15.05.2012 Views

Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft m.b.h.

Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft m.b.h.

Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft m.b.h.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.H.<br />

Vienna, Austria<br />

Ratings and Contacts<br />

Category Moody’s Rating<br />

Issuer Rating Aaa<br />

Bonds Aaa<br />

Commercial Paper -Dom Curr P-1<br />

Key Indicators<br />

Analysis<br />

Analyst Phone<br />

Janne Thomsen/London 44.20.7772.5454<br />

Gabriele Baur/London<br />

Yves Lemay/New York 1.212.553.1653<br />

<strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.H.<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Total assets (Euro 000's) 1,350,724 1,386,100 2,066,280 2,945,463 3,734,482<br />

Total capital (Euro 000's) 29,436 51,177 257,923 355,798 323,161<br />

Return on average assets (%) 1.18 1.08 0.89 3.32 1.81<br />

Recurring earning power (PPI % avg. assets) 1.29 1.29 0.88 5.66 3.14<br />

Net interest margin (%) 11.31 11.36 7.39 11.73 7.51<br />

Cost/ income ratio 88.81 88.83 90.05 59.86 63.33<br />

Problem loans % gross loans — — — — —<br />

Tier 1 ratio (%) — — — — —<br />

Opinion<br />

Credit Strengths<br />

Credit strengths of <strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.H<br />

(BIG) are:<br />

-The 100% state ownership of BIG is enshrined in the<br />

revised BIG law (29 December 2000) and the Ministry of<br />

Finance has no intention to sell or privatise the entity.<br />

-BIG benefits from steady and stable revenues due to the<br />

nature of its activities, i.e. property ownership and management<br />

of public buildings for schools and universities.<br />

-The very specific nature of BIG ’s business provides comfort<br />

that the company will remain of strategic importance to<br />

its current owner.<br />

- Strong state oversight and commitment to ensure financial<br />

viability is also present through board representation,<br />

nomination of senior management and auditing.<br />

Credit Challenges<br />

Credit challenges of BIG are:<br />

- A future expansion into private sector property activities<br />

cannot be ruled out, especially as BIG is not barred from<br />

commercial activities.<br />

- High debt levels required to fund acquisition of state<br />

properties.<br />

-A majority of the tenants can terminate the rental agreement<br />

with a year’s notice period.<br />

- Rigid cost structure.<br />

- Somewhat inflexible rent adjustment factors.<br />

Rating Rationale<br />

BIG is rated Aaa, which is at the level of the Republic of Austria,<br />

which owns 100% of it. Its legal status is a Gmbh (public<br />

limited company). Implicit support is provided via 100%<br />

ownership by the Republic of Austria and the strategic role<br />

that BIG performs on behalf of the government. We also do<br />

not believe that its status is likely to change in the foreseeable<br />

August 2003<br />

future. Any alterations in ownership structure or legal status<br />

would require an overhaul of the BIG law.<br />

BIG's main activities are government-related, consisting of<br />

facilitating and managing properties needed by the state to<br />

carry out its functions. The properties consist mainly of<br />

schools and university buildings, as well as administrative<br />

buildings of ministries. As such, the activity is closely linked<br />

to central government administration and state functions, and<br />

is therefore less prone to volatile demand.<br />

Although BIG's stand-alone financials are less sound than<br />

those of a comparable private sector entity, the proximity to<br />

the state and state functions strongly mitigates these factors.<br />

Rating Outlook - Stable<br />

Moody's stable rating outlook for BIG is based on the<br />

medium-term expectation that the 100% ownership by the<br />

Republic of Austria will continue, stable revenues and a generally<br />

predictable cost structure.<br />

In addition, the outlook is based on the expectation that<br />

<strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> MbH will be able to adequately<br />

service the debt related to the agreed acquisition of<br />

state properties like schools, and university buildings with the<br />

revenue from operations and some refinancings (within the<br />

framework of BIG ’s projections).<br />

What Could Change the Rating - DOWN<br />

Any decision to privatise, or part-privatise the entity would<br />

exert negative pressure upon the Aaa rating.<br />

Recent Developments/Results<br />

1H 2003 showed good profit after tax, despite the increasing<br />

financing cost as debt levels reach peak in 2003 as the last purchase<br />

of properties from the central government are concluded.


