02.02.2013 Views

ZX Computings - OpenLibra

ZX Computings - OpenLibra

ZX Computings - OpenLibra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Welcome to the second issue of<br />

<strong>ZX</strong> Computing. As you can see<br />

the magazine is going from<br />

strength to strength as <strong>ZX</strong> programmers<br />

develop their skills,<br />

and share these with us. We've<br />

brought the <strong>ZX</strong> Spectrum on<br />

board with this issue with some<br />

great programs, and also,<br />

details on how you can quickly<br />

master the tremendous sound<br />

and colour possibilities of Uncle<br />

Olive's newest computer.<br />

As well as information on<br />

Spectrum programming, we<br />

have several big, big programs<br />

to make the most of your 16K<br />

RAM pack. These include ELE-<br />

PHANT'S GRAVEYARD and<br />

the very useful TELEPHONE<br />

DIRECTORY. If you're worried<br />

about the lack of READ/DATA<br />

on the <strong>ZX</strong>81, a IK routine in<br />

this issue will put your mind at<br />

rest.<br />

We introduce a new section<br />

in this issue — <strong>ZX</strong> Education —<br />

which looks at the work of<br />

EZUG, the Educational <strong>ZX</strong><br />

Users' Group, and reviews<br />

educational software. We're<br />

also reviewing a number of<br />

books, a unit which makes your<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>81 talk, and a fast-moving<br />

version of GALAXIANS. We<br />

want you to make the wisest<br />

decisions when it comes to<br />

buying software or hardware<br />

add-ons for your <strong>ZX</strong> computer,<br />

so our reviewers have been<br />

brutally honest.<br />

Machine code. If you're like<br />

me, you keep saying to yourself<br />

"I really must get to grips with<br />

machine code someday." Our 1K<br />

machine code disassembler<br />

should help you along the way.<br />

And to maximise use of your<br />

printer, we have a tremendous<br />

routine to allow you to define<br />

your own graphics. Why not<br />

write a complete lower case<br />

alphabet? No hardware modifications<br />

are required. If you do want<br />

to get your soldering iron out, our<br />

article on adding a numeric<br />

keypad to your <strong>ZX</strong>81 should interest<br />

you.<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>80 owners are not forgotten.<br />

We have a number of programs<br />

for you, as well as programs<br />

which will run on either the<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>8Q or the <strong>ZX</strong>81, and a cassette<br />

file-handling routine for the<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>80. To make the most of the<br />

wealth of programs written in<br />

other dialects of BASIC, this<br />

issue of <strong>ZX</strong> Computing contains a<br />

major article explaining just how<br />

easy it is to convert other 8AStCs<br />

32<br />

to <strong>ZX</strong> BASIC.<br />

There's much more, including<br />

the latest news from Cambridge.<br />

So if you're reading this in a<br />

newsagent, buy it and rush home<br />

immediately. And if you're at<br />

home, miles away from your<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>81, don't read a single word<br />

