandi<strong>to</strong>bjectpassportpassportagentbanditfakedagentbanditfakedbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit faked signaturebandit faked signaturerelationobjectrelationobjects<strong>to</strong>lePurdue Universitysignatures<strong>to</strong>lePurdue UniversitysignatureProposition!! In the test phase, a word is given and thesubject responds as quickly as possibleProposition!! Activation will flow through the entire proposition thatincludes this wordobjectpassportpasspor<strong>to</strong>bjectpassportpassportagentbanditfakedagentbanditfakedbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelationbandit faked signaturebandit faked signaturerelationobjectrelationobjects<strong>to</strong>lePurdue Universitysignatures<strong>to</strong>lePurdue UniversitysignaturePSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 7


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Proposition!! When the next word is shown, its node has not beenprimed, so it responds more slowlyobjectpassportbandit s<strong>to</strong>le passportrelations<strong>to</strong>leagentbanditbandit faked signaturePurdue UniversitysignatureobjectsignaturefakedrelationProposition!! Test Phase : Priming Task!! compare RTs for second in a pair <strong>of</strong> words!! within a common proposition (bandit -- passport)!! between propositions (passport -- signature)!! not related in sentence (horizon -- signature)!! interested in RT <strong>to</strong> second word in each pair!! Ratcliff & McKoon (1978)!! results»! within same proposition words: 561 msec»! between proposition words: 581 msec»! unrelated: 671!! evidence <strong>of</strong> priming by propositional activation!! We think in propositions!Purdue UniversityConclusions!! Concepts!!definitions!!pro<strong>to</strong>types!!exemplars!! Propositions!!Evidence we think in terms <strong>of</strong> propositionsNext time!! Other types <strong>of</strong> knowledge!! Mental images!! mental rotation!! mental scaling!! limitations <strong>of</strong>!! CogLab on Mental rotation due!!! Is a picture in your head like a picture in the world?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 8


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Mental imageryMental representationPSY 200Greg FrancisHow do you mentally representknowledge? concepts (pro<strong>to</strong>types, exemplars)Lecture 24 propositions mental images, mapsIs a picture in your head like a picture inthe world?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPerceptionWe have knowledge about, and memories<strong>of</strong>, perceived stimuli sights smells <strong>to</strong>uches soundsAre these converted in<strong>to</strong> propositions, orconcepts or is there something else?Purdue UniversityWhen we see thisimage how do werepresent theinformation in theimage? analog: copy <strong>of</strong>image in head andwe can retrieve itImages symbology: convert <strong>to</strong>propositions/conceptsPurdue UniversityImagesImagesI can remember theimage on theprevious slide and itfeels like I picturethe image in myhead but is it really? could it be aproposition?shortswearsgirlRuns <strong>to</strong>ballIf you ask me questions about the previous slide,my answers would not necessarily identify therepresentationshortswearsgirlObservableRuns <strong>to</strong>ballThere was a girl running <strong>to</strong>a soccer ball. She wore red shorts.MentalPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Pure propositionsLets look at the arguments for a purelypropositional representationLook at this picture, Ill ask you questions about itWorking with imagesIf this image was printed on a piece <strong>of</strong> paper, you wouldhave no problem answering the questions about itIf you had an exact copy <strong>of</strong> the image in your head, youwould expect you could look at the copy and make allkinds <strong>of</strong> judgments but you cannot how you interpret the image <strong>to</strong> a large extent determines whatyou know about itMental images are not exactly like real images this tends <strong>to</strong> be particularly true for memory <strong>of</strong> images verbal descriptions dominate memory for imagesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityAnswer these questions:Another exampleHow did you do?Another exampleWhich is further North, Seattle, Washing<strong>to</strong>n orMontreal, Canada?Which is further East, Detroit, Michigan orIndianapolis, Indiana?Which is further South, Bos<strong>to</strong>n, Massachusetts orNew York City, New York?Which is further West, Reno, Nevada or SanDiego, California?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPropositionsSo this suggests that mental images are not exactly like realimages and something like propositional information likely influencesreports that are ostensibly based on mental images or mentalSan DiegomapsinagentrelationNevadaSan Diego is inCaliforniaobjec<strong>to</strong>bjectCaliforniaCalifornia is west <strong>of</strong> NevadaagentrelationWestPurdue UniversityReno is in NevadaagentRenoinrelationPropositionsIt is clear that propositional information influencesmental imagery but is it all propositions? are there mental images, as we tend <strong>to</strong> experience them?Is there any reason <strong>to</strong> believe that mental imagesare at all analogous <strong>to</strong> real images? yesPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Representation <strong>of</strong> mental imagesImagine you have a mental image <strong>of</strong> a lion If the mental image is a description (set <strong>of</strong>propositions), then it should include descriptiveinformation (head, mane, ears, whiskers,, tail,…)» size <strong>of</strong> body parts shouldnt matter much(except as information in the proposition)Representation <strong>of</strong> mental imagesImagine you have a mental image <strong>of</strong> a lion If the mental image is a depiction, then it shouldinclude fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as head, mane, ears, and theirsizes and relative positions» self reports <strong>of</strong> mental images suggest thedepicted version, but how <strong>to</strong> measureexperimentally?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityRepresentation <strong>of</strong> mental images Kosslyn (1976) Ask subjects <strong>to</strong> quickly answer questions like:» Does a lion have a head? (big body part)» Does a lion have claws? (small body part) subjects in two groups» 1) form a mental image <strong>of</strong> a lion» 2) think about a lion, but without a mental image Subjects forming a mental image respond more quickly <strong>to</strong> the headquestion than the claw question» presumably because the head is bigger in the mental imageRepresentation <strong>of</strong> mental imagesSubjects that did not form a mental image respond more quickly<strong>to</strong> the claws question than the head question presumably because the propositions about a lion having claws aremore accessible in some network <strong>of</strong> propositionsSo, different ways <strong>of</strong> thinking about a lion can lead <strong>to</strong> differentpatterns <strong>of</strong> access <strong>to</strong> information which implies mental images are different than propositions16001600Reaction time (ms)140012001000800600400200ImageryNo imageryReaction time (ms)140012001000800600400200ImageryNo imagery0SmallpartBig partPurdue University0SmallpartBig partPurdue UniversityMental rotationShepard & Metzler(1971) 3-D shapes rotated in plane or in depthCogLab experiment 163 participantsThe more rotated thestimuli are, the longerit takes <strong>to</strong> make aresponseMental rotation decide if shapesare same aredifferent close <strong>to</strong> linear increasein RT measure time <strong>to</strong>decidePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Mental rotationVividnessThis type <strong>of</strong> experiment has been taken as strongevidence that mental images are not just propositionsThere are individual differences in reports <strong>of</strong> mental imagevividness imagined movement <strong>of</strong> the mental image (rotation) resemblesactual movement It takes time <strong>to</strong> mentally move through a mental space» The CogLab data suggests it is about 100 degrees/second» 10 milliseconds for each degree some people report their mental images are just like real images others report they are fuzzy and vague some people report no mental images at all (10%) Nevertheless, people all do basically the same on many tasks thatseem <strong>to</strong> require operating on mental images no reason why propositions would give data that incorporatespatial and temporal relations between aspects <strong>of</strong> the mentalimagesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityfMRIfMRIHugdahlet al. (2006) had subjects perform a mentalrotation task or a comparison task (did not require rotation)in an fMRI scannerCompared <strong>to</strong> the 2-D condition, the 3-D condition hasmore activity in the superior parietal lobesMalesFemalesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusionsNext timeMental representations <strong>of</strong> pic<strong>to</strong>rialConsciousnessinformationDualismThere are some things you cannot do withmental imagesPropositions are importantArtificial intelligenceQualiaMental images are not just propositionsMental rotation taskDo you see red like I see green?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/2/13ConsciousnessPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 25Do you see red like I see green?What is consciousness?Awareness <strong>of</strong> events, stimuli, thoughts,selfA sequence <strong>of</strong> meaningful itemsStream <strong>of</strong> thoughtsDistinct from unconscious processing(e.g., hearing a sentence, retrievinginformation from memory,…)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityHis<strong>to</strong>ryDescartes dualism (Cartesian dualism) pineal gland link between body and spirit how they could connect was a real problemMaterialismNearly all scientists are materialists, bu<strong>to</strong>ld ideas die hardA lot <strong>of</strong> work (PET scans, fMRI,…) looksfor the site <strong>of</strong> consciousness a special physical transformation thalamusMind-body problemMaterialism (the brain is the mind) or the mind derives from the brain reticular formation quantum mechanics distributed awarenessPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBeforeconsciousnessA turning pointA common view is that there is a moment/place which/where before something wasnot conscious and which after it isconsciousBut this is not true in the brainConsciousnessAfter consciousnessDistributed processingInformation processing is spatially andtemporally distributed in the brainProcessing changes with new stimuliThere really is no moment <strong>of</strong>consciousness different brain areas know different things atdifferent timesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Greg Francis 1/2/13An analogyWhen did the British empire learn <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the War <strong>of</strong>1812? treaty signed in London months before the Battle <strong>of</strong> NewOrleans word was not received by British troops in America until twoweeks after the Battle <strong>of</strong> New Orleans (January 8, 1815)An analogyFor complicated systems like the British empire (andhuman brains) different parts know different things at different times there is no <strong>of</strong>ficial moment <strong>of</strong> knowledge no <strong>of</strong>ficial moment <strong>of</strong> consciousness!Demonstration when does the class know/understand?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityHow / Why?There is no moment becauseinformation is distributed in the brain Both in space and timeCan distributed processing really produceconsciousness, or must there besomething else <strong>to</strong> put it all <strong>to</strong>gether? can consciousness arise from non-consciousprocessors? (artificial intelligence?)Purdue UniversityHow do you know aperson is conscious/intelligent? They behave in a waythat we interpret asconsistent with aconscious beingTuring test: apply thesame logic <strong>to</strong> acomputer if a conversation with acomputer isindistinguishable from aconversation with ahuman Then conclude thecomputer is intelligentTuring testPurdue UniversityArtificial intelligenceNo computer has passed anything but a weakform <strong>of</strong> the Turing test lack sufficient schemas, creativity, general knowledgeIt is worth noting that other things would also notpass a Turing test children mentally impaired people mute people people who speak a language we do not understandPassing a Turing test is not necessary forconsciousnessPurdue UniversityCaptchaThe basic ideas are implemented in severalmethods for computer securityCompletely Au<strong>to</strong>mated Public Turing test <strong>to</strong> tellComputers and Humans ApartPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Greg Francis 1/2/13Turing testThe Turing test is only one way <strong>to</strong> demonstrateintelligence and a rather strict one at that not passing the Turing test does not mean that acomputer is not intelligent <strong>of</strong> course, it doesnt mean the computer is intelligenteitherVariations on Turing testDoubtersMany people have suggested that computerscannot, in principle, become intelligent they argue that purely symbolic computations cannotlead <strong>to</strong> consciousness and humans use emotion, insight, intuition,intentionality instead <strong>of</strong> simple computationLets look at two arguments against strong AI discriminate conversation between a child and acomputer look at a conversation and decide which was thecomputer ...Purdue UniversityPurdue University1. The Chinese room (Searle)Imagine you are in a room with two slots and a book Slot 1: someone sends you notes with Chinese characters on them Book (written in English): in the book you can look up the Chinesecharacters and write down corresponding Chinese