Related Research<br />

Analysis:<br />

<strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.H., August 2003 (Doc ID#79243)<br />

To access any of these reports, click on the entry above. Note that these references are current as of the date of publication of this<br />

report and that more recent reports may be available. All research may not be available to all clients.<br />

© Copyright 2003, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors including Moody's Assurance Company, Inc. (together, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. ALL INFORMATION<br />

CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER<br />

TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY<br />

FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by<br />

MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as<br />

is" without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or<br />

fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part<br />

caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers,<br />

employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct,<br />

indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such<br />

damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely<br />

as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY,<br />

TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR<br />

MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of<br />

any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider<br />

of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. Pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, MOODY'S hereby discloses that most issuers of<br />

debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to<br />

pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to $1,500,000.


This Analysis provides a discussion of the factors underpinning the<br />

credit rating/s and should be read in conjunction with our Credit<br />

Opinion. The most recent ratings, opinion, and other research<br />

specific to this issuer are provided on Moodys.com. Click here to link.<br />

Analysis<br />

August 2003<br />

The main rating driver of <strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong>’s (BIG) Aaa rating is its 100% ownership by the Republic of<br />

Austria, rated Aaa. BIG’s main activities are government-related, consisting of facilitating and managing properties<br />

needed by the state to carry out its functions.<br />

The properties consist mainly of schools and university buildings, as well as administrative buildings of ministries.<br />

As such, BIG’s activity is closely linked to central government administration and state functions, and is therefore<br />

less vulnerable to volatile demand. Although BIG’s stand-alone financials are less sound than those of a comparable private<br />

sector entity, the closeness to the state and state functions strongly mitigates these factors.<br />

Business Franchise<br />

Contact Phone<br />

London<br />

Janne Thomsen 44.20.7772.5454<br />

Gabriele Baur<br />

New York<br />

Yves Lemay<br />

<strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.H.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

BIG is in charge of the management of the Austrian Republic’s real estate, with a portfolio dominated by schools and<br />

universities (55%) and other administrative buildings (45%). BIG’s activities involve renting out the buildings to the various<br />

government entities, carrying out renovations and new investments and handling possible sales of redundant buildings<br />

and land. BIG’s holdings include a small housing portfolio, comprising mainly the current and former homes of<br />

civil servants and other public sector employees. Finally, BIG offers facilities management if required by the tenants.<br />

BIG consists of the holding company, <strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong> m.b.h (BIG), and three daughter companies.<br />

The report will focus on the consolidated results.<br />

STATE OWNERSHIP STRONGLY SUPPORTS RATING<br />

The 100% ownership of BIG by the Republic of Austria provides comfort that the owner will:<br />

• support the entity in the event of a problem arising<br />

• continue to be the main tenant of BIG, and hence provide revenue/margin stability<br />

• determine policy (tasks and obligations) of the entity going forward, while taking financial stability into account<br />

• supervise and control the activities of BIG<br />

Ownership can only be reduced below 100% by changing the law pertaining to <strong>Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft</strong>.<br />

Although this is not impossible, the Austrian state currently has no intention of effecting such a change, as BIG is<br />

regarded as a vital instrument in the management of the state’s properties. Moreover, there are no plans to extend the<br />

entity’s activities to the private sector in a meaningful way. Although commercial property marketing and development<br />

are possible under the BIG law, they are supposed to be of a subsidiary nature. There are currently no plans to expand<br />

commercial activities beyond asset sales of surplus properties and land.<br />

BIG is audited by the Federal Audit Office.