more until you turn on your computer.<br />

This magazine is designed<br />

to help you make the most of<br />

your <strong>ZX</strong> computer, and will do so<br />

more effectively if you run<br />

through the routines as you come<br />

to them rather than just read<br />

about them.<br />

Thank you to those who<br />

wrote in about issue one, and to<br />

those who sent in programs. One<br />

comment which was repeated a<br />

couple of times regarded the lack<br />

of clarity of inverse letters in <strong>ZX</strong>81<br />

program listings. One of the decisions<br />

I made when starting this<br />

magazine was to use printer<br />

listings whenever possible, to<br />

minimise the chance of bugs. If<br />

you've waded through programs<br />

in any of the computer<br />

magazines, you'll know that it is<br />

very difficult to produce bug-free<br />

listings. However, we do<br />

sacrifice a little of the appearance<br />

to use printer listings. However, I<br />

believe — the comments of certain<br />

correspondents not<br />

withstanding — that having program<br />

listings work is more important<br />

than having them look 'pretty'.<br />

Therefore, we'll continue to<br />

use direct printer listings<br />

Letters<br />

whenever we can. However, if<br />

you send us programs for<br />

publication, please do nof use inverse<br />

letters in the listing. If you<br />

think certain lines would look better<br />

in inverse when you're running<br />

the program, or other lines<br />

must be inverse to make it work,<br />

make this clear in the letter accompanying<br />

the program.<br />

Contributions<br />

We're on the lookout now for<br />

good programs and articles for<br />

the next issue of <strong>ZX</strong> Computing,<br />

Program listings are vital, along<br />

with clear instructions on what<br />

the program does, how it works,<br />

and what the user will see when<br />

he or she runs it. Any kind of programs<br />

are useful, but we are<br />

especially interested in ones<br />

which use <strong>ZX</strong> BASIC in par<br />

ticularly clever ways, or in ones<br />

which contain routines which<br />

can be re-used in other programs.<br />

All contributions we use are<br />

paid for, of course, so if you'd like<br />

to contribute to forthcoming<br />

issues and make a bit of pocket<br />

money, look through the contents<br />

of this issue, and if you can<br />

write as well, or better than our<br />

present contributors, let's hear<br />

from you.<br />

But for now, get down to enjoying<br />

this issue with your <strong>ZX</strong><br />

computer,<br />

Tim Hartnell<br />

Damn the<br />

Spectrum<br />

Dear <strong>ZX</strong> Computing,<br />

No doubt the columns of your<br />

magazine will soon be buzzing<br />

away with news of Sinclair's<br />

new "<strong>ZX</strong> Spectrum" unveiled at<br />

the rather hap hazardly<br />

organised Earls Court Computer<br />

Fair held in April. As a quick<br />

reminder, the Spectrum is the<br />

£125.00 colour/sound, hi res<br />

16K micro that, taking inflation<br />

into account, is cheaper than<br />

the <strong>ZX</strong>80I<br />

Sinclair's total secrecy of the<br />

project may have given his<br />

creation a grand theatrical<br />

entrance, but at what price. I<br />

am not talking about the VIC-20<br />

and Texas computers that will<br />

be wiped out overnight. That's<br />

business after all. I'm referring<br />

to the small hardware designers<br />

of add-ons for the <strong>ZX</strong>81, to<br />

bring its specifications up to<br />

that approaching the<br />

Spectrum's. These people are<br />

not in direct competition with<br />

Sinclair; they are just trying to<br />

improve his product, albeit for<br />

the reasons of personal profit.<br />

A prime example is the case<br />

of one barren stall-holder in the<br />

<strong>ZX</strong>81 village who had jusi<br />

brought out a <strong>ZX</strong>81 colour<br />

graphics system for £90.00.<br />

Who will buy it, when for only<br />

£35.00 extra they can get that<br />

plus lots more in the Spectrum?<br />

The fact that there are already<br />

so many <strong>ZX</strong>81 owners means<br />

that maybe these people can sell<br />

their products, but the low price<br />

of the Spectrum means that a<br />

good percentage of <strong>ZX</strong>81<br />

owners will buy the new micro<br />

instead of any add-ons for their<br />

old one.<br />

All these independent<br />

hardware companies helped to<br />

support the <strong>ZX</strong>81. Maybe they<br />

won't now be so willing to do<br />

so with the Spectrum, even<br />

though it doesn't really need<br />

that much help.<br />

Trevor Lawford,<br />

Kenton, Middlesex.<br />

• / sympathise with your point<br />

of view to some extent, but<br />

point out that if this argument<br />

was followed to its logical<br />

conclusion we'd still be using<br />

slide rules. There would have<br />

been no pocket calculators<br />

unless Sinclair was allowed to<br />

vent the spleen of his creative<br />

genius bringing new electronic<br />

goodies into our lives. And the<br />

freedom that allows dive to<br />

produce new products is the<br />

same one that was exercised b\<br />

all those people who decided tc<br />

produce products for the <strong>ZX</strong>8I.<br />

<strong>ZX</strong> COMPUTING AUG/SEPT 1982 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!