characters onanother piece <strong>of</strong> paper Slot 2: you can send your piece <strong>of</strong> paper out this slotSlot 1 Slot 21. The Chinese room (Searle)If the book provides rules on how <strong>to</strong> answer questionsin Chinese then you can answer written questions in Chinese even though you do not know Chinese!Consciousness (in general, understanding) is not afunction <strong>of</strong> the thing (or person) who implements therulesBut consider it from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a personoutside the room Who is sending messages inPurdue UniversityPurdue University1. The Chinese room (Searle)You are having a conversation with someone You have <strong>to</strong> decide if the person understands what you are saying(its the Turing test) You ask them <strong>to</strong> describe the wall <strong>of</strong> their room They report it is green …and so on…Slot 2 Slot 11. The Chinese room (Searle)Searles point is that We know the person in the room does not understandChinese We might be fooled in<strong>to</strong> thinking they do based on theirresponses <strong>to</strong> the questions Thus, the Turing test is a bad testBecause the Turing test is essentially the samestructure The computer plays the role <strong>of</strong> the person in the roomPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Greg Francis 1/2/13However,...Searle has set up a deceptively simple scenario the Chinese room may be an impossibilityYou can imagine a situation where one has a bookwith rules <strong>to</strong> answer questions in Chinese but only if you do not think <strong>to</strong>o hard in reality, there may be no such book! if the questions can be on almost any <strong>to</strong>pic, thenunderstanding is required for that type <strong>of</strong> complexprocessingAnd understanding is generally restricted <strong>to</strong>consciousness Or maybe one needs <strong>to</strong> conclude that such an advancedbook has potential consciousnessPurdue UniversityAnd moreover...At a smaller level <strong>of</strong> computation, it is hard <strong>to</strong> seehow consciousness could not be (theoretically)possible in computersEach cell in your head is data in - data out suppose cells were gradually replaced by tinycomputers that kept all processing the same» Neuromorphic chips would you claim that at some point you are no longerconscious?There is nothing fundamental about organicconsciousnessPurdue University2. QualiaSome researchers object <strong>to</strong> the very idea thatcomputers could become conscious They argue that some things in consciousness are notjust computation e.g., consider the color red There seems <strong>to</strong> be a particularly subjective experience<strong>of</strong> seeing something red2. QualiaConsider two people who see the world incolor oppositesQualia for person 1A red apple with agreen leafQualia for person 2A red apple with agreen leafPurdue UniversityPurdue University2. QualiaClearly, theres a big difference in theperceptual experience <strong>of</strong> these people,but their behavior is essentially the same And there seems no way <strong>to</strong> distinguish oneexperience from the other Its the unmeasureable experience that is aqualia2. QualiaQualia proponents argue, for example, you can learn all there is <strong>to</strong> know about light waves,pho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs, neural transduction and coding <strong>of</strong>color,… But suppose you never see any red objects Your knowledge will not tell you what you willexperience when you first see the red <strong>of</strong> an apple Indeed, you could be tricked in<strong>to</strong> believing a greenapple was red (if you had never seen green either)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/2/132. QualiaConclusionsBut this is a defeatist argument, or a pointless oneConsciousness if I knew everything about light, pho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs, andneural representation <strong>of</strong> colors, then I would be able <strong>to</strong>know what I will experience when I see red it is difficult (maybe impossible for any single human) <strong>to</strong>know (or even imagine knowing) all that information in anacademic sense but that doesnt mean that such information does notexistIts partly an empirical question But no one can do the experimentdistributed processing in the brain no site <strong>of</strong> consciousness no time <strong>of</strong> consciousnessChinese roomQualiaArtificial IntelligenceDaniel Dennet Consciousness ExplainedPurdue University(1991)Purdue UniversityNext time Review for exam 3 After Exam 3 Start a discussion <strong>of</strong> language Language as an instinct pidgins and creolesWhy we do not have <strong>to</strong> worry about teachinglanguage in school.Purdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/6/11The language instinctPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 26Why we do not have <strong>to</strong> worry aboutteaching language in school.Purdue UniversityLinguistics!! Study <strong>of</strong> language (Noam Chomsky)!!sentences!!words!!sounds!!structure!!interpretation!! The language instinct!!Pinker (1994)Purdue UniversityPreconceptions!! We tend <strong>to</strong> think <strong>of</strong> language as!!a great invention <strong>of</strong> human cognition!!taught <strong>to</strong> children!!taught in schools!!a cultural invention!! This is wrong!!!instead, language is an instinctPurdue UniversityCultural influences!! Culture does influence language!! Consider words in English»! Some derived from the invading Normans (1066)(considered sophisticated and polite)»! Some derived from the Anglo-Saxon language <strong>of</strong> theBritish Isles (considered crude by the invaders)!! Norman: perspiration, dine, deceased, desire, urine,excrement!! Anglo-Saxon: sweat, eat, dead, want, piss, shit!! But this is not what determines our capability <strong>to</strong>have language!Purdue UniversityBiology!! Language is a specialized skill <strong>of</strong>human animals!!Darwin (1871)!! Humans instinctively learn language!!effortless!!unconscious!!procedural knowledgePurdue UniversityLearning!! Like all skills, language needs the properenvironment <strong>to</strong> be developed!!blinded birds cannot navigate by the stars!!Atlantic Ocean turtles that navigate by magneticfields need <strong>to</strong> be in the correct ocean!! Language development needs exposure <strong>to</strong>other people for communication!!but it needs surprisingly less exposure than youmight suspectPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/6/11Child learningLearning!! Children do not learn language by simplyimitating others!!otherwise they would never come up withstatements likeDon’t giggle me!We holded the baby rabbits.I’m felling!Purdue University!! Instead, each child reinvents language!!difficult <strong>to</strong> test because we rarely get <strong>to</strong> see alanguage created from a non-language!!however, there are cases!!! Slave plantations in the South Pacific mixed<strong>to</strong>gether people <strong>of</strong> many differentlanguages!!create a jargon called a pidginPurdue UniversityPidgin!! For example, in New Guinea!!pidgin is similar <strong>to</strong> English (rulers <strong>of</strong> the plantation)woman: ‘meri’ (Mary, generic word for woman)another man’s wife: ‘meri bilong enaderfelo man’hair: ‘grass bilong hed’helicopter: ‘mixmasta bilong Jesus Christc<strong>of</strong>fin: ‘die bokus’piano: ‘bokus bilong teeth yu hitim teeth bokus is cryPurdue UniversityPidgin!! The Ten commandments in pidgen!!as translated by the Alexishafen Catholic Mission in1937!! 1. Mi Master, God bilong yu, yu no ken mekim masalai end oltambaran.!! 2. Yu no ken kolim nating nem bilong God.!! 3. Yu must santuium sande.!! 4. Yu mast mekin gud long papamama bilong yu.!! 5. Yu no ken kilim man.!! 6. Yu no ken brukim fashin bilong marit.!! 7. Yu no ken stilim samting.!! 8. Yu no ken lai.!! 9. Yu no ken duim meri bilong enaderfelo man.!! 10. Yu no ken laik stilim samting.Purdue UniversityLearning!! In Hawaii at the turn <strong>of</strong> the century!!workers from China, Japan, Korea, Portugal,The Philippines, and Puer<strong>to</strong> Rico werebrought in <strong>to</strong> harvest sugar!!they developed a pidgin!!some were still alive in 1970 and interviewed<strong>to</strong> see how the pidgin workedLearning!! Pidgin is not a true language!!word order is arbitrary!!no rules!!no tenses!!no prefixes or suffixesMe cape buy, me check make.!!can only be unders<strong>to</strong>od in context <strong>of</strong> theconversationHe bought my c<strong>of</strong>fee; he made me out a check.I bought c<strong>of</strong>fee, I made him out a check.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/6/11Creoles!! The children <strong>of</strong> these workers speak verydifferently!!if removed from parents (and so unable <strong>to</strong> learnnative <strong>to</strong>ngue)!!they transform the pidgin in<strong>to</strong> a full-fledgedlanguage»!tenses, rules, prefixes, suffixes,...!! Find the same type <strong>of</strong> transformations amongchildren learning sign-languagePurdue UniversitySign language!! Nicaraguan schools for the deaf (1979)!!tried <strong>to</strong> teach children <strong>to</strong> lip-read (poorresults)!!but children started making a pidgin on theplayground»!Lenguaje de Signos Nicaraguense(LSN)!! New students <strong>to</strong>ok the pidgin andcreated a language (creole)!!Idioma de Signos Nicarguense (ISN)Purdue UniversitySign language!! You can even see the invention <strong>of</strong> language ina single child!! “Simon,” a deaf boy who also had deaf parents!!parents learned American Sign Language (ASL) latein life and so are not very good at it!! Simon had little contact with other deaf people!!but his signing was much better than his parents!!! Language learning is not imitation!Education!! There is always a group <strong>of</strong> people who say that weneed <strong>to</strong> get back <strong>to</strong> the “basics” <strong>of</strong> education!! including studies <strong>of</strong> grammar!! usually, these are veiled versions <strong>of</strong> racism!! In fact, children do not learn language in school!! No one learns <strong>to</strong> speak by properly identifying nouns,pronouns, prepositional phrases, verbs, adverbs,…!! Education is good for reading and writing!! but writing is dramatically different from speaking!! and reading is dramatically different from listeningPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityEducation!! But then how do we explain thatuneducated people speak improperly?!! e.g. gang member in HarlemYou know, like some people say if yourgood an’ shit, your spirit going’t’heaven…’n’ if you bad, your spirit goin’<strong>to</strong> hell. Well bullshit! Your spirit goin’ <strong>to</strong>hell anyway, good or bad.Education!! This person is not speaking with bad grammar, buthe is also not speaking in Standard AmericanEnglish (SAE)!! He’s speaking in a dialect called Black EnglishVernacular (BEV)!! Both languages have certain rules!! His statements obey the rules <strong>of</strong> BEV precisely!!! Consider contractions <strong>of</strong> wordsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Greg Francis 1/6/11Rules!! In SAE you can replace some word pairswith contractions!!“They are” --> “They’re”!!“He is” --> “He’s”!! But you cannot always do this!!“Yes he is!” -->? “Yes he’s!”!!“Who is it?” -->? “Who’s it?”!! BEV has similar types <strong>of</strong> rulesPurdue UniversityRules!! BEV allows speakers <strong>to</strong> drop some words!!“…if you are bad…” --> “…if you bad…” isgrammatically correct!! BEV does not allow word dropping arbitrarily!!“Yes he is!” -->? “Yes he!”!!“Who is it?” -->? “Who it?”!! It is difficult for a non-speaker <strong>of</strong> BEV <strong>to</strong> noticethe application <strong>of</strong> the rulesPurdue UniversityLanguage!! So if everyone is speaking a language, which iscorrect?!!none, they are just different!!they are different dialects <strong>of</strong> English!! Linguist Max Weinreich!!“A language is a dialect with an army and a navy.”!! The dialect you speak may give away yourpersonal his<strong>to</strong>ry, but it is not fundamentallyworse than any other dialect.Purdue UniversityConclusions!! Language is an instinct!!specialized skill among humans!!children need little tu<strong>to</strong>ring <strong>to</strong> learn language!!children invent language if one is not readilyavailable!! Language follows rules!!even when it doesn’t seem <strong>to</strong>Purdue UniversityNext time!! Grammar!! Long term dependencies!! Phrases!! Language universals!! Dr. Francis says something new!Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/6/11Phrase treesPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 27Dr. Francis says something new!Language!! Conveys information!! Allows us <strong>to</strong> know about things we havenever experienced!!moon flights!!mating habits <strong>of</strong> tigers,…!! How do we do it?!! Two key aspectsPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! SymbolsSymbols and grammar!!words are arbitrary!!the sound “dog” has nothing <strong>to</strong> do with dogs!!compare driving on parkway <strong>to</strong> parking ondriveway, blueberries and cranberries,hamburger…!! Grammar!!the order <strong>of</strong> words matters!!Dog bites man. vs. Man bites dog.Purdue UniversityGrammar!! Discrete combina<strong>to</strong>rial system!!combinations <strong>of</strong> words!! How many combinations?!!if interrupted anywhere in the middle <strong>of</strong> asentence, there are about 10 words one couldselect before finishing it up!!if sentences average around 20 words, thatmeans there are 10^20 sentencesPurdue UniversityGrammar!! But in fact, there are infinitely manydifferent sentences!!there is no limit <strong>to</strong> how long a sentence canbe!! For any sentence I give you, you canalways make it longer by addingsomething like!!Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Francis said that, “….”Vastness!! It is amazing how powerful language is!! You have probably never heard thefollowing sentence!!moreover, it is probably its first utterance inhuman his<strong>to</strong>ry, but you understand it anyhowWe still have a month <strong>of</strong> classes <strong>to</strong> go, but it is so warm that itfeels like it is already dead week.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Greg Francis 1/6/11Grammar!! You not only understand language, yousense when a sentence is ungrammatical!!Is raining.!!The child seems sleeping.!!Sally poured the glass with water.!!It’s a flying finches, they are.Sometimes youstill understandwhat was meant!!!Rarely is the question asked: Is our childrenlearning? (a joking George W. Bush)Grammar!! You can also have sentences withoutmeaning that are perceived as grammatical!!Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.!!If we don’t succeed, we run the risk <strong>of</strong> failure.(a not joking Dan Quayle)!!‘Twas brillig, and the slithy <strong>to</strong>vesDid gyre and gimble in the wabe:All mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityGrammar!! These properties <strong>of</strong> language suggest that yourknowledge about language grammar is a basiccomponent <strong>of</strong> language systems!! It is distinct from both meaning and understanding!! Much <strong>of</strong> linguistics explores the rules <strong>of</strong> language!! we are interested in how people perceive grammar!! this is different from the grammar rules you may havelearned in school!»! Which <strong>of</strong>ten focus on forming sentences that are easy<strong>to</strong> understandModern linguistics!! Noam Chomsky used the properties <strong>of</strong>grammar <strong>to</strong> demonstrate that language isquite different from other types <strong>of</strong> learningthat might occur!!it’s not like learning <strong>to</strong> play a piano!!or learning about statistical regularities in theenvironment (stimulus-response)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNonsense sentences!! Think about the sentence!!Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.!! What is the probability that in normal life youwould hear the word “green” follow the word“colorless”?!!it must be close <strong>to</strong> zero!! But we recognize it as a grammaticallycorrect sentence!Purdue UniversityStatistics!! If you just learned the statisticalcombinations <strong>of</strong> words, you might thinksomething like this was a grammaticalsentenceHouse <strong>to</strong> ask for is <strong>to</strong> earn our living byworking <strong>to</strong>wards a goal for his team in oldNew York was a wonderful place wasn’t iteven pleasant <strong>to</strong> talk about and laugh hardwhen he tells lies he should not tell me thereason why you are is evidentPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Greg Francis 1/6/11Statistics!! The previous paragraph creates coherentgroups <strong>of</strong> 4 words at a time (genera<strong>to</strong>r madesure 4 words were with high probability)!! Maybe by including a larger number <strong>of</strong> wordsgrouped <strong>to</strong>gether you can insure that everysentence is appropriate!! Actually you cannot!!Because sentences have no maximum lengthPurdue UniversityLong-term dependencies!! Language has rules that determine what types <strong>of</strong>words can be used and when!! A word choice early in a sentence can have an effectat the end <strong>of</strong> a sentenceHow Ann Salisbury can claim that Pam Dawber’s angerat not receiving her fair share <strong>of</strong> acclaim for Mork and Mindy’ssuccess derives from a fragile ego escapes me.1) “at not receiving ” --> noun “acclaim”2) “anger” --> “derives” (singular)3) “How” --> “escapes” (number)Purdue UniversityLong-term dependencies!! Chomsky demonstrated that long termdependencies can be very long!!Consider “If…then…” and “Either…or…” sentencesIf the girl eats ice cream, then the boy eats hot dogs.Either the girl eats ice cream, or the boy eats hot dogs.Recursion!! In fact, any sentence can go inside the “if…then”part <strong>of</strong> a sentence!! embed a sentence in a sentence!! Thus the following is a (ugly) valid sentenceEither if the girl eats ice cream, then the boy eats icecream, or if the girl eats ice cream then the boy eats candy.!! recursion cannot be learned by statistics, it has <strong>to</strong> bebased on rulesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPhrases!! Every sentence is built out <strong>of</strong> phrasesThe happy boy eats candy.The first three words form a unit calleda noun phrase (NP)The happy boyWhat identifies anoun phrase?This is not the same analysis you didin grammar school!Purdue UniversityPhrases!! All noun phrases obey certain rules!!rewrite rulesNP-->(det)A*Nthe happy boy!!NP -- noun phrasethe boy!!det -- determinant: “the”, “a”, “an” John!!A -- adjectivethe tall slender woman!!N -- noun!!( ) -- optional!!* -- as many as you wantPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Greg Francis 1/6/11Phrase tree!! It helps <strong>to</strong> describe rules as phrase trees!! Specifies both what can be used in thephrase and where it must be usedNPdet A NPhrases!! Similarly, there are rules for all sorts <strong>of</strong>phrases in a language!! There may be many ways <strong>to</strong> rewrite aphrase!S-->NP VPVP-->V NPS -- sentenceNP -- noun phraseVP -- verb phrasethe happy boyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityLexicon!! We also need a mental dictionary(lexicon) that specifies parts <strong>of</strong> speech!!N --> boy, girl, candy, hot dogs, ice cream,…!!V --> eats, likes, bites,…!!det --> a, the, one,…!!A --> lucky, tall,...Purdue UniversityPhrase tree!! With rewrite rules and a mental dictionary,you can create a sentence by linking therules <strong>to</strong>getherSNPVPVNPdet A NNthe happy boyeatsice creamPurdue UniversitySockets!! In a phrase tree, a phrase is like a componentthat snaps in<strong>to</strong> the right placedetthe!!any appropriate phrase works! (even nonsensephrases)SNPVPVNPA A NNcolorless green idea eatsice creamPurdue UniversityUsefulness!! It is important <strong>to</strong> appreciate how the phrase treeapproach simplifies the description <strong>of</strong> language!! Consider how we learn a new word and knowhow <strong>to</strong> use it!! If you learn that a word is a noun, you canimmediately use that noun in many differentwaysPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/6/11Learning phrases!! You do not have <strong>to</strong> relearn the role <strong>of</strong> the word“boy” for each useThe boy eats candy.Long term dependencies!! Phrase trees have no problems with long-termdependencies and recursion!! The rewrite rules provide the structure needed<strong>to</strong> insure the right if-then combinationI like the happy boy.I gave the new boy a cookie.The happy boy’s cat eats candy.S--> either S or SS--> if S then SS -- sentenceeither -- the word “either”or -- the word “or”if -- the word “if”then -- the word “then”Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPhrase tree!! A phrase tree can handle this type <strong>of</strong> sentenceSifSSthenS or Sthe boy eats hot dogseitherthe girl eats candythe girl eats ice creamPurdue UniversitySignificance!! Rules and phrase trees allow us <strong>to</strong> identifyfundamental characteristics about howhumans communicate!! Consider all the ways you mightcommunicate!!Morse code, 0-1’s, English, Spanish, tapping<strong>to</strong>es, beeps,..!!an infinite number <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>to</strong> create a languagePurdue UniversityLanguage similarity!! All human languages are very similar,compared <strong>to</strong> the possibilities!! In some sort <strong>of</strong> language space all our 6000languages are clustered <strong>to</strong>getherHumanMartianDolphinAlphacentaurianPurdue UniversityLanguage universals!! There are several types <strong>of</strong> universals!! For example, in English the normal pattern <strong>of</strong>sentences is!! Subject-Verb-Object!! (There are exceptions: “A bear he shot.”)!! This pattern is true for most <strong>of</strong> the world’slanguages!! 98% <strong>of</strong> languages have the Subject before the Object (theVerb location varies across languages)!! 80% <strong>of</strong> languages have the Subject before the Verb (theObject location varies across languages)Purdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Greg Francis 1/6/11Language universals!! Most language universals involve co-appearance <strong>of</strong>linguistic features!! For example, if a language’s preferred word order isSubject-Object-Verb!! the language is likely <strong>to</strong> form questions by adding somewords at the end <strong>of</strong> the question!! If a language’s preferred word order is Subject-Verb-Object (like English)!! the language is likely <strong>to</strong> form questions by adding somewords at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the question!! “Where did he…?”, “When did they…?”Conclusions!! Language consists <strong>of</strong>!!symbols (words)!!grammar (rules)!! Language is best described as phrasetrees!!explains long term dependencies!! Language universalsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext time!! Words!! Mental lexicon!! Morphology!! Structure!! CogLab on Word superiority due!!! What is the plural <strong>of</strong> “walkman”?Purdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12WordsGrammarPSY 200Greg FrancisThe rules <strong>of</strong> phrases rules for combining phrases universals for all languagesLecture 28What is the plural <strong>of</strong> walkman?So why do we have so difficult a timecommunicating with people that speak otherlanguages?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWordsWords are specialEven if all languages have similarrules for combining phrases, they usedifferent wordsWords are symbols that are arbitraryin many respectsWe are better at identifying a word thanan individual letter Word superiority effect--?-E or L--?-E or L dog is nothing like a dog is it rote memorization?» partly, but it is also more than thatLXXXXFELTXXXXPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWords are specialNote: context does not give the answer Just knowing there was a word should not help FEET FELTLXXXX--?-E or LFELTXXXXPurdue University--?-E or LWords are specialNevertheless, a letter in a word is better identifiedCogLab class data Results are based on data from 155 participants" Condition ! !Percent correct detections" Target letter in a word "67.4" Target letter in isolation "66.7"CogLab global data" Results are based on data from 39,489 participants" Condition ! !Percent correct detections" Target letter in a word "77.2" Target letter in isolation "76.0"No convincing explanationPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Word rulesMorphologyPart <strong>of</strong> linguistics identifiesthe rules for working withwords (morphology) Show this page <strong>to</strong> apreschoolerThe child will say wugseven though he has neverseen a wug before This implies that there mustbe a rule for pluralizing nounsThe rules <strong>of</strong> word formationIn many respects English has a verylimited morphology nouns have two forms verbs have four formsduckducksquackquacksquackedquackingPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMorphologyOther languages have many morevariations Italian and Spanish have 50 forms <strong>of</strong> each verb classical Greek has 350 forms <strong>of</strong> each verb Turkish has 2 million forms <strong>of</strong> each verb some languages build entire sentences aroundone complex verbThere are rules for these formsPurdue UniversityMorphologyEnglish can convey this information in as many waysas other languages, but we use grammatical phrases<strong>to</strong> do soSimple present tense General truths: Ducks quack. Habitual action: I quack like a duck when I wake up.Present Perfect Progressive To express duration <strong>of</strong> an action that began in the past, hascontinued in<strong>to</strong> the present, and may continue in<strong>to</strong> the future:The duck has been quacking for two hours, and he hasntfinished yet.Other languages have different verb forms <strong>to</strong> indicatethese conditionsPurdue UniversityMorphologySuffixesOn the other hand, English morphologyallows one <strong>to</strong> easily create new wordsfrom old words add suffixes and prefixesteachteachableteacher unteachable teachablenessEnglish has lots <strong>of</strong> these derivational suffixes-able-age-al-ate-ed-en-ify-ion-ish-ize-an-ant-ance-ary-er-ful-hood-ic-ism-ist-ity-ive-ness-ory-ous-yExamples<strong>of</strong> morphemesYou probably donot consciously knowwhat some <strong>of</strong> thesemean, but yourlanguage system does.