THE PURPOSE OF BIG’S CREATION WAS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY<br />

BIG was created by law in 1992 with the objective of centralising the property management of the public sector,<br />

making it more efficient and, more importantly, trying to make the various departments more cost-conscious. The<br />

underlying premise is that if departments had to pay and account for the usage of buildings, space would only be<br />

used if really needed. Thus surplus stock could be put to alternative use or sold off.<br />

BIG NOW OWNS THE PROPERTIES<br />

In the past, BIG used to pay a fee to the state for the “lease” of the buildings. However after the 2000 revision of the<br />

act regulating BIG’s activities, the entity has over the past three years acquired the buildings (in part previously<br />

leased) from the state for an agreed price of €2.4 billion. BIG has financed the purchase via debt. The properties<br />

continue to be let out to the various ministries.<br />

PRICE FOR THE TRANSFERRED ASSETS IS DEEMED FAIR<br />

The sale price of €2.4 billion for the transferred assets seems fair. According to an independent valuation of the<br />

properties by the Technische Universität Wien, the market value is €6.9 billion. The lower transfer value takes into<br />

account the specialist nature of the properties, i.e. possibly a lower re-sale value and future investment needs. If BIG<br />

sells transferred assets in future, and the price is above the purchase price, BIG will need to pay a share of the gain to<br />

the state (i.e. a formulaic calculation of the share, taking into account the gain on disposal), and the equivalent of<br />

about 70% of the capital gain will need to be paid out.<br />

Financial fundamentals<br />

SATISFACTORY 2002 RESULTS<br />

Results for 1H 2003 were satisfactory at €97.3 million after tax (€64.9 million 1H 2002) and compare favorably to<br />

results for 2002 at €60.5 million. The 2002 results were lower due to increased funding costs as BIG’s debt<br />

increased as a consequence of taking over more properties from the central government. The growth in rental<br />

income of 4.5% is satisfactory and in line with budget, given the continued increase in properties owned; whereas<br />

operating costs increased by almost 25% as a result of increased financing costs, again in line with budget.<br />

According to BIG’s budgets, growth in rental income is expected to continue over the next five years, at a total rate<br />

of 8%. Other income continues to be high due to the disposal of properties.<br />

BIG’s management is focused on cost efficiency and project management, and has been successful in keeping<br />

operating costs at an acceptable level. We expect the prudent cost management to be continued. Cost control of<br />

projects is also strict on joint-venture activities in BIG’s daughter companies. Some savings have also taken place<br />

due to reductions in personnel costs, in connection with restructuring of the companies. Operating expenses are<br />

forecast to be quite stable, growing by approximately 3.5% over the budget period. If BIG can contain costs as projected,<br />

this will positively affect levels of operating income, which are due to grow by 15% over the budget period.<br />

Interest expenses are projected to peak between 2004 and 2006, at €170 million a year, and are expected to<br />

fall thereafter as a consequence of reduction in debt levels.<br />

In 2002, BIG paid a dividend of €100 million to its owner, although it would be preferable from a creditor’s<br />

point of view to retain all profits in order to keep gearing lower going forward.<br />

RELATIVELY SECURE TENANTS AND STEADY RENTAL FLOWS<br />

Rental income is the mainstay of BIG’s income. Of this, 90% comprises rents received from the state (ie from various<br />

ministries that use the buildings). The main ministries are the Federal Ministry for Education (60%), Ministry<br />

of the Interior (10%), Ministry of Finance (approximately 10%). Rents are paid quarterly for all properties, whereas<br />

housing rents are paid monthly. There are options for giving notice under the rental agreements; the notice period<br />

is one year for tenants, covering 70% of the total revenue. However, the tenants are deemed to be relatively stable,<br />

since the ministries need the properties as a base from which to provide services such as education. The notice periods<br />

for new projects or major renovations take into account sunken costs and the necessary period for repaying the<br />

debt-financed investment. Such projects usually benefit from a clause that forbids the tenant to give notice during<br />

the debt amortisation period (usually 20-25 years).<br />

2 Moody’s Analysis


RENTAL AGREEMENTS TAKE INTO ACCOUNT A REASONABLE MARGIN AND THE NEED FOR INVESTMENT<br />

Rental rates assume a reasonable margin after running and investment costs. The revised BIG law (29 December<br />