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12CompoundingEnglish also allows new words <strong>to</strong> be createdout <strong>of</strong> other words and combinations can be combined<strong>to</strong>oth<strong>to</strong>othbrushbrushunmicrowaveabilityRulesSo what are the rules?One looks <strong>to</strong> be easy <strong>to</strong> pluralize a noun, add -sNNstem Ninflection NstemNNinflectionbootyliciousPurdue Universitydog -swug -sPurdue UniversityRulesMore detail on rulesThe creation <strong>of</strong> compound nouns also followsa simple ruleNstemNstemNstem NstemConsider a rule that creates an adjective out <strong>of</strong>a verbOr a noun out <strong>of</strong> a verbAstemNstemNstem<strong>to</strong>othNstembrushdogbiteBy the way, ignore what grammarschool might have taught you, theseare not adjective-noun phrasesVstemcrunchAstemaffix-ableVstemcrunchNstemaffix-erPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityRootSome morphemes canonly be attached <strong>to</strong> certaintypes <strong>of</strong> words a root is a word that cannotbe split in<strong>to</strong> smaller parts some morphemes attachonly <strong>to</strong> rootsNstemNstemNstemaffix thus, Darwinianisms is aword, but Darwinismians is-ismnotNroot Nrootaffix» -ian must attach <strong>to</strong> a rootDarwin -ianPurdue UniversityNNinflection-sLexiconTo keep track <strong>of</strong> what can attach <strong>to</strong> what,there must be a mental dictionary <strong>of</strong>morphemes -able -er ...» adjective stem affiix; means capable <strong>of</strong>being Xd;attach me <strong>to</strong> a verb stem» noun stem affix; means one who Xs;attach me <strong>to</strong> a verb stemPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12ExceptionsExceptionsThese exceptions generally come from otherYou can probably think <strong>of</strong> lots <strong>of</strong> exceptions <strong>to</strong>languages (with appropriate rules)these types <strong>of</strong> rules English adopts the words but not the rules many words seem <strong>to</strong> follow arbitrary rulesThese exceptions tend <strong>to</strong> be very common wordsPluralization, past tense» mouse, mice teach, taught» leaf, leaves buy, bought» man, men fly, flew drink-drank sink-sank throw-threw ring-rang sit-satblow-blewAll derive from a pro<strong>to</strong>-Indo-European languagethat formed past tense by replacing one vowelPurdue Universitywith anotherPurdue UniversityLanguage familiesMany languages are related <strong>to</strong> each other and havebroad familiesVery special casesWhat is the plural <strong>of</strong> walkman? Which is why you see so many similar words across languages walkmans? walkmen? Neither feels quite rightTo answer this question we have <strong>to</strong> understandhow the word walkman is formed and what it isabout this tells us how <strong>to</strong> pluralize the wordPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityHeadsHeads and compoundsMost words have a head that indicates whatthe word is aboutIn English it is always the rightmostmorpheme crunchable a thing that can be x-ed cruncher a thing that does x workman a type <strong>of</strong> person saw<strong>to</strong>oth a type <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>othThe plural form <strong>of</strong> a compound word is basedon the plural form <strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> the compoundword <strong>to</strong>othbrush --> <strong>to</strong>othbrushesNstem saw<strong>to</strong>oth --> sawteeth snowman --> snowmen Nstem NstemIs walkman a compound noun? yes, but it is not normal walkmanPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/14/12Headless compoundsHeadless compoundsSome compound words are headlessHow can you tell?Sony corporation suggests that the plural <strong>of</strong>walkman is a walkman is not about a type <strong>of</strong> man thus, the head is not what the word is about this tell us that walkman is more like a new wordthan a compound word (e.g., electricity)A similar analysis explains the plural form <strong>of</strong>namesWalkman Personal StereosToron<strong>to</strong> Maple Leafs (not Leaves)For headless compounds the irregular pluralform is not appropriateFlorida Marlins (not Marlin) no plural form feels correct because the word hasno headI am sick <strong>of</strong> all the Mickey Mouses in thisadministration. (not Mickey Mice)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusionsNext timeWords follow rulesInterpreting languageParsersMorphology / morphemesMore ambiguityLexiconComputers vs humansExplains characteristics <strong>of</strong> languageCogLab on Lexical decision due!This is a valid sentence: Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalobuffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13ParsingPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 29This is a valid sentence:Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalobuffalo buffalo buffalo.Purdue UniversityLinguisticsSo far we have looked at grammar wordsFrom the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> generating asentenceToday we look more closely at interpreting asentencePurdue UniversityEliza / EmacsEliza / Emacs Weizenbaum (1966)I am the psychotherapist. Please, describe your problems. Each timeyou are finished talking, type RET twice.I am sad.Why do you say you are sad?My parents wont give me a new car.Tell me something about your family.I have five brothers and two sisters.You seem <strong>to</strong> dwell on your family.They are important.Is it because <strong>of</strong> your plans that you say they are important?Purdue UniversityI am the psychotherapist. Please, describe your problems. Each timeyou are finished talking, type RET twice.Hi, my name is Greg.How do you do? What brings you <strong>to</strong> see me?I am showing a demonstration for class.Why do you say you are showing a demonstration for class?Because I am.Can you elaborate on that?Well, I am a pr<strong>of</strong>essor.Tell me about your pr<strong>of</strong>essor.I am the pr<strong>of</strong>essor!Eliza just picks upon key phrases andgenerates somes<strong>to</strong>ck responses.Purdue UniversityParsingWho does what?Eliza does not really understand anything Try it yourself at http://www.manifestation.com/neuro<strong>to</strong>ys/eliza.php3The difference between Dog bites man. Man bites dog.Requires identifying the subject, object, and verbThe system that does this is called a parserYou can learn quite a bit about a sentences meaningby knowing the phrase tree structure <strong>of</strong> the sentence indicates some aspects <strong>of</strong> meaningThe green idea eats the girls candy.We know the sentence is about an idea rather than agirl we also know the idea is doing the eatingPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13Building phrase treesYou create a sentence with ideas in your headThose ideas are converted in<strong>to</strong> appropriate words andphrase trees <strong>to</strong> convey those ideasSometimes two different ideas can give rise <strong>to</strong> thesame sentence leads <strong>to</strong> ambiguous sentences the parser does not work in the same way as the crea<strong>to</strong>rAmbiguous sentencesConsider the followingYoko Ono will talk about her husband John Lennonwho was killed in an interview with Barbara Walters.Two cars were reported s<strong>to</strong>len by the Purdue policeyesterday.Tonights program discusses stress, exercise, nutrition,and sex with former Celtic forward Scott Wedman, Dr.Ruth Westheimer, and Dick Cavett.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityAmbiguous sentencesAmbiguous sentencesThe writer had in mind a phrase tree likeBut a reader/listener could interpret it likeVdiscussVPNPNsexwithPPNPDick CavettVdiscussVPNPNwithsexPPNPDick CavettNo pho<strong>to</strong>Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityMentaleseThat two different internal thoughts cangive rise <strong>to</strong> the same language statementis interesting it suggests that we think in some way that isdifferent from languageParsingParsing is something like building aphrase tree in reverseLets parse through a simple sentenceword by word The dog likes ice cream.S a mentalese, if you willNPVPPurdue Universitydet N Vthe dog likesNPNPurdue Universityice creamPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13ParsingTwo problemsOnce every slot is filled, the sentence isparsed a mental click <strong>of</strong> understandingEach word has its role definedParsing is complicated in two ways (1) Phrases are not always consistent with word order (2) The same spoken sounds are sometimes used forwords with different meanings (noun vs verb vsadjective) and the order <strong>of</strong> the phrases identifies themeaning (usually)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWord orderWord orderThis sentence is relatively easy <strong>to</strong> parse,even though it is a complicated sentenceThis sentence is not as easyOne type <strong>of</strong> phrase is embedded in anotherSPP PP PPRemarkable is the rapidity <strong>of</strong> the motion <strong>of</strong> the wing <strong>of</strong> the hummingbird.SPPThe rapidity that the motion has is remarkable.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWord orderThis sentence is nearly impossibleS PP PP PPThe rapidity that the motion that the wing that the hummingbird has has has is remarkable.Purdue UniversityDifficult sentencesThese sentences are difficult for humans because <strong>of</strong>limited memory when a phrase tree includes many unfilled branches <strong>of</strong> thesame type (PP) the parser becomes confused as <strong>to</strong> which phrase isassociated with a new word ends up backtracking <strong>to</strong> sort out the phrases sometimes falls apart (has has has)The grammar genera<strong>to</strong>r and the parser are differentthings in your language system these are grammatically correct sentences they are not good sentencesDont you make sentences like thesemake meshow youyour exams!Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13Word ambiguityWord ambiguityA word by itself is <strong>of</strong>ten ambiguousConsider a parser trying <strong>to</strong> follow the phrase The plastic pencil marks...A differently designed phrase tree handles thenew word The plastic pencil marks...SSdetNPNVPWord pencil isinconsistent withstructure created!detNPANVPWord pencil isconsistent withstructure created!the plastic pencilthe plasticpencilPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWord ambiguityBut you run in<strong>to</strong> the same problem with theword marks (noun or verb?) The plastic pencil marks were ugly. (noun) The plastic pencil marks easily (verb)Parsers build phrase trees on the fly, sobacktracking is <strong>of</strong>ten required many times it is so fast that we do not notice seems effortlessLexical decisionIt is not effortless and it can be shown with anexperimentThe experiment is a variation <strong>of</strong> the lexical decisiontask, which you did in CogLabIn the lexical decision experiment, you see a pair <strong>of</strong>words/non-words, and we measure the reaction timefor you <strong>to</strong> decide if the second word is a word RT is faster if the second word is semantically related <strong>to</strong> thefirst wordPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityLexical decisionThe data find that RT is faster if the second word is meaningfullyrelated <strong>to</strong> the first wordCogLab DataResults are based on data from 180 participants [Global 53,570 participants] Condition ! ! !Reaction time (ms)! Associated words ! !686 [Global: 619]! Unassociated words !685 [Global: 629]! Word then non-word !870! Non-word then word !766! Two non-words ! !871!Evidence <strong>of</strong> ambiguityWe can apply the lexical decision task <strong>to</strong> the ambiguity<strong>of</strong> parsing (Swinney, 1979)Consider the following paragraph, which subjectslistened <strong>to</strong> Rumor had it that, for years, the government had beenplagued with problems. The man was not surprised when hefound several spiders, roaches, and other bugs in the corner<strong>of</strong> his room.The word bugs is ambiguous insects vs surveillance devicesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13Evidence <strong>of</strong> ambiguityNo one notices the ambiguityBut, give a lexical decision test for words verses nonwords Flashed visually on a screen just after the word was spoken Subjects respond faster for words related <strong>to</strong> either definition <strong>of</strong>bugSentence ambiguitySome sentences never resolve their ambiguities Ingres enjoyed painting his models nude. Visiting relatives can be boring. I saw the man with the binoculars.Context <strong>of</strong>ten helps more laterant sew spyfasterslowerfasterPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySentence ambiguityInterestingly, people <strong>of</strong>ten miss ambiguities insentences Time flies like an arrow.Humans recognize only one interpretationComputer algorithms can find 5 interpretations all grammatically correct!Sentence ambiguityTime flies like an arrow.(1) Time proceeds as quickly as an arrow proceeds.(2) Measure the speed <strong>of</strong> flies in the same way thatyou measure the speed <strong>of</strong> an arrow.(3) Measure the speed <strong>of</strong> flies in the same way that anarrow measures the speed <strong>of</strong> flies.(4) Measure the speed <strong>of</strong> flies that resemble an arrow.(5) Flies <strong>of</strong> a particular kind, time-flies, arefond <strong>of</strong> an arrow. (Fruit flies like a banana.)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityAmbiguity and computersOr consider the following (valid) sentence thatcomputer algorithms can correctly interpret Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalobuffalo.Heres a hint <strong>to</strong> make it understandable inprincipleChicago horses (that) Milwaukee cowsintimidate (also) intimidate Cincinnatipigs.SignificanceThese types <strong>of</strong> results suggest that wordsand grammar are not enough <strong>to</strong> insurecommunicationIn a certain sense a speaker and listenermust already be agreeing about the <strong>to</strong>picbefore anything can be communicatedThus, we can understand the followingdiscourse Woman: Im leaving you.Purdue University Man: Who is he?Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/2/13Schemas / scriptsSchemas / scripts<strong>Cognitive</strong> devices describe stereotypical properties <strong>of</strong> a situation e.g., restaurant scene involves table, waiter, drinks, tips,…Giving computers the general knowledge <strong>of</strong>life needed <strong>to</strong> create something like schemasis very difficultFill-in the missing information that is critical forunderstanding language (and events in general) explains why it is difficult <strong>to</strong> communicate across cultures,even with a common languageThis is why computers do not carry onconversations with youLots <strong>of</strong> work going on in artificial intelligence <strong>to</strong>Schemas provide the context <strong>to</strong> remove the almostaddress this problemconstant ambiguities <strong>of</strong> languagePurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusionsNext timeUnderstanding languageParsingPhrase trees (in reverse)SpeechPhonemesArticulation / coarticulationAmbiguitiesComputer generated interpretationsMissing information / schemasWhy do we say razzle-dazzle instead <strong>of</strong>dazzle-razzel?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 6


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11SpeechPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 30Why do we say “razzle-dazzle” instead <strong>of</strong>“dazzle-razzle”?Purdue UniversityLanguage!! Many levels!!grammar!!phrases!!words!! All humans, who can, communicate throughspoken language!!how does language depend on speech?!!what are the units <strong>of</strong> speech?Purdue UniversityIllusions!! When you hear what I say, you think youhear at least!!separate words!!separate syllables!! But you do not!!words actually overlap in the speech signal!!it is nearly impossible <strong>to</strong> take a speech signaland cut it up in<strong>to</strong> separate wordsPurdue UniversityIllusions!! The “blurriness” <strong>of</strong> speech explains some long-heldconfusions!! Oronyms (Mondegreens)The good candy came anyways. The good can decay many ways.It’s a doggy-dog world.Purdue UniversityWhy the blur?!! The ear is a bottleneck!!analogous <strong>to</strong> the critical flicker frequency in theeye!!the ear can distinguish as separate onlyif they are given at less than 20 hertz»!20 clicks per second!!above that, a series <strong>of</strong> clicks sounds like acontinuous buzzBut...!! Speech is seemingly perceived muchbetter!! Normal speech provides 10 <strong>to</strong> 15 distinctphonemes each second!! Fast speech is 20 <strong>to</strong> 30 phonemes persecond!! Artificially fast speech is 40 <strong>to</strong> 50phonemes per secondPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Phonemes!! pho!neme \'fo-,nem\ n[F phoneme, fr. Gk phonemat-, phonema speechsound, utterance, fr. phonein <strong>to</strong> sound](ca. 1916):a member <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> the smallest units <strong>of</strong> speechthat serve <strong>to</strong> distinguish one utterance fromanother in a language or dialect, the \p\ <strong>of</strong> pat andthe \f\ <strong>of</strong> fat are two different phonemes in English>Phonemes!! Speech is made <strong>of</strong> phonemes!! Different combinations <strong>of</strong> phonemescorrespond <strong>to</strong> different syllables andwords!! We seemingly hear more phonemes thanthe ear can actually handle!!how?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPacking!! If the ear can only distinguish up <strong>to</strong> 20 sounds persecond!! and we can interpret speech that seems <strong>to</strong> contain 50phonemes per second!! then the speaker must be combining many phonemes<strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong> overcome the limits <strong>of</strong> the ear!! The listener hears the 20 (or so) sounds in a second,but interprets them as more than 20 differentphonemesPacking!! If phonemes are being smashed <strong>to</strong>getherthere must be some blurriness!!and this can lead <strong>to</strong> misinterpretations!! This is also why there are few computers <strong>to</strong>read <strong>to</strong> the blind!!they do not know how <strong>to</strong> combine phonemes inthe right wayPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! So what are phonemes?Speech!! All speech is made <strong>of</strong> sounds!! sound is a pattern <strong>of</strong> pressure on the ear!! a tuning fork vibrates back and forth <strong>to</strong> make the sound <strong>of</strong> apure <strong>to</strong>ne!! Frequency <strong>of</strong> vibration corresponds <strong>to</strong> pitch <strong>of</strong> the sound!! Speech consists <strong>of</strong> lots <strong>of</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> this sort!! With many different overlapping frequencies!! Lungs pushair out <strong>to</strong>make asound!!otherorgansshapesoundPhysiologyPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Example!! Note where your <strong>to</strong>ngue is as you say!!bet butt!!beet bat!! The position <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>ngue shapes the vocaltract and makes different sounds!!!this is true for all vowelsExample!! Note what your lips do as you say!! boot book!! The lips add additional frequencies <strong>to</strong> make differentsounds!! Thus, you can hear someone smile across atelephone!!! Vowels are all distinguished by the shape <strong>of</strong> the vocaltractPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConsonants!! Consonants are more complicated!!different type <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> air flow!! (1) Voicing: vibration <strong>of</strong> vocal cords!!/b/, /d/, /m/, /w/, /v/ (voiced)!! /p/, /t/, /f/ (not voiced, or unvoiced)!! (2) Place <strong>of</strong> articulation:!!/d/, /t/ (upper gum)!!/m/, /b/, /p/ (lips)!!/f/, /v/ (lip and teeth)Purdue UniversityConsonants!! (3) Manner <strong>of</strong> articulation!!/d/, /t/ (s<strong>to</strong>p)!! /m/ (nasal)!!/f/, /v/ (fricative)!! Each consonant is uniquely identified by itsvoice (or not) and its place and manner <strong>of</strong>articulation!!Some languages have a few other characteristicsas well (e.g., <strong>to</strong>ne)Purdue UniversityFun!! Why do we say razzle-dazzle instead <strong>of</strong>dazzle-razzle?!!for phrases like this, people always first say theword with a leading consonant that impedes air flowthe leastsuper-duperhelter-skelterharum-scarumhocus-pocuswilly-nillyroly-polyholy molywalkie-talkienamby-pambywing-dingherky-jerky mumbo-jumboPurdue UniversityIt’s arule!Phonemes!! English uses 22-26 (it depends on how you count)combinations <strong>of</strong> voicing, place, and manner <strong>of</strong>articulation (and 20 vowels)!! Ro<strong>to</strong>kas (Papua New Guinea) uses 6 (and 5 vowels)!! Khoisian (Bushman) uses 141»! Uses clicks as consonants!! No language uses some possible sounds!! raspberries, scraping teeth, squawking,…!! Note, these sounds are used for communication, but not aspart <strong>of</strong> language!!! Japanese does not distinguish /r/ from /l/Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Rules!! To say a word, we must combine phonemes!! In every language there are rules (trees) thatdescribe what phonemes can follow otherphonemes!! Thus, we can identify possible words fromimpossible words!!plast ptak!!vlas rtut!!thole hladCompression!! Moving the <strong>to</strong>ngue (and otherarticula<strong>to</strong>rs) around is difficult and takestime!!<strong>to</strong> say sounds faster, people usecoarticulation!!shape <strong>to</strong>ngue in advanced preparation forthe next phoneme!!this influences the sound <strong>of</strong> phonemes!!nypip dnom Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityCoarticulation!! We generally do not notice theseadjustments!!we are tuned <strong>to</strong> recognize the new soundsas coarticulation!! This is the main reason computers havea hard time recognizing human speech!Purdue UniversityCoarticulation!! Notice that your <strong>to</strong>ngue body is in differentpositions for the two /k/ sounds in!!Cape Cod!! Note <strong>to</strong>o, that the /s/ becomes /sh/ in!!horseshoe!! And /n/ becomes /m/ in!!NPR!! You can enunciate these “correctly”, but incasual speech you do not!Purdue UniversityCoarticulation!! There are rules for how <strong>to</strong> coarticulate!! When a s<strong>to</strong>p-consonant appears betweentwo vowels, you do not actually s<strong>to</strong>p!!flapping!! slapped --> slapt!! patting --> padding!! writing --> wridingPurdue UniversitySpelling!! We have <strong>of</strong>ten observed that written languageis different from spoken language!! George Bernard Shaw (among others)complained about spelling in English!!he noted you could spell “fish” as “g-h-o-t-i”gh -- <strong>to</strong>ugh o -- women ti -- nation!! He <strong>of</strong>fered a prize in his will for someone <strong>to</strong>create a good alternative <strong>to</strong> English spellingPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 1/6/11Spelling!! It is true that English spelling does not seem <strong>to</strong> agreewith pronunciation!! a problem for learning how <strong>to</strong> read!!! Nor should it!! if words were spelled the way they were pronounced, wewould lose the visual connection between words!! slap --> slapped would become slapt!! write --> writing would become wridding!! National Public Radio --> NPR would become MPROther approaches!! There are other written forms <strong>of</strong> language that avoidsome <strong>of</strong> these problems!! The most sensible writtenlanguage is probably theKorean hangul!! Drawn characters indicatehow consonants arepronouncedPurdue UniversityPurdue University!! Speech!! Blurring!! Phonemes!! Articulation!! Coarticulation!! SpellingConclusionsNext time!! Learning language!! Babies!! Children!! Learning a second language!! When should you learn a foreign language?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/15/12Language developmentLanguagePSY 200InstinctiveGreg Francis your brain is wired <strong>to</strong> work with grammars, words,phrasesLecture 31Learning you do have <strong>to</strong> learn some specifics for yourWhen should you learn a foreignlanguage?native <strong>to</strong>ngue rules wordsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityLearningBabies and phonemesWhat is learned?How does a child learn?How much about language does a childknow?Infants have linguistic skills as soon as theyare born babies are interested in new things attach a tape player <strong>to</strong> a pacifierWhen have you mastered language? each suck causes the player <strong>to</strong> play a soundHow do you learn a second language?Repetition <strong>of</strong> the same sound leads <strong>to</strong>boredom and fewer sucksWhat do babies do? ba, ba, ba, ba, ba, ba, ba, ba,Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBabies and phonemesBabies and phonemesWhen the syllable changes babies suck more <strong>of</strong>ten ba, ba, …, pa, pa, pa, pa, pa,…Moreover, they hear things the way adults do you can change the pronunciation (timing) <strong>of</strong> ba and still hear it asba (CogLab data) babies hear it the same wayBA"PA"Identification taskSame/different taskPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/15/12BabiesBabies hear all phonemes, even ones theirparents cannot distinguishBabies, even newborns, do show a preferencefor what will become their native <strong>to</strong>ngue occurs because they hear mothers voice while in thewombMostly prefer the melody, stress, timing French infants like French and Italian equally well playing language backwards keeps many consonantsbut dis<strong>to</strong>rts melody (babies are not interested)Language developmentBetween 5-7 months, babies start making sounds clicks, hums, hisses, smacks,…Between 7-8 months babies start babbling insyllables ba-ba-ba-ba-ba neh-neh-neh da-da-da-da-daPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBabblingBabbling sounds are the same in all languages patterns are common across languagesBy the end <strong>of</strong> the first year babies combine syllables<strong>to</strong> sound like words neh-nee da-dee meh-nehBabbling is important children who do not babble <strong>of</strong>ten show slower speechdevelopment deaf children babble with hands, if parents use signlanguagePurdue UniversityBabblingBabbling teaches child how sequences <strong>of</strong> musclecombinations lead <strong>to</strong> different sounds necessary <strong>to</strong> produce speechBy about 10 months babies learn the sounds <strong>of</strong> theirnative <strong>to</strong>ngue they can no longer distinguish phonemes that are not part <strong>of</strong>the language Part <strong>of</strong> learning is forgetting!Purdue UniversityLanguage stagesNearly all children learn language in stages 1) Cooing (first several months) 2) Babbling (~6 months) 3) One word utterances (~1 year) 4) Two-word utterances and telegraphic speech(1-3 years) 5) Basic adult sequences with grammar(~4 years)The rate <strong>of</strong> learning varies substantiallyPurdue UniversityLearning wordsChildren learn words with ridiculous easeAn average 6 year old knows 13,000 words learned one new word every two waking hours this is without knowing how <strong>to</strong> read!The average high school graduate knowsabout 60,000 different words (not countingcompound words and such) means that in 17 years <strong>of</strong> life (not counting the firs<strong>to</strong>ne), they learned an average <strong>of</strong> 10 new wordseach day (one word every 90 waking minutes)Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/15/12Around 18 monthsChildren learn simple rules <strong>of</strong> syntax All dry. All messy. All wet. I sit. I shut. No bed.All hell breaks looseAfter mastering 2-word strings, <strong>to</strong>ddlers go crazy onlanguageConsider changes in language (year;month) (2;3) Play checkers. Big drum. I got horn. No pee. See baby. See pretty.Content is similar for all languages objects appear, disappear, move,… people do things, see things,… ask questions, who, what, where,... (2;5) Now put boots on. Where wrench go? What that paperclip doing? (2;7) Ursula has a boot on. Shadow has hat like that. (2;9) Where Mommy keep her pocket book? Show yousomething funny. (2;11) Why you mixing baby chocolate? I finishing drinking allup down my throat.Purdue University (3;1) You went <strong>to</strong> Bos<strong>to</strong>n University? Doggies like <strong>to</strong> climb up.Purdue UniversityErrorsThree year olds make lots <strong>of</strong> grammaticalerrors that is because there are lots <strong>of</strong> opportunities forerrors but pick any particular grammatical rule and youfind most three year olds obey it most <strong>of</strong> the time this is amazing because there lots <strong>of</strong> cases that youwould expect would be difficult <strong>to</strong> learnExpected errorsConsider a child hearing adults talk and howthey might incorrectly apply what they learnOut <strong>of</strong> 66,000 sentences, children never madethese errorsHe seems happy. -->Does he seem happy?He is smiling. -->Does he be smiling?He did eat. -->He didnt eat.He did a few things. -->He didnt a few things.