2000) stipulates that BIG has to provide buildings to the state at market prices and, more importantly from our<br />

point of view, only if they are economically viable. Rents have been fixed on a market basis, while taking into<br />

account the relatively specialised nature of the properties, and are indexed to a designated consumer price index with<br />

a year’s lag (currently CPI 1996). Adjustments are only allowed if they are 5% above this index, and the adjustment<br />

will then be in full. As such, the potential for rental increases is not considered to be very flexible.<br />

DEBT HAS NOW REACHED ITS PEAK<br />

BIG’s stock of debt has risen quite rapidly since year 2000 as a result of taking over properties from the central government.<br />

The debt is expected to peak in mid-200 at around €3.0 billion, when the final payment to the government<br />

is to be made. Thereafter, debt is due to fall year-on-year throughout the budget period to reach a level of just<br />

over €3.0 billion in 2010.<br />

The maturity profiles are prudent, with more than 65% of the total stock of debt having more than five<br />

years to maturity and, of the remainder in 2002, an acceptable 7% falling due within one year.<br />

Almost 85% of the total debt is denominated in euros, with the balance in Swiss Francs. Interest rate stability<br />

is afforded by the fact that over 75% of the total stock is in fixed rates. BIG has prudent counterparty guidelines<br />

in place.<br />

Related Research<br />

Analysis:<br />

Austria, Republic of, July 2002 (75399)<br />

To access any of these reports, click on the entry above. Note that these references are current as of the date of publication of this<br />

report and that more recent reports may be available. All research may not be available to all clients.<br />

Moody’s Analysis 3


Bundesimmobliengesellschaft Mbh<br />

Summary Balance Sheet (EUR 000's) 31/12/1998 31/12/1999 31/12/2000 31/12/2001 31/12/2002<br />