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityErrorsChildren do make errors, but the errors are consistentwith rules <strong>of</strong> languageChildren <strong>of</strong>ten over generalize a rule -s <strong>to</strong> pluralize a noun» Mouses, leafs -ed <strong>to</strong> make the past tense <strong>of</strong> a verb» My teacher holded the baby rabbits and we patted them.» Hey, Hor<strong>to</strong>n heared a Who.» I finded Renee.» Once upon a time a alliga<strong>to</strong>r was eating a dinosaur and thedinosaur was eating the alliga<strong>to</strong>r and the dinosaur was eatenby the alliga<strong>to</strong>r and the alliga<strong>to</strong>r goed kerplunk.Purdue UniversityOvergeneralizationThese past tense forms sound wrong because Englishhas around 180 irregular verbs inherited from other languages These past-tense forms are not derived from rulesIrregular forms have <strong>to</strong> be memorized, word by wordIf a child cannot remember (in its lexicon) s/he defaults <strong>to</strong> the ruleThese errors are for the most difficult parts <strong>of</strong> alanguage <strong>to</strong> learn Because they dont follow the normal rulesPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/15/12OvergeneralizationsWe know this is the most difficult part <strong>of</strong> language because adultsmake the same kind <strong>of</strong> mistakes tread - trod strive -strove dwell - dwelt slay-slew rend - rentsmite - smoteSound weird because we do not <strong>of</strong>ten hear them many adults regularizethe words treaded, strived, dwelled,slayed, rended, smited thus language changes…!Purdue UniversitySyntax errorsChildren make similar mistakes in applyinggrammatical rulesIn English there is a causative rule that applies <strong>to</strong>some verbs and not others takes a verb meaning <strong>to</strong> do something and converts it <strong>to</strong> averb meaning <strong>to</strong> cause <strong>to</strong> do somethingThus you can say The butter melted. --> Sally melted the butter. The ball bounced. --> Hiram bounced the ball.But you cant say the second <strong>of</strong> each pair I like sausage. --> I am liked <strong>of</strong> sausage. I giggled. --> Sally giggled me.Purdue UniversitySyntax errorsChildren over generalize application <strong>of</strong> the causativerule <strong>to</strong> inappropriate verbs I go <strong>to</strong> the bathroom. --> Go me <strong>to</strong> the bathroom. Aunt Jane died. --> The tiger will come and eat David andthen he will be died and I wont have a little brother anymore. I drink with a cup. --> Yawny Baby - you can push her mouthopen <strong>to</strong> drink her.Many <strong>of</strong> these errors would be fine in other languages!The situation is similar <strong>to</strong> the special past tense verbs This rule must be memorized as applying <strong>to</strong> some verbs andnot othersSyntax errorsAdults also misapply the causative rule Sparkle your table with Cape Cod classic glass-ware. Well, that decided me. This new golf ball could obsolete many golf courses. If she subscribes us up, shell get a bonus. Boiler up!Childrens errors tend <strong>to</strong> track the more difficultaspects <strong>of</strong> a language, relative <strong>to</strong> other languages Adults make the same kinds <strong>of</strong> mistakes for still more difficult<strong>to</strong> remember casesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySecond languageIt is difficult (and rare) for an adult <strong>to</strong> becomefluent in a second language children do it easilyWhat accounts for the difference? most likely it is age there seems <strong>to</strong> be a critical period during whichlanguage can be learned beyond age six (or so) it becomes more difficult <strong>to</strong> learna language (first or second)Second languageHigh school and college (or later) is just about theworst time <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> learn a second languageIt should be in kindergarten or preschoolImmigrants who arrive after age 6 may never fullylearn a second language Children who fail <strong>to</strong> learn any language by age 6never do they might create a pidgin <strong>of</strong> some sortPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/15/12ConclusionsNext timeLanguage developmentStages <strong>of</strong> learningErrorsSecond languageLanguage & brainBrocas aphasiaWernickes aphasiaAnomiaLanguage ability <strong>of</strong> chimpsWhats the big deal about Nim Chimpsky?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/17/11Language and the brainPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 32What’s the big deal about NimChimpsky?Language!! Properties!!grammar!!phrases!!words!! Instinct!!different from other types <strong>of</strong> learning!!special areas in the brain related <strong>to</strong> language!!evolution: can similar brains learn language?Purdue UniversityPurdue University!! Some stroke patientsshow agrammaticalspeech!! Seem <strong>to</strong> know whatthey want <strong>to</strong> sayBroca’s aphasia!!But are unable <strong>to</strong> say itRighthemisphereLefthemisphereBroca’s aphasia!! Some stroke patients showagrammatical speech!! repetition!! short sentences!! true for both written and spoken!! no problem controlling mouth»! e.g. blowing out candlesDo you drivehome on weekends?Why, yes…Thursday,er, er, er, no, erFriday…Barba-ra…wife…and, oh, car…drive…purnpike…you know…reset and…teevee.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBrain damageBroca’s aphasia!! Broca’s area ==> Broca’s aphasia!! Wernicke’s area ==> Wernicke’s aphasia!! Mr. Ford!! omitted endings (-ed, -s)!! omitted function words (or, be, the)!! skipped function words when reading (or, be, the) but readsimilar sounding words (oar, bee)!! named objects and recognized names!! high (nonverbal) IQPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/17/11Broca’s aphasia!! Difficulty getting ideas across!! Patient BL was asked <strong>to</strong> describe this pictureB.L.: Wife is dry dishes. Waterdown! Oh boy! Okay Awright.Okay ...Cookie is down...fall, andgirl, okay, girl...boy...um...Examiner: What is the boydoing?B.L.:Cookie is...um...catchExaminer: Who is getting thecookies?B.L.: Girl, girlExaminer: Who is about <strong>to</strong> falldown?B.L.: Boy...fall down!Purdue UniversityBroca’s aphasia!! Could understand questions if gist couldbe deduced from content words!!Do you use a hammer for cutting?!!Does a s<strong>to</strong>ne float on water?!! Failed <strong>to</strong> understand anything requiringgrammatical analysis!!The lion was killed by the tiger, which one isdead?Purdue UniversityBroca’s area!! Plays a role in learningthe rules <strong>of</strong> a language!! Musso et al. (2003)!! fMRI while subjects judgewhether Italian sentencesare grammatically correc<strong>to</strong>r not!! At start, subjects did notknow rules <strong>of</strong> Italian!! Broca’s area is activated!! Signal correlates withcorrect identificationRighthemispherePurdue UniversityLefthemisphereWernicke’s aphasia!! Other stroke patientsalso showagrammatical speech!! Seem <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> saythings!!But what they say isalmost meaninglessRighthemispherePurdue UniversityLefthemisphere!! Patients showWernicke’s aphasia!!poor comprehension!!poor vocabulary!!“empty” speechWhatbringsyou <strong>to</strong> thehospital?Boy, I’m sweating, I’m awful nervous, you know, once ina while I get caught up, I can’t mention the tarripoi, amonth ago, quite a little, I’ve done a lot well. I impose alot, while on the other hand, you know what I mean, Ihave <strong>to</strong> run around, look it over, trebbin and allthat sort <strong>of</strong> stuff...Purdue University!! Difficulty getting ideasacrossWernicke’s aphasiaH.W.:First <strong>of</strong> all this is falling down, just about, and is gonna fall downand they're both getting something <strong>to</strong> eat...but the trouble is this is gonnalet go and they're both gonna fall down...but already then...I can't seewell enough but I believe that either she or will have some food that'snot good for you and she's <strong>to</strong> get some for her <strong>to</strong>o...and that you get itand you shouldn't get it there because they shouldn't go up there and getit unless you tell them that they could have it. and so this is falling downand for sure there's one they're going <strong>to</strong> have for food and, and didn'tcome out right, the uh, the stuff that's uh, good for, it's not good for youbut it, but you love it, um mum mum (smacks lips)...and that sothey've...see that, I can't see whether it's in there or not.Examiner:Yes, that's not real clear. What do you think she's doing?H.W.:But, oh, I know. She's waiting for this!Examiner:No, I meant right here with her hand, right where you can'tfigure out what she's doing with that hand.H.W.:Oh, I think she's saying I want two or three, I want one, I think, Ithink so, and so, so she's gonna get this one for sure it's gonna fall downthere or whatever, she's gonna get that one and, and there, he's gonna ge<strong>to</strong>ne himself or more, it all depends with this when they fall down...andwhen it falls down there's no problem, all they got <strong>to</strong> do is fix it and goright back up and get some more.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/17/11Wernicke’s aphasia!! Most aphasias involve damage <strong>to</strong> morethan just one specific areaAnomia!! Damage around Wernicke’s area produces a deficit in theability <strong>to</strong> name things!! e.g., after a stroke in this area CB cannot retrieve nouns he wants<strong>to</strong> useC.B. Uh, well this is the...the...<strong>of</strong> this. This and this and thisand this. These things going in there like that. This is...thingshere. This one here, these two things here. And the other onehere, back in this one, this one...look at this one.Examiner Yeah, what's happening there?Purdue UniversityC.B. I can't tell you what that is, but I know what it is, but Idon't know where it is. But I don't know what's under. I knowit's you couldn't say it's ... I couldn't say what it is. I couldn'tsay what that is. This shu-- that should be right in here. That'svery bad in there. Anyway, this one here, and that, and that's it.This is the getting in here and that's the getting around here,and that, and that's it. This is getting in here and that's thegetting around here, this one and one with this one. And thisone, and that's it, isn't it? I don't know what else you'd want.Purdue UniversityAnomia!! Sometimes anomia can be remarkablespecific!! Some patients have difficulty with only certaintypes <strong>of</strong> nouns!!concrete vs abstract (chair vs trust)!!nonliving vs living (table vs dog)!!animals and vegetables vs food and body parts!!colors!!proper namesPurdue UniversityBrain and language!! Recall that the left side <strong>of</strong> the brain is more involvedin language than the right side!! Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas are on the left hemisphere!! However, the right hemisphere can also work withlanguage!! left handed people!! hemispherec<strong>to</strong>mies (age matters!)Purdue UniversityBrain and evolution!! We’ve argued that language is an evolved instinct!! differences in brains account for differences in abilities!! One might hope <strong>to</strong> find pro<strong>to</strong>-language abilities in“close” animals <strong>to</strong> humans!! Chimpanzees, apes!! Ana<strong>to</strong>mically, there are many similarities betweenhuman brains and apes and chimpanzeesPurdue UniversityBrain and evolution!! Cantalupo & Hopkins (2001)!! Broadmann’s area 44 (part <strong>of</strong> Broca’s area in humans)!! Compare area on left and right hemispheres»! Larger on left for humans and apeschimpanzeesgorillasbonobosPurdue UniversityImplieshemisphereasymmetriesthat underlaylanguagebeganat least 5million yearsagoPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/17/11Chimpanzee language!! In the 1960s several research groups reportedteaching chimpanzees American Sign Language(ASL)!! after failure <strong>to</strong> teach spoken language!! other groups taught chimps <strong>to</strong> press symbols on a computerkeyboard or string magnetized plastic shapes on a board!! Claimed <strong>to</strong> teach chimps hundreds <strong>of</strong> words!! and chimps created new compound words»! swan -> water bird»! stale Danish -> cookie rock»! See videoProblems!! Just like with Eliza (the computer therapist) it iseasy <strong>to</strong> attribute language ability where it doesnot really exist (9 month old children)!! You can teach an animal a lot using simpleconditioning tricks!! Researchers were quick <strong>to</strong> excuse mistakesas “play”, “jokes”, “puns”, “metaphors”,...Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityWord counts!! For example, a deaf student on one research teamlater commented that she saw much fewer signs thanthe non-deaf students!! Like!! seems the researchers counted almost any hand movementas a sign!! scratch --> “scratch”!! pointing --> “you”!! finger <strong>to</strong> mouth --> “drink”!! hugging --> “hug”!! reaching --> “give”!! kissing --> “kiss”Purdue UniversityNim Chimpsky!! A relative <strong>of</strong> other “signing” chimps!!with more careful judging probably learnedapproximately 25 words!!moreover, the “signs” were variations <strong>of</strong> the naturalmovements <strong>of</strong> chimps in the wild!! The chimps did not learn ASLPurdue UniversityGrammar!! Chimps failed <strong>to</strong> learn the rules <strong>of</strong> ASLgrammar!!unable <strong>to</strong> understand complex signs!! Seemingly able <strong>to</strong> understand complexsentences!!Would you please carry the cooler <strong>to</strong> Penny?!! But really, the chimp need only understand twowords: cooler and Penney!!the rest can be guessed!Purdue UniversityGrammar!! Likewise, the chimps never produced complex sentences!! They tended <strong>to</strong> “say” things like the following!! Nim eat Nim eat.!! Drink eat me Nim.!! Tickle me Nim play.!! Me eat me eat.!! Me banana you banana me you give.!! Banana me me me eat.they communicatebut not with reallanguage!! Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me ea<strong>to</strong>range give me you.Purdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Greg Francis 8/17/11Evolution!! Note, it would have been interesting if chimpscould learn language!!and not inconsistent with the idea that we have alanguage instinct!! But the failure <strong>of</strong> chimps <strong>to</strong> learn languagedoes not go against the idea that languageevolved in humans!!as some people have proposedPurdue UniversityEvolution!! Chimps are the closest evolutionary relatives <strong>of</strong>humans!!so if any non-human animal could learn language itwould probably be chimps!! But in evolutionary his<strong>to</strong>ry, chimps and humanssplit from a common ances<strong>to</strong>r millions <strong>of</strong> yearsago!! Humans evolved a language skill and chimpsdid notPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Language and the brain!! Broca’s aphasia!! Wernicke’s aphasia!! Anomia!! Chimps!! Review for exam 4!! After exam 4Next time!! Decision making!! Framing effects!! Risks!! Alternatives!! What every consumer should know before they buy.Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY 200: Intro. <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Greg Francis 1/7/11Decision makingPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 33What every consumer should knowbefore buying.Purdue UniversityDecision making!! We have <strong>to</strong> make lots <strong>of</strong> choices!!course selections!!elections!!housing!!job!!cancer treatment!! What affects our choices?!! How do we make choices?Purdue UniversityTopics!! Influences on decision making!!framing effects!!risks!!alternatives!!loss aversion!! Effects are <strong>of</strong>ten relatedFraming effects!! Your decisions are influenced by the way aset <strong>of</strong> choices is presented!! The child cus<strong>to</strong>dy problem!!two versions, essentially the same!!lead <strong>to</strong> different choicesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityVersion 1: award frame!! Imagine that you serve on the jury <strong>of</strong> an only-child solecus<strong>to</strong>dycase following a relatively messy divorce. The factsare complicated by ambiguous economic, social, andemotional considerations, and you decide <strong>to</strong> base yourdecision entirely on the following few observations. To whichparent would you award sole cus<strong>to</strong>dy <strong>of</strong> the child?!! Parent A: average income, average health, average workinghours, reasonable rapport with child, relatively stable sociallife!! Parent B: above-average income, very close relationship withchild, extremely active social life, lots <strong>of</strong> work-related travel,minor health problems64%Version 2: deny frame!! Imagine that you serve on the jury <strong>of</strong> an only-child solecus<strong>to</strong>dycase following a relatively messy divorce. The factsare complicated by ambiguous economic, social, andemotional considerations, and you decide <strong>to</strong> base yourdecision entirely on the following few observations. To whichparent would you deny sole cus<strong>to</strong>dy <strong>of</strong> the child?!! Parent A: average income, average health, average workinghours, reasonable rapport with child, relatively stable sociallife!! Parent B: above-average income, very close relationship withchild, extremely active social life, lots <strong>of</strong> work-related travel,minor health problems55%Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Greg Francis 1/7/11Framing effects!! So Parent B is the choice <strong>to</strong> award cus<strong>to</strong>dyand <strong>to</strong> deny cus<strong>to</strong>dy!!but one necessarily precludes the other!!! Subjects are biased by the task at hand!!focus on different characteristics depending onwhether they are considering awarding ordenyingFraming effects!! Your decisions are influenced by the way aset <strong>of</strong> choices is presented!! The Asian disease problem!!two versions, essentially the same!!lead <strong>to</strong> different choicesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityVersion 1: Saving frame!! Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak <strong>of</strong>an unusual Asian disease, which is expected <strong>to</strong> kill600 people. Two alternative programs <strong>to</strong> combatthe disease have been proposed. Assume that theexact scientific estimates <strong>of</strong> the consequences <strong>of</strong>the programs are as follows:!! If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved.72%!! If program B is adopted, there is a 1/3 probabilitythat 600 people will be saved and a 2/3 probabilitythat no people will be saved.Version 2: Dying frame!! Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak <strong>of</strong>an unusual Asian disease, which is expected <strong>to</strong> kill600 people. Two alternative programs <strong>to</strong> combatthe disease have been proposed. Assume that theexact scientific estimates <strong>of</strong> the consequences <strong>of</strong>the programs are as follows:!! If program A is adopted, 400 people will die.!! If program B is adopted, there is a 1/3 probabilitythat nobody will die and a 2/3 probability that 600people will die. 78%Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityChoices and framing!! The two problems are essentiallyidentical, except that the choices arephrased differently!!200 people saved = 400 people dead!!2/3 probability that no one is saved = 2/3probability that 600 will die!! But the phrasing makes a difference inthe choices <strong>of</strong> subjects!!why?Purdue UniversityRisks!! Risk corresponds <strong>to</strong> those events tha<strong>to</strong>ccur with probability!!will I like the next movie starring Matt Damon?!!will I live <strong>to</strong> be 50?!!will the dice show double sixes?!! Events that occur with certainty are withoutrisk!!the sun will rise <strong>to</strong>morrow!!I will be older <strong>to</strong>morrow!!I will give you an A if your grade is 90 or abovePurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Greg Francis 1/7/11Risk!! Humans sometimes prefer risky optionsover non-risky options!!and vice-versa!! When the choices are perceived as losses!!subjects tend <strong>to</strong> be risk-seeking!! When the choices are perceived as gains!!subjects tend <strong>to</strong> be risk-averse!! Decision making is open <strong>to</strong> manipulation!!subjects can contradict themselvesPurdue UniversityRisk: monetary choices!! Assume yourself richer by $300 than you are<strong>to</strong>day. You have <strong>to</strong> choose between72%!! A) a sure gain <strong>of</strong> $100.!! B) 50% chance <strong>to</strong> gain $200 and 50% chance<strong>to</strong> gain nothing.!! Subjects tend <strong>to</strong> prefer the sure gain!!risk averse with perceived gainsPurdue UniversityRisk: monetary choices!! Assume yourself richer by $500 than you are<strong>to</strong>day. You have <strong>to</strong> choose between!! A) a sure loss <strong>of</strong> $100.!! B) 50% chance <strong>to</strong> lose nothing and 50%chance <strong>to</strong> lose $200.64%!! Subjects tend <strong>to</strong> prefer the risky option!!risk seeking with perceived lossesPurdue UniversityNotice!! Selecting A) in either situation means you endup with $400!!$300 + $100!!$500 - $100!! Selecting B) in either situation means you endup with either $500 or $300!!$300 + $200 or $300 + $0!!$500 - $0 or $500 - $200!! People do not just look at the “bot<strong>to</strong>m line”!!which is why businesses emphasize that approachPurdue UniversityAlternatives: version 1!! Imagine you are shopping for a new car and havenarrowed down your choices <strong>to</strong> three models.According <strong>to</strong> a consumer magazine, the cars’ ridequality (RQ) and gas mileage (GM) are rated asModel RQ GMAsteroid 100 27Bravo 80 33Comet 100 21!! Which car do you select?69%29%2%Alternatives: version 2!! Imagine you are shopping for a new car and havenarrowed down your choices <strong>to</strong> three models.According <strong>to</strong> a consumer magazine, the cars’ ridequality (RQ) and gas mileage (GM) are rated asModel RQ GMAsteroid 100 27Bravo 80 33Clarion 60 33!! Which car do you select?19%79%2%Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Greg Francis 1/7/11Notice!! Subjects hardly ever select the Comet or theClarion!!you might think they do not enter the decisionmaking process at all!!!but they do!! The comparison <strong>of</strong> Asteroid and Comet clearlyfavors the Asteroid!!it is less clear for the Bravo and Comet!!it is the reverse for ClarionPurdue UniversityConsumer beware!! S<strong>to</strong>res are very aware <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong>behavior!! Thus, they <strong>of</strong>ten s<strong>to</strong>ck merchandise for thesole purpose <strong>of</strong> influencing your purchasingbehavior!!usually <strong>to</strong>wards a more expensive model!! Likewise companies make low-end modelssimply <strong>to</strong> bias you <strong>to</strong>ward higher endmodels and against the competitionPurdue UniversityLoss aversion!! Another general property <strong>of</strong> decision making is thatpeople tend <strong>to</strong> be more sensitive <strong>to</strong> losses than <strong>to</strong>gains!! thus people rarely take an “even-bet”!! the loss <strong>of</strong> $10 is more significant than the gain <strong>of</strong> $10!! This is also why fans <strong>of</strong> sports teams think thereferees treat their team unfairly!! In a game <strong>of</strong> basketball, each team will!! have fouls called on them when they shouldn’t have (a loss)!! Commit fouls that are not called (a gain)!! But the gains don’t count as much as the losses!! So in a truly fair game both teams (and their fans) feel as ifthey were treated unfairly!! <strong>of</strong> course one team wins, so it feels that it overcame theinjusticePurdue UniversityLoss aversion!! The same phenomenon ruins many marriages/relationships!! When your partner does something for you (a gain) itdoesn’t count as much as when your partner doessomething against you (a loss)!! Thus, you perceive your relationship as overall not beingworth the trouble (even if your partner is good as <strong>of</strong>ten asbad)!! That’s why therapists suggest that in successfulrelationships people must learn <strong>to</strong> forgivePurdue UniversityLoss aversion!! By definition a choice is a loss or a gaindepending on where you start!! As a result, loss aversion dramatically affectsmany types <strong>of</strong> choices by magnifying thosecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> a choice that leads <strong>to</strong> aperceived loss!! Consider choosing a jobPurdue UniversityChoosing a job: 1!! You have decided <strong>to</strong> leave your current job. It islocated so far away from your apartment that itrequires an 80-minute commute each way. But you dolike the fact that your job involves much pleasantsocial interaction with your coworkers. Your search fora new job has given you two options and now youmust choose between them. Which job would youprefer?!! Job A: Limited contact with others, commuting time 20minutes.!! Job B: Moderately sociable, commuting time 60 67%minutes.Purdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/7/11Choosing a job: 1!! You have decided <strong>to</strong> leave your current job. The jobinvolves only a ten-minute commute, which you ratherlike. But your job leaves you isolated from coworkersfor long periods <strong>of</strong> time. Your search for a new job hasgiven you two options and now you must choosebetween them. Which job would you prefer?!! Job A: Limited contact with others, commuting time 20minutes.70%!! Job B: Moderately sociable, commuting time 60minutes.Loss aversion!! In each case the subjects tend <strong>to</strong> choose the optionthat produces the least loss! keep sociable coworkers in version 1! minimizing commuting time in version 2!! Note, this means subjects are not just choosing whatthey perceive <strong>to</strong> be the best job overall (again, notlooking at the bot<strong>to</strong>m line)! but are instead choosing the best job relative <strong>to</strong> the currentsituation!! a very strange phenomenon!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityConclusions!! Influences on decision making!! Framing effects!! Risk aversion (perceived gains)!! Risk seeking (perceived losses)!! Loss aversion!! Problem solving!! Expertise!! Analogy!! Set effects!functional fixedness!! InsightNext time!! What does that “aha!” feeling mean?Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Greg Francis 1/7/11Problem solvingPSY 200Greg FrancisLecture 34What does that “aha” feeling mean?Purdue UniversityProblem solving!! A hallmark <strong>of</strong> intelligence!!<strong>of</strong>ten used as a definition <strong>of</strong> intelligence!! Seem <strong>to</strong> get something from nothing!! We will not explain exactly how it happens!!but we can look at some characteristics <strong>of</strong>problems and problem solving»!what makes for an easy (or hard) problem?»!what makes for a good (or bad) problemsolver?Purdue UniversityTopics!! We will look at a number <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rsthat influence our ability <strong>to</strong> solveproblems!!expertise!!analogy!!set effects»!priming»!incubation»!functional fixedness!!insightPurdue UniversityExperts!! Some people learn how <strong>to</strong> solve particulartypes <strong>of</strong> problems!! What makes an expert different from anovice?!! Experts know how <strong>to</strong> describe problems!!other than that, there seems <strong>to</strong> be n<strong>of</strong>undamental difference (even for geniuses!)Purdue UniversityAn example <strong>of</strong> experts!! Chi, Fel<strong>to</strong>vich & Glaser (1981)!! Take second year physics students (novices) and ask them <strong>to</strong>classify a bunch <strong>of</strong> physics problems!! they tend <strong>to</strong> group them by surface similaritiesAn example <strong>of</strong> experts!! Have experts (PhDs) classify the sameproblems!!grouped according <strong>to</strong> how <strong>to</strong> solveExpert 2: “Conservation <strong>of</strong> energy”Novice 2: “Angular velocity; momentum, circular things”Novice 3: “Rotational kinematics, angular speeds, angularvelocities”Novice 6: “Problems that have something rotating, angularspeed”Novice 1: “These deal with blocks on an inclineplane”Novice 5: “Inclined plane problems, coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction”Novice 6: “Blocks on inclined planes with angles”Expert 3: “Work-energy theorem. They are allstraight-forward problems.”Expert 4: “These can be done from energyconsiderations. Either you should know the principle<strong>of</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> energy, or work is lostsomewhere.”Expert 2: “These can be solved by New<strong>to</strong>n’s second law”Expert 3: “F=ma; New<strong>to</strong>n’s second law.”Expert 4: “Largely use F=ma; New<strong>to</strong>n’s second law.”Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Greg Francis 1/7/11Chess expertsChess experts!! Chase & Simon (1973)game!! Chase & Simon (1973)random!! Show subjects a chess board andthen clear it!! have subjects recall positions <strong>of</strong>the chess pieces on the board!! Master players are better thanbeginners when the pieces arepositioned as in the middle <strong>of</strong> areal game!! Experts have schemas that allowthem <strong>to</strong> organize the piecepositions!! They only need <strong>to</strong> remember theschemaCorrect pieces3025201510501 2 3 4 5 6MasterBeginner!! Show subjects a chessboard and then clear it!! have subjects recallpositions <strong>of</strong> the chesspieces on the board!! Master players are worsethan beginners when thepieces are positionedrandomly!! Experts try <strong>to</strong> use theschemas, but they end upmisremembering the actualpiece positionsCorrect pieces25201510501 2 3 4 5 6MasterBeginnerTrialPurdue UniversityTrialPurdue UniversityExpert schemas!! In general, experts have lots <strong>of</strong> problemsolving schemas specific <strong>to</strong> their domain <strong>of</strong>expertise!!given such and such; do such and such!!allows them <strong>to</strong> organize information in a way thatallows for easy recall and easy use!! Expertise in one domain does not transfer <strong>to</strong>another!!except for especially useful skillsPurdue UniversityAnalogy: Attack-Dispersion S<strong>to</strong>ry!! The many roads <strong>to</strong> a dicta<strong>to</strong>r’s fortress aremined so that small groups <strong>of</strong> men maypass, but a large group will be destroyed. Ageneral knows that his army can defeat thefortress if he can get his entire army <strong>to</strong>attack at once, but he cannot take his armydown a single road all at once without losing<strong>to</strong>o many men.!! What should he do?Purdue UniversitySolution!! The general should split up his army in<strong>to</strong>many smaller units!!each unit takes a separate road <strong>to</strong> converge onthe fortress simultaneously and defeat thedicta<strong>to</strong>rfortressPurdue UniversityAnalogy: Parade-dispersion!! A dicta<strong>to</strong>r wants <strong>to</strong> show <strong>of</strong>f his army so hetells a general <strong>to</strong> plan a parade <strong>of</strong> the army. Hedemands that the general insure that the armyis seen and heard across the entire kingdomsimultaneously. The dicta<strong>to</strong>r also demands thatthe parade be the most impressive ever at thefortress. Splitting up the army would allow it <strong>to</strong>be seen everywhere, but would make thedisplay at the fortress unimpressive.!! What should the general do?Purdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Greg Francis 1/7/11Analogy!! The solution is the same!!split up the army and have them converge <strong>to</strong>the fortress from different parts <strong>of</strong> the kingdom!! Glick & Holyoak (1980)!!subjects read s<strong>to</strong>ries like these and wereasked <strong>to</strong> solve the problems!!even when shown one solution and <strong>to</strong>ld that itcould be applied by analogy <strong>to</strong> another!!subjects used analogies only 20% <strong>of</strong> the timeAnalogy!! Analogies are actually very difficult <strong>to</strong> apply!!need <strong>to</strong> identify what is common between twoproblems!! Analogies are <strong>of</strong>ten applied after twoproblems are solved and well unders<strong>to</strong>od!!it is then easier <strong>to</strong> see what is common!! One <strong>of</strong> the problems handed out can besolved by analogy <strong>to</strong> these two problemsPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySet effects!! “Set” refers <strong>to</strong> “mind set” (or something likethat)!!negative set: bias <strong>to</strong>ward solving a problem makesit more difficult!!positive set: bias <strong>to</strong>ward solving a problem makesit easier!! You can be biased by lots <strong>of</strong> things!!problem statement!!previous methods <strong>of</strong> reaching solution!!general knowledgePurdue University!! Buddhist monk problemPast experience!! One morning, exactly at sunrise, a Buddhist monk began <strong>to</strong>climb a tall mountain. The narrow path, no more than a foo<strong>to</strong>r two wide, spiraled around the mountain <strong>to</strong> a glitteringtemple at the summit. The monk ascended the path with anaverage speed <strong>of</strong> 3 mph. He reached the temple shortlybefore sunset. After several days <strong>of</strong> fasting and meditationhe began his journey back along the same path, starting atsunrise and walking an average speed <strong>of</strong> 5 mph. Is there aspot along the path that the monk occupied on both trips atprecisely the same time <strong>of</strong> day?Purdue UniversitySelf-imposed limits!! Nine dots problem!!Draw four straight lines, passing through all nine<strong>of</strong> these dots, without lifting your pencil from thepage.Set effects: Representation!! Mutilated chessboard!!62 squares remain!!can 31 dominoes cover them?!! Easy solution!Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3


Greg Francis 1/7/11Set effects: Priming!! Safren (1962)!! Unscramble the following anagrams!! 12.2 seconds per wordKOBO CTURK STTESet effects: Incubation!! Cheap necklace problem!! Opening a link costs $2!! Closing a link costs $3!! Go from given <strong>to</strong> goal state for no more than $15CHUOC ANCYD DRINEF7.4 seconds per wordKMLI GRAUS RECMAFOEFCE TEESW IKRDNPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversitySet effects: Incubation!! Silveira (1971)!! Control: Work on problem for half an hour!!55% solve problem!! Exp A: Work on problem for half an hour in15 minute sections, half-hour distracter task!!64% solve problem!! Exp B: Work on problem for half an hour in15 minute sections, 4 hour distracter task!!85% solve problemPurdue UniversitySet effects: Incubation!! Subjects <strong>of</strong>ten get stuck using an approachthat goes nowhere (set)!! After a break they are more likely <strong>to</strong> try adifferent approach!! Brains<strong>to</strong>rming tries <strong>to</strong> avoid set effects byallowing free “dreaming” <strong>of</strong> solutions!!most <strong>of</strong> the ideas are worthless, but the approachis still beneficialPurdue UniversitySet effects: Functional fixedness!! How can you tie two strings <strong>to</strong>gether?!! Dunker (1945)!!“MacGyver”Purdue UniversityInsight!! Intuitively, we sometimes feel as if we have astrong insight in<strong>to</strong> a problem and its solutionbecomes obvious!!the “aha” feeling!!is it real?!!what does it correspond <strong>to</strong>?!! Using problems like the “Bronze coin” andthe “Tree planting” problems!!subjects judge their progress with a “warmth”ratingPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 4


Greg Francis 1/7/11Insight!! Warmth stays mostly steady, right up <strong>to</strong>proposing a solution!!the “aha” feelingUnfortunately,the feeling doesnot necessarilyindicate acorrect solutionConclusions!! Effects on problem solving!! Expertise!! Analogy!! Set effects!! Insight!! Solve remaining problems!! Tumor problemPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext time!! Wrapping up the course!! Other courses <strong>to</strong> take/avoid!! Paths <strong>to</strong> pursue!! Graduate school!! Advice for further explorationPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 5


Greg Francis 8/15/12Now what?CoursePSY 200Greg FrancisNeurophysiology brain characteristics neural networksLecture 35 perceptionMemoryAdvice for further exploration characteristics theoriesPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityCourseLanguage/LinguisticsWhat else?Most <strong>of</strong> psychology requires experimentation,you need characteristicsCognition decision making problem solving PSY 201: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> quantitative <strong>to</strong>pics inpsychology (statistics) PSY 203: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> research methods inpsychology (experimental methods)More statistics PSY 202 <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Quantitative <strong>Psychology</strong> STAT 225 <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Probability Models STAT 311 <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Probability STAT 350 <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> StatisticsPurdue University STAT 511 Statistical MethodsPurdue UniversityOther coursesResearch PSY 355: Stereotyping & prejudice PSY 577 (IE 577): Human fac<strong>to</strong>rs inengineering PSY 337: Social cognitionIndustrial engineering may have otherrelevant courses Look for human fac<strong>to</strong>rsPSY 390 Research in… Actively participate in a research labora<strong>to</strong>ry Details vary dramatically across labs Advisors can identify some positions Talk <strong>to</strong> faculty about possibilitiesResearch Focused Honors program 3 semester sequence (starts Spring <strong>of</strong> penultimateyear) Design and carry out your own research study (withguidance from a faculty member)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 1


Greg Francis 8/15/12Useful backgroundUseful backgroundComputersMathematics Most experiments are run on computers Models are simulated on computers Learn <strong>to</strong> program in a computer language» MatLab, C / C++, Java, Basic Possible courses CS 15800 C Programming CS 17700 Programming With Multimedia Objects CS 18000 Problem Solving/Object-Oriented Programming Most psychologists have little mathematicalbackground But it is especially useful for cognitive psychology Take as much mathematics as you can, especially» Calculus (MA 161, 165 or 223)» Finite (discrete) mathematics (not easy <strong>to</strong> get at Purdue WestLafayette)» Linear (matrix) algebra (MA 262, 265)» Differential equations (MA 266) CS 24000 Programming In C CNIT 15500 <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> Object-Oriented Programming CNIT 17500 Visual ProgrammingPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityBrain characteristicsFurther study PSY 222: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> behavioral neuroscience SLHS 304: Ana<strong>to</strong>my and physiology <strong>of</strong> the speech and hearingmechanism PSY 320: Behavioral neuroscience <strong>of</strong> sensation & arousal PSY 322: Neuroscience <strong>of</strong> motivated behavior PSY 324: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> cognitive neuroscience PSY 512: Neural systems PSY 390s with Davidson, Kemmerer, Kinzig, Chester, Powley,Swithers, KaganovichThere is a behavioral neuroscience concentration inpsychology More natural sciences than typical psych degreePurdue UniversityNeural networksFurther study PSY 514: Intro. <strong>to</strong> mathematical psychology (sometimes) Artificial intelligence in computer science or electricalengineering PSY 390 with FrancisPerception PSY 310: Sensory & perceptual processes Artificial intelligence in computer science or electricalengineering PSY 511: Psychophysics PSY 520: Attention & performance PSY 390 with Dzhafarov, Francis, Pizlo, Proc<strong>to</strong>rPurdue UniversityFurther studyFurther studyMemory:Language (many courses in Speech, Language, andHearing Sciences - SLHS) PSY 311: Human learning & memory SLHS 227: Elements <strong>of</strong> linguistics PSY 314: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> learning SLHS 309: Language development PSY 410: Animal memory & cognition PSY 518: Memory & cognition PSY 390 with Karpicke, Nairne, Schweickert SLHS 401: Language & the brain PSY 426: Language development PSY 526: Psycholinguistics PSY 390 with Hollich, Kemmerer, Kaganovich, Alex Francis(SLHS)Purdue UniversityPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 2


Greg Francis 8/15/12Further studyConclusionsProblem solving & decision making PSY 285: Consumer behaviorCourses <strong>to</strong> consider if you liked thiscourse PSY 318: Problem solving & decision making PSY 514: <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> mathematicalpsychologyHow <strong>to</strong> get involved in research PSY 390 with Pizlo, Proc<strong>to</strong>r, SchweickertPurdue UniversityPurdue UniversityNext timeReview for final examPurdue UniversityPSY200 <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!