Cash & central bank<br />

Due from banks<br />

Securities<br />

Gross loans<br />

Loan loss reserves (LLR)<br />

Fixed assets<br />

Other assets<br />

Total assets<br />

Total assets (USD million)<br />

48,196<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1,282,624<br />

19,904<br />

1,350,724<br />

1,438,710<br />

12,159<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1,334,779<br />

39,162<br />

1,386,100<br />

1,382,918<br />

3,502<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1,976,404<br />

86,374<br />

2,066,280<br />

2,061,536<br />

40<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2,817,593<br />

127,830<br />

2,945,463<br />

2,938,701<br />

3,675<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3,614,492<br />

116,316<br />

3,734,482<br />

3,977,747<br />

Demand deposits<br />

Savings deposits<br />

Due to banks<br />

Market funds<br />

Other liabilities<br />

Total liabilities<br />

LT/Subordinated debt<br />

Shareholders' equity<br />

Total capital funds<br />

Total liabilities & capital funds<br />

0<br />

0<br />

76,070<br />

0<br />

247,015<br />

323,085<br />

998,203<br />

29,436<br />

1,027,639<br />

1,350,724<br />

0<br />

0<br />

62,313<br />

0<br />

233,004<br />

295,317<br />

1,039,606<br />

51,177<br />

1,090,783<br />

1,386,100<br />

0<br />

0<br />

327,602<br />

0<br />

135,792<br />

463,394<br />

1,344,963<br />

257,923<br />

1,602,886<br />

2,066,280<br />

0<br />

0<br />

570,641<br />

0<br />

408,731<br />

979,372<br />

1,610,293<br />

355,798<br />

1,966,091<br />

2,945,463<br />

0<br />

0<br />

404,602<br />

0<br />

415,919<br />

820,521<br />

1,547,983<br />

323,161<br />

1,871,144<br />

2,691,665<br />

Derivatives - notional amount<br />

Derivatives - replacement value<br />

Risk weighted assets (RWA)<br />

Contigent liabilities<br />

--<br />

--<br />

--<br />

0<br />

--<br />

--<br />

--<br />

0<br />

--<br />

--<br />

--<br />

0<br />

--<br />

--<br />

--<br />

0<br />

--<br />

--<br />

--<br />

0<br />

Summary Income Statement (EUR 000's)<br />

+Interest income 249,824 260,037 292,927 677,073 697,229<br />

-Interest expense 97,090 102,628 140,128 331,653 416,952<br />

=Net Interest income 152,734 157,409 152,799 345,420 280,277<br />

+Trading income 0 0 0 0 0<br />

+Fees & commissions 0 0 0 0 0<br />

+Other operating income 57 38 156 7,881 6,088<br />

=operating income 152,791 157,447 152,955 353,301 286,365<br />

-Personnel expenses 2,395 2,398 3,142 12,294 13,366<br />

-Other operating expenses 76,887 76,839 69,675 80,311 17,888<br />

= operating funds flow 73,509 78,210 80,138 260,696 255,110<br />

-Amortisation/depreciation 56,419 60,617 64,925 118,871 150,101<br />

=Preprovision income (PPI) 17,090 17,593 15,213 141,825 105,009<br />

-Loan loss provisions (LLP) 0 0 0 0 0<br />

+Other non operating adjustments [1] 413 382 565 354 366<br />

+Extraordinary profit / loss 0 0 0 -11,142 1,116<br />

=Pretax income 17,503 17,975 15,778 131,037 106,492<br />

-Taxes 1,954 3,200 403 47,833 45,970<br />

=Net income 15,549 14,775 15,375 83,204 60,522<br />

-Minority interests 0 0 0 0 0<br />

=Net income (group share) 15,549 14,775 15,375 83,204 60,522<br />

Real Growth Rates (Inflation Deducted) (%)<br />

Liquid assets -- -- -- -- --<br />

Gross loans -- -- -- -- --<br />

Problem loans -- -- -- -- --<br />

LLR -- -- -- -- --<br />

Total assets 4.22 1.91 46.87 39.34 23.94<br />

Customer deposits (demand and savings) -- -- -- -- --<br />

Market funds & due to banks 44.54 -18.65 417.97 70.27 -30.69<br />

Shareholders' equity 122.33 72.65 396.53 34.85 -11.21<br />

Risk weighted assets -- -- -- -- --<br />

Operating Income 48.24 2.33 -4.29 125.79 -20.77<br />

Operating Expenses 43.17 2.34 -2.97 50.08 -16.17<br />

Preprovision Income 106.16 2.23 -14.81 811.3 -27.62<br />

Loan Loss Provisions -- -- -- -- --<br />

Net Income 35.03 -5.64 2.52 429 -28.9<br />

Income Statement in % Average Assets<br />

Operating income 11.57 11.51 8.86 14.1 8.57<br />

Operating expenses 10.28 10.22 7.98 8.44 5.43<br />

Preprovision income 1.29 1.29 0.88 5.66 3.14<br />

Loan loss provision 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Net income 1.18 1.08 0.89 3.32 1.81<br />

Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet Composition<br />

Avg. liquid assets % avg. total assets 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Avg. gross loans % avg. total assets 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Avg. customer deposits % avg. total funding 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Avg. interbank funds % avg. total funding 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Avg. market funds (excl. interbank) % avg. total funding 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Avg. liquid assets % avg. customer deposits -- -- -- -- --<br />

Avg. gross loans % avg. customer deposits -- -- -- -- --<br />

Avg. market funds reliance [2] -- -- -- -- --<br />

Avg. RWA % avg. total assets -- -- -- -- --<br />

4 Moody’s Analysis


PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Rating History Bonds<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

To order reprints of this report (100 copies minimum), please call 1.212.553.1658.<br />

Report Number: 79243<br />

Author<br />

Janne Thomsen<br />

Editor<br />

Patricia Radnor<br />

Associate Analyst<br />

Benjamin Clay<br />

Production Associate<br />

David Ainsworth<br />

© Copyright 2003, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors including Moody's Assurance Company, Inc. (together, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. ALL INFORMATION<br />

CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER<br />

TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY<br />

FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by<br />

MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as<br />

is" without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or<br />

fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part<br />

caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers,<br />

employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct,<br />

indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such<br />

damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely<br />

as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY,<br />

TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR<br />

MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of<br />

any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider<br />

of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. Pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, MOODY'S hereby discloses that most issuers of<br />

debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to<br />

pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to $1,